Connect with us

Accounting

Accounting class-action filings rose slightly last year

Published

on

The number of accounting-related securities class-action filings increased slightly in 2024, but were filed against smaller companies, according to a new report.

The report, released Wednesday by Cornerstone Research, found that filings rose to 57, up from 56 in 2023. Even though the number (35) of accounting-related securities class-action settlements in 2024 remained consistent with 2023, the total value associated with these settlements dropped significantly, from $1.6 billion in 2023 to $1.1 billion in 2024, the second-lowest level in the past 10 years. That was partly due to the finding that there was only a single mega settlement larger than $100 million in 2024, compared to the historical average of four mega settlements per year.

While the number of settlements remained the same as 2023, the total value of those settlements declined by 36% from the prior year.

While the number of accounting cases remained steady last year, they were filed against smaller issuer defendants. The median pre-disclosure market capitalization of issuer defendants dropped to $445.6 million, the lowest level in the past 10 years. In addition, the DDL Index (the dollar-value change in the defendant firm’s market capitalization) of accounting cases fell 42% to $45.6 billion and was 17% lower than the 2015–2023 historical average of $54.8 billion.

Last year, some of the filing trends changed. “For many years, revenue recognition had been the most common GAAP violation alleged in accounting-related securities class action filings,” said Frank Mascari, a report coauthor and vice president at Cornerstone Research, in a statement. “That changed in 2024 when, for the first time since tracking began, allegations related to asset valuations and/or impairments were the most common.”

For the fourth consecutive year, the median pre-disclosure market capitalization of issuer defendants declined in 2024. Accounting cases filed in 2024 involving restatements decreased over 30% from 2023, returning to historical levels. Since 2015, 32 issuers had at least two separate complaints that included accounting allegations filed against them.

The median pre-disclosure market capitalization of issuer defendants decreased by 39% in 2024 to $745.5 million, which is consistent with lower median and average settlement amounts, as issuer defendant size is a proxy for the resources available to fund the settlement. The average settlement amount declined from $47 million to $30.1 million, while the median settlement amount fell from $15.4 million to $12 million.  

After a spike in 2023, the average time from filing to settlement for accounting cases declined by over seven months, returning to a level consistent with the average over the previous nine years. 

“The single most important factor in explaining individual settlement amounts is ‘plaintiff-style damages,’ a proxy for the amount of potential investor losses that plaintiffs may claim in a securities class action,” said Elaine Harwood, a report coauthor and senior vice president at Cornerstone Research, in a statement. “The sharp decline in the size of accounting case settlements in 2024 can be explained, in large part, by the nearly 50% decline in the median plaintiff-style damages for accounting case settlements compared to 2023.”

Accounting case settlements with both alleged GAAP violations and allegations of internal control weaknesses dropped to the lowest level in the past decade. The value of accounting case settlements for cases involving allegations of internal control weaknesses also decreased to just 27% of the total of all accounting case settlements.

While the number of accounting case settlements involving restatements increased, the median settlement amount was 85% lower than in cases not involving a restatement.

The median settlement amount as a percentage of plaintiff-style damages for accounting case settlements in 2024 was in-line with the 2015–2023 average for cases involving restatements and/or GAAP violations; however, cases involving a write-down were 42% lower than the average.

Earlier reports from Cornerstone Research have presented “simplified tiered damages” as a measure of potential investor losses. This year’s report is introducing “plaintiff-style damages” as a way of measuring potential investor losses that accounts for more case-specific data while still employing a consistent approach across a large volume of cases, drawing on investments in big data analytics and other capabilities from Cornerstone Research’s Data Science Center.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending