Connect with us

Accounting

AICPA, NASBA propose alternative pathway to CPA licensure

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy have proposed changes in the Uniform Accountancy Act model legislation used by states to provide an additional path to CPA licensure, while preserving CPA mobility across the states.

The AICPA and NASBA asked the joint UAA committee to draft proposed model law language in two main areas: A bachelor’s degree plus two years of experience as a pathway to licensure that incorporates a broad role for experience, to be determined at the state level; and individual-based practice privilege that incorporates a CPA’s ability to practice across state lines. 

The recommended changes come as state CPA societies and lawmakers in various states have been looking at ways to attract more young people to the accounting profession, providing more flexibility in attaining a CPA license without jeopardizing the ability of CPAs to practice across state lines. Last month, Ohio’s governor signed into law a bill backed by the Ohio Society of CPAs that provides alternatives to the traditional 150-credit hour requirement.

The AICPA and NASBA have been looking at recommendations through a National Pipeline Advisory Group, which issued a report last year.

The comment letters received in response to two recent AICPA and NASBA exposure drafts, along with early 2025 state legislative activity such as Ohio’s indicate a growing preference for an individual practice privilege and a bachelor’s degree plus two years of experience path. Feedback also supported a more in-depth study of competencies as they relate to the experience requirement.

“The accounting profession has seen a remarkable convergence in recent weeks of stakeholders around flexibility that creates greater access for those who are interested in pursuing a career in accounting,” said Susan Coffey, CEO of public accounting at the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. “A bachelor’s plus two years of experience path, in which states define the needed skills and competencies, is responsive to the market and protects the public.”

The proposal would maintain the existing two pathways of a master’s degree plus one year of experience, as well as a bachelor’s degree plus 30 credits plus one year of experience.

The UAA is jointly published by AICPA and NASBA and gives state legislatures and boards of accountancy a national model they can either adopt as is or adapt to meet the needs of each jurisdiction. The proposed UAA language will be open for public comment for 60 days.

“We look forward to the expertise and perspectives the 55 U.S. licensing jurisdictions will share during this next comment period,” said NASBA president and CEO Daniel Dustin in a statement. “We believe that any new proposal, and the feedback received from all stakeholders, will not only result in a thriving profession but also one that, because it keeps its eye on protecting the public, will allow that public to continue to trust in a CPA’s work.” 

The AICPA and NASBA opened a call for comments last September asking about a proposed initiative to help CPA candidates meet initial licensure requirements by exhibiting their competency in specific professional and technical areas. Later that month, they also issued a set of corresponding UAA model legislative amendments for discussion. Comments on the proposals can be accessed through the NASBA and AICPA websites. The feedback indicated support for the concept of competencies, but not as proposed. Based on the volume and nature of responses, the AICPA and NASBA agreed to table the framework for intended purposes. 

“Through continued collaboration and alignment, we’ll be able to achieve this shared goal of growing pathways into the profession, while protecting the public,” said Carla McCall, who serves as AICPA chair and co-chair of the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. “This is an important and exciting step for our profession. We are ready to get this done.”

“The input and feedback from the members of the Boards of Accountancy and key stakeholders in the accounting profession is crucial to the UAA process,” said NASBA chair Maria Caldwell in a statement. “We appreciate the continued collaboration and expertise of the members of the joint UAA Committee.”

The feedback received on last September’s proposals indicated support for the concept of competencies, but not as proposed. Based on the volume and nature of responses, the AICPA and NASBA agreed to table the framework for intended purposes. 

“As such, we are exploring plans for a longer-term, data-driven approach working with stakeholders to understand how competencies can help shape the future of our profession,” Coffey stated. “This aligns with recommendations made in 2024 by the National Pipeline Advisory Group and reinforces the profession’s longstanding commitment to competence as a core principle already in our profession’s Code of Professional Conduct and in the UAA.”

The AICPA and NASBA plan to work to redefine the UAA processes for greater inclusivity and transparency, as well as devote more resources to helping CPAs with navigating practice mobility as states enact legislation. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending