Connect with us

Accounting

Businesses pounce as GOP weighs limiting corporate SALT break

Published

on

Business groups are mobilizing to squelch a plan gathering momentum among Republicans to curtail a heavily used federal income tax break that allows corporations to deduct state and local taxes.

The proposal to cap or eliminate the so-called C-SALT deduction, which has especially riled manufacturers, oil and gas producers and life insurers, is gaining traction with lawmakers as they search for ways to contain the cost of a giant tax cut package Republicans are rushing to approve by the end of May.

C-SALT finds itself in political peril — at least partially — because of the debate over the individual SALT deduction. The household version of that write-off has become one of the most hot-button tax issues in Congress ever since President Donald Trump limited it to $10,000 in his first-term tax bill.

Administration officials and Capitol Hill Republicans are mulling trimming C-SALT as a way to pay for increasing the individual SALT deduction to $25,000. That’s an expensive proposition that will likely require the party to find offsets elsewhere.

Enter the struggle over corporate SALT, which is playing out as the drive to pass tax legislation enters a period of both high risk and great opportunity for myriad interest groups. Lawmakers in the coming weeks hope to work out the measure’s final details and impose some semblance of balance between tax cuts and offsetting revenue increases.

Senate Republicans’ budget gives them $1.5 trillion for new tax cuts over the next 10 years, on top of renewing President Donald Trump’s expiring 2017 tax cuts. 

Republicans are looking for a way to squeeze in new tax cuts on tips, overtime pay and auto loans as well as a higher standard deduction for seniors into that allowance. 

In 2017, Republicans held a large enough majority in Congress that they were able to brush aside concerns of residents of high-tax states such as New York, New Jersey and California over the $10,000 cap individual SALT to offset other tax cuts. This time, the GOP’s margin in the House is razor-thin and at least six Republicans representing high-tax states are insisting the limit be raised.

Business backlash

The corporate SALT break is a parallel version of the deduction for individual taxpayers, except that it was left uncapped in 2017 law. Corporations currently can write-off state levies on income, property and other taxes such as on oil production from income subject to the 21% federal corporate tax.

Business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, Retail Industry Leaders Association, American Petroleum Institute and American Hotel and Lodging Association are all lobbying Congress to shelve the proposal.

The right-of-center Tax Foundation estimates that ending the break for business income taxes would raise $223 billion over 10 years, while ending it for income and property tax would result in $432 billion in new revenue. The broader proposal would cause 147,000 job losses, the group projects. 

Watson McLeish, senior vice president for tax policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the proposal will make the country less competitive because it partially reverses the corporate tax cuts in the 2017 law.

The proposal would at a minimum raise the effective rate on U.S. corporations by an average 1.25%, he said. 

Manufacturers are the heaviest users of the tax break with the finance industry closely behind, according to the Tax Foundation study. 

Life insurers argue that they will be squeezed because they will lose deductions for state taxes on premiums but can’t quickly adjust rates on long-term policies to pass on the added cost to customers.

Manufacturers would be especially hard hit by limitations on deducting local property because of the large physical footprint of many plants, said Charles Crain, a vice president of the manufacturers association. 

“If you increase taxes on manufacturers, there is less capital available for job creation, capital investment and research and development,” Crain said.

Retailers are warning they could be hit with higher effective tax rates under the proposal, further squeezing tight margins already under pressure from Trump’s tariff increases. 

That “would provide a disincentive for employers to invest in new facilities or employment,” said Courtney Titus Brooks, a vice president with the retailers group.

Chirag Shah, with the hoteliers group, predicts loss of the tax break “could end up being a major challenge for jobs in the industry.”

The Petroleum Institute’s Aaron Padilla said including state levies on the production of non-renewable resources known as severance taxes would damage Trump’s efforts to promote production and “would be discriminatory against oil and natural gas.”

Proponents of capping business SALT breaks say part of the reason to do so is because states have used the corporate break to allow residents to get around the individual SALT cap by re-classifying income as business earnings. 

“That’s becoming more widespread and more expensive,” said Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which advocates for deficit reduction.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending