Connect with us

Accounting

CBIZ centralizes tech services post-merger

Published

on

Following its acquisition of Marcum last year, Top 10 Firm CBIZ has begun centralizing its disparate technology services offerings under a single office, headed by Peter Scavuzzo who — after being CEO of Marcum Technology — has now become the firm’s national leader of technology, as well as its chief strategy officer. 

Prior to the acquisition, CBIZ had a decentralized approach to technology services. Different parts of the firm had their own technology offerings specific to their practice area, which would then be bundled as part of the larger advisory service. The idea to centralize these service offerings came up between when the acquisition was first announced in July and when the deal finally closed in November. During this time, the leadership of both firms discussed many possible ideas for improving efficiency and productivity in different areas of the firm, including this one, though it was not until the deal’s conclusion that the plan gained real momentum. 

“Come November 1, and shortly after, we had a lot of accelerated meetings, looking at what we workshopped and what we knew of each other. And we said, all right, let’s take action and let’s start making quick decisions and figure out where to go from here. And we formulated [the change] and, all right, this sounds good. We like this overall. So now let’s get this going,” Scavuzzo told Accounting Today

Peter Scavuzzo CBIZ

Peter Scavuzzo, national technology leader and chief strategy officer, CBIZ

The new office, focused more on technology-centered client service offerings than internal IT operations more associated with the CIO, was formally established at the beginning of this year, and started integrating groups into its structure in February; the very first action was bringing together the data analytics groups from both firms, so they could operate as a single team.

The model the firm decided upon was that if the deliverable is rooted in technology, it will be aggregated into a single portfolio of technology services. Doing so allows CBIZ to offer a wide range of technology services. This includes the obvious areas such as IT infrastructure management as well as cybersecurity, including governance, risk controls, penetration testing and managed security. 

Outside typical operational IT functions, the new office acts as a strategic advisor to a company’s executive leadership when it comes to technology-aligned decisions. This means providing “thought leadership at a high level” on things like business transformation, AI implementation, or the enterprise system selection process. Professionals can theoretically go past even that by actually doing the implementation of these systems themselves. 

And finally, the office includes an emerging technology section that offers things like AI solutions, blockchain, data analytics or automation. 

“A company reads the news every day, and looks at how AI is having an impact. The CEO says, ‘Well, how is it going to impact me?’ [Say] I’m a health care CEO and I don’t want to just play, I want real, tangible use cases. I need someone to bring me through a journey quickly, because my IT team is traditionally operational, and they don’t have the depth of expertise, and I don’t want to miss out on the opportunity. We could step in and bring them through that, or anything else in the portfolio,” said Scavuzzo. 

He said that both CBIZ and Marcum had made heavy technology investments over the years, but that their particular specialties varied slightly, such as Marcum leaning a little more heavily on AI technology. By combining the firms’ different expertise in different areas, their new technology office became capable of offering services CBIZ could not offer before, leading to a wider variety of client offerings. One of the firm’s divisions, he noted, had been servicing a prominent client for a few years; this client noticed the new capacities under the combined office and wanted to learn more, so they brought his team onto the call. 

“Now, this is one division bringing in another division. We go in there and we win something CBIZ traditionally could not win. And then we’re getting a little deeper on the technology side, and we identify something to flip to a third division … The combination created a much more powerful offering,” he said, adding that “this win demonstrates what I think CBIZ intended to do by bringing Marcum into the portfolio: to be able to go into a client, a single service deliverable client, and now we’re going to be able to cross-sell and add more value to what we’re offering this client through multiple divisions of the company because of this combination,” he said. 

Getting to this point did require some change management, as it was a significant reordering of the firm’s structure, but Scavuzzo said that both CBIZ and Marcum already had a significant amount of M&A integration experience, having done hundreds of mergers between them. While no two transactions are exactly the same, he said there is a certain playbook that develops on how to execute integrations properly. While technology is part of it — noting that they need to integrate systems and data — he said that the people aspect is much more important. 

“Because while we’re integrating, we’re also forming new relationships and forming new bonds, and we are highly focused on accelerating that trust so that we both know, you know, we’re here to both make each other better,” he said. 

The benefits have been more people-oriented as well. Scavuzzo talked about how the data team, which before may have been siloed doing its own thing, is now in the same meetings as the AI leadership team, the strategic consulting group and other areas that, before, were not in the habit of regularly talking to each other. This has led not only to more relationship-building, but also the creation of new ideas and the identification of new opportunities. 

“Everybody’s just naturally engaging more, speaking more, in meetings, so when you’re dealing with a complex problem, you’re calling in all these people because you’ve built relationships with them. It’s a more natural collective service offering we could bring to our clients,” he said. 

Which, ultimately, is the goal: to provide clients equal if not better service than before. 

“To us, the client should either come out of it feeling no change or, if they do feel a change, it will all be on the positive side of the equation,” he said. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending