Connect with us

Accounting

Cybersecurity best practices as 2025 tax season kicks off

Published

on

Every year during tax season, finance professionals handle an influx of sensitive financial and personal information passed along by their clients. Although most CPAs and accountants excel at processing this information, as well as other data related to their field, they’re typically not experts in cybersecurity.

As our technology-driven world grows increasingly complex and evolves more rapidly over time, the more important it becomes for financial institutions to take precautions that safeguard their clients’ sensitive information (and also their own). Bad actors are always working to get a step ahead of protection tech and services, and take advantage of the habits of employees who may not be aware of the latest cyber threats.

The best CPAs and accountants tend to be naturally inquisitive, perhaps to the point of skepticism — and their clients should thank them for it. Because when it comes to finances or cybersecurity, speaking as someone with professional experience in both spaces, those characteristics are superpowers. As cyberattacks become increasingly frequent and sophisticated, financial professionals should be encouraged to maintain a healthy dose of suspicion and lean into hypervigilance. From small accounting operations to large, enterprise-level firms, organizations and their employees must understand and embrace the importance of cybersecurity and its best practices.

Tax season is busy and a potential cybersecurity weakness

It’s critical for financial organizations to observe and maintain cybersecurity best practices, even (and perhaps especially) during tax season. Increased workloads during the busy season may push cybersecurity and network infrastructure down the list of priorities, but bad actors often look for such openings to exploit.

CPAs handle an influx of sensitive financial information and personal information during tax season, which could make them a more attractive target for cybercriminals. Failing to strengthen and maintain cybersecurity technology and protocols could lead to even more chaos and stress during what can already be a nerve-wracking time of year for the industry.

Building client and firm cybersecurity protocols

There is no one-size-fits-all approach to cybersecurity and instituting best-practice protocols, but one of the best methods in the financial services space is to separate cybersecurity into a two-pronged issue: client information and firm information.

Because clients — like CPAs — are rarely cybersecurity experts themselves and, in fact, often operate under the expectation that a financial firm has the proper tools and protocols in place to protect their information, it’s vitally important that nothing be taken for granted on this side.

Key areas of focus for client information

  • Email: Email is inherently insecure for the exchange of sensitive financial documents. Once an email is sent, a firm has little to no control over where it ends up — possibly forwarded, intercepted or left in an insecure inbox. Email is also a primary attack vector for phishing. Clients might accidentally open malicious attachments or click on links in phishing emails disguised as legitimate requests. It can be clunky, too, as some email providers block certain file types that could be necessary for tax preparation, and size limits may prompt clients to use insecure methods, such as unencrypted file-sharing services or breaking files into multiple emails — a significant data security risk.
  • Secure portal: The best antidote to publicly available email is a secure portal. A private, secure portal provides a financial firm with a controlled, encrypted environment for file sharing, minimizing the risk of breaches. Encryption protects data in transit and at rest, and access controls allow a firm to decide who gets access to which files and set permissions (view, download or edit) for further guardrails. Additionally, portals often log activity and provide an audit trail of who has accessed and modified files.
  • Guest Wi-Fi networks: Guest networks are essential for accountants and CPAs in order to protect client data and their own systems. Strong passwords, encryption and network segmentation are crucial components of a secure Wi-Fi network. For extra layers of security, consider hiding your guest network’s SSID (network name), restricting guest network access to internet-only (blocking access printers and file shares) and creating a separate access point, further segregating it from your main network.

Internally, protecting firm information requires a multilayered approach that encompasses technology, policies and ongoing employee training. Strong access controls, encryption and data backups are fundamental security measures, but accounting firms should also partner with cybersecurity experts to create a comprehensive security program that accounts for employee awareness training and builds a strong security culture.

Key areas of focus for firm information

  • Device security: All company devices and storage media, including hard drives and USB drives, should be encrypted to prevent data loss and theft. Install robust endpoint security software (antivirus, anti-malware and intrusion detection) on all company devices that access firm networks and client data. Implement mobile device management solutions to secure company-issued mobile devices and enforce security policies.
  • Data security: Firms should use data loss prevention tools to prevent sensitive data from leaving the network without authorization. Secure file-sharing platforms and encrypted email for internal and external communication protect sensitive data. Meanwhile, a comprehensive data backup and recovery plan helps ensure business continuity in the case of adverse events such as a ransomware attack or even a natural disaster.
  • Employee training and awareness: In addition to new employee training, regular security awareness training for all employees should be conducted to educate a firm’s workforce about cybersecurity threats, company security policies and best practices (including recognizing phishing emails and following strong password habits). Run simulated phishing attacks to test employee awareness and reinforce their training, and develop and regularly practice an incident response plan so that, if all else fails, employees know how to react in case of a security incident. This can significantly mitigate lost time, revenue and reputational impact in the event of a cyber attack.
  • Physical security: Implement physical security measures to protect office space and equipment, including old-school and analog methods. That may include security cameras, visitor logs and physical locks that limit access to control systems. Be sure to shred and securely dispose of sensitive documents to prevent data breaches.

Cyber attacks, no matter the time of year, can have significant financial and reputational costs. Organizations that lack the time or resources to bolster or sustain their cybersecurity and network infrastructures — again, especially during the upcoming busy season — should consider partnering with external cybersecurity specialists to ensure their clients’ personal information and network security stay protected. As always, better safe — and secure — than sorry.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending