Connect with us

Accounting

Employers never paid $2 billion in deferred payroll taxes

Published

on

Approximately 10,000 employers never paid the Social Security taxes they have deferred ever since the pandemic, according to a new report.

The report, from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, examined an option offered by the Trump administration in 2020 allowing employers to defer the employee portion of Social Security taxes between Sept. 1 and Dec. 31, 2020 as a form of pandemic relief. The report found that over 1 million employers opted to use the payroll tax deferment, and most paid it as required. However, approximately $2 billion in unpaid deferrals remain (as of July 2024). 

The CARES Act enabled employers and self-employed individuals to defer Social Security tax payments during the pandemic. This temporary deferment of Social Security taxes were expected to be paid by December 2021 or December 2022. 

As of July 2024, nearly 1.1 million employers deferred approximately $133 billion in Social Security taxes for tax year 2020. The vast majority of it, an estimated $131 billion (98%) was paid. However, 167,373 employers had approximately $2 billion (2%) in unpaid deferrals. According to the IRS, as of May 2025, there were approximately 10,000 employers remaining who had not paid their deferral, and the IRS had yet to manually adjust their account which would subject the unpaid amounts to standard collection processes.

The report noted that employers that did not timely pay their deferred Social Security taxes by the December 2021 and December 2022 due dates, or by the time the IRS manually adjusts their account, are subject to the IRS’s standard collection processes. As of July 2024, the IRS assessed an estimated $591 million in penalties and interest on 403,711 tax accounts for employers who failed to pay their deferred Social Security taxes in a timely way.

However, TIGTA found the IRS incorrectly assessed manual Failure to Deposit penalties totaling $73.7 million on 9,548 business tax accounts. These employers had credits, such as payments or refund offsets available, but these transactions did not post to their tax accounts in a timely manner. The delay in posting these transactions caused the employer to have a delinquent deferral and resulted in the penalty being overstated. 

TIGTA recommended that the IRS review the population of 9,548 business tax accounts with late posted payments and credits that resulted in overstated Failure to Deposit penalties, ensuring that the penalties are corrected for those accounts. The IRS agreed with this recommendation and said it would ensure that the penalties are adjusted on the identified accounts.

“We have continued working diligently through a range of unique technical and procedural challenges to ensure taxpayers pay their deferred Social Security taxes as required under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act,” wrote Lia Colbert, commissioner of the IRS’s Small Business/Self-Employed Division, in response to the report. “We have continued collaborating with multiple functions within Taxpayer Services, Small Business/Self-Employed Division, and the Chief Financial Office. These offices identify taxpayer accounts and resolve technical conditions to ensure reversal adjustments post correctly without interfering with other actions.”

She noted that the IRS had created a temporary credit equal to the amount of the deferral on employers’ accounts in its systems back in 2020, and when an employer doesn’t pay or deposit the required amount by the installment due dates, the IRS reverses the credits on their accounts. The IRS has completed 99.5% of the reversals for the first installment and 98.7% of reversals on the second installment. It’s working to complete the remainder of reversals for the first and second installments by the end of this year.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending