Artificial intelligence is fast becoming a source for new client leads—as more people use the technology to research complex accounting and finance questions, public models like ChatGPT have started referring users to accounting firms germane to their particular issues. While the number and nature of such leads can vary, firms across the country have been seeing leads from AI bots, and likely will see more in the future.
A diverse array of firms have been getting leads from AI bots, ranging from small local boutique firms to large firms with multinational footprints. But one thing they all have in common is a robust internet presence built by active and ongoing digital marketing efforts. This is because public AI models generally tend to get their information from scraping the internet, so the more online a firm is, the more likely it is a bot has absorbed its content.
For example, Katherine Bunschoten, head of North Carolina-based Certum Solutions, noted her firm has significant presence on YouTube and social media platforms as well as a great deal of resources and thought leadership content on its site. This has led to a regular stream of referrals from AI bots.
mayucolor – stock.adobe.com
“They found us through our content,” she said. “What I think is happening is people are looking for how to do things or how to learn things through these answer engines, through artificial intelligence like ChatGPT, and we actually have content out there. We love developing our own content, so they were running into some of our content, but it was brought into the answer engine.”
Patrick Camuso, head of digital asset specialist firm Camuso CPA, agreed that a strong online presence is vital if one wants to get noticed by AI. While he is getting a large number of AI leads, he doesn’t think this is because he discovered one weird trick to getting the bots to recognize him. He believes instead that the leads are the combined result of not only content he puts out himself but the videos and podcasts he has appeared on, as well as what is published about him in places like Accounting Today.
“It’s basically like every piece of marketing you’re putting online can, to a certain degree, impact AI. All of them are going to pull from different sources to different degrees and weigh their importance differently, but overall there’s not necessarily one thing you can do. … The real results come from having all these fundamental things in place,” he said.
Similarly, Katherine O’Toole, chief marketing officer for Top 25 firm PKF O’Connor Davies, noted that her own firm was aware that AI would likely become a factor in the firm’s marketing and so accounted for it in its search engine optimization strategy.
“After ChatGPT first launched, we approached it like our SEO strategy where we identified keyword groups, built out a strategy based around brand awareness and conversions to develop content specific for the users’ needs, while monitoring AI referrals to our website and staying abreast of industry trends and insights,” she said.
Meanwhile, Tanina Khanuja, Top 25 firm Withum’s digital marketing director, said the firm’s already active SEO efforts began to naturally bleed into AI optimization as time went on, as it raised the same kinds of questions about how content was structured.
“We did make that active change early on. We also paid very close attention to the structure of our content: Is it simple for bots to read, is it structured the right way, does it have [marketing software] Schema in the back end telling Google what type of insight it is?” she said.
Becky Livingston, founder and CEO of accounting-focused marketing consultancy Penheel Marketing, felt this made sense, as what she has observed is that the likelihood of a firm getting AI referrals was not a function of size but the diligence and consistency of its digital marketing, especially SEO. A lot of AI optimization isn’t that much different from traditional SEO techniques, she added.
“It’s not that much different, technically. The [challenge] is focusing on answering your target market’s questions because people are usually asking questions to get the search result snippets. But otherwise you’re doing the same thing: You’re using your SEO keywords, you’re putting it in your headlines and subhead and alt tags. It’s still the same. The difference is you’re answering the question as your headline versus embedded inside the article. And you’re usually bullet-pointing steps instead of paragraphs as you organize the content,” she said.
She added that currency is another factor; whether one is optimizing for search engines or AI, firms should not take a “set it and forget it” approach for their marketing because what people are looking for and what questions they’re asking can change with the season. Further, regularly updated content will be seen as more relevant and so be weighed higher for both AI and search engines.
While firms had not been optimizing specifically for AI before, they are now, and in doing so are finding the same sorts of similarities to traditional SEO and digital marketing techniques Livingston talked about. However, as they refine their techniques over time, they are learning that similar does not mean identical.
Suzanne Reed, chief marketing officer for Top 50 firm LBMC, noted that it has started emphasizing blog posts that provide clear, direct answers to client questions versus high-level educational pieces. The firm is also tightening up content around key specialties it wants to be associated with, as well as investing in more AI-friendly solutions for its back-end marketing infrastructure. This is similar to what has always been done, but with some key differences.
“The biggest difference is mindset. Traditional SEO is often about keywords and rankings. With AI, it’s about clarity and credibility. If your content clearly answers real questions in a trustworthy way, you’re more likely to get surfaced. We’re not abandoning traditional digital marketing, but we are adapting. AI is changing how people find professional services, and we want to be proactive about meeting them where they are,” she said.
Khanuja said Withum was also planning content changes on its website: All page hits will have a “Why Choose Us” section to explain why her firm is particularly suited to addressing a specific issue, and all websites will have a summary at the top plus a set of key takeaways.
“We certainly cannot do that for everything, but a lot of our evergreen content we are now approaching [this way], making sure we have an intro, making sure we have all our headings in the right order for bots to read,” she said.
Sasha Tchulkova, Withum’s marketing director, added that the content itself is also being rethought. Superficially, this means making sure pages have the proper tags and headers. But more deeply, it also means a mindset shift in how the firm presents its content in the first place. She has found that bots tend to prefer simple, direct, clear content that is arranged in an orderly manner, which might be a little different from how people have traditionally approached their online thought leadership.
“It goes beyond marketing, into our teams delivering this stuff. … Customizing for AI does make them think a little differently than the tradition of putting all [their] thoughts into the article,” she said. Noting that they still want people to be reading these pieces, the new approach emphasizes content that is easy to understand for both humans and AIs. “It’s a real restructure on thought leadership and content as a whole.”
People also reported investing in more back-end solutions to increase AI visibility, such as O’Toole from PKFOD.
“In 2025, we’ve been more proactive with purchasing plans on trusted platforms (like SEMrush) to gain deeper insights like favorability ratings, competitive benchmarking and prompt insights. With these insights, we’ve reassessed and updated content to get our website to show up more in relevant chats/outputs,” she said.
While the art and science of AI optimization is a still-evolving field, firms have found even these rudimentary techniques have been yielding potent results.
“We had no playbook for ‘getting recommended by ChatGPT,’ but we knew traffic and leads were being impacted by the new AI models, i.e., ChatGPT, Google Genius, Perplexity, etc. ,” said Reed. “We did not realize it was actually happening, though, until a few prospects mentioned it. That is when we shifted our content strategy and focused on publishing niche content, answering detailed questions, and keeping our site updated. It’s paying off in new ways we didn’t fully anticipate.”
However, Livingston from Penheel Marketing warned that optimizing for AI may also lead to backlash from humans. Firms need to remember to balance the interests of both in their marketing efforts, because while some humans may embrace AI referrals, others may be repelled by them.
“I teach adult continuing education and I also teach traditional students, and both groups tell me of their distrust,” she said. “When they see AI search results, they often don’t believe them because they think they’re fabricated or faked or hallucinated, so they distrust it. That might be a drawback. Until we begin to believe the AI results are real, people won’t trust it as much as they would the search results sitting beneath the AI snipper.”
Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.
Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.
In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.
Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.
Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.
Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.
Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.
Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.
The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.
In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.
AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.
When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.
Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.
This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.
Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.
Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.
Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.
Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.
Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.
This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.
Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.
By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.
Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.