Connect with us

Accounting

Looking through Gen Z accountants’ eyes

Published

on

2025 November Young Accountants cover art.jpg

Gen Z wants a seat at the table, but they’re evaluating their employers just as much as their employers are evaluating them.

As accounting firms compete to recruit and retain top young talent amid an ongoing CPA shortage, understanding their wants and needs in the workplace is paramount. Work-life balance, professional development, and transparency rank at the top of the list. Simultaneously, they seek stability amid the turbulence of political and economic uncertainties, a tightening job market, higher interest rates, and rising costs of living.

But in order to attract young talent, the first step is removing the stigma around the talent.

“I think Gen Z gets a bad rap in some ways, rather unfairly,” said Bonnie Buol Ruszczyk, founder of BBR Consulting and president and manager of the Accounting MOVE Project. “I think they have a much healthier view of what a workplace should be than, say, Gen X and even some millennials. … They want to work to live rather than living to work, so they want clearly defined, ‘This is what I expect of you,’ and they also want recognition and opportunity to advance, and they may want that on a quicker schedule than what firms are typically doing.”

(Read more: Meet our 2025 Best Firms for Young Accountants.

“Removing the stigma around assumptions for Gen Z is the best thing that firms can do when they’re meeting their future partners where they are, and continuing to invest in them,” said Liz Burkhalter, director of CPA pipeline at the American Institute of CPAs. “If you continue to invest, you’ll continue to get the best out of them.”

Lexi Weber, senior manager of emerging professionals initiatives at the AICPA, added, “They’re challenging those norms that we’ve been accustomed to: Is it appropriate to ask people to work overtime? To work weekends? They’re setting healthy boundaries, which I don’t think we’ve seen in the past so much. It’s not necessarily laziness, but it’s kind of a changing of the guard in terms of focusing on what employees want and making that known.”

Gen Z’s must-haves

As the accounting profession undergoes an evolution — from states passing legislation creating alternative paths to licensure, to the wide-spread implementation of technologies like artificial intelligence, to private equity investors entering the scene — young people are looking for firms they can trust to navigate those changes.

“I think they want a firm who is putting them first and has a people-first culture, but also a firm that is transparent in, what are your strategies leading into the future and how are we going to handle these complexities?” Weber said.

Transparency is the key word. Young people face a unique set of challenges that are far different from what their parents and previous generations faced, and that influence their attitude toward work. “I think there are a lot of mental pieces for them: How do I plan for the future? What is that going to look like?” Weber said. “Firms really need to be transparent with their employees as to, what is your three-year career plan that they have for you here? What are those pay grades, or salary ranges that you could potentially meet if you do X, Y and Z?”

Compensation is the No. 2 priority for young accountants when choosing a firm, following work-life balance, according to KPMG’s 2025 Intern Pulse Survey. But the accounting profession has historically lagged behind rival careers like finance and technology. Finance and tech typically offer fresh college graduates a higher starting salary, versus accounting’s bid of a lower starting salary in exchange for a promise of a much greater payout years down the road after they make partner.

“We have a lot of pressure from external organizations, outside of public accounting, that are coming in, giving lucrative offers for senior accountants because of the talent shortage,” Weber said. “So I think that they weigh that, as well as, ‘What is the opportunity for me from not only a growth in career development, but also monetarily, how can I leverage myself?'”

Another demand from young accountants is professional development. Especially with AI and automation taking over the mundane tasks that typically fell to new employees, young accountants are being forced to upskill faster than ever. However, in the past, firms have been less likely to invest as many resources into developing their young talent due to the perception that most people who enter public accounting leave within two or three years.

“It’s a bit of a double-edged sword,” Ruszczyk said. “Firms don’t necessarily want to spend the money [developing young talent] all the time because people are leaving early, but one of the reasons they’re leaving early is because they’re not getting that investment in them.”

(Read more: A balancing act for both firms and young staff.)

Investing in talent as soon as they walk in the door is a crucial retention tool that increases an employee’s loyalty, job satisfaction and engagement. Firms’ use of technology is also a no-brainer, and thus, a must-have for this digital-native cohort. Almost two-thirds (60%) of accounting interns think they are more experimental with AI tools compared to older generations, according to the KPMG survey.

“From the student perspective, I think it’s piquing their interest for sure,” Burkhalter said. “They want to understand how much technology accounting firms are using and that they will be leveraging when they get into their first role. It’s such an opportunity for them to leverage that technology and to continue to upskill themselves and get to those higher-order skills earlier on in their career.”

“Our investments in technology are letting our people really develop themselves and really focus on the risky areas and focus their time on what matters,” said Sandra Oliver, EY’s global assurance talent leader. “With the impact of technology, AI is allowing our people to excel in their skill development and focus on the things that matter. Technology transformation is really going to allow our young professionals to have the careers that they’ve been seeking.”

Gen Z unplugging

Experts highlighted that one of the biggest differences separating Gen Z from previous generations is their search for purpose in work.

“Younger people have a bigger sense of purpose as well about what they’re doing and why they’re doing it. They definitely want a career, they definitely want to work hard, but they definitely want to know why they’re doing what they’re doing,” Oliver said. “It’s not about separating time for work from time for the personal. It’s living your fullest life.”

“The No. 1 primary measure of success for the younger generation is around having a healthy physical and mental state,” according to Irmgard Naudin ten Cate, EY’s global talent attraction and acquisition leader.

From the employer’s perspective, fulfilling that need in the workplace can look like allowing for flexible work schedules, offering mental health resources and stress-relief activities during tax season, getting involved in local communities, and fostering employee resource groups.

“They actually like the idea of finding a place with a culture where they feel like they belong, where they contribute and stay there and grow,” Ruszczyk said. “But they’re also very quick to jump ship if what has been promised to them is not being delivered.”

Burnout and overwork is the leading reason accountants leave their firms, with 60% of respondents citing it in the 2025 Accounting MOVE Survey — but this year’s findings pointed to something slightly different, according to Ruszczyk: “The profession has always had a burnout issue and a busy season issue, but the overwork is something that feels a little bit different. And I think it’s because of the smaller talent pipeline, and people saying, ‘I’m not going to continue doing this every year.'”

Despite wanting a seat at the table, Gen Z is not picking a career and blindly sticking to it because custom says it’s the right thing to do.

“I can speak from my own experiences being an early career professional in a public accounting firm,” Burkhalter said. “I wasn’t sure if they were going to invest in me. I wasn’t sure if I had a seat at the table. I felt compelled to ensure that I had a seat at the table and made sure I was on a committee, but I also worked for an incredibly supportive firm. And so I think new accounting grads, as they are entering into the workforce, have an amazing opportunity in front of them because so many firms are understanding the talent gap that they’re experiencing, and they’re looking for ways to continue to retain their talent.”

“I think Gen Z is incredibly talented and bright. They just may have different priorities than the generations that are there before them,” she continued. “I think the firms that will be on Best [Firms] to Work For lead with a people-first mentality, and it’s meeting those new hires, those individuals that are just joining the firm, where they are, and ensuring that their priorities match the firm’s priorities.”

Even despite the current tightened job market, young accountants are still speaking out and pushing back on systems and traditions they don’t like. “I really like their adaptability,” Naudin ten Cate said. “I think a lot of other generations I see, they might not be as adaptable because they’ve not had as much change.”

She also finds Gen Z’s directness surprising and refreshing: “My teams are in all sorts of countries, and, of course, there’s nuances within the cultures, but I think that’s something that I think a lot of our early-career professionals learn when they’re in high school and on campus — they learn more to debate and discuss.”

“I really, really appreciate the fact that they are willing to push back,” Ruszczyk said, noting the challenge that it has created in intergenerational communication. “I think with Gen Z, often their reaction is to be like, ‘Well, I can go get a job down the street.’ And the firm leaders want to jump to, ‘Well, they’re just lazy,’ and that’s not going to create a conversation where we find a middle ground and are able to meet client needs. So I think everybody has to come to this with a bit more of an open mind. Let’s figure out people’s strengths and work with those.”

Derek Thomas, KPMG’s national partner-in-charge of university talent acquisition, has advice for young accountants looking to wield their power more effectively: “The thing that I always tell folks is that you have a bigger voice when you demonstrate that you’re capable and you’re able to get the job done, and you’re providing results. At the end of the day, it’s not just about having the numbers on your side, it’s about having the fact that you have results, that you’re showing yourself as a valued member of the team, and you’re making an impact. And I think when those types of employees are speaking up, they’re more likely to be heard, because they’re providing value to their organization. The organization wants to show them how much they’re valued.”

“I do see this generation come in ready to work,” Thomas continued. “I think it’s figuring out how to remotivate them; how do we work with them? I look at some reverse mentoring, too: How do I adjust how I’ve been doing things, seeing things through their eyes?”

Continue Reading

Accounting

SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Proposal Faces Investor Pushback: What CFOs Need to Know

Published

on

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.

What the SEC Proposed

According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.

The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.

Why Investors Are Pushing Back

Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.

Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.

Lessons From the U.K. Experience

The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.

Practical Implications for Finance Teams

Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.

Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.

What to Watch Next

The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.

Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.

 

Continue Reading

Accounting

AI-Driven Automation and Continuous Accounting Frameworks

Published

on

The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.

The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.

Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.

Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.

Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.

Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.

Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Trending