Connect with us

Accounting

Massachusetts CPAs see clients moving for lower taxes

Published

on

Clients are relocating from Massachusetts to lower-tax states, according to a new report from the Massachusetts Society of CPAs.

For the report, MassCPAs surveyed nearly 200 CPAs representing around 4,600 high-income clients earning over $1 million and found 70% of the respondents reported that clients changed their tax domicile in 2024. The main reasons cited were lower taxes (47%) and cost of living (17%). States including Florida, New Hampshire, Texas and South Carolina are the main ones attracting these clients due to their tax-friendly policies.

massachusetts.jpg

Business clients who have remained in the state for now are contemplating a move, with 27% of CPAs’ business clients reconsidering their presence in Massachusetts, up from 22% in 2023 in the annual survey. The top barriers to growth include the “sting tax” (30%), the individual income tax rate (27%) and the estate tax threshold (23%). The sting tax is an entity-level tax of approximately 2% on S corporations with gross receipts between $6 million and $9 million, with an additional 2.9% tax on S corps with gross receipts over $9 million. MassCPAs has been advocating for eliminating or at least reforming the sting tax, which dates back to the 1980s, viewing it as a deterrent to business growth and investment in the Commonwealth.

The survey found that 49% of the respondents believe Massachusetts is becoming less competitive than other states, while only 6% believe it is more competitive. 

To deal with the talent shortage, 42% of the CPA respondents’ clients have increased their focus on retention of talent to maintain a competitive edge in a tight labor market, while 21% of those surveyed are also turning to contractors and gig workers, reflecting a growing preference for flexible staffing models. However, economic uncertainty has led only 5% of them to implement hiring freezes or layoffs as they navigate financial pressures. Massachusetts’ own efforts, such as the Internship Tax Credit, aim to strengthen the talent pipeline but need to be expanded to counter ongoing workforce shortages, according to the report.

In terms of their overall economic outlook, 33% of respondents remain neutral or cautiously optimistic, while 18% express a pessimistic economic outlook due to inflation, interest rates and market uncertainty. However, nearly half (49%) of the CPAs surveyed believe Massachusetts is becoming less competitive than other states, and only 6% see the state as significantly more competitive.

“This year’s survey echoes what we hear regularly from firms and financial leaders across the state: Massachusetts is losing its competitive edge,” said MassCPAs president and CEO Zach Donah in a statement Wednesday. “While the findings in this report are concerning, what’s even more troubling is what’s not captured, the individuals and businesses who won’t ever consider Massachusetts because of policies that make us an outlier. State leaders have a real opportunity to build on the momentum from the 2023 tax reform initiative to position Massachusetts for long-term success.”    

The report offers a number of recommendations, in addition to eliminating or reforming the sting tax on S corporations. Other suggestions include decoupling from the Section 163(j) business interest expense limitation to support capital investment and raising the estate tax threshold to $5 million. 

With federal tax policy changes on the horizon and signs of continued economic volatility, the report urges state leaders to act now to help Massachusetts avoid further outmigration, stabilize revenue and position itself as a leading destination for innovation and opportunity.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending