Connect with us

Accounting

Mid-level managers report lowest job satisfaction

Published

on

Middle managers report the lowest rate of satisfaction, according to a new survey.

Data from the latest edition of the annual CPA Career Satisfaction Survey shows that mid-career middle managers — particularly directors, senior managers and managers — were the least satisfied group overall by job title. Twenty-one percent of managers and 42% of directors/senior managers were highly satisfied, versus 71% of partners and 54% of CEOs, presidents and managing partners. 

“Verbatim feedback from respondents indicates that mid-level managers feel squeezed from both ends,” the report reads. “They don’t seem to have enough junior staff to handle basic level work and too many partners above them — eying early retirement — are making unreasonable demands on middle managers’ time while not providing enough mentoring or career support. More than one respondent lamented the feeling that positive change is tough to come by when a culture at the top keeps ‘kicking the can’ down the road.”

Accounting and analysis with laptop and calculator

Laurent Delhourme/ldprod – Fotolia

The top ranked drivers of CPA career satisfaction are ample career opportunities for those not on the partner track, coworkers being aware of the respondent’s interests outside of work, firm takes their side over the client even if it means loss of revenue, colleagues are respectful of their time, a variety of work responsibilities and client mix, and their firm speaking to or warning clients about inappropriate language or behavior.

Following the top attributes for career satisfaction and ranking slightly lower were working for a firm that promotes work-life balance, providing work-from-home flexibility, having a culture that freely shares knowledge across the organization, having a diverse and inclusive culture, freedom from tracking time and having a mentor-mentoring program. 

The top reasons for employee dissatisfaction were a lack of support from firms, mental and physical issues that are work-related, lack of positive work culture, and a limited variety of work responsibilities and client mix.

While the profession wrestles with an ongoing retention problem, the survey found that many accountants are satisfied with their careers. Fifty-three percent of CPAs working 50 hours or more per week during busy season reported being “highly satisfied,” and 41% working 60 hours or more per week during busy season were “highly satisfied.” Meanwhile, 16% of CPAs working less than 40 hours per week during busy season said they were “dissatisfied.” 

In regards to salary, which is considered a major contributor to the declining number of CPAs entering the profession, 54% of respondents who felt their pay was “no better” than their professional peers’ pay were still “highly satisfied,” and 43% who felt their pay was not competitive were still “highly satisfied.”

The survey was conducted by Tri-Merit Specialty Tax Services, in association with Accountants Forward and HB Publishing & Marketing Company, and collected responses from 238 accounting professionals nationwide.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending