Connect with us

Accounting

New crypto reporting regs will generate information deluge

Published

on

Crypto reporting enters a new phase on Jan. 1, 2025, the effective date for the new 1099-DA and finalized reporting regs. Brokers, traders, banks, wallet hubs, and taxpayers are still trying to digest the regulations and decide what is necessary to comply.

“I think it’s flown under the radar for a lot of people,” said James Creech, a director in the tax advocacy and controversy practice of Top 10 Firm Baker Tilly. “But the fact that the IRS is now going to get information about the transactions, and how inaccurate the information will be, is really underappreciated at this point. There will be a lot of people who will realize, too late, that this has taken effect.”

And there is very little time to become familiar with the rules, which go from nothing, or ad hoc reporting, through to a 1099 type B statement. 

crypto-symbol-shirt.jpg
An attendee wears a shirt with cryptocurrency logos during the CoinDesk 2022 Consensus Festival.

Jordan Vonderhaar/Bloomberg

“It’s going to be a rough transition period, beginning on Jan. 1, 2025,” Creech said. “For example, if hypothetically a bunch of people buy Bitcoin at 100,000 and it crashes down to 50,000 and they sell out at a loss, they’re going to be very confused if they just get a 1099 that has the proceeds on it. It would look like they have a $50,000 gain versus a $50,000 loss.”

“The concern was that there is not really much of any kind of standardized reporting,” he continued. “For example, if I were to buy $1,000,000 of crypto or sell $1,000,000 of crypto, there’s no guarantee that the information on the sales will make it to the IRS. So Congress  imposed two code sections, 6045 and 6050, that created these reporting requirements which were a little sparse. They had some definitions that were a little vague, or that shouldn’t have been there at all. One senator held up the process and kept the definition vague, while the majority wanted to narrow it to be more precise. Overall, considering they were handed a really complex bundle of regulations to implement, they did a good job to come up with reasonable definitions.”

Creech said that he believes everyone expects the Form  1099-DA to result in  “scattershot, unhelpful reporting” for the first few years. “No one really knows what to expect. To really be effective there needs to be a continuity of ownership within exchanges, so you can track both what the basis is and what the proceeds are. The first few years we might get half the report. The basis is going to be an issue — we’re likely to get inaccurate basis but accurate gross proceeds on these forms.”

Over time, the Treasury plans to expand these regulations and provide more clarity to some of the other people who are covered by Section 6045 and 6050 regulations. 

“And the reporting will be expanded to things such as peer-to-peer exchanges or other kinds of marketplaces, since the definition tends to be, ‘Can you set prices or set fees for exchanging crypto?’ It’s pretty broad and it’s going to cover people who may not have the ability to comply, he said. “But that’s not so much of a January 1st issue.”

There have been estimates of up to 6 billion 1099-DAs to be filed with the IRS a year, according to Creech: “And if they’re all inaccurate, what is the IRS going to be able to do with them? Every transaction will generate a 1099-DA. If I’m trading crypto and make 1,000 trades, I could be getting 1,000 1099-DAs. It will all have to go into a digital shoe box.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending