Connect with us

Accounting

Overcome obstacles on your path to partnership

Published

on

Only one in 50 accountants ultimately becomes a partner. If you ask most accountants what it takes to make partner, they’ll say it takes intense dedication to the job, outstanding technical skills, great leadership skills, outstanding communication skills, client development skills and maybe having a friend or mentor in senior management.

However, our research and skills assessment tests show there are five personality traits that significantly make or break your chances of becoming a partner. Some are inherent, some can be learned, some can be corrected. The list may surprise you.

1. Conscientiousness done differently

Overly conscientious persona: Taylor got promoted into a management role at a midsized accounting firm six months ago. Her diligent commitment to getting clients’ accounts done on time and exceeding the firm’s expectations of quality and attention to detail played a big part in Taylor getting that promotion. But, she has very little experience managing teams and it’s beginning to show.

Most people think conscientiousness is a positive attribute since conscientious people tend to be reliable, prudent, dependable folks who value planning, organization and structure. They typically adhere to well-established policies and processes. They not only meet deadlines but do so with quality output to meet their high personal standards.

It’s no surprise that conscientious employees are prized by accounting firms when the role requires meeting immovable external deadlines and producing quality output. But when highly conscientious accountants start moving up the ranks and begin managing people, they often struggle. Their rigid mindset can make it difficult for them to think outside the box and adapt when complex challenges arise — challenges that can’t be solved by sticking with the firm’s longstanding policies and procedures.

Since they’re hesitant to take shortcuts or look for “workarounds,” they generally don’t mind working late and coming in on weekends. But expecting team members to make the same sacrifices often creates resentment, erodes firm culture and can spike a rash of resignations and mental and physical health issues. 

When I speak to firms and organizations about “Conscientiousness Done Differently,” I tell them it’s not about setting immovable deadlines and work quality expectations; it’s about questioning the way things are done at one’s organization to see if their rigid mindset is adversely affecting their team in a profession that’s perpetually short of talent.  

Solution: With a preference for valuing and adhering to established methods, highly conscientious people who aspire to become partners must be trained to ask themselves if their adherence to old methods still adds value — or where the process could be streamlined and still deliver results. The Taylors of your firm must also be trained to ask themselves if they’re contributing to an unhealthy “long hours culture” at the firm. Help the Taylors keep the focus on results, not on maxing out billable hours. 

2. Let it go! Trusting and delegation

Trusting/delegation persona: Chris is a team leader who prides himself on the quality and accuracy of the accounts produced by his team. He spends considerable time performing quality assurance checks on all work produced by his reports.

During his last performance review, Chris was asked to reduce the time spent reviewing his team’s work so he could focus on developing his staff to be self-sufficient and grow their careers. Chris is clearly struggling with this request. 

Most accounting tasks require careful attention to detail and forensic levels of fact-checking and verification. Employers tend to hire accountants who have a healthy degree of skepticism to ensure they’re not accepting everything a client shares with them at face value or letting fraudulent or misleading data find its way into financial statements. But what happens when these wary accountants start moving up the ranks and managing teams of their own? They often struggle to delegate and evolve into micromanagers who scrutinize every single task their team members do. This naturally breeds resentment and erodes firm culture. 

Solution: If you think people like Chris have partnership potential at your firm, help them see the benefits of delegation and allow their reports to make their own mistakes — if mistakes occur — as long as those mistakes don’t irreparably harm the firm. 

3. Emotional Intelligence

We designed our firm’s Accountants Personality Profile Questionnaire to prioritize traits linked to EI. This allows accounting firms and corporate finance departments to assess the degree to which their emerging leaders build deeper, more meaningful relationships with their teams and clients. Our research shows most accountants would rather join a people-first culture than a me-first culture. 

Emotionally unintelligent persona: Wayne is a technical genius when it comes to accounting. Soon after joining the firm two years ago, he became the “go-to” person for solving complex accounting matters. Because of his technical acumen, the firm’s partners want to keep promoting Wayne, but the firm’s administrator and HR manager have reservations. Wayne would rather be right than make friends at work, and his personality has led to several tearful interventions by management and even a resignation or two.

Without improving his people skills, Wayne’s personality will likely do more harm to firm culture and retention than his technical expertise will add value.

Solution: From a coaching perspective, EI can be developed for professionals like Wayne, but it’s not a quick fix. He can start by showing more empathy toward his colleagues and take a genuine interest in their lives outside the office — remembering team members’ birthdays, kids’ names or favorite hobbies, and chatting with them about things other than work. When people feel their manager is genuinely interested in them, they are much more likely to stay at their firm and report satisfaction with their job. Widely used personality tests such as 16PF, Personality Assessment Inventory and Big 5/OCEAN call this the “warmth scale.” 

4. Self-confidence and resilience

Insecure persona: Ella has been with a large accounting firm for six years but has never hinted at wanting to progress her career. As a new hire, she recorded some of the highest critical reasoning test scores ever recorded at the firm and consistently produces high-quality work. But her manager and the HR team have seen her stymied at times by extreme anxiety when asked to take on new tasks. 

I’m guessing you have people at your firm who are trustworthy, reliable and highly competent at their jobs, but don’t have the confidence to seek out promotions or advocate on their own behalf. This reticence could have been caused by toxic bosses undermining them at previous jobs, or it could go back earlier in life to parents reminding them they weren’t as smart as their siblings, vindictive teachers not recognizing their talents or “friends” who betrayed them in childhood. 

As much as you feel for the Ellas of the world, they won’t make good partners or help you move your succession plan forward if they’re still haunted by ghosts of their past failures and embarrassments (real or imagined). Also, widely used personality tests such as MBTI and DISC don’t measure a respondent’s coping style or stress tolerance. However, our personality questionnaire (APPQ) extensively measures a team member’s stress tolerance, self-confidence and emotional stability, which combine into their coping style. 

Solution: Resilience-based coaching can help the Ellas of your firm address their fear of failure and lack of confidence. Addressing emotional instability and apprehension may also require the help of an outside mental health professional. We’ve found that most employees are receptive to coaching if it shows them how much the firm or company values them and wants them to succeed. And when the highly competent Ellas of the firm have more confidence to be leaders, this tends to improve the motivation and morale of all those around them. 

5. Assertion and social boldness

Non-assertive persona: Sam is being considered for promotion at a Midwest accounting firm with many clients in the agricultural sector. Clients are experiencing challenging conditions. They’re straight talkers who often question the accounting advice and don’t mince words. If Sam gets promoted, he will move out of back-office support into an advisory role in which he will need to communicate persuasively with clients and sometimes challenge the accounts they submit.   

As accountants move up the ranks, they must spend more time interfacing with clients, massaging egos, defending the firm’s work and challenging clients’ business practices. Without being assertive and confident, accountants like Sam could be coerced into doing something unethical or not addressing questionable behavior or risk losing the client unless their unreasonable demands or expectations are met.

Solution: Provide Sam with the coaching he needs to get comfortable with these situations when much of his early career has been back-office support should be an early coaching priority.

Becoming an accounting firm partner requires more than long hours, personal sacrifice and technical expertise. By recognizing and addressing the five personality traits above, accountants can overcome hidden obstacles and significantly improve their partnership prospects.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending