Connect with us

Accounting

Scaramucci struggles to spin a Trump tax break into profit for clients

Published

on

Anthony Scaramucci is struggling to spin one of President Donald Trump’s big tax breaks into a profit for his wealthy clients. Yet “the Mooch,” as he’s known on Wall Street, keeps getting paid his fees.

The hedge fund manager known for his 10-day stint as White House communications director in 2017 promised wealthy investors that he could help them take advantage of Trump’s signature program for spurring projects in low-income communities, dubbed opportunity zones. 

His list of ideas included a luxury hotel in Oakland, California, a warehouse in Savannah, Georgia, and middle-income housing. 

But key targets that Scaramucci laid out in 2018 interviews haven’t been realized. Instead of raising $3 billion for his SkyBridge Opportunity Zone Real Estate Investment Trust, he amassed less than $50 million and made a single investment: a Virgin Hotels property in the Warehouse District of New Orleans. 

The vehicle has yet to distribute payouts to REIT shareholders — let alone generate the 8% to 10% annualized returns before tax benefits that he suggested would be possible over the fund’s lifetime.

SkyBridge Capital, meanwhile, continues getting paid 1.75% of the fund’s net asset value, which was $43.2 million at the end of 2024.

Executives for the hedge fund firm declined to comment.

Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act recently made opportunity zones permanent, setting up another wave of investment funds that could start taking shape in January 2027. The SkyBridge experience may serve as a cautionary tale to investors: Tax benefits only matter if you make money.

Trump championed these zones in his first term as a way to drive private capital to long-neglected parts of the U.S. Investments in the zones topped more than $80 billion, according to a report from the Joint Committee on Taxation based on returns filed for 2019 through 2022.

Boosters say the zone investments have helped build affordable housing and created jobs and new businesses. 

Yet these dollars have not been evenly spread, with much of the money flowing to urban and suburban areas and wealthier states such as Florida and New York, the Joint Committee found. Louisiana, home to the SkyBridge fund’s hotel, received less than $500 million, or $106 per person, one of the lowest amounts across the U.S., even though it’s among the poorest states.

Most academic studies of the program show that, at least in its first few years, the opportunity zones had little or no economic impact, according to the Joint Committee’s report. 

Investors, though, potentially win big. If they take profits from stocks, bonds or other investments and put them into an opportunity zone fund, they’ll reduce their capital gains on the initial sale and defer its payment until 2026. If they keep the fund for at least a decade, they’ll pay no capital gains on its returns.

So far, it looks like SkyBridge clients could miss out on that tax-free benefit. From the firm’s initial money raise in December 2018 through the end of last year, it has lost 1.4%, according to investors. Those who got into the fund the following year are down 5.6%, the investors said. 

The New Orleans hotel is a sleek building with a rooftop pool, nestled in a neighborhood full of galleries, restaurants and shops. It gets 4.7 stars out of 5 on TripAdvisor. Even so, some investors say they doubt the value of the hotel will rise sharply in coming years. It makes money, but its net operating income has been fairly stable — between $4.7 million and $5 million — in its first three full years of operation, according to investors. 

The lack of growth is in line with other hotels in New Orleans, where revenue per available room was 11% lower in July than it was three years earlier, according to data from STR.

While data on opportunity zone investment returns more broadly is scant, the pandemic hit the real estate market hard, meaning that some funds have had difficulty making money. A pool that backed downtown office buildings, for example, is probably underwater, while one that focused on multi-family units in the Sun Belt would more likely be profitable.

“The program has been disappointing,” SkyBridge President Brett Messing said in a March 2020 interview with Yahoo Finance, pointing to the 10-year holding period and inherent risks of real estate development. “We’ve been modestly successful, but it’s been tougher to execute than we expected.”

No-win situation

Because of strict loan covenants, the hotel’s lender sweeps some profits into an escrow account, meaning investors in the REIT haven’t received any cash distributions. The REIT itself has run out of money, so in July it sold new shares to existing holders. With the proceeds, it can continue to pay fees to SkyBridge.

The fund offered more than $6 million of shares to existing holders at an 80% discount, amounting to 15% of shareholder equity, according to investors and a regulatory filing.  

That move put clients in what some saw as a no-win situation. If they chose not to participate, they’d dilute their holdings. If they chose to buy, they’d get an immediate return on paper — but could risk having to pay taxes on that gain unless the fund owns the hotel for 10 more years. SkyBridge told some investors it expects to get out before then.    

SkyBridge also charges investors a collective $150,000 a year for proxy fees and an annual meeting on video conference. 

During last year’s shareholder call, Messing told clients he couldn’t answer their questions about the fund because he was sitting in his car in Los Angeles. Anyone wanting more information could set up a call in the coming weeks, he said.

When investors groused about the lack of immediate responsiveness, he said he was adjourning the meeting, which caused even more complaints. Messing retorted with a threat: Keep up the insults, and we won’t talk to you at all. 

On this year’s call held in May, SkyBridge put its clients on mute.  

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending