Connect with us

Accounting

Senators say Bessent misled them on DOGE’s Treasury access

Published

on

Three Senate Democrats criticized Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for what they call a “lack of candor” about what DOGE workers are doing with U.S. payment systems. 

The senators, in a letter to Bessent, accuse him of providing “inaccurate or incomplete information” regarding the access that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency effort had to the payment systems.  

“Despite Treasury’s denials, DOGE personnel had the ability to modify system coding and were planning to use the Treasury systems to help pause payments by other agencies,” according to the letter authored by Senators Elizabeth Warren, Ron Wyden and Jack Reed dated Wednesday. “You need to provide a clear, complete, and public accounting of who accessed the systems, what they were doing, and why they were doing it.” 

Last month, the newly-formed DOGE acquired access to the Treasury’s payment system. That prompted a senior level civil servant who tried to block the move to abruptly leave. Attorneys general from 19 states and three labor unions also filed lawsuits to prevent DOGE’s access to the sensitive systems. 

The senators pointed to Bessent’s recent interview with Bloomberg News in which he said no one was “tinkering” with the payment system. “These are highly trained professionals. This is not some roving band running around doing things. This is methodical and it is going to yield big savings,” he said at the time.

They also pointed to a letter Treasury sent to Wyden on Feb. 4 that said DOGE only had read-only access to the system and likened DOGE’s involvement to an “operational efficiency assessment” that was “similar” to previous audits and reviews, and that there was no intent to stop any payments.

The senators said that documents released in conjunction with the state lawsuits show that “those earlier representations have turned out to be wrong.”

The lawsuit, they say, disclosed that a 25-year-old software engineer and not Tom Krause, the DOGE lead at Treasury, was granted access to the payment systems or source code, that he received a laptop that connected to a source code repository, as well as read-only access of the systems.

They also cite a sworn statement from an official who said Krause and the engineer, Marko Elez, were drawing up a payment plan to assist agencies to comply with an executive order to pause foreign aid-related payments. Elez left DOGE last week after a report linked him to online comments on racism and eugenics, though Musk later said he would be reinstated.

The process was also designed to flag payment files for the US Agency for International Development and the Department of Health and Human Services, the senators said.

“You said that DOGE was conducting a review to improve efficiency, but it was actually trying to use the payment systems to help implement a broad funding freeze,” the senators wrote in the letter. “You downplayed the risk to the integrity of the Treasury systems while career civil servants responsible for them scrambled to mitigate it.”

The senators asked Bessent to respond to their queries by Feb. 14. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending