Connect with us

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Rainy day feelings

Published

on

Diversionary tactic; bad intentions; keeping it real; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Cheshire, Massachusetts: Dennis Condron, 75, owner of a construction company, has agreed to plead guilty to four counts of tax fraud in connection with a multiyear income tax scheme.

Over three years, in addition to depositing customer payments to his company, D Condron Construction, Condron hid more than half a million dollars in customer checks by cashing them and diverting them to his personal accounts.

When Condron had his taxes prepared, he allegedly did not tell his preparer about the checks he was cashing and about diverting customer checks, resulting in his underreporting the gross receipts of the business by hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Aristes, Pennsylvania: Linda Tarlecki has pleaded guilty to tax evasion and bank fraud.

Tarlecki was the former secretary/treasurer for Conyngham Township in Columbia County. From 2013 through 2017, Tarlecki defrauded the township and Fulton National Bank of more than $147,000 by issuing forged paychecks to herself to which she was not entitled.

Tarlecki also failed to report this additional income on her personal income taxes, resulting in a tax loss to the IRS of more than $38,000.

The maximum penalty for this offense is 35 years in prison, a term of supervised release and a fine.

Friendswood, Texas: Businessman William Christopher Womack has admitted he only reported a small amount of income to keep other federal benefits.

Womack was the sole owner of Intents Services, a company that leased industrial and special event tents, trailers and specialty vehicles locally. He concealed income by cashing business receipts at check-cashing businesses and writing fraudulent checks to fictitious employees and vendors. Womack spent the money on personal expenses, including boats, luxury vehicles, RVs and tickets to sporting events.

Womack admitted he reported only a small portion of his income on tax returns. In 2019 to 2021, he reported wages of $12,000 annually while collecting Social Security benefits ranging from $15,672 to $16,121. This was far less than he earned; for example, Womack admitted that his 2020 tax return failed to include $260,895 in income he earned from Intents Services.

He must also pay restitution to the IRS of $219,599 in tax loss resulting from the returns he filed for 2019 through 2021.

Sentencing will be Oct. 14, when Womack faces up to three years in prison and a maximum $250,000 fine.

Orlando, Florida: Three Florida men were sentenced this week for tax crimes related to a scheme to prepare false returns for clients.

Jonathan Carillo was sentenced to 121 months in prison, Franklin Carter Jr. to 84 months and Diandre T. Mentor to 36 months in prison. 

From 2016 to 2020, Carter and Carrillo owned and operated Neighborhood Advance Tax, a tax prep business with a dozen offices throughout Florida. Mentor was employed there as a preparer and from 2018 and 2019 he managed the Orlando office. Carter, Carrillo, Mentor and their co-conspirators fraudulently inflated clients’ refunds by fabricating deductions and by holding periodic training sessions at which they taught other NAT employees to prepare fraudulent tax returns.

In 2020, Mentor and his co-conspirators started their own tax prep business, Smart Tax & Finance. Like NAT, Mentor and his co-conspirators prepared false returns for clients that included fabricated deductions. Mentor and his co-conspirators also taught franchise owners and employees how to prepare false returns for clients. In total, Mentor caused a tax loss to the IRS of $3,090,077.

In 2021, Carter, Carrillo, and their co-conspirators started a new tax prep business, Taxmates, which operated out of the same offices that NAT previously used. As with NAT, Carter, Carrillo, and others used Taxmates to prepare false returns for clients. Many of those returns included false deductions. Carter, Carrillo and their co-conspirators also taught franchise owners and employees how to prepare false returns. In total, they caused a tax loss to the IRS exceeding $12 million.

Several other co-conspirators have been sentenced for their roles in the scheme.

Mentor was also ordered to serve three years of supervised release and to pay some $3,090,077 in restitution to the U.S; Carter to serve three years of supervised release and to pay some $12,543,946 in restitution; and Carrillo to three years of supervised release and to pay some $12,170,066 in restitution. All three previously pleaded guilty.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Tampa, Florida: Exec Brian Davison has been sentenced to three years in prison for making false and fraudulent statements on tax returns.

Davison was the co-founder and former CEO of the real estate investment firm Equialt LLC, which was placed into judicial receivership following a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission complaint in 2020. Between October 2018 and December 2020, Davison caused multiple personal returns to be filed that underreported his income from Equialt and other business entities by at least $29.7 million. This resulted in a federal tax loss of $6,293,592.

Davison, who pleaded guilty in March, was ordered to pay that amount in restitution to the IRS.

Lake Forest, Illinois: Dr. Krishnaswami Sriram has been sentenced to 34 months in prison for health care fraud and for hiding assets and lying to the IRS about his ability to pay some $1.6 million in taxes, penalties and interest.

From around 2011 to 2017, Sriram evaded payment of approximately $1.6 million he owed to the IRS. He transferred ownership, in name only, of two rental properties to his children without their knowledge while he continued to receive income from the properties. He also transferred some $700,000 from bank accounts he controlled in the U.S. to accounts in India.

To fraudulently reduce the money he owed, Sriram submitted documents to the IRS as part of an offer in compromise that omitted an investment account in the United States, bank and investment accounts in India, and ownership of the rental properties. 

Between 2012 and 2022, Sriram also caused false Medicare billings to be submitted for episodes of in-home physician care that did not occur. Sriram claimed to provide care for Medicare beneficiaries on dates when those individuals were either deceased or resided at inpatient facilities other than their homes. Sriram’s false statements in medical records relating to these episodes of care resulted in $136,980.36 in false billings to Medicare.

He was also ordered to serve three years of supervised release and to pay some $1.7 million in restitution to the United States.

Columbus, Ohio: Tax preparer Ali Kasimu Alston has been sentenced to the statutory maximum, 36 months, in prison for aiding in the preparation of thousands of fraudulent returns. 

From at least 2015 through at least 2022, Alston owned and operated the tax prep firm Overtime Ventures LLC, d.b.a. Raining Cash Tax Service. He systematically falsified client tax returns to maximize refunds from the IRS. He filed Schedule Cs with fake businesses to maximize tax credits. For example, one false tax return for calendar year 2021 reported false losses for a home healthcare company that did not exist. The false business losses reduced the client’s taxable income, thereby decreasing the tax due and increasing the client’s claimed tax refund.

The defendant also attempted to bribe one of his former employees with $4,000 in cash to provide false information to law enforcement, which he knew at the time was investigating his tax prep business. Even after entering his guilty plea, the defendant continued to assist in the filing of false tax filings.

Alston was charged by a bill of information in September 2024 and pleaded guilty in October 2024.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending