Connect with us

Accounting

Tax season nears its end, but uncertainties linger

Published

on

The 2024 filing season, which began with a hint of uncertainty, has progressed into one of the smoothest in recent memory — but the uncertainty still exists, fueled by court decisions and pending legislation. 

The legislation was “pending” at the beginning of filing season and is still pending, while court decisions called into question the Corporate Transparency Act, which, although not a tax issue, is front and center for many accountants that deal with small businesses which come under the purview of the act’s beneficial ownership information reporting requirements. 

Accountants are hesitant to become involved with questions regarding BOI reporting; depending on the jurisdiction they may be charged with practicing law without a license, since they are called on to interpret definitions under the act as to beneficial ownership. Despite this, they routinely are expected to interpret the complexities of the Internal Revenue Code and have done so for decades without the benefit of a law degree. Add to this the fact that their professional liability insurance may or may not protect them — again, depending on the jurisdiction in which charges might be brought against them. 

The American Institute of CPAs, in a letter dated April 3, 2024, to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and the director of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Andrea Gacki, voiced its concern that small businesses will be caught off guard with the new filing requirement, and failure to file could result in steep civil and criminal penalties.

1040 forms

“The recent NSBA v. Yellen court case which found the Corporate Transparency Act to be unconstitutional has only compounded confusion, with most entities believing they no longer have a furling requirement,” said the letter.

“Based on these strong concerns,” the letter continued, “we ask that you suspend all enforcement actions until one year after the conclusion of all court cases related to NSBA v. Yellen, and further believe that FinCEN should take no retroactive enforcement for non-compliance during this time. The portal can remain open, and small businesses may voluntarily report BOI, but no small business should be compelled to file nor should any small business face enforcement for failure to comply until after the courts have worked through this complex case.”

Failure to address the situation will lead to “rampant noncompliance” in the small-business sector, according to Roger Harris, president of Padgett Business Services. “And it will not help us catch money launderers or child traffickers.”

Still in limbo

Still pending is the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024, which passed in the House. It contains taxpayer-favorable alterations to the Child Tax Credit and a trio of lapsed business provisions: bonus depreciation, research and experimental expenditures, and the business interest deduction limitation, and is awaiting action in the Senate. The general feeling is that the TRAFWA will be “pending” all the way through the November elections, but will eventually pass in one form or another.

Depending on the client, this could be a pretty significant delay, according to Ryan Losi, executive vice president of Virginia-based CPA firm Piascik. 

“It has caused heartburn for some companies in the tech industry or pharmaceuticals,” he observed. They have to capitalize expenses rather than include them as deductions, which can make the difference between making a profit or paying tax on taxable income that doesn’t exist. It was supposed to pass in February, but Republicans held the bill up because of immigration issues. Now, it looks as though nothing will happen until after the election. So maybe tax season won’t be so smooth because you have to file based on current law, not what you think it will be.”

“Things started to normalize in late February when people recognized that maybe the tax bill would not pass that quickly, and the IRS said not to wait, that they would fix refunds automatically if the bill passed,” he added.

Filing season statistics show that “do-it-yourselfers” were up by 1% over a year ago, as of March 29, but that’s probably not entirely accurate, according to Mark Steber, chief tax officer at Jackson Hewitt. “The IRS is increasingly concerned with ‘ghost preparers,’ those who prepare a return for a fee but don’t sign the return,” he said. 

“The IRS has seen repeat self-prepared returns coming from the same address,” he remarked. “In some cases, the taxpayer doesn’t even know that the person sitting next to them in a tax pro’s office doesn’t even work in the office — they pull out their computer, ask a few questions and agree to meet at a Starbucks around the corner.”

Looking forward

Other than these few issues, the season has been smooth. But it may be the last for a while, according to Steber. “A new 1099-K, the presidential election, expiring Trump provisions all converge, so we may have seen the last of the “normal” seasons for a while,” he said. 

This is an election year and even though tax season is nearly behind us, Congress might make retroactive changes which they may instruct the IRS to implement, or some returns might have to be amended to receive benefits, according to Tom O’Saben, director of tax content & government relations at the National Association of Tax Professionals. “Pay close attention to the news,” he advised. 

April is filing extension time, according to Losi. “Our cutoff is March 25. If they don’t have all their information together by then, they’ll have to extend,” he explained. “We’re in the process of contacting all our clients with large items and will try to get a sense of the taxes they paid in prior years. If the client is in a refund situation, we can file the extension easily and electronically and without needing more information. Or if they have a balance due, we have to decide how much is due. If it’s a large balance due, we have to decide how to pay it. Most have their money tied up in illiquid assets, so they might have to give it a tweak or two.”

Wrapping up

The filing season began with tax professionals thinking they had lost clients to the new IRS Direct File, but they were only waiting in the wings, according to Beanna Whielock, former IRS director of national public liaison, and now executive director of Tax Pro Fellowship.

“Taxpayers hate taxes. Only if they think they are getting a refund, rebate CTC or some other funds do they get in early to file,” she said. “Most have owed, either because they took a second job to make ends meet and were insufficiently withheld or they followed IRS guidance on completing the Form W-4 and were underwithheld. Then the taxpayers who did strange things began to come in. While only energy credits seemed to be a saving grace, they were few and far between because people are hurting in the economy.”

With the end of the season in sight, overall it’s gone pretty well, according to Harris. 

“There have been some minor hiccups here and there, but compared to most recent filing seasons it’s been relatively smooth,” he said. “The problem every year has been late 1099s, and it seems as though there are more corrections this year than in the past. For example, people don’t realize that their financial advisor has invested their money in a limited partnership with an ownership interest in an oil well in Oklahoma. They bring in all their information at the end of March, get their return filed and then show up two weeks later with the additional information. Or they might leave it for the IRS to fix, since the preparer might cost more than the tax that is due. It’s frustrating, because it creates additional work for the preparer and for the IRS.”

Tax season 2024 has mirrored last tax season in that it felt like “business as usual” — essentially what tax season has typically been like, according to Jim Guarino, managing director at Top 100 Firm Baker Newman Noyes. 

“One of the larger surprises was the increase in overall investment income, especially in terms of their interest income and U.S. government interest,” he said. “Interest jumped during 2023 and individuals were the recipients of this increased interest income, but it led to smaller refunds or a balance due on retirement account values at December 31 of the preceding year.”

“Tax professionals at this time of year have come to appreciate one general rule of thumb: Expect the unexpected,” he concluded. “Living by that mantra helps us to navigate and weather the storm that is certain to come every January.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending