Connect with us

Accounting

Thoughts on the rise or fall of accounting

Published

on

I’m a lover of history. I could write an entire book on what history means. Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of history to me are the long-term changes (over decades or even centuries) that have occurred, some good, some not so good. 

The common denominator of these changes is that few could have predicted these changes before they happened. Who could have predicted that the Romans, the English, the Dutch and the Spaniards would cease to be the most powerful nations in the world? Who could have predicted the catastrophic impact of the 1918 flu and the 2020 COVID? Why didn’t the Jews of Europe see the handwriting on the wall and flee to friendly countries as Hitler began his scourge in the early and mid-1930s? I can go on and on.

I start with the above to ease into your central question (“A setting sun, or a rising?): Is the CPA profession declining? You’re correct to state that revenues and profits of CPA firms are strong and growing and that demand for accounting services are at an all-time high. 

But as Chad and Jeremy sang, “That was yesterday and yesterday’s gone.” I’m not a chess player but I know enough about chess to know that you win by planning your moves several moves ahead. Those of us in the CPA profession, from managing partners to consultants to journalists, are painfully aware of the very real threats, such as declining labor pools and the possible negative impacts of artificial intelligence and private equity (both great examples of glass half-empty or half-full discussions).

Our profession has withstood many sea changes and survived them … and then some. Looking over the most recent 40 years of the CPA industry, there have been epic positive changes that the CPA profession made to avoid declining:

  • Being able to sell without ethical restraints. 
  • Providing services other than basic compliance work.
  • Running a firm like a real business instead of a bunch of collegial buddies with no one really in charge.
  • The advent of computers, causing legions of CPAs to do things with technology that they used to do by hand.
  • The consolidator storm of the late 1990s, closely followed by merger mania that shows no signs of letting up.
  • Remote work, necessitated by COVID, prevented legions of staff, especially younger ones, from benefitting and developing from the collegiality and learning that is best cultivated by being in an office with co-workers. Today, the trend is getting back to more time in the office, such as hybrid schedules that require staff to be in the office three days a week. 

In the mid-1990s, the subject of a front-page article in The Wall Street Journal was the demise of smaller firms due to CPA firm mergers, which, of course, never happened and never will happen. I sent a letter to the journalist who wrote the article tactfully explaining that his premise was grievously in error. I never received a response.
The two biggest threats to the profession, to me, are:

  1. Declining labor pool. Most firms today are not comfortable with the progressive ways to solve the problem — offshoring and outsourcing personnel, hiring people from outside a firm’s market and hiring non-CPAs. But as of today, firms are moving very slowly on this. It reminds me of firms in the late 1980s and early 1990s fighting the trend to do their work with computer software instead of manually. Nobody today has a problem with the analysis and diagnosis of MRIs and x-rays regularly performed by invisible, trained doctors abroad. Why should CPA firms have a problem with some of their basic work being done by CPAs in the Philippines, India and other countries? Many CPA firms are fighting this trend, but they will eventually see the light. The way things are going, they might not have a choice.
  2. The fear that AI will substantially reduce CPAs’ present work and processes. Yes, the way we do our work today and the fees we charge for this work will decline, perhaps greatly, as a result of AI. But this gives CPAs an opportunity to re-engineer themselves, just as they did in the 1990s when they started adding ancillary services to accounting work, thus doing a better job of satisfying clients’ needs. This reminds me of the time in the early 1990s when Quicken and QuickBooks were introduced. The dilemma presented to CPAs was twofold; first, there was the negative: “These programs will reduce our work.” Then the positive, which more than offsets the negative, is that with these technologies, CPAs can focus more on helping clients run their businesses, supported by client reports that the clients effortlessly create. Again, the result is more time to focus on clients’ needs instead of focusing on pumping the work out.

CPAs in the 1960s and 1970s would be dumbfounded and shocked to see the monumental changes that have occurred through today. I think that CPAs today will be equally stunned to see what the profession looks like in 30-40 years, a profession that continues to adapt and thrive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending