Connect with us

Accounting

Trump dismisses last-gasp EU push to stop tariffs kicking in

Published

on

President Donald Trump rejected a European Union proposal to drop tariffs on all bilateral trade in industrial goods with the U.S., meaning that his 20% tariff on all EU imports is due to come into force Wednesday. 

Speaking at the White House on Monday, Trump said the offer from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen is not enough to reset the transatlantic trading relationship, accusing the EU of maintaining other barriers to trade.

“The European Union has been very bad to us,” he said. “We’re paying them to guard them militarily and they are screwing us on trade, so that’s not a good combination.”

EU trade officials have been trying to calibrate their response to the U.S. tariff proposals, seeking to project a degree of firmness and also to avoid escalation.

The EU plans to begin consulting with member states and industry early next week on how it plans to retaliate against the across-the-board tariffs, along with levies targeting the auto industry.

Olof Gill, a commission spokesman, said Tuesday that the bloc’s executive arm plans to discuss its response before coming up with a final set of measures to be voted on at a later date by member states.

On Monday, the commission dropped plans for a 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey as part of a separate dispute over Trump’s decision last month to put levies on aluminum and steel imports. The initial list targeted some €22 billion ($24.1 billion) in products, before a few categories were removed.

Instead, the bloc’s executive arm is proposing tariffs on a selection of U.S. goods that includes diamonds, motorcycles, pleasure boats, household appliances, safety glass, playing cards, tobacco, poultry and other agricultural products. 

Most face a 25% tariff, but a few would be hit with a 10% rate, according to a document seen by Bloomberg. Several member states had pushed for whiskey to be excluded after Trump threatened to introduce a 200% tariff on European wine and champagne producers in response. 

Earlier, von der Leyen noted the EU has previously offered to zero out tariffs on industrial products, including autos, if the U.S. does the same, but that Washington hasn’t engaged.

Now, Europeans are struggling to prevent the dispute spinning out of control, with the U.S. singling out the EU and China as two of the main targets of his trade policy. 

Trump on Monday promised to impose an additional 50% tariff on Chinese imports on top of two separate levies — of 34% and 20% — that he’d already announced after Beijing announced that it would retaliate. Those new levies are also due to kick in on Wednesday. 

In his comments on Monday, Trump railed against European trade policy, asserting that the EU has blocked access to U.S. cars and agricultural products, and demanding that European countries buy more energy from the U.S. 

The EU “was formed to really do damage to the U.S. on trade, that’s the reason it was formed,” Trump said, who repeated his complaints that the U.S. has been paying for Europe’s defense since other NATO allies haven’t been spending enough on defense.

Even so, Trump hasn’t been specific about what kind of concessions he’s looking for, and EU officials have struggled to engage with their U.S. counterparts. Von der Leyen has yet to meet with Trump since he took office.

EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic suggested he’s open to discussing non-tariff issues as the U.S. has demanded, as long as there’s a mutual benefit for both sides. But he said that the value-added tax, which Trump has criticized, is an important source of income for member states and the EU won’t change this system.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Bloomberg Television on Monday that he doesn’t expect any deals with countries before the higher tariffs kick in on Wednesday.

EU trade ministers meeting in Luxembourg on Monday to formulate their response signaled readiness to deploy a full spectrum of countermeasures including potential taxes on U.S. tech companies in response to the sweeping tariffs that have tipped global markets into freefall since Trump announced them. 

“If we can’t find an agreement we also have measures available,” Jens Spahn, a German conservative who is one of the frontrunners to be economy minister in the next government, said Tuesday in an interview with Deutschlandfunk radio. “I would mention the taxation of digital companies — Amazon, Meta, Apple — all of those present. It’s a clear indication of what we can also do.”

Some $10 trillion has been wiped off the value of global equities since Trump’s Rose Garden presentation last week with investors pricing in fears that the escalating trade war will trigger a global recession.

BlackRock Inc. Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink said Monday that most CEOs he talks to think the U.S. is already in a recession, warning that stock markets could decline further as Trump destabilizes the global economy. 

In Luxembourg, all 27 EU members backed the commission’s approach to negotiate and prepare countermeasures if talks fail, giving the commission a solid mandate to move ahead with its plan, senior EU diplomats said.

“While the EU remains open and prefers negotiations, we will not wait endlessly,” Sefcovic told reporters.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending