Connect with us

Accounting

Trump tightens grip on regulators in latest order

Published

on

President Donald Trump sought to rein in independent federal agencies in an executive order Tuesday that aims to curb the ability of some of Washington’s most powerful regulators to oversee banks and other companies.

The order, which applies to agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission, calls for the entities to submit draft regulations for White House review before publication and consult with the Trump administration on their priorities and strategic plans.

Independent agencies have frequently followed directives from the White House, but their mandates don’t require them to do so. This order would change that requirement — and has the potential to draw legal challenges from the agencies.

The order exempts the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors and the Federal Open Market Committee’s work on monetary policy from the additional oversight. The order, however, specifies that the Fed’s Board of Governors will need to comply on issues related to “its supervision and regulation of financial institutions.”  

“Previous administrations have allowed so-called ‘independent regulatory agencies’ to operate with minimal Presidential supervision,” according to the order Trump signed Tuesday. “These regulatory agencies currently exercise substantial executive authority without sufficient accountability to the President, and through him, to the American people.”

The directive is Trump’s latest attempt to clamp down on the power of agencies. The president has sought to appoint loyalists to key administration jobs. Elon Musk, a close Trump confidant involved with the Department of Government Efficiency‘s cost-cutting effort, has embedded allies across the federal government to identify spending cuts and staff to terminate.

Independent agencies are designed to have a degree of separation from the White House, said James Angel, an associate finance professor at Georgetown University. At the SEC, for example, no more than three of its five commissioners are allowed to be from the same party. Those members have staggered terms, and the appointments are not designed to be part of the “political spoils system.”

“Congress set up these specialist agencies for a very good reason,” Angel said. “They are designed to be technical experts run by a bipartisan group that would be slightly isolated from the whims of the current president.”

Bill Kovacic, former FTC chair under President George W. Bush, said the White House has always been involved in the budget process for independent agencies, but had far less engagement in their priorities and plans for regulations.

During the first Trump administration, Trump clashed with then-FTC Chair Joe Simons over an executive order targeting Big Tech companies after the platform then known as Twitter imposed fact-checks on his posts. Trump personally pressured Simons to open a probe into the social network over how it enforces its terms of service, but lacked the ability to fire him, though the White House did interview potential replacements and considered demoting him.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending