Connect with us

Accounting

Trump’s tariffs leave US business tied up in costly red tape

Published

on

Donald Trump promised to slash red tape for business. His tariff regime has gotten American companies increasingly tangled up in it. 

The president’s ever-changing trade rules are piling up mountains of extra work for firms trying to follow them. Smaller ones in particular are struggling to cope with unprecedented requirements to trace paper trails for every widget and gadget, showing what’s in them and where they came from.

The bureaucratic burden is a less-discussed consequence of Trump’s move to hike import taxes to a hundred-year high. America Inc., which broadly cheered his election win, is already bristling at the direct cost of tariffs. Uncertainty around their on-again, off-again rollout is a drag on investment plans, too. The challenges of compliance add another layer of hurt.

One business owner who has experienced it all is David Zampierin, the founder of Idaho-based Zamp Racing, which makes helmets, suits and other kits for auto-racing drivers.

He spent July glued to a screen tracking a shipment from China, then realized it wouldn’t arrive before Trump’s trade truce with Beijing was due to expire. His solution: Park the stuff in a bonded warehouse in South Korea, then wait and see. When Trump extended the truce into November, Zampierin immediately ordered his goods to be shipped.

“Even though the pandemic was crazy, there was kind of a certainty there. Now it’s more about the confusion,” he said. “I’ve been doing this for 40 years. And it’s never been this complicated.”

Take the administration’s widening of steel and aluminum duties to include hundreds of categories of consumer items and manufacturing inputs, from motorcycles to baby gear. Importers must be able to document not just the value of metals contained in the goods, but also where the steel was poured and the aluminum smelted, according to customs broker Pete Mento. 

Even when a product like deodorant sprays or shampoo doesn’t contain any listed metals, importers can be required to submit documents that prove it. 

In the case of aluminum, if importers can’t prove the origin, customs officials will assume it’s from Russia – which has the highest rate — and charge 200%. Russia is likely the ultimate source of metal used in many products that arrive via third countries, but some suppliers don’t want to share the information, or perhaps even have it in the first place.

“It’s death by a thousand papercuts,” said Shannon Bryant, president of trade compliance advisory service Trade-IQ.

Every goods entry under the requirement takes “at least one to three hours of work on the low end,” while more complex cases — like figuring out the metal content in a shipment of motorbike parts — could take 10 hours or more, according to Hugo Pakula, chief executive of Tru Identity, an AI automation platform for global trade.

It’s a far cry from Trump’s campaign-trail promises last year to unleash U.S. business by scrapping burdensome rules. Since taking office, he’s crowed about his progress.

“Countries as they get older, they develop a lot of red tape,” the president said in May at an investment conference in Saudi Arabia. “We’re getting rid of it at record levels.”

To be sure, the administration has slashed plenty of regulations, including on the environment, finance, labor and diversity. And Trump has taken other steps to help business, like the tax-law provisions that allow deductions and full expensing for capital investments.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment.

What’s more, domestic manufacturers have cheered some of the president’s tariffs as a shield against foreign competition — a major purpose of Trump’s policy, which aims to revive U.S. manufacturing and reduce dependence on imports.

Those are longer-term objectives. In the meantime, U.S. business has been hoping for more clarity over the near future, and Trump’s Aug. 1 deadline for global tariff rates was expected to provide some. But since then he’s only expanded his plans — doubling levies on India to 50% and threatening fresh charges on furniture imports. New tariffs on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and other key industrial goods are in the pipeline too.

Adding to the confusion, a federal appeals court ruled that Trump’s country-specific tariffs broke the law. The White House has appealed to the Supreme Court and is seeking an expedited ruling. 

Policy zigzags can add to the bureaucratic burden. Every time the rules change, some companies that already placed orders — and have shipments en route to the U.S. — are left unsure whether they’ll be subject to the new rates, or qualify for what’s known as an “on the water” exemption.

Compliance costs fall particularly hard on small businesses. Even in relatively straightforward cases, ensuring that paperwork is all in order adds to the workload — and larger companies are better equipped to respond by staffing up, said John Arensmeyer, who runs the Small Business Majority, a nonprofit that represents some 85,000 companies. 

Smaller firms also tend to lack the global networks that make it easier to switch suppliers in response to tariff shifts. And last week’s shutdown of the so-called “de minimis” exemption, which allowed tariff-free entry for packages worth $800 or less, was another blow. It means more forms to fill, as well as taxes to pay.

“Larger companies will very rarely be looking to import products valued less than the previous de minimum threshold,” said James Knightley, chief international economist at ING. More broadly, with everyone looking to offset new tariff costs, “small operations are likely to have less fat to trim” and risk a bigger hit to profits, he said.

On the other end, U.S. Customs and Border Protection faces challenges of its own in enforcing the complex new tariff regime. The agency is using artificial intelligence and data mining to examine changes over time and compare one company’s reports with another’s. These tools are proving effective at spotting potential noncompliance, according to Cindy Deleon, a former CBP auditor who now runs Houston-based consultancy Deleon Trade LLC.

“Customs is definitely moving at light speed to maximize their intelligence,” said Deleon. “That’s what they should be doing.” As for companies, she said, many “are just grossly unprepared. They don’t see the red flags.”

There’s also the Entry Summary Review process, in which CBP can identify compliance issues early on and seek documents from the importer or broker before issuing a formal Request for Information. Those initial reviews can sometimes lead to CBP issuing bills.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending