Connect with us

Accounting

US carmakers push for EV tax credits to be phased out

Published

on

Automakers are lobbying against Washington lawmakers ending popular electric-vehicle tax credits that President Donald Trump has railed against, pushing instead for a gradual phase-out over several years if he moves to cut them. 

General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co. are among the carmakers and industry lobbying groups making pilgrimages to ask the Trump administration and Republican legislators to preserve some EV incentives in the Inflation Reduction Act passed under Joe Biden, according to people familiar with the effort who weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

Among the options being floated if the Trump administration moves to strike EV incentives is a three-year wind-down to allow more time for the companies to adjust their businesses, these people said.

It’s not immediately clear if Trump is receptive to the idea, or whether automakers can find enough votes among Republicans in Congress to keep EV incentives in place. But the industry is making the case that thousands of jobs now rely on electric vehicles, and that a disproportionate number of EV and battery plants are in Republican states such as Ohio, South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama, making what’s now sometimes referred to as the U.S. “Battery Belt.”

The effort shows how big auto companies are working to influence key policies beginning to take shape in Trump’s Washington that could deal a blow to their operations and bottom lines. Automakers have spent billions of dollars to build EV and battery manufacturing plants in the U.S., helped by IRA subsidies that support production and consumer demand for plug-in cars. Trump has directed his administration to consider eliminating policies that favor electric vehicles, which could put those investments at risk of being stranded should near-term federal support disappear. 

Carmakers also are looking to avert or mitigate the effects of new potential tariffs that at least one industry leader has warned would be devastating to U.S. carmakers. 

To preserve EV subsidies, carmakers are also stressing that a multiyear phase-out period would give them time to drive battery and EV costs down so they can reduce prices and sell electric vehicles without help from the federal government, the people said. Federal support also helps give domestic automakers a chance to build an American-made supply chain to better compete with China.

“We have the potential repeal of various IRA elements,” Ford Chief Executive Officer Jim Farley said Tuesday at an investor conference in New York. “We’ve already sunk capital. And many of those jobs will be at risk” if the IRA or large parts of it are repealed, he said.

Farley said he’ll meet with members of Congress this week, which he said will be his second trip to Washington in three weeks.

Tax credits

The IRA contained a 10-year extension of both consumer tax credits for EV buyers and subsidies that go directly to manufacturers for building batteries in the U.S.

Many automakers are asking to preserve as much of the IRA incentives as they can. That includes the so-called leasing loophole, which allows leased EVs to qualify for the full $7,500 tax credit that would otherwise be ineligible if purchased outright.

GM CEO Mary Barra recently met with Trump to discuss tariffs and other administrative policies that affect the auto industry. The company has pushed to apply the same sourcing standards to incentives toward leasing EVs that are currently applied to purchases, so that battery materials and production would have to be in the U.S. or come from certain trading partners, one of the people said. If GM gets its way, Asian and European automakers would have a tougher time leasing EVs.

The automakers’ campaigning for credits contrasts with Tesla Inc. CEO Elon Musk’s calls for EV subsidies to be eliminated. In the years since he’s said the federal incentives should be scrapped, Tesla cut prices of vehicles including the Model X in order to qualify. The company also promotes the tax-credit eligibility of various models on its order pages.

Any cuts or repeal of EV credits provided by the IRA would likely come in a reconciliation bill where Republicans will have to weigh the benefits of falling in line with Trump’s priorities against potential drawbacks for high-paying jobs in their states. About $167 billion has been invested to create 200,000 EV-related manufacturing jobs in 12 states, according to the American EV Jobs Alliance, an advocacy group. 

The GOP represents congressional districts with 19 of 25 major automaker battery and EV assembly plants in operation or under construction. Most of the remaining facilities in Democratic Party-represented districts are in states that supported Trump in the November election.

The concentration of EV facilities in Republican states has fueled hopes in the industry that IRA subsidies supporting battery production are more likely to survive than the consumer-facing tax credits.

Autos Drive America, which lobbies for foreign-owned carmakers, has said that preserving both the consumer credit for EVs and the manufacturing credits for domestic battery manufacturing are among its top legislative priorities for the year. Some carmakers have argued that eliminating the tax credits that bolster consumer demand will undermine the new EV and battery plants that are concentrated in Republican states.

Trump’s pledge to eliminate EV tax credits comes with a carrot for automakers: He wants to weaken Biden-era fuel efficiency rules that would effectively require half of all new car sales in 2032 to be battery-electric. Easing those rules would lessen the pressure on companies to sell more EVs.

That could in turn reduce the need for federal incentives and discounts to support EV sales, GM Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson said during an investor presentation on Tuesday.

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

Published

on

FASB Standardizes Carbon Offsets Accounting Rules

In a decisive move toward standardized environmental financial reporting, accounting standards boards issued updated implementation guidance during the week ending July 25, 2026, regarding the formal recognition and valuation of corporate carbon offsets and environmental credits. The revised frameworks establish precise rules for how enterprises must measure, record, and disclose carbon credits on balance sheets, eliminating years of inconsistent reporting practices across public capital markets.

Under the finalized accounting standard, purchased carbon offsets can no longer be categorized under vague administrative expenses or unstandardized intangible asset accounts. Instead, organizations must classify environmental credits based on underlying operational intent—distinguishing between credits held for immediate compliance compliance obligations, long-term offset obligations, or active market trading. Furthermore, companies are required to evaluate carbon holdings for fair value impairment at the end of each reporting period, ensuring that depreciated or low-quality environmental credits do not distort corporate asset values.

The standardized rules carry significant implications for corporate audit committees and chief accounting officers. External audit firms are implementing rigorous verification protocols to validate the physical legitimacy, legal ownership, and scientific permanence of carbon credits claimed on balance sheets. Inaccurate or overstated carbon accounting claims now carry substantial financial litigation risk, alongside potential regulatory enforcement for misleading ESG disclosures.

To remain fully compliant, corporate accounting departments must establish centralized carbon tracking systems integrated into primary standard ERP ledgers. Accounting teams that proactively adopt standardized environmental reporting protocols will build investor credibility, streamline annual audit processes, and insulate their organizations against evolving regulatory scrutiny.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Published

on

Automated Tax Compliance Tools Reduce Risk

Corporate tax departments reached a critical juncture in automated operational management. With nations worldwide rapidly enacting digital service taxes, localized value-added tax (VAT) mandates, and real-time electronic invoicing requirements, manual tax calculations have become obsolete. Modern corporate tax divisions are aggressively deploying AI-driven tax engine software to automate complex cross-border indirect tax calculations in real time.

The imperative for automated tax compliance stems from the sheer complexity of current trade policies and multi-jurisdictional commerce. E-commerce platforms, software vendors, and global manufacturers face constantly changing regional tax rates, statutory exemption rules, and cross-border tariff structures. Automated tax engines embed directly into enterprise enterprise resource planning (ERP) architectures, automatically applying correct tax codes at the point of sale, calculating real-time withholding amounts, and generating compliant e-invoices.

Automated audit trail generation represents another key advantage of modern tax tech integration. Advanced compliance platforms log every transactional tax determination on immutable digital ledgers, providing tax authorities with transparent, self-verifying audit trails. This capability drastically reduces the operational duration and administrative cost of corporate tax audits, protecting enterprises against severe penalties resulting from calculation errors or missed reporting deadlines.

For chief financial officers and tax directors, investing in automated tax compliance is a vital operational risk mitigation strategy. Automating routine tax calculations frees high-level accounting professionals to focus on strategic tax planning, transfer pricing optimization, and risk management in an increasingly complex global economic environment.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Trending