Connect with us

Accounting

Barry Melancon: The most important man in accounting

Published

on

Barry Melancon

The most important man in accounting originally intended to be a lawyer.

When Barry Melancon — who is retiring at the end of this year after three decades of leading the accounting profession as president and CEO of the American Institute of CPAs — started college at Nicholls State University in Louisiana in 1975, accounting wasn’t even on his radar.

“If you went back to my high school yearbook, I believe it would tell you that I wanted to be a lawyer,” he recalled, and when he started in his first semester, he was majoring in pre-law.

Coming from what he describes as “a very modest family” — his father had been pulled out of school in sixth grade to cut sugarcane by hand on the family farm — he explained that, “There wasn’t a frame of reference for me, really, about the CPA profession.”

That changed in his second semester, though, because he realized that he wanted to know more about business, and he chose accounting as a concentration largely because it offered the most comprehensive introduction to business: “If I majored in accounting, I would take all the other disciplines, because it was required — I would take management and marketing and economics and finance and, of course, accounting. And it just felt like if I wanted to know business — still probably within the back of my mind being a lawyer — that was going to give me the broadest base of knowledge.”

Then, in an epiphany experienced by countless CPAs before and since, he took the entry-level accounting course and was hooked.

“I liked it — I don’t think it’s the right course and we’re talking about changing it today, and I never thought it was the right course then,” he said. “It was way too mechanical to teach accounting. But I grasped the notion of what accountants really were doing, and so I changed my major into accounting after that first year.”

(See our 2024 list of the most influential people in the accounting profession.)

Having made the choice, he charged ahead at full speed, finishing his undergraduate accounting degree in 3 ½ years, quickly landing a job at a small local firm, Bergeron & Co., and making partner there by the unprecedented age of 25. Not long after that he became the head of the Society of Louisiana CPAs, and seven years later he was named the youngest-ever head of the AICPA at 37. (He was actually hired when he was 36, but they delayed his start date until after his birthday so it would look better in the press release.)

By the time he arrived at the institute, Melancon had long since fully committed himself to accounting — and he had strong ideas about where he wanted to take the profession, and that would mean major changes at its main membership organization.

“Professional bodies in any profession usually have a DNA about saying why a profession couldn’t or shouldn’t do things,” he explained. “And I think what we created and what I had a passion about was to be an organization that led a profession, that worked with the profession to actually give permission to be much broader than what it was, to see those opportunities and what was in the best interest of the profession and the public interest — not to be an organization that tried to figure out why you might want to be really careful, or to say you shouldn’t do these types of things.”

While it’s far from the only thing Melancon has accomplished during his long tenure, shifting the AICPA from being an inhibitor to an enabler — and driving the profession as a whole to be more open to new opportunities and approaches and risks — may well be how he’s had the most influence.

“We need to have a mindset of the things we can do, rather than the reasons why we can’t,” he said, “and I think the profession embodies that today.”

Getting it in writing

To understand how Melancon rose to the level where he was able to wield that kind of influence, it helps to know that he had it written on his list of goals from the get-go.

Early in his career at Bergeron, Melancon started keeping a written list (he still keeps it, only now it’s on his phone), because a partner at the firm suggested it.

“One time this partner and I were going to a client, and the partner was building a new house and we passed in front of his house and he said, ‘You see, even before my house is being built, we have a pool in it. I had a written goal.’ This is what he said: ‘I had a written goal to have a pool, and now I’m able to achieve that.’ And he basically impressed upon me — I might have been 21 at that point — how important written goals were.”

And high on the list Melancon started keeping was a goal that sounds an awful lot like a job description for the head of the AICPA: “Literally I had a written goal to fly around, get off a plane and give speeches,” he said with a laugh. “I mean, it wasn’t worded exactly like that.”

AICPA CEO and president Barry Melancon addressing the 2018 Engage event
Melancon at the 2018 Engage

AL POWERS

Also on the list was making partner by 25 — an objective he almost didn’t fulfill, because a client offered him a job at a substantially higher salary than he was making at his firm.

“I was at Bergeron & Co. about nine months, and I was making $15,000 a year, and I had a client offer me a job at $25,000,” he recalled. “And when you’re making $15,000, $25,000 is a big increase, right?”

Feeling tempted, he told the partners of the firm about the offer — and even today, 40 years later, he makes a point of telling firm leaders about their response: “What they did is they said, ‘Let’s go to lunch.’ We had a 2 ½-hour lunch and basically they painted a picture for me of what being a partner was going to be like in the firm — basically what they made — and they painted the picture so well and it was one of my goals, that it caused me to say, ‘I am not doing this.’ I’m not leaving because I will always regret not experiencing that outcome.”

Not every goal on the list gets fulfilled, though; for instance, he originally had a goal to retire at 55: “But when I got later in my career, I said that’s a really dumb goal.”

The people around you

Of course, merely willing a thing (even in writing) isn’t always enough to make it come true. It also takes hard work and determination, which Melancon has always been willing to put in — and it certainly helped that leaders all around him recognized his talent early.

“The people around you in your life really determine who you are, and it’s important to understand that,” he said.

The day he passed the CPA exam, for instance, a partner at Bergeron & Co. congratulated him by taking his own name off an LSCPA committee, and having them put Melancon on it.

“So literally I was on a society or a professional committee the first day I was a CPA in my career,” he said, and he only got more involved, chairing committees and putting his minor in government from Nicholls to good use on advocacy work in the state.

(See who the most influential people in the profession think are the most influential people for 2024.)

He was so active, in fact, that when the then-CEO of the society moved to the top spot at the Texas state society, both he and the CPA who succeeded him as head of the LSCPA offered Melancon the No. 2 spot at their respective organizations. Having just made partner at Bergeron, he turned them both down — but three years later when the Louisiana position opened up again and the then-chair made it clear that the job was his for the taking, he said yes.

“Really, what my wife and I talked about was that, in reality, we can go do this, and what’s the worst case? If I don’t like it, I can go back into public practice,” he said. “Those doors aren’t going to be closed to me.”

He couldn’t know that he wouldn’t return to public practice, and that his seven years at the Louisiana society would lead to him being so active with the AICPA that he would be considered a potential candidate to succeed then-president and CEO Phil Chenok in the mid-1990s.

But when the call came from search firm Korn Ferry, Melancon initially turned them down, too. “I told them no,” he recalled. “I said, ‘I’m probably too young for the institute to hire me and I don’t think that’s going to happen, and so I don’t think I’m going to put my name in.’ And about a month later, they called me back and they said, ‘Look, people want you to put your name in, and if you put your name in, I can guarantee you that you will be one of nine that gets interviewed.’ So, at that point, it’s sort of hard to say no to that.”

It wasn’t just the accountants recommending him to Korn Ferry who envisioned Melancon at the head of the institute. Much earlier, one of the leaders of the LSCPA saw it too. One component of his compensation involved deferred comp that would be forfeited if he left before serving for 10 years; at the time the position at the AICPA came open, Melancon had served seven years, but “unbeknownst to me, one of the society leaders had written into my contract a provision that said — and I didn’t ask for this — you forfeit unless you leave to be CEO of the AICPA. And that was written when I was 30.”

“It’s people around you who see things in you, at least in my case, that have been unbelievable in life,” he said. “For someone to see that in you, to me, is about what people around you make of you and what people around you contribute to you. When someone that was around me saw that — what an incredible compliment and support mechanism that was — it is amazing. I’ve had a lot of luck.”

Promising change

Melancon put his name in the ring, but still didn’t think he had a chance, even though he flew to California to meet the recruiter from Korn Ferry.

“We were supposed to have a one-hour dinner in the San Francisco airport,” he recalled. “And essentially I started that dinner off with, ‘Look, I didn’t go to a name-brand university. I’m 36 years old. I never worked in a big firm. I’m not from the Northeast. You and I both know that the institute is not going to hire me in this job. So, let me tell you what I think ought to happen.'”

The one-hour dinner ended four hours later, after Melancon had outlined all the changes he thought should be made at the institute. “And when I ultimately got into the role,” he said, “I did a lot of the stuff that we talked about.”

Barry Melancon - Engage 2021

Melancon speaking at Engage 2021

Despite — or perhaps because of — his candor with Korn Ferry, Melancon got the job, and felt empowered to implement the changes he had suggested. “I went in with the notion that people put me here and I was going to change the place,” he said. “And in the first 90 days I did a massive reorganization, including many people being asked to leave the institute.”

He cut headcount at the AICPA from 863 to below 600 (a level it maintained for 20 years, until it merged with the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants in 2016). He also began to build up the institute’s advocacy muscles, speed up its processes, promote high-potential talent (including current CEO of public accounting Sue Coffey), and to change what the institute meant to firms — particularly those below the Big Four, who had not been as engaged with the AICPA before.

“I knew the profession was changing and I knew that the institute could not be what a lot of people would have said that it was then — an ivory tower institute — and I also knew that we had to be more entrepreneurial and that the profession had to be more entrepreneurial and that’s what drove me, and we did it,” he said.

From there to the future

A wholesale reorganization of the leading organization in the profession would be accomplishment enough for many, but for Melancon, it served to give him a strong platform from which to lead accounting into the future.

The three decades of his tenure have been among the most tumultuous, unpredictable and full of change in accounting’s history, and Melancon has taken the lead in navigating the profession through two recessions, the collapse of Arthur Andersen and the Enron crisis, the creation of major new regulatory regimes in the form of Sarbanes-Oxley and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the rise of the internet and the cloud, a global pandemic, and most recently, the birth of artificial intelligence, through all of which he has charted a proactive course forward, rather than merely reacting.

All that time, Melancon and the institute were pursuing their own agenda — computerizing the CPA exam and taking it international, launching

CPA.com as its technology arm, exploring and proselytizing new services, launching initiatives to boost audit quality, working to promote diversity, aggressively pursuing solutions to the current pipeline program, and, perhaps most ambitiously, merging with CIMA to create an international powerhouse.

With so much to do, it’s easy to see why Melancon has stayed in his role longer than any other leader in AICPA history. “I went in at first with a five-year commitment, so you don’t really know how that is going to play out,” he said. “But I had a passion for the profession and I always have had confidence in myself, so I did not go in to the institute with the notion that this was going to be a short-term process.”

Even with his time at the institute almost up, Melancon is still looking forward, seeing the future course of the profession in his mind, spying out both challenges and opportunities.

He highlights artificial intelligence as a transformational technology that will, like the rise of the internet three decades ago, have repercussions for both society at large and the accounting profession.

“I am not one who’s going to say that with AI, the role of the human is going to be fine, or that it’s always going to be there. I don’t believe that at all,” he said. “I believe that just like a lot of other technologies change jobs, change the quantity of jobs in certain areas, change the expectations of what people do in jobs, it’s going to have an impact; it’s going to change how we define work in society not in the next two years but in the next decade.”

AI’s impact on the profession is going to be tied into an ongoing evolution in the structure of firms and how accountants progress in their careers. “The fundamental change for the profession is that we have been a profession that takes entry-level people … we take in entry-level people and we put them in an environment to progress upward to the middle of the organization,” he explained. “And it takes a while, and the key component of that is a broader set of competencies than just accounting and a broad notion of what you can call business acumen. And when you get to the middle part of an organization, whether it’s a finance function or a firm, your value-add to a client or to your employer is really about those broader skills and your business acumen.”

“Organizations like the AICPA and firms and professional accountancy bodies around the world need to think about how we take an entry-level accountant where technology is going to do the bulk of that entry-level accounting work and how we move them up quickly and get them those broader skills quicker so that they’re value-add players,” he explained. “It is an immense challenge, but we’re going to have to figure it out. And if we figure it out, then starting from human capital, our services are going to change.”

Those challenges will be for the next generation of leaders of the profession to deal with, but Melancon does have some advice for the accountants of the future ­— and it is, naturally, about taking a broader view of what they, and the profession, can do.

“If we go into every morning and we think, ‘We know accounting,’ we’re not going to have the same future as if we think, ‘We know business information,'” he said. “We really need to take our skills and our competencies and apply it to the broader footprint of business and do it right and effectively, with ethics. And if we do that, we’re going to have a lot of new and different opportunities, and the next generation of our profession is going to be even more successful than the current generation of our profession.”

Much of Melancon’s career can be summed up by a relentless drive to move accounting forward, to improve every aspect of it — but as he looks back, it’s not the impact he has had on the profession that is foremost in his mind, but rather the impact that the people in the profession had on him.

“I would thank the people that I have interacted with, the people in our profession, for how much I’ve learned from so many different people,” he said. “I find it really hard to believe someone can have a career that gets exposed to anything like what I’ve been exposed to, because CPAs and the profession are fantastic, and the people who interact with you and the questions they ask and the contributions they make are just tremendous. … And that knowledge makes one’s life — in my case, my life — so incredibly enjoyable and fulfilled that I’m very appreciative of the profession.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

COSO offers governance framework for robotic process automation

Published

on

The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission published a framework for imposing internal controls over robotic process automation.

COSO is jointly sponsored by the American Accounting Association, the American Institute of CPAs, Financial Executives International, the Institute of Management Accountants and the Institute of Internal Auditors.

The publication, Achieving Effective Internal Control Over Robotic Process Automation, was commissioned by COSO and co-authored by Marc Eulerich, a professor of internal auditing at the Mercator School of Management at the University Duisburg-Essen in Germany; Jan Gruene, a leader for Digital Internal Audit at Deloitte Germany’s Risk Advisory Practice; and David A. Wood, an accounting professor at Brigham Young University in Utah. It describes an RPA governance framework designed to help organizations maximize RPA benefits while mitigating risks through an effective internal control framework. COSO already provides widely used frameworks for internal controls and enterprise risk management and earlier this year began working with the National Association of Corporate Directors on developing a corporate governance framework.

Robotic process automation relies on computers to perform repetitive, rules-based tasks that have traditionally been performed by humans. However, the COSO paper notes that RPA technology comes with significant governance and control challenges that should be addressed to maximize RPA’s benefits while mitigating the associated risks. 

The white paper provides a guide for integrating RPA governance requirements with the COSO Internal Control Integrated Framework. COSO’s RPA governance framework identifies several governance areas and control requirements to address common challenges associated with RPA, including security vulnerabilities, process knowledge loss and uncontrolled bot proliferation. RPA offers significant advantages, but also introduces risks such as inconsistent bot deployment, increased potential for security breaches, and difficulties in scaling automation efforts. 

wind-lucia-coso.jpg

Lucia Wind

“The integration of RPA governance principles with the COSO-ICIF framework is an important step for organizations looking to not only leverage the benefits of automation but also maintain a robust system of internal controls,” said COSO executive director and chair Lucia Wind in a statement Thursday. “This publication provides practical strategies and best practices for ensuring that RPA implementations align with established governance principles, thus protecting organizations from emerging risks and enabling long-term success.”

COSO acknowledged that RPA offers organizations significant efficiency, cost savings and accuracy improvements, but warned that it also introduces some unique governance and internal control challenges. RPA provides ease of use, low cost, and scalability but that can lead to ad-hoc implementations that bypass traditional IT governance frameworks, creating potential security risks and operational inefficiencies. The paper discusses how organizations can align RPA governance with the five key components of the COSO-ICIF framework: control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities.

“By addressing each component of the COSO framework in relation to RPA, organizations can develop a holistic approach to governance that supports both innovation and control,” Wind stated.

By mitigating the various risks through a structured internal control framework, organizations can make sure their RPA initiatives contribute to overall operational effectiveness while maintaining a high standard of governance and risk management.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Chips have fallen

Published

on

Dutch treat; for the record; last Resort; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

New York: Frank Butselaar, a native of Naarden, Netherlands, has pleaded guilty to one count of aiding or assisting in the filing of a false or fraudulent return.

Butselaar advised the creation of offshore structures for ultra-high-net-worth individuals and did so while a shareholder in the Amsterdam office of a major U.S.-based international law firm. When the clients were becoming or had become U.S. tax residents, Butselaar and his co-conspirators, who were partners at the firm, sought to conceal the clients’ offshore income through nominee owners, generally a family member who lived outside the U.S. The clients, with the knowledge of Butselaar and his co-conspirators, unknowingly continued to operate their offshore entities as their own and believed they had access to and could direct the money they were accumulating offshore.

The amount of unreported income for two of the client taxpayers exceeded $70 million. Butselaar was also repeatedly warned that the income being collected offshore for his clients was reportable.

He faces up to three years in prison. Sentencing is Feb. 13.

St. Louis: Tax preparer Robert Droege, 59, has been sentenced to 46 months in prison for filing false returns that caused an estimated tax loss of $2.5 million.

Droege pleaded guilty in June to four counts of aiding in the preparation of a fraudulent return, admitting to preparing at least 34 false returns in his home office, Bob’s Tax Service.

He prepared returns that contained false or fraudulent information including medical expenses, charitable contributions, personal property rental expenses, non-business bad debt and other deductions.

White Plains, Maryland: Part-time tax preparer Anthony Judd has pleaded guilty to preparing and filing a false return for a client.

Since at least 2013, Judd, who was also a full-time special police officer at the National Archives and Records Administration, prepared and filed more than 40 false returns for individual clients that reduced the clients’ taxes and inflated refunds. These returns reported losses for businesses that the clients did not have and deductions for expenses, such as transportation and job-related expenses, that the clients did not actually incur.

Judd prepared and filed each return as a ghost preparer and caused a tax loss to the IRS of some $484,525.

Sentencing is April 16. He faces a maximum of three years in prison as well as a period of supervised release, restitution and monetary penalties.

Naples, Florida: Tax preparer Heidi Torres-Moncaleano, 45, has been sentenced to a year and a day in prison for aiding in the preparation of false and fraudulent income tax returns.

From 2018 through 2021, Torres-Moncaleano, through her business Torres Tax Services, submitted fraudulent returns and Schedules C to the IRS, inflating clients’ losses to generate larger refunds. The federal tax loss exceeded $847,000.

Torres-Moncaleano, who pleaded guilty in April, was also sentenced to a year of supervised release with the condition that she pay $429,888 in restitution to the IRS.

Hands-in-jail-Blotter

New York: Ilya Kahn, a national of the U.S., Israel and Russia, has pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the Export Control Reform Act for his role in a scheme to secure and illegally export dual-use semiconductors and other sensitive technology to Joint Stock Company Research and Development Center Elvees and other entities in Russia. Kahn also pleaded guilty to attempted tax evasion for failing to pay taxes on his income from the scheme.

Kahn owns Senesys Incorporated and Sensor Design Association, which operated in California and Brooklyn, New York. Kahn operated these businesses as fronts for a years-long conspiracy to acquire and export sensitive and sophisticated dual-use electronics from the U.S. to Elvees, one of the leading Russian developers of microchips and which was sanctioned by the U.S. in 2022.

Many of these items required an export license for national security and anti-terrorism reasons, which Kahn did not obtain. He also arranged for Elvees to continue to fabricate and import semiconductors after Russia’s February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, using a network of front companies and bank accounts.

Kahn’s export activity for the benefit of Elvees dates to at least 2012, and accounts under his control received more than $50 million from Elvees and related entities between 2012 and 2022. Of that money, Kahn channeled nearly $5 million for his personal use, which he did not report to the IRS and on which he did not pay income taxes.

Kahn agreed to forfeit $4,923,548.94 and to pay an additional $1,892,816.00 in restitution to the IRS. He also faces up to 20 years in prison.

Newark, New Jersey: Insurance broker Joseph Schwartz of Suffern, New York, has admitted his role in a $38 million employment tax fraud scheme involving nursing homes.

He pleaded guilty to two counts of an indictment charging him with willfully failing to pay over employment taxes withheld from employees of his company and willfully failing to file a Form 5500 for a 401(k).

Schwartz, operator of Skyline Management Group, with headquarters in New Jersey, failed to pay employment taxes relating to health care and rehabilitation facilities that Skyline operated in 11 states. From October 2017 through May 2018, Schwartz caused taxes to be withheld from employees’ pay but failed to then pay over more than $38 million in employment taxes to the IRS. He also failed to file the 5500.

The employment tax fraud count carries up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense, whichever is greater. The failure to file a Form 5500 carries a maximum of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense. Sentencing is April 10.

Cape Coral, Florida: William Skaggs Jr. and Billie Adkison have pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit tax fraud.

Skaggs owned and operated Nastar Roofing; Adkison was the main office administrator for Nastar, and her duties included managing the company’s payroll. Between 2013 and 2023, Nastar paid its employees predominantly in cash to avoid paying taxes the pair knew were owed to the federal government. Typically, one or more Nastar employees, including Skaggs and Adkison, withdrew significant amounts of cash on Thursdays and Fridays to make Nastar’s payroll at the end of the work week.

Between 2013 and 2023, Nastar employees withdrew more than $21 million from the company’s bank accounts to pay employees in cash. The company did not withhold taxes from the cash payments, nor did it pay its own share of FICA taxes.

Skaggs and Adkison have agreed to make full restitution to the United States for the employment taxes, including an upfront partial restitution payment of $1 million before their sentencing. Each faces up to five years in prison.

Ocala, Florida: Tax preparer Steven Cabrera has been sentenced to three years in prison for assisting in preparing false tax documents, submitting false tax documents and willfully failing to file returns.

From 2017 to 2019, Cabrera, who pleaded guilty in August, engaged in widespread tax fraud, adding unauthorized and fraudulent deductions and credits to clients’ returns without their knowledge and then embezzling the additional tax return money.

He also defrauded clients directly by telling them to make out checks to “IRS” and pledging that he would send the funds to the IRS himself. Instead, he deposited those checks into an account he controlled for a fictitious business, “International Resort Services.”

Cabrera caused total losses of nearly $1 million.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Republicans urge end to IRS Direct File

Published

on

A group of Republican lawmakers have sent a letter to the incoming administration asking that it end the IRS Direct File service, ideally via a day one executive order. 

The IRS piloted the program—developed as part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2021—this past tax season, available in 12 states: Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming. Around 140,000 taxpayers used the service, and the response, according to surveys of users, was very positive, with over 90% rating their experience either “excellent” or “above average.” The IRS said it aims to double the reach of the program next filing season. 

Republicans have long been critical of the program, saying it was not officially authorized and that its overall implementation has been highly wasteful. The letter divides the total amount budgeted by the total number of taxpayers who took part and concluded that the cost was $814 per return. Beyond procedural issues and cost, Republicans have also raised concerns about the fact that Direct File makes the IRS a tax assessor, collector, preparer, and enforcer in one, which they believe represents a clear conflict of interest as well as an invitation for government overreach. The letter sent to the income administration went over these points again, saying the government can find better use of its resources. 

“This is not an efficient use of government resources, especially when the private sector offers better tax preparation services at no cost to the federal government and taxpayers already have the option to file their taxes for free using the pre-existing public-private partnership between the IRS and many tax preparation and filing software companies—Free File. The IRS can, and should, spend a fraction of the resources it spent on creating a government run program on promoting existing free options. The results of such efforts would be better for all taxpayers,” said the letter. 

In contrast, Democratic lawmakers in October urged the IRS to make the Direct File program more accessible, specifically by relaxing some of the identification requirements. The service, said the Democrats, operates at a significant disadvantage compared to commercial tax prep services due to its stringent identity verification requirements in the form of the ID.me service, which is used by both the federal government and several state governments. ID.me credentials are assessed against the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Identity Assurance Level 2 standard. The letter noted that private tax preparation companies are not assessed against IAL standards but basically operate at a Level 1 basis, as users simply assert their identity.

“Requiring them to use ID.me is creating yet another needless barrier to exactly these taxpayers who need Direct File most to claim tax benefits, as it has been with other government benefits,” said the Democrats’ letter.  

Continue Reading

Trending