Connect with us

Accounting

Steps to take as bonus depreciation phases down

Published

on

As we enter the beginning of 2025, bonus depreciation continues to leverage down as more portions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire. Bonus depreciation was one of the significant provisions in the TCJA, with 100% bonus depreciation by the end of 2022. Unfortunately, this was a temporary provision, and the amount of bonus depreciation started leveraging down by 20% per year in 2023; going into 2025, the bonus depreciation rate will be 40%.

To understand how to make decisions, it is essential to understand how bonus depreciation works. Bonus depreciation is an acceleration of depreciation adjustments into the first year. Eligible property includes assets with a life of 20 years or less. This can include personal property, land improvements and qualified improvement property. Critical to the availability of bonus depreciation for many taxpayers is that the TCJA extended bonus depreciation to used and new property. This means a taxpayer purchasing an existing warehouse can use bonus depreciation to accelerate the land improvements, such as the parking lot and any personal property acquired along with the property.

Unfortunately, with bonus leveraging down, the value of this accelerated depreciation deduction is lessened. Going into 2025, the bonus depreciation rate is only 40%; this means that a taxpayer who purchases a parking lot for $100,000 would get a $40,000 bonus depreciation expense, and the remaining $60,000 would be depreciated over 15 years at a 150% declining balance method.  

One of the main goals of the incoming administration is to bring back the TCJA policies; this will likely include reinstatement of 100% bonus depreciation moving forward. It is important to note that this will likely only impact assets acquired after the law is enacted. If we look at past extensions of bonus depreciation, they have been prospective only. For example, when the TCJA came out in 2017, property acquired after Sept. 27, 2017 was eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. However, assets acquired before that date were subject to the old rules. What does this mean for businesses in 2025? 

Unfortunately, businesses acquiring assets before the anticipated announcement of the new regulations will most likely be subject to the current bonus depreciation amounts. Even if a taxpayer delays placing an asset in service, they will most likely be subject to the current rules, as the new law will look at when the taxpayer was under contract or started construction.

For taxpayers completing projects in early 2025 or even 2024, what are some options to expand the value of expensing? One option for many taxpayers is to look closely at 179 expensing. Section 179 allows taxpayers to deduct the cost of qualifying improvements immediately, including personal property and some real property, including qualified improvement property, roof replacements and HVAC replacements, when installed on nonresidential real property. However, like all good things, 179 has restrictions. Section 179 is limited to $1,000,000 indexed for inflation; for 2024, this inflation increase means up to $1,220,000 in eligible assets qualify.

One of the biggest issues is that not all investments are eligible for 179; first, Section 179 of the code limits the use if a business acquires more than $2,500,000, indexed for inflation, of eligible assets. The bigger restriction for many investors is that 179 is limited to assets used to create income “from a trade or business.” This traditionally means that assets held simply for an investment will not qualify for this deduction. Under Publication 946, the IRS states that “investment property, rental property (if renting property is not your trade or business), and property that produces royalties” do not qualify.

So, what are taxpayers to do in 2025? The first thing is that taxpayers who qualify for 179 must consider 179 when completing their taxes. Making sure to maximize 179 over bonus depreciation can make a massive difference in the tax liability for individuals. The other thing taxpayers should do is look to maximize their eligible property through cost segregation or other depreciation analyses to make sure they are getting every dollar of deduction to come their way.

What should taxpayers not do in 2025? Right now, the biggest mistake taxpayers can make is to wait for Congress to act on a new tax bill before moving forward. As mentioned above, the likelihood is that any tax bill will change these items only in a prospective manner. Waiting for a tax law change for most taxpayers will have little effect on assets they are already under contract to acquire. While a tax bill could affect future investments, it will most likely not affect 2024 tax planning or investments in early 2025.

While tax policy could change dramatically in 2025 under the new administration, understanding the interaction of 179 and bonus depreciation can drastically affect outcomes in 2024 and 2025 tax returns. While planning for changes in the Tax Code can be beneficial, taxpayers must also look at how to maximize savings based on the current law.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending