Connect with us

Accounting

Trump sets 25% steel, aluminum tariffs, widening trade war

Published

on

President Donald Trump ordered a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports, escalating his efforts to protect politically important U.S. industries with levies hitting some of the country’s closest allies.

The tariffs will apply widely to all U.S. imports of steel and aluminum, including from Canada and Mexico, among the country’s top foreign suppliers of the metals. The levies, which also include finished metal products, are meant to crack down on what administration officials said were efforts by countries like Russia and China to circumvent existing duties. 

Trump cast the effort as one that would help bolster domestic production and bring more jobs to the U.S., and warned that the rate on metal tariffs “may go higher.” The new rates will take effect on March 12, at 12:01 am Washington time, according to a pair of proclamations issued by the White House late Monday.

“It’s going to mean a lot of businesses are going to be opening in the United States,” Trump said Monday as he signed the measures in the Oval Office.

The announcement of Trump’s metals tariffs comes about a week after he added a 10% duty on all Chinese imports. Economists warn that higher border taxes paid by American importers risk raising costs for everything from groceries to gasoline — potentially stoking the very inflationary pressures the president campaigned on quelling. 

U.S. administration officials counter, however, that the levies are part of a broader economic strategy — including extended tax cuts and expanded domestic energy production — that will help lower costs overall.

Retaliation, costs

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said Trump’s plan to impose 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports will largely be passed through to U.S. prices, if no major trading partners are exempted.

Trump’s tariffs will also provoke trading partners including the European Union to retaliate against American exports.

In response to Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Tuesday in a statement that “unjustified tariffs on the EU will not go unanswered — they will trigger firm and proportionate countermeasures.”

In a speech, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said if the U.S. “leaves us no other choice, then the European Union will react to this as one. As the largest market in the world with 450 million citizens, we have the strength to do so.”

The EU should be able to retaliate quickly if the U.S. follows through on its threat. The bloc suspended tariffs on about $3 billion of American products in 2021 after it reached a deal with the Biden administration on steel and aluminium imports. It could quickly reinstitute those duties, which targeted iconic products including Harley-Davidson Inc. motorcycles and Levi Strauss & Co. jeans. could not be loaded, either because the server or network failed or because the format is not supported.

While the measures unveiled Monday didn’t include exemptions for trading partners — and U.S. officials said they were wary of granting any leeway — Trump indicated that he may consider a break for Australia, crediting the country’s import of U.S.-made aircraft.

After-hours movement was muted in shares of the major American steel and aluminum producers. Alcoa Corp., the largest American aluminum producer, gained about 1%, while Nucor Corp., the largest U.S. steelmaker, rose 0.5%. U.S. equity futures were down 0.2% during mid-day trade in Asia on Tuesday.

The U.S. president also reiterated his threat to levy reciprocal tariffs against countries that have levies on U.S. imports, saying those could be announced over the next two days. And he said the administration will be looking at levies on cars and semiconductors, as well as other potential sectors. not supported.

Trump authorized the new tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which gives the president broad authority to impose trade restrictions on domestic security grounds. It’s the same power that Trump used to levy steel and aluminum tariffs in 2018, during his first term. With his proclamations Monday, he is effectively reviving and expanding those tariffs.

The U.S. saw a bump in manufacturing employment fueled by Trump’s tax cuts early in his last administration. But things started to change after he introduced the steel and aluminum tariffs in March 2018 and also launched a trade war against China. 

In 2019, the first full year after Trump’s initial steel and aluminum tariffs went into effect, the U.S. actually lost manufacturing jobs and the broader factory sector entered a slump with industrial production falling.

A senior administration official said the new action was necessary because steel and aluminum exporters abused exceptions under the previous policy, which hurt U.S. producers. The official detailed the moves on a call with reporters earlier Monday on condition of anonymity.

Trump’s decision to include downstream finished products is a significant move that will have broad-reaching price impacts on a massive swath of U.S. consumers. 

Whereas Trump’s 2018 tariffs focused mostly on raw steelmaking and primary aluminum production, these new tariffs will include things like extrusions and slabs that are turned into value-added products needed in everything from automobiles to window frames and skyscrapers. The move would fulfill what the most extreme trade protectionists have sought for years.

In Washington, the National Association of Home Builders said that tariffs will likely hinder Trump’s goal to reduce housing costs and boost supply.

“His move to impose 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum products imports into the U.S. runs totally counter to this goal by raising home building costs, deterring new development and frustrating efforts to rebuild in the wake of natural disasters,” NAHB Chairman Carl Harris said in an emailed statement.

Border checks

Trump will also direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to step up oversight to prevent foreign countries from misclassifying steel products to evade tariffs, the officials said.

The effort reprises a strategy Trump adopted during his first term, when he imposed tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum that prompted a decline in U.S. imports of the metals. 

Trump ended up granting duty-free status to several major exporters, including Canada, Mexico and Brazil. Former President Joe Biden expanded those exemptions.

It’s unclear how countries might respond to Trump’s latest decision on metals. New retaliatory Chinese levies over the 10% tariff on goods took effect on Monday. Last week Trump delayed until March 4 the imposition of a 25% tax on goods from Canada and Mexico.  

“Steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada, the United States’ closest ally, would be totally unjustified,” François-Philippe Champagne, Canada’s minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, said in a statement Monday night. “Canadian steel and aluminum support key industries in the U.S. from defense, shipbuilding, energy to automotive.”

The U.S. is heavily reliant on aluminum imports to meet domestic demand, with many of those supplies coming from Canada, the United Arab Emirates and China. Net imports of aluminum reached more than 80% in 2023, according to Morgan Stanley. 

Although foreign steel represents a smaller portion of overall consumption, the aerospace, auto manufacturing and energy sectors rely on imported specialty grades. 

Opponents overseas say the widespread tariffs violate global trading rules and are an affront to U.S. allies abroad.

The move comes before a visit from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi this week. India is a supplier of steel to the U.S. and the Indian Steel Association, a lobbying group, has urged the government to take diplomatic action to secure exemptions from US trade restrictions. 

Trump made reviving U.S. steelmaking a signature aim of his agenda; it also was a potent political promise in Rust Belt states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania that have seen an erosion of industrial manufacturing jobs. While the United Steelworkers union, which is influential in such states, endorsed his general-election rival — former Vice President Kamala Harris — many local chapters backed Trump. 

On Friday, Trump declared he would continue blocking a bid by Japan’s Nippon Steel Corp. to take over United States Steel Corp. — a deal that is also opposed by the steelworkers union. Instead, the president said after a meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba that Nippon Steel might make a significant investment in the U.S. steelmaker, allowing it to remain an American company with significant foreign backing.

Continue Reading

Accounting

IAASB tweaks standards on working with outside experts

Published

on

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board is proposing to tailor some of its standards to align with recent additions to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants when it comes to using the work of an external expert.

The proposed narrow-scope amendments involve minor changes to several IAASB standards:

  • ISA 620, Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert;
  • ISRE 2400 (Revised), Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements;
  • ISAE 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information;
  • ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-upon Procedures Engagements.

The IAASB is asking for comments via a digital response template that can be found on the IAASB website by July 24, 2025.

In December 2023, the IESBA approved an exposure draft for proposed revisions to the IESBA’s Code of Ethics related to using the work of an external expert. The proposals included three new sections to the Code of Ethics, including provisions for professional accountants in public practice; professional accountants in business and sustainability assurance practitioners. The IESBA approved the provisions on using the work of an external expert at its December 2024 meeting, establishing an ethical framework to guide accountants and sustainability assurance practitioners in evaluating whether an external expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity to use their work, as well as provisions on applying the Ethics Code’s conceptual framework when using the work of an outside expert.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tariffs will hit low-income Americans harder than richest, report says

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s tariffs would effectively cause a tax increase for low-income families that is more than three times higher than what wealthier Americans would pay, according to an analysis from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

The report from the progressive think tank outlined the outcomes for Americans of all backgrounds if the tariffs currently in effect remain in place next year. Those making $28,600 or less would have to spend 6.2% more of their income due to higher prices, while the richest Americans with income of at least $914,900 are expected to spend 1.7% more. Middle-income families making between $55,100 and $94,100 would pay 5% more of their earnings. 

Trump has imposed the steepest U.S. duties in more than a century, including a 145% tariff on many products from China, a 25% rate on most imports from Canada and Mexico, duties on some sectors such as steel and aluminum and a baseline 10% tariff on the rest of the country’s trading partners. He suspended higher, customized tariffs on most countries for 90 days.

Economists have warned that costs from tariff increases would ultimately be passed on to U.S. consumers. And while prices will rise for everyone, lower-income families are expected to lose a larger portion of their budgets because they tend to spend more of their earnings on goods, including food and other necessities, compared to wealthier individuals.

Food prices could rise by 2.6% in the short run due to tariffs, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab. Among all goods impacted, consumers are expected to face the steepest price hikes for clothing at 64%, the report showed. 

The Yale Budget Lab projected that the tariffs would result in a loss of $4,700 a year on average for American households.

Continue Reading

Accounting

At Schellman, AI reshapes a firm’s staffing needs

Published

on

Artificial intelligence is just getting started in the accounting world, but it is already helping firms like technology specialist Schellman do more things with fewer people, allowing the firm to scale back hiring and reduce headcount in certain areas through natural attrition. 

Schellman CEO Avani Desai said there have definitely been some shifts in headcount at the Top 100 Firm, though she stressed it was nothing dramatic, as it mostly reflects natural attrition combined with being more selective with hiring. She said the firm has already made an internal decision to not reduce headcount in force, as that just indicates they didn’t hire properly the first time. 

“It hasn’t been about reducing roles but evolving how we do work, so there wasn’t one specific date where we ‘started’ the reduction. It’s been more case by case. We’ve held back on refilling certain roles when we saw opportunities to streamline, especially with the use of new technologies like AI,” she said. 

One area where the firm has found such opportunities has been in the testing of certain cybersecurity controls, particularly within the SOC framework. The firm examined all the controls it tests on the service side and asked which ones require human judgment or deep expertise. The answer was a lot of them. But for the ones that don’t, AI algorithms have been able to significantly lighten the load. 

“[If] we don’t refill a role, it’s because the need actually has changed, or the process has improved so significantly [that] the workload is lighter or shared across the smarter system. So that’s what’s happening,” said Desai. 

Outside of client services like SOC control testing and reporting, the firm has found efficiencies in administrative functions as well as certain internal operational processes. On the latter point, Desai noted that Schellman’s engineers, including the chief information officer, have been using AI to help develop code, which means they’re not relying as much on outside expertise on the internal service delivery side of things. There are still people in the development process, but their roles are changing: They’re writing less code, and doing more reviewing of code before it gets pushed into production, saving time and creating efficiencies. 

“The best way for me to say this is, to us, this has been intentional. We paused hiring in a few areas where we saw overlaps, where technology was really working,” said Desai.

However, even in an age awash with AI, Schellman acknowledges there are certain jobs that need a human, at least for now. For example, the firm does assessments for the FedRAMP program, which is needed for cloud service providers to contract with certain government agencies. These assessments, even in the most stable of times, can be long and complex engagements, to say nothing of the less predictable nature of the current government. As such, it does not make as much sense to reduce human staff in this area. 

“The way it is right now for us to do FedRAMP engagements, it’s a very manual process. There’s a lot of back and forth between us and a third party, the government, and we don’t see a lot of overall application or technology help… We’re in the federal space and you can imagine, [with] what’s going on right now, there’s a big changing market condition for clients and their pricing pressure,” said Desai. 

As Schellman reduces staff levels in some places, it is increasing them in others. Desai said the firm is actively hiring in certain areas. In particular, it’s adding staff in technical cybersecurity (e.g., penetration testers), the aforementioned FedRAMP engagements, AI assessment (in line with recently becoming an ISO 42001 certification body) and in some client-facing roles like marketing and sales. 

“So, to me, this isn’t about doing more with less … It’s about doing more of the right things with the right people,” said Desai. 

While these moves have resulted in savings, she said that was never really the point, so whatever the firm has saved from staffing efficiencies it has reinvested in its tech stack to build its service line further. When asked for an example, she said the firm would like to focus more on penetration testing by building a SaaS tool for it. While Schellman has a proof of concept developed, she noted it would take a lot of money and time to deploy a full solution — both of which the firm now has more of because of its efficiency moves. 

“What is the ‘why’ behind these decisions? The ‘why’ for us isn’t what I think you traditionally see, which is ‘We need to get profitability high. We need to have less people do more things.’ That’s not what it is like,” said Desai. “I want to be able to focus on quality. And the only way I think I can focus on quality is if my people are not focusing on things that don’t matter … I feel like I’m in a much better place because the smart people that I’ve hired are working on the riskiest and most complicated things.”

Continue Reading

Trending