Connect with us

Accounting

AICPA, NASBA propose alternative pathway to CPA licensure

Published

on

The American Institute of CPAs and the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy have proposed changes in the Uniform Accountancy Act model legislation used by states to provide an additional path to CPA licensure, while preserving CPA mobility across the states.

The AICPA and NASBA asked the joint UAA committee to draft proposed model law language in two main areas: A bachelor’s degree plus two years of experience as a pathway to licensure that incorporates a broad role for experience, to be determined at the state level; and individual-based practice privilege that incorporates a CPA’s ability to practice across state lines. 

The recommended changes come as state CPA societies and lawmakers in various states have been looking at ways to attract more young people to the accounting profession, providing more flexibility in attaining a CPA license without jeopardizing the ability of CPAs to practice across state lines. Last month, Ohio’s governor signed into law a bill backed by the Ohio Society of CPAs that provides alternatives to the traditional 150-credit hour requirement.

The AICPA and NASBA have been looking at recommendations through a National Pipeline Advisory Group, which issued a report last year.

The comment letters received in response to two recent AICPA and NASBA exposure drafts, along with early 2025 state legislative activity such as Ohio’s indicate a growing preference for an individual practice privilege and a bachelor’s degree plus two years of experience path. Feedback also supported a more in-depth study of competencies as they relate to the experience requirement.

“The accounting profession has seen a remarkable convergence in recent weeks of stakeholders around flexibility that creates greater access for those who are interested in pursuing a career in accounting,” said Susan Coffey, CEO of public accounting at the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. “A bachelor’s plus two years of experience path, in which states define the needed skills and competencies, is responsive to the market and protects the public.”

The proposal would maintain the existing two pathways of a master’s degree plus one year of experience, as well as a bachelor’s degree plus 30 credits plus one year of experience.

The UAA is jointly published by AICPA and NASBA and gives state legislatures and boards of accountancy a national model they can either adopt as is or adapt to meet the needs of each jurisdiction. The proposed UAA language will be open for public comment for 60 days.

“We look forward to the expertise and perspectives the 55 U.S. licensing jurisdictions will share during this next comment period,” said NASBA president and CEO Daniel Dustin in a statement. “We believe that any new proposal, and the feedback received from all stakeholders, will not only result in a thriving profession but also one that, because it keeps its eye on protecting the public, will allow that public to continue to trust in a CPA’s work.” 

The AICPA and NASBA opened a call for comments last September asking about a proposed initiative to help CPA candidates meet initial licensure requirements by exhibiting their competency in specific professional and technical areas. Later that month, they also issued a set of corresponding UAA model legislative amendments for discussion. Comments on the proposals can be accessed through the NASBA and AICPA websites. The feedback indicated support for the concept of competencies, but not as proposed. Based on the volume and nature of responses, the AICPA and NASBA agreed to table the framework for intended purposes. 

“Through continued collaboration and alignment, we’ll be able to achieve this shared goal of growing pathways into the profession, while protecting the public,” said Carla McCall, who serves as AICPA chair and co-chair of the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. “This is an important and exciting step for our profession. We are ready to get this done.”

“The input and feedback from the members of the Boards of Accountancy and key stakeholders in the accounting profession is crucial to the UAA process,” said NASBA chair Maria Caldwell in a statement. “We appreciate the continued collaboration and expertise of the members of the joint UAA Committee.”

The feedback received on last September’s proposals indicated support for the concept of competencies, but not as proposed. Based on the volume and nature of responses, the AICPA and NASBA agreed to table the framework for intended purposes. 

“As such, we are exploring plans for a longer-term, data-driven approach working with stakeholders to understand how competencies can help shape the future of our profession,” Coffey stated. “This aligns with recommendations made in 2024 by the National Pipeline Advisory Group and reinforces the profession’s longstanding commitment to competence as a core principle already in our profession’s Code of Professional Conduct and in the UAA.”

The AICPA and NASBA plan to work to redefine the UAA processes for greater inclusivity and transparency, as well as devote more resources to helping CPAs with navigating practice mobility as states enact legislation. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending