Connect with us

Accounting

KPMG report encourages AI for sustainability

Published

on

A KPMG report says that AI, despite its large energy burden, can still be a positive tool for corporate sustainability efforts. 

The report, “AI for the Chief Sustainability Officer: Understanding the Intersection of AI and Sustainability,” notes there are many ways entities can use AI to reduce their environmental impact and advance their sustainability goals. 

AI-driven analytics, for example, can help a company gain deeper insights into their carbon footprint as well as identify inefficiencies for target emission reduction measures. It could also be used to optimize energy and water consumption in buildings and industrial processes, as well as supply chain logistics, via analysis of real-time use patterns. The report also explains that AI can be used for sustainability reporting, which often draws on many different data sources, both financial and nonfinancial. KPMG noted that AI can be an innovation tool that can assist in designing sustainable products and services, as well as forecast extreme weather events and analyze historical and real-time market data to predict future trends. 

KPMG noted that it is using AI for these purposes itself. For clients, the firm uses AI to identify its most impactful decarbonization pathways for target reduction, offers AI-guided solutions to accelerate reporting and compliance with sustainability standards, provide optimized AI tools that can reduce manual efforts within the sustainability data management and reporting process, as well as offer ongoing guidance on emerging AI technologies. 

And for itself, the firm said it is actively working to integrate AI and sustainability into its larger environmental strategy. It is currently exploring the development of AI tools that will help enhance its sustainability professionals’ efficiency and accuracy. Beyond that, it’s also working with international teams to assess the impact of their own AI use, especially on data centers they own, as well as within the context of Scope 2 emissions. KPMG is working with its key technology partners to understand the impact of AI use outside its direct control. The firm sees sustainability as a core component of its trusted AI framework. 

Despite these measures, there is the matter of AI being highly energy intensive. For instance, in Google’s most recent environment report, it revealed that its emissions have increased 13% from last year and 48% from their 2019 target, which the tech company mainly attributed to a rise in data center energy consumption and supply chain emissions, which it said was at least partially due to AI. The company conceded that as it further integrates AI into its products, reducing emissions may be challenging due to increasing energy demands from the greater intensity of AI computing, and the emissions associated with the expected increases in its technical infrastructure investment. For example, another estimate says that one query to ChatGPT uses approximately as much electricity as lighting one lightbulb for about 20 minutes. The KPMG report acknowledged this can be a challenge but is hopeful that technological advances can address the issue. 

“The computational power required for AI can lead to significant resource use and an increase in emissions, potentially offsetting sustainability gains,” said the report. “However, recent advancements in energy-efficient AI technologies and renewable infrastructure are promising in reducing energy consumption, carbon emissions and water usage. As the AI landscape continues to rapidly evolve in cost and energy efficiencies, companies may focus on emissions from owned data centers and cloud computing providers, in order to create a clear path to decarbonize.” 

Tegan Keele, KPMG US climate data and tech leader, who co-authored the report, said in an email that while AI does consume a lot of energy, it’s not the whole story when it comes to emissions. 

“While companies should be mindful of AI’s energy footprint, focusing on AI computing alone won’t move the needle on emissions. We need to look holistically at overall Scope 2 consumption and value chain impacts,” said Keele. 

Maura Hodge, KPMG US’s sustainability leader and another of the report’s authors, added that KPMG’s own efforts to help clients reduce their carbon footprint, in turn, can be useful in creating a net environmental benefit for AI solutions. 

“This is why at KPMG, we’re actively working to maximize AI’s immense potential to help drive decarbonization, while simultaneously mitigating the impacts of its energy and water consumption. It’s about finding a way to strike the balance, where AI ultimately delivers net positive environmental impact,” said Hodge. “We recommend that companies work closely with their technology partners to understand the full impact of their AI usage and development, especially for operations outside their direct control.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending