Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.
Layoffs and other executive moves at the Internal Revenue Service are the latest in a series of ripples the Trump administration has made in the tax arena, from proposed tariffs to extending the landmark Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.
Accountants and tax pros are left asking how new reporting standards, congressional budget efforts and a thinned-out IRS will impact the ongoing tax season.
Thousands of employees across the IRS’s divisions responsible for small business and self-employed filers, enforcement and collection duties and handling processing responsibilities were laid off on Feb. 20, further complicating the IRS’s struggles with retaining talent. Most of them were hired by the agency on a probationary basis with funding from the Inflation Reduction Act.
These firings have former IRS commissioners concerned that the agency’s progress towards improving filing turnarounds will now be upended, leaving senior staffers to pick up the slack.
“A lot of these people have been there a year to two years, and are revenue agents and revenue officers, but also customer service,” John Koskinen, who was IRS commissioner from 2013-2017, told Accounting Today. “They can do more standard work, so the more senior people can handle a more complicated issue. … So when you wipe them out, the more senior people then have to fill the gaps to the extent they can.”
Bipartisan legislators have been working to advance proposals that, if passed, would improve the digital filing process for taxpayers and provide more flexibility in the IRS’s “math error” calculations. The House Ways and Means Committee passed both bills in February.
Mark Giallonardo, tax partner-in-charge for Top 25 Firm Cherry Bekaert’s south Florida region, said that for now, accountants need to first manage filing expectations to help clients weather these delays, while prioritizing electronic filings and payments to minimize the slowdown in processing and problem resolution.
Fraud has also become a growing concern among accountants, as the IRS’s diminished enforcement capabilities fuel concerns of bad actors falling through the cracks.
Data released by the agency’s Criminal Investigations unit showed that for the 2024 fiscal year, IRS-CI was successful in identifying over $9.1 billion in total fraud, obtaining court orders totaling $1.7 billion in restitution to the IRS and seizing approximately $1.2 billion in criminal assets.
Noteworthy cases from the IRS-CI include one of the agency’s first indictments and guilty pleas of a U.S. taxpayer solely for not paying taxes on gains from cryptocurrency sales, as well as the $4 billion Binance settlement over violations of the Bank Secrecy Act.
All of that could change in the wake of widespread staff cuts, however.
Kevin Knull, chief executive of the Frisco, Texas-based tax record fintech TaxStatus, said that delays are only the tip of the iceberg.
“In the aftermath of massive data breaches in 2024, criminals are already using stolen taxpayer identification numbers to file fake and fraudulent returns, trying to claim the refunds before the legitimate taxpayer files or is aware of the issue,” Knull said. “When these fraudulent claims are uncovered, the legitimate taxpayer is forced to deal with the consequences, including working with the IRS to recover their rightful benefits or refunds.”
Under the proposed arrangement, a joint task force of DOGE representatives and IRS software engineers would oversee debugging, software testing, programming and implementing safeguards to prevent fraud, according to the memo obtained by Bloomberg Tax. At the time of reporting, the memo did not limit what kinds of taxpayer information DOGE officials could access.
Legal experts with The W Tax Group, a tax defense company located in Southfield, Michigan, explained how DOGE’s involvement weighs the importance of protecting personal privacy against the significance of improving how the IRS operates.
“The reality is that the IRS already shares sensitive taxpayer information with contractors, congressional committees and Treasury personnel, [therefore] proper restrictions on DOGE, with limited and monitored access, will help root out mismanaged money and fraud without putting taxpayer privacy in danger,” Stephen Weisberg, principal attorney and founder, said. “If the process is handled appropriately, the risks are not as extreme as some suggest.”
Once a new IRS acting commissioner is confirmed, the agency’s path forward will start to come into focus and provide accountants with more clarity on what to expect from the service moving forward.
Former IRS heads predict delays ahead for agency
Following numerous layoffs at the IRS, former agency leaders say processing delays are on the horizon.
More than 7,000 IRS staffers, most of whom were probationary employees, were dismissed last month as part of government-wide cuts. With the enforcement and collection areas sustaining the largest downsizes, past IRS commissioners said the decisions seemingly go against the mission to increase cost savings.
“The irony is this is an administration that claims to be worried about the deficit and claims to be looking for $2 trillion in savings. … And it seems to be nonsensical to think that one good way to do that is to hamstring your revenue arm, your accounts receivable division,” John Koskinen, who was IRS commissioner from 2013-2017, told Accounting Today.
“Indiscriminate firings of IRS employees around the country are a recipe for economic disaster,” Doreen Greenwald, National Treasury Employees Union national president, said in a statement. “In the middle of a tax filing season, when taxpayers expect prompt customer service and smooth processing of their tax returns, the administration has chosen to decimate the whole operation by sending dedicated civil servants to the unemployment lines.”
The Trump Administration is turning the tax world on its head
Death and taxes, as the old adage goes, are the only two things certain in life. But while taxes aren’t going away, the same can’t be said for the underlying regulations.
Starting with President Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order enacting a lengthy hiring freeze at the IRS and continuing with the administration’s efforts to renew the expiring provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, there are numerous proposals in play that promise to bring widespread change.
In speaking with AT’s Michael Cohn, Mark Everson, a former IRS commissioner and current vice chairman of the Washington D.C.-based consulting firm Alliant, said the anti-DEI campaign from the Trump administration will be reflected in the IRS’s future.
“Consistent with the move against DEI, my guess would be a return to enforcement without scrutiny of results by racial grouping,” Everson said.
Bipartisan bills seek to modernize tax filing and admin at IRS
The Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act and IRS Math and Taxpayer Help Act are moving on with bipartisan support, both aiming to introduce more transparency and ease of access to taxpayers’ lives.
The first would introduce changes into the filing procedures by allowing electronically submitted documents to be afforded the same timeliness standards as paper counterparts, known as the “mailbox rule.” The second would mandate that the IRS provide taxpayers with justifications behind “math error” calculations and a 60-day comment period to refute the findings.
“The AICPA is pleased that these bills have been included in the markup and is encouraged by the momentum generated by these provisions moving forward in a bipartisan way,” Melanie Lauridsen, vice president of tax policy and advocacy for the AICPA, said in a statement.
IRS hiring freeze, pulled job offers is cold start for 2025 tax season
It’s a cold start of tax season for the IRS, as a lengthy hiring freeze casts a great shadow over the agency.
President Trump’s executive order, simply named “Hiring Freeze,” established an indefinite hold on recruiting at the agency “until the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Administrator of the United States DOGE Service, determines that it is in the national interest to lift the freeze,” according to the order.
In speaking with AT’s Michael Cohn, Bill Smith, managing director of CBIZ Advisors’ National Tax Office, said curtailing hiring efforts in an industry already starved for talent will prove troublesome for the IRS.
“A third of the workforce is eligible for retirement, and if you hire new people, they don’t come in as senior auditors, they come in out of college or relatively inexperienced for the most part,” Smith said. “It takes two years to train them and get them marginally effective. … If you kill all that, there will be a tremendous amount of natural attrition at the service, and the attrition is going to be at the most experienced level, which will have a huge impact.”
The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.
The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.
Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.
Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.
Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.
Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.
Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.
Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.
Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.
In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.
Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.
Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.
Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.
Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.
Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.
The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.
In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.
AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.
When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.
Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.
This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.
Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.