Connect with us

Accounting

Art of Accounting: I practice what I preach

Published

on

Complimentary Access Pill

Enjoy complimentary access to top ideas and insights — selected by our editors.

I write about what I did that was successful. It is my way of giving back to the CPA profession that has been great for me. I grew, as did my firm, my staff, my clients and everyone associated with my partners and me. I take great pride in the growth I burgeon. Some of what I did might seem nutsy, but I had my sights set on building a business and that required leveraging my partners and myself. And that took an investment that sometimes seemed unconventional. Here are three stories of some things I did:

Story 1: I always felt that the best way of training someone was for them to correct their own errors, no matter what! I figured that if they did, they would never make that type of error again, and they would also try to reduce future errors to avoid any inconveniences caused by having to fix them. 

One time when I had my NYC practice, it was tax season and I called a staff person around 3:00. I told him he had to come to the office that night to fix an error on a tax return he prepared. I told him I wanted to get it out that night, it was going to be delivered by a taxi that night, and he had to fix it before 8:00. He lived in Queens and went to a client in Long Island. That was like a “vacation day” since he could easily drive to the client and also be home for an early dinner, with no overtime that night. He was a little put out, but he knew he had to come back. He called me a few minutes afterward and asked if he could drive to the office rather than take the subway, would we pay the parking, and I said we would. Also, we paid overtime, so he would get paid for the time fixing the return, but not for the travel time. When he got into the office, I showed him the tax return where he had to fix the zip code which he had wrong. That was the only error and, if looks could kill, I would have been dead at that very moment. He said nothing, fixed it and left.

I told this story about a dozen years ago at a CPE program and that staff person was sitting in the front row. He called out that it was him and remembered how angry he was at me. He also said that “because of that, I never made a mistake on a name or address ever again.” He also now had his own very successful practice. I didn’t remember who it was, but he reminded me. Question: If the reviewer fixed the zip code, how many future similar errors do you think he would have made?

Story 2: The first book I wrote was titled Successful Tax Planning. It was for businesspeople and was very successful. I decided I wanted to publish a professional edition to be sold to accountants and hired a law school student to add citations and references. He seemed like a go-getter, having previously worked part-time on a political campaign. I wanted to set a serious tone with him and also show him this was thoughtful research work, even though we were CPAs and not attorneys. At that time the Tax Code added Section 465. I held up a paperback copy of the Code, opened it to Section 465 and pointed to the word “interest.” I told him I needed a definition of that word and that we would meet in three days to discuss what he came up with. He looked at me like I was crazy, but when we met, he told me he did not have a clue.

My purpose was to show him that nothing in taxes and tax planning was simple or obvious and to get him to understand that I needed him to be very thorough, disciplined and exact, that maybe he didn’t know everything and perhaps I would be able to teach him something.

This project was never completed, getting pushed aside by more urgent or important projects and possibly by my losing interest in becoming a “book publisher.” However, he migrated into tax preparation and planning and some review work. We offered him a permanent job when he graduated law school and he stayed a few years, leaving for a “better opportunity” and ending up in his own tax practice. He built a substantial practice with one of his sons, also an attorney, who is now running it while he is pleasantly clipping coupons on a Florida beach.

My first “exercise” was my investment to get him on board with “my way of doing things.” It worked, and he did great work for us for the time he was with us.

Story 3: Sometimes when you meet a job applicant, there is a spark that shines through, and you just know this is the right person for you. That happened with a young woman we were interviewing. We hired her and sometime during the first week she was working on a humongous aged accounts receivable schedule. She completed it very well, but there was an error of, if I remember correctly, 11 cents in its being balanced perfectly. This was in the early days of computerized spreadsheets. I told her I needed it balanced exactly. She spent a couple of days on it and eventually got it to balance. I explained to her that the 11 cents wasn’t a concern or material. In fact it was completely immaterial, but I wanted her to learn that whatever she worked on had to balance. All she was doing was taking some numbers from one place and reproducing them in another place and there was no reason for them not to match. 

That was my investment to teach her to be careful, work deliberately and that speed was not more important than error-free work. She worked for us for 10 years until she left for a job in private accounting close to her home and her three children. She was single when she started working for us.

There are many more stories, but I particularly like these as I am still in touch with these three people. Each story was costly at the time, but that became an investment that paid great dividends. I recommend taking the long view with your practice and to not miss any opportunity to train a staff person properly. My partners and I practiced what we preached, and we had a very successful practice. These ideas are being continued by us through Withum.

Do not hesitate to contact me at emendlowitz@withum.com with your practice management questions or about engagements you might not be able to perform.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

In the blogs: Recovery mode

Published

on

Muni bonds and taxes; BE-10 time; a troubling history; and other highlights from our favorite tax bloggers.

Recovery mode

  • Don’t Mess with Taxes (http://dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com/): As natural disasters continue to break records in number and severity, government agencies help a little — but in many cases, those who survived major disasters must come up with cash for repairs and recovery. Many turn to their largest pot, retirement savings. What to remind them about what federal lawmakers have done to help those who must tap tax-advantaged nest eggs.
  • Yeo & Yeo (https://www.yeoandyeo.com/resources): How victims may also qualify for additional relief, including on amended returns.
  • Current Federal Tax Developments (https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/): A chief counsel memorandum addresses the deductibility of theft losses (under Sec. 165) for five hypothetical taxpayers who were victims of scams in 2024.
  • Tax Vox (https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox): If Congress makes muni bonds taxable, what could happen to states and cities?
  • Turbotax (https://blog.turbotax.intuit.com): If they’re asking a lot of questions about this season (and we bet they are), here’s your cheat sheet.

Getting real (estate)

  • The Tax Times (https://www.thetaxtimes.com): The IRS has new advice regarding transfer pricing adjustments for high-profit-potential intangible property.
  • CLA (https://www.claconnect.com/en/resources?pageNum=0): Lawmakers are under pressure to identify revenue offsets to finance fiscal and tax packages. One such potential offset: curtailing the business-related property tax deduction, which could have consequences for commercial real estate owners, developers and investors.
  • Tax Foundation (https://taxfoundation.org/blog): As the property tax debate continues in Kansas, two proposals recently emerged: a tight levy limit that would give voters the opportunity to approve or reject property tax increases and a proposal allowing taxpayers to protest and overturn property tax increases they disagree with, while increasing state transfers to cities and counties. Should policymakers continue doing more?
  • Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (https://itep.org/category/blog/): Why lawmakers should improve or implement a circuit breaker program that kicks in to help alleviate the pressure property taxes put on working families’ budgets.

Reshaping obligations

  • Tax Notes (https://www.taxnotes.com/procedurally-taxing): A recent case, In re John Carr Smith, provides a straightforward application of a previous landmark case, United States v. Craft. In the latter, the decision focused on spouses owning property as tenants finding themselves unable to shake off a federal tax lien on one of the spouses. What makes Carr a “sad case” is that Mr. Carr married into the house and contributed nothing to its purchase, yet the IRS will reap a benefit from his ownership interest. 
  • Withum (https://www.withum.com/resources/): Guidance did exist on minimum investment amounts when determining whether an issuer has taken reasonable steps to verify purchasers’ accredited investor status, but further clarification has arrived from the Securities and Exchange Commission about relying on Rule 506(c) of Regulation D.
  • Virginia – U.S. Tax Talk (https://us-tax.org/about-this-us-tax-blog/): A recently leaked memorandum has revealed potential tax reform, including changes concerning foreign-earned income and the corporate income tax rate that could reshape the tax obligations of U.S. persons living abroad and those of multinational business owners.

Finding the way

  • U of I Tax School (https://taxschool.illinois.edu/blog/): How to use the Taxpayer Advocate Service taxpayer roadmap from tax prep through processing, collections, appeals and litigation.
  • Mauled Again (https://mauledagain.blogspot.com/): New bills in the Washington Senate and the Washington House look to impose a state vehicle miles-traveled tax, a different name for a mileage-based road fee.  
  • MBK (https://www.mbkcpa.com/insights): Some nonprofit clients are hesitant to use background checks on board members — a reluctance understandable, but misplaced. Why and how such clients should know their board members as completely as possible.
  • Taxjar (https:/www.taxjar.com/resources/blog): April’s sales tax due dates.
  • The National Association of Tax Professionals (https://blog.natptax.com/): This “You Make the Call” looks at Jim and Sarah, married filing a joint return in 2024. Their modified adjusted gross income was $237,000, and they completed the adoption of a child with special needs in 2024 and have qualified adoption expenses of $10,000. Is their adoption credit limited to $10,000 in 2024?
  • Taxable Talk (http://www.taxabletalk.com/): The BE-10 Survey deadline looms again for large business clients.
  • TaxProf Blog (http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/): A recent paper looks at Colonial America’s intertwining of taxes and slavery.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Scammers revive cyber schemes during tax season

Published

on

Tax scammers are exploiting the current political divide and resurrecting old websites to lure potential victims, according to a new report.

The report, released Tuesday by BforeAI, a cybersecurity company specializing in threat prevention, found cybercriminals and identity thieves reviving old internet domains, dating as far back as 2009, to fool victims this filing season. 

“Due to successful evasion techniques used by these cybercriminals, old websites with good reputations and rankings on search engines garner a sense of legitimacy among the targeted audience,” said the report. “Since security analysts generally warn people interacting with recently registered websites, old websites remain off the radar.”

Those include several websites registered using freely available platforms such as the venerable blogging service Blogspot. The fraudulent sites feature alleged “warnings” from the IRS about impending deadlines, but have giveaways such as misspellings and odd use of capital letters. BforeAI’s threat research team noticed that some of the old domains were re-registered last December right before tax season. 

Tax scam site

Scammers are also taking advantage of the current political climate in the U.S., launching websites mentioning President Donald Trump with tax-related keywords to entice users to their alleged services. One site used the keyword “trump” with “tax refund” while also offering a tax calculator. The BforeAI team also noticed cybercriminals exploiting the cryptocurrency arena through meme coin scams, including a “NoTax Coin” featuring Trump, who has launched memecoins of his own that have led to heavy losses for many investors. 

The threat researchers spotted a new tax-related service in which recently established businesses are leveraging the “gov” keyword to mislead people in search of legitimate government services. One website previously advertised a service to claim up to $32,000 in just 20 minutes, but now features an affiliate referral link and promotes a completely new business offering.

The BforeAI team also observed the use of the IRS logo to make fraudulent websites mimic the official IRS website, but with the use of different fonts and colors creating a confusing, unclear target. One such site featured the official IRS logo but was in Russian language and is probably targeting Russian nationals.

Some websites showed statements of tax payments, perhaps in an effort to lure victims into checking their statements and thereby sharing their financial data. The team also saw various phishing attempts featuring fake login and signup forms requiring users to authenticate their identities via ID.me, Google or their social media accounts.

“As we fulfill our tax obligations this season, be on the lookout for tax-related traps laid by cybercriminals,” warned the report.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Treasury promotes IRS whistleblowers who probed Hunter Biden

Published

on

The Treasury Department named a pair of Internal Revenue Service agents as special advisors to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and plans key roles for them in reforming the IRS after they complained of mistreatment under the Biden administration while investigating Hunter Biden’s taxes.

Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, who were both special agents with the IRS’s Criminal Investigation division, testified in 2023 before the House Oversight Committee claiming then-President Biden’s son Hunter received preferential treatment during a tax evasion investigation, and they had been removed from the investigation after complaining to their supervisors in 2022. Biden agreed to a plea deal in 2023 on both tax and firearms charges with prosecutors, but the plea deal fell apart when it was questioned by a judge and special counsel David Weiss, who had initially agreed to the deal. Biden was later convicted in 2024 of the firearms charges, which related to lying about his drug use on an application for a handgun, and he again pleaded guilty to not paying at least $1.4 million in taxes. He was pardoned by then-President Biden shortly before leaving office in January. 

The two whistleblowers had accused prosecutors and IRS CI officials of not pushing for felony charges, allowing the statute of limitations to expire on some of the tax charges, and retaliating by removing them from the investigation. Their cause has been championed by Republicans in Congress, including Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley of Iowa, who sent a letter last month to Bessent commending Shapley and Ziegler’s “bravery, courage, expertise and integrity” and asking Bessent to take action to place Shapley and Ziegler in leadership positions. The promotion is a result of Grassley’s direct request.

“As I noted in my letter to Secretary Bessent last month, if we reinstate whistleblowers who have been retaliated against, it will send a clear signal that pointing out wrongdoing is an honorable thing to do,” Grassley said in a statement Tuesday. “It will help change the culture of our bureaucracy. I’m very grateful to Secretary Bessent for supporting Gary and Joe, and I have no doubt they will be a boon to the Treasury Department in their new roles. Gary Shapley and Joe Ziegler put their entire careers on the line to stand up for the truth, and instead of being thanked, the Biden administration treated them like skunks at a picnic. Far too many whistleblowers share a similar experience of retaliation. I hope today is the first of many redemption stories for whistleblowers who’ve been mistreated. By taking a stand for whistleblowers, President Trump and his cabinet are ushering in a new era of transparency and accountability.”

Bessent hailed their promotion to positions of influence in the Trump administration. “I am pleased to welcome Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler to the Treasury Department, where they will help us drive much-needed cultural reform within the IRS,” Bessent said in a statement. “These veteran civil servants join us to help further the agency’s focus on collections, modernization, and customer service, so we can deliver a more effective and efficient IRS experience for hardworking American taxpayers. I appreciate Senator Grassley’s efforts in Congress to support whistleblower protections in order to improve transparency, accountability and root out the culture of retaliation.”

Shapley and Ziegler are expected to transition to senior IRS leadership after their stint at the Treasury Department, according to the New York Post. They have reportedly named six IRS officials who they claim retaliated against them and asked for the officials to be disciplined in an official complaint filed with the federal Merit Systems Protection Board. In February, a federal whistleblower protection agency known as the Office of Special Counsel found the IRS had wrongly retaliated against the two men. That same month, Trump fired the head of that agency, Hampton Dellinger, prompting a short-lived court battle before he agreed to drop his appeal of the ouster.

“We are enormously grateful to Secretary Bessent, Senator Grassley, and all of the members of Congress for their leadership and trust,” Shapley and Ziegler said in a joint statement. “We have been motivated by one singular mantra: do what’s right, and do it the right way. It has not been easy, but having a clear conscience is worth the effort. We appreciate the opportunity Secretary Bessent is giving us to put our experience and firsthand knowledge to good use for the American people to eliminate waste and reform the IRS.”

Continue Reading

Trending