Connect with us

Accounting

Changes to Form 6765: What accountants need to know

Published

on

Over 14,000 businesses in the U.S. claim the federal research and development tax credit every year, so businesses relying on this funding must be aware the claiming process has recently changed. 

The Internal Revenue Service has made significant changes to Form 6765, Credit for Increasing Research Activities, with new requirements set to take effect this tax year. These revisions emphasize enhanced qualitative reporting and will impact how businesses file for the credit. The final versions of the form and instructions were published in February, and accountants should begin preparing now to ensure compliance.

Historically, companies have used Form 6765 to report numerical, quantitative data. But the revised form now requires businesses to include much more qualitative data directly with the tax return to explain what the claim is for. Accurate documentation ensures businesses’ tax credit claims are well supported and reduces the risk of IRS scrutiny or audits. The changes to the form include:

Preliminary questions before Section A

Before completing Section A, taxpayers must now answer two key questions: 

  1. Controlled group status: Determine whether the organization is part of a controlled group or under common control. This is crucial because R&D credit limitations and aggregation rules apply at the group level, which could impact the total credit available.
  2. 280C election box: Indicate whether the taxpayer is electing the reduced 280C credit, which allows companies to claim the R&D credit without reducing their deductible expenses by the credit amount.

New Sections E, F and G

The IRS has also introduced three additional sections to enhance reporting and transparency. 

Section E – Other Information
Taxpayers must now provide detailed information, including:

  • Number of business components used in the credit calculation, helping ensure compliance with the four-part R&D test;
  • Officer compensation included in the wage qualified research expenditures;
  • Acquisitions and dispositions that may impact the R&D credit calculation, ensuring changes in business structure are properly reflected;
  • New categories of expenditures added to the current year’s QREs, to identify inconsistencies year over year in credit claims; and,
  • Use of the ASC 730 Directive, which is relevant for companies with assets over $10 million using certain financial reporting methods.

Section F – Qualified Research Expenses Summary

This section mandates that taxpayers:

  • Indicate whether they are required to complete Section G.
  • Provide a breakdown of QREs by type (e.g., wages, supplies, contract research), offering the IRS greater transparency into qualified R&D activities.

Section G – Business Component Information

The biggest change is the introduction of Section G, which will require taxpayers to disclose detailed information about their business components. The IRS is phasing in mandatory reporting:

Taxpayers must report at least 80% of total QREs, listed in descending order by amount, with a maximum of 50 business components. Each business component must include:

  • Identification details (e.g., company name, unique identifiers);
  • Type of business component, categorized as a product, process, formula, invention, software or technique.

Special treatment for software R&D

Companies developing software will now be required to classify business components into one of the following categories:

  • Internal use software (IUS);
  • Dual function software;
  • Non-IUS software (developed for commercial sale or third-party interaction); 
  • Exceptions from IUS treatment, if applicable.

Additionally, taxpayers must provide detailed reporting, including:

  • The specific information sought to be discovered through R&D activities;
  • Wage breakdowns by three qualified levels per business component;
  • Costs associated with supplies, rental/lease of computers, and qualified contract amounts categorized by business components.

Implications for accountants

These changes reflect the IRS’s increased focus on qualitative R&D information, potentially leading to greater scrutiny of claims. Accountants and tax professionals should be aware that the additional reporting will increase administrative burdens, particularly for businesses with complex R&D activities. Some key considerations include:

Documentation will be critical: With the IRS requiring more detailed reporting, taxpayers must maintain thorough records of their research activities, costs, and business components.

More preparation time needed: The expanded reporting requirements mean tax preparers should allocate additional time to gather and verify required data before filing.

Greater IRS oversight: Increased transparency could lead to heightened audits or examinations of R&D claims, making accuracy and compliance even more essential.

Educating clients

Many businesses may not be aware of these changes. Proactive communication will be necessary to ensure clients understand what’s required and avoid last-minute surprises during tax season.

The IRS’s proposed updates to Form 6765 represent a shift toward greater transparency and compliance enforcement for R&D tax credit claims. While these changes will require taxpayers and accountants to adapt, early preparation and proper documentation can help businesses continue benefiting from this valuable incentive.

As Section G becomes mandatory for most taxpayers in 2025, now is the time for accountants to review these updates, educate clients and refine documentation processes to ensure seamless compliance with the new requirements. By staying ahead of these changes, tax professionals can help businesses maximize their R&D credits while minimizing audit risks.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending