Connect with us

Accounting

Updates to the Financial Data Transparency Act

Published

on

The Gov Fin 2024 conference in New York City provided a comprehensive exploration of government financial reporting, focusing on the implications of the Financial Data Transparency Act. The opening keynote offered insights into current practices and anticipated changes in government financial reporting.

The first panel discussion, featuring large government issuers, highlighted the complexities faced by these entities and the potential impacts of the FDTA. Next, a small government issuer panel addressed the unique challenges faced by smaller entities. Resource and staffing constraints were more pronounced in these jurisdictions. 

A professional services panel examined the role of accounting and legal firms in aiding government entities with their financial disclosures. They discussed how these firms could support the transition to machine-readable financials, highlighting both opportunities and challenges.

A crucial session on federal and research data use featured representatives from the U.S. Census and the U.S. Department of Education. This session explored how federal agencies utilized municipal financial data and the implications of the Grants Reporting Efficiency and Transparency (GREAT) Act. Speakers from the GAO and the U.S. Census provided insights into the integration of FDTA requirements with existing federal data usage practices.

Day two of the conference started with a conversation between the SEC Office of Municipal Securities and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, focusing on the implications of the FDTA and progress toward taxonomy development. Following this, a case study on data standards development for public companies was presented by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, providing a model for municipal entities. The sessions emphasized the importance of developing and implementing robust data standards to enhance transparency, efficiency and legal identifiers in government financial reporting, especially in the Electronic Municipal Markets Access system.

Financial Data Transparency Act Joint Data Standards

Ironically, just a few days later, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued its proposed Financial Data Transparency Act Joint Data Standards. The Gov Fin 2024 conference was remarkably perceptive in addressing the core issues the rule contemplates. Here are some of the rule highlights:

The Financial Data Transparency Act Joint Data Standards outlines standards for data transmission and schema and taxonomy formats to ensure interoperability of information transmitted to regulatory Agencies. 

Key aspects of the rule include:

  1. Collections of information: Defined by the Paperwork Reduction Act.
  2. Legal Entity Identifier (LEI): A 20-character alphanumeric code that uniquely identifies legal entities. The LEI is non-proprietary and available under an open license, used for regulatory reporting worldwide.
  3. Some other common identifiers mentioned:

    • Unique Product Identifier (UPI) for swaps and security-based swaps.
    • Classification of Financial Instruments (CFI) code for other financial instruments.
    • Financial Instrument Global Identifier (FIGI) for all classes of financial instruments.
    • ISO 8601 date format for consistent date and time representation.
    • U.S. Postal Service abbreviations for identifying states and geographic locations.
    • Geopolitical Entities, Names and Codes (GENC) standard for country codes.
    • ISO 4217 Currency Codes for currency identification.

The rule also aims to improve data integration, interoperability, and global transparency in financial reporting:

  1. Data transmission formats: Formats such as CSV, XML, JSON, HTML (under certain conditions), and PDF/A are used to ensure information is digitally received, machine-readable, and fully searchable.
  2. Schemas and taxonomies: These provide the syntax, structure, and semantic meaning of the data. High-quality, machine-readable descriptions enable automated verification and consistent semantic interpretation across different parties.
  3. Properties of standards: The proposed joint standards for data transmission and schema and taxonomy formats should:

    • Be fully searchable and machine-readable.
    • Use schemas with machine-readable metadata defining the data’s semantic meaning.
    • Consistently identify data elements or assets related to regulatory information collection.
    • Be nonproprietary or available under an open license.
  4. Regulatory compliance: Schemas and taxonomies should include metadata to track regulatory requirements, aiding in the identification of data assets subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
  5. Interoperability: There is a focus on data interoperability across different formats to ensure consistency and ease of use among various financial regulatory entities.
  6. Current formats: Existing formats like XML Schema Definition (XSD), eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) Taxonomy, and JSON Schema already meet the required properties.
  7. Flexibility and future adaptation: The standard emphasizes properties rather than specific formats, allowing for the adoption of new open-source formats as they emerge, provided they meet the listed properties.

The proposed rule requests comments on accounting and reporting taxonomies: 
Standardized data definitions: Taxonomies like the FFIEC Call Report, U.S. GAAP and IFRS facilitate consistent information exchanges through standardized data definitions.

Current usage: These taxonomies define data semantics and are used in regulatory reporting.

Request for comment: Agencies seek feedback on two options:

  • Option 1: Establish a joint standard based on specific properties.
  • Option 2: Identify and establish specific taxonomies as joint standards.

Definition and flexibility: Agencies request input on defining “taxonomy” and propose flexibility in using or modifying standard taxonomies to meet specific needs and legal requirements.

Multiple taxonomies: Agencies are considering allowing multiple taxonomies for individual data collection and invite comments on the needed flexibility for this approach.

An opportunity exists to engage in this rulemaking process and finally, implementation. GovFin 2025 will be held in Denver in July 2025, and will feature in-depth discussions, expert panels and hands-on workshops focused on navigating the new regulatory landscape effectively. Details will be released for registration in the coming months.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending