There are many different ways Accounting Today’s 2024 Best Firms for Women earned the honor of being among the top 10 most female-forward workplaces, but while the individual policies and programs they employ to effectively recruit, retain and advance women vary by practice, two stand out as critical for the highest-ranked firms: flexibility and mentorship.
Both strategies also empower female employees to make critical choices for their personal and professional success.
“Mentorship is so important — it’s just the be-all, end-all these days,” said April Miller, principal at Laurel, Maryland-based Bormel, Grice & Huyett PA, a Best Firm for Women for the third consecutive year, this year ranking No. 3. “So much more focus is on mentorship and training than ever before. It has a lot to do with retaining people and a lot to do with attracting people. Most people want to grow and advance, and we really want to foster that here. It’s more important than anything else.”
Bormel, Grice & Huyett offers two types of mentors, Miller explained: “a mentor for learning, your work-side policies, procedures, technical help, as people advance and get more experience in the industry, and also a mentor whose primary focus is on career guidance.”
San Francisco-based Realize CPA, No. 5 among this year’s Best Firms for Women but also the highest ranked midsized firm on the list, shares those priorities, with managing partner Minerva Tottie crediting her female staff’s satisfaction to its strong mentorship program and flexible work culture.
All the Best Firms for Women are chosen from the members of Accounting Today’s annual Best Firms to Work For list, which is based on in-depth employee surveys. The Best Firms for Women, among other criteria, garnered positive survey responses from their female employees.
“Providing flexibility for women,” Tottie identified as one of Realize’s strengths. “We have a really strong mentorship program at Realize. Mentorship and flexibility. We usually get women fresh out of college, super eager and ambitious and ready to work. And then life happens: marriage, kids. Having mentors who can help guide them along the work side of things and different changes of life is really important, and we continue to provide that. We don’t want to get them discouraged. Accounting is a hard profession, with the hour requirements, especially on the tax side.”
Staff at B.A. Harris
The Best Firms for Women recognize that the profession’s current talent shortage makes these two principles more vital than ever. To combat the pipeline problem, they have also adjusted for the needs of younger candidates.
“Based on experience, education, and how they are brought in, we have a dedicated coaching and staff development plan that details expectations at each level,” shared Kayla Perry, firm administrator at Boise, Idaho-based B.A. Harris, No. 2 on this year’s list. “We make it clear to staff. This generation asks for complete clarity. They’re not a gray generation but black and white. We provide as much information as possible; the expectations of the next level up and so on. All expectations are provided to them even at an associate level, to see what it takes for a promotion to senior, to manager.”
At the Best Firms for Women, employees also have a choice in mentors and coaches.
“Good mentors, leaders who are also women, who have also been there, can provide guidance,” explained Tottie. “Oftentimes, myself as a partner, I’ll team up with another woman at a supervisor, manager level just so they can feel comfortable bringing up the types of issues they might not otherwise feel comfortable bringing up with men. Some women don’t care, and can be paired up with men or women. We are sensitive to what people need to get far in their career.”
“Any of the partners are always welcoming,” shared Miller. “Sometimes people don’t want to talk to partners, but have [a talk with] managers, principals or peers. There are different groups with different comfort levels of what they want to speak about.”
Bormel, Grice & Huyett also finds value in connecting female new hires with more senior women in the firm.
“We are respectful of the challenges some women face,” Miller said. “Not all women struggle with work-life balance but that is a thing, responsibility in the office plus family … We try to be respectful of women and men having the work-life balance everyone is talking about. Among new hires, we encourage setting up a meeting with a woman at the firm to talk about their experiences. We’ve found that to be really helpful to put candidates at ease.”
Flexibility at the forefront
Staff at all levels continue to value flexibility, both in work hours and location, and in career paths.
“We try to be very flexible to all staff,” said Megan Sunthimer, partner at No. 4-ranked firm C&D, based in Solvang, California. “We see that a lot with women who have kids, trying to be flexible with needs that parents in general have with young kids.”
Staff at C&D
All the Best Firms for Women stressed that their flexible work policies apply to men and women, with or without children, to maintain the ever-important work-life balance. But many firm leaders also acknowledge the extra burden that can fall on women.
“From personal experience, for quite a few really great female employees, different life things come up, particularly in the accounting industry, that can be pretty stressful at times with other commitments,” said Sunthimer. “They have decided, based off family dynamics and needs, the accounting industry in general: Is that where I want to be, in public accounting? That’s been a struggle in retention, specifically. Recruiting has been a tough few years with COVID and a lot less people entering the accounting industry.”
“Females are typically the default parent when it comes to children,” said Perry. “Whenever there are sick kids, the ability to work remotely at a moment’s notice, they need everyone to be super understanding. The leadership here is two-thirds women, and it really sets a good example for the rest of the staff, that there’s a place in leadership for women. And I think the partners here really empower women and hear them out. A great maternity leave policy also contributes to the satisfaction for women.”
The Best Firms for Women offer hybrid and remote work options, with C&D and Realize both calling for core hours for staff when everyone must be available, with flexibility outside those time frames.
B.A. Harris has also adjusted its mindset around long hours. “As a firm, over the past two years, we have reduced that expectation of hours worked,” said Perry. “It’s more about workload, the projects assigned to you, if you get them done … We allow everyone to set their own schedule, even during busy season. A lot work more, but that’s their decision. If they come in on a Saturday, we buy lunch, and it’s a casual environment with no dress code.”
B.A. Harris also closes the office on Fridays from May 1 through Labor Day to give staff three-day weekends to look forward to during the longer hours of busy season.
Realize recently “beefed up the head count so there is enough people to spread the work around, which is really helpful,” shared Tottie. “A new woman joined not too long ago, from out of state. She said, ‘That’s the best busy season I’ve ever had.’ It breeds loyalty, when you feel rested and good at work.”
Carving new paths
Employees also value choice in career paths, especially women juggling family commitments.
“Each family dynamic is different, each woman’s responsibilities are different,” said Sunthimer. “They might have kids, might be married, might not have a partner. Those hour commitments sometimes can be overwhelming, stressful. It’s OK to have different tracks available. Sometimes you get into public accounting and envision one track of how to move forward, but start to develop other paths. Maybe you have a staff person that can only work 40 hours a week and can’t do overtime. That doesn’t mean you can’t get to the next level. Have different paths available — do not stick to this is how it has always been done.”
Sunthimer and the female leaders at the other Best Firms for Women all have personal experience with these varied trajectories.
“My goal, ever since starting at C&D, was to eventually become partner,” Sunthimer shared. “When I moved to Indiana, I thought that might permanently derail that; we never had a remote partner before. It was a big step for them to take. They really value the experience I bring to the team. Two other employees, both employees working remotely before COVID, both female, they did want to retain them because they valued them so much. The retention of the other female employees is because the firm values everything they bring to the table. When you work for a firm that shows appreciation and values you, genuinely cares about you, as this firm does, it makes you want to stick around.”
Tottie can also relate, having worked at Realize since 2016.
“I absolutely did have mentors,” she recalled. “I have two kids. At one point [I thought] I don’t think I’m going to be able to do it. They allowed me to scale back my workload for a couple of years, which was hugely beneficial. They also reduced pay, and I’m OK with that if it meant I could stay in the game. When the kids were a little bit older, I came back little by little and was able to stay in it. I’m a partner now, and it’s an amazing career.”
“We’re just in general really focused on giving everyone the right guidance,” Tottie continued. “It’s such a great career if you can have, early on, someone to navigate through the challenges, to allow you to stay in the business, allow you to grow, allow you to have empathy skills for other women coming in and growing through the same challenges.”
One of Tottie’s colleagues benefited directly from Realize’s determination to retain the best talent.
“One woman had a baby and felt very strongly — she’s one of our superstars — that she wanted to take half a year off to be with the baby,” Tottie shared. “She’s so good we said, ‘OK. We’re here, we don’t want you to go anywhere, you’re on the partner track.’ It presents a challenge for us to allow that flexibility, but we know long term it’s the right thing to do, we’re in it for the long haul with them. They know that, and it helps a lot.”
A proposal from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to potentially shift some public companies away from quarterly financial reporting toward a semiannual model is drawing significant pushback from investors, even as it continues moving through the regulatory process. The debate has direct implications for corporate finance teams, auditors, and the broader transparency of U.S. capital markets.
What the SEC Proposed
According to a summary published by accounting advisory firm Cohen & Co., the SEC issued a proposed rule on May 19, 2026, aimed at simplifying financial reporting requirements for many U.S. public companies. The proposal would potentially reduce the frequency of certain mandatory disclosures from quarterly to semiannual, a structural change that has not been made to core U.S. reporting requirements in decades.
The proposal follows an extended debate within U.S. policy circles, with proponents arguing that reduced reporting frequency could lower compliance costs and free up management time for longer-term strategic planning rather than quarter-to-quarter results management.
Why Investors Are Pushing Back
Comment letters submitted in response to the proposal have been extensive, and according to Cohen & Co.’s review of the public record, investors “appear to be largely opposed” to the shift, viewing frequent interim reporting as a core benefit of U.S. capital markets relative to other jurisdictions.
Accounting and law firms have taken a more measured position, generally urging any changes to remain aligned with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), whose existing disclosure requirements and guidance are built around a quarterly reporting cadence. A shift to semiannual reporting without corresponding changes to FASB guidance could create friction between SEC filing requirements and GAAP-based disclosure expectations.
Lessons From the U.K. Experience
The debate is not without precedent. The United Kingdom moved away from mandatory quarterly reporting for listed companies in 2014, returning to a semiannual disclosure requirement. According to Cohen & Co.’s analysis, that experience offers a cautionary data point: there was no measurable increase in capital expenditure or R&D investment following the change, while analyst coverage of affected companies declined as reliable interim information became less available — a particular risk for smaller and newly public companies that rely on analyst coverage to maintain investor visibility.
Practical Implications for Finance Teams
Beyond the debate over disclosure philosophy, the proposal carries practical complications. Many companies have debt covenants and credit agreements structured around quarterly financial delivery; a shift to semiannual reporting could require renegotiating those terms. Reduced reporting frequency would also extend the “window of market silence” between disclosures, a factor that governance and investor-relations teams would need to manage carefully to avoid information asymmetry.
Separately, and unrelated to the reporting-frequency debate, the SEC and FASB have continued finalizing more routine updates this year. New Accounting Standards Updates are taking effect for December 31, 2026, fiscal year-ends covering income tax disclosures, credit loss measurement, induced debt conversions, and stock compensation, according to Eide Bailly’s review of 2026 ASU activity. Additional guidance on paid-in-kind dividends and environmental credits is also on the near-term horizon.
What to Watch Next
The semiannual reporting proposal remains in the comment and review phase, and no final rule has been adopted as of this writing. Finance leaders should monitor the SEC’s regulatory agenda for further movement, while treating the current quarterly reporting requirement as the operative standard until any final rule is issued and an effective date is set.
Given the extent of investor opposition documented in the comment file, a full shift to mandatory semiannual reporting appears more likely to result in either a scaled-back compromise or continued study rather than swift adoption — though the SEC’s ultimate direction remains uncertain.
The accounting profession is undergoing a fundamental structural transition as enterprise finance departments shift from periodic month-end closes toward automated continuous accounting models. By integrating specialized machine learning algorithms directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, chief accounting officers are transforming financial reporting from a retrospective exercise into a real-time operational asset.
The Shift from Periodic Close to Continuous Financial Reporting
Traditional accounting workflows heavily relied on manual data reconciliation, spreadsheet calculations, and multi-week closing cycles at the end of each fiscal period. In contrast, continuous accounting frameworks utilize automated software agents to process, validate, and post transactional data in real time as business activities occur.
Automated bank reconciliation tools cross-reference incoming bank feeds, invoice records, and purchase orders automatically. By resolving transactional variances instantly throughout the month, corporate accounting teams eliminate the traditional workload spikes associated with quarterly and annual closes.
Machine Learning in Audit Trails and Anomaly Detection
Advanced natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning tools are redefining internal audit and financial control environments. Automated systems analyze 100% of general ledger entries, identifying anomalous transactions, duplicate payments, and unauthorized journal entries in real time.
Rather than relying on random statistical sampling, corporate internal auditors can focus their attention on high-risk flags automatically surfaced by algorithmic monitoring platforms. This continuous risk assessment strengthens internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and significantly reduces fraud risk.
Evolving Roles for Accounting Professionals
As routine data entry and manual reconciliation tasks become fully automated, the skill set required for accounting professionals is shifting toward data analysis, system design, and strategic business advisory.
– Systems Governance: Accountants are increasingly responsible for monitoring algorithmic accuracy and managing data integration pipelines.
– Business Partnership: Finance professionals leverage real-time financial dashboards to advise operational leaders on margin management and working capital allocation.
– Regulatory Compliance Management: Accounting teams utilize automated platforms to ensure compliance with dynamic tax codes and international accounting standards.
Core Implementation Recommendations
1. Deploy Automated Reconciliation Tools: Integrate continuous transaction processing modules into existing enterprise ERP architectures.
2. Establish Algorithmic Governance Controls: Implement strict internal testing protocols to ensure automated accounting rules comply with GAAP/IFRS standards.
3. Reskill Accounting Teams: Invest in training finance staff on data analytics, workflow automation, and predictive financial modeling.
Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.
Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.
In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.
Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.
Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.
Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.
Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.