Connect with us

Accounting

Apple, Google lose multibillion dollar court fights with EU

Published

on

Apple Inc. lost its court fight over a €13 billion ($14.4 billion) Irish tax bill and Google lost its challenge over a €2.4 billion fine for abusing its market power, in a double boost to the European Union’s crackdown on Big Tech.

The EU’s Court of Justice in Luxembourg backed a landmark 2016 decision that Ireland broke state-aid law by giving Apple an unfair advantage. In another victory for the EU’s antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager, the same court ruled that Google illegally leveraged its search-engine dominance to give a higher ranking to its own product listings.  

Vestager — who is just weeks away from departing the Brussels-based European Commission after two terms — made Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google top targets after taking up her role in 2014. The Apple decision was by far the biggest in her decade-long campaign for tax fairness, which has also targeted the likes of Amazon.com Inc. and carmaker Stellantis NV’s Fiat. Vestager has argued that selective tax benefits to big firms are illegal state aid that are banned in the EU.

Apple store in New York

“It’s important to show European taxpayers that once in a while, tax justice can be done,” Vestager told reporters in Brussels in response to questions on her Apple win. 

Apple’s Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook previously blasted as “total political crap” the EU’s 2016 move to order the firm to pay €13 billion in back taxes, while the commission’s 2017 fine against Google was leveled for abusing its search dominance to give a higher ranking to its own product listings. Vestager ordered Ireland to claw back the sum, which amounts to about two quarters of Mac sales globally. The money has been sitting in an escrow account pending a final ruling. Ireland must now decide what to do with its unwanted windfall.

“We are disappointed with today’s decision as previously the general court reviewed the facts and categorically annulled this case,” an Apple spokesperson said. The company expects to record a one-time income tax charge of about $10 billion in the fiscal fourth quarter ending Sept. 28 as a result of the ruling, increasing its effective tax rate for the period. 

Apple shares were down 0.9% at $218.95 in premarket trading at about 9:15 a.m. New York time. 

Separately, a Google spokesperson said that the company is “disappointed” with the court judgment on its appeal and that a 2017 offer to remedy the EU’s concerns helped to generate more clicks for other shopping services. not supported.

The EU’s focus on Google paved the way for global scrutiny, from the US to the UK. The EU hasn’t merely targeted the firm’s search dominance. Its shopping case was the first round in a trio of fines that led to penalties totaling more than €8 billion. The EU’s competition watchdogs are hoping that the conduct of Silicon Valley will be definitively fixed by sweeping new regulation that came into effect last year — the Digital Markets Act. 

The shopping case “was symbolic because it demonstrated that even the most powerful tech companies could be held accountable,” Vestager said. “No one is above the law.”

Among other dos and don’ts — the DMA forces Big Tech players to refrain from favoring their own services over rivals — an obligation inspired by the bloc’s near decade-long tussle with the tech giant’s search dominance. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Key Factors to Select for Optimal Bookkeeping Software Solution

Published

on

Selecting the Optimal Bookkeeping Software Solution: Key Factors to Consider

In today’s fast-paced, digital environment, businesses have an abundance of bookkeeping software options to choose from. However, not all platforms are equally suited to every organization’s needs. Selecting the ideal software requires thorough research and evaluation to ensure it effectively supports accounting processes, enhances efficiency, and meets the business’s unique operational demands. This article highlights key factors to consider when choosing the optimal bookkeeping software solution.

User Access and Permissions

A critical starting point in selecting bookkeeping software is determining the number of users who will need access. Many software providers structure their pricing plans based on the number of users, making it essential to assess how many employees, accountants, or managers require permissions to view, edit, or manage financial data. This consideration not only influences costs but also ensures that appropriate security settings are in place to protect sensitive financial information. Businesses should prioritize platforms that offer customizable user roles and permissions, allowing access to be granted according to each individual’s responsibilities.

Integration Capabilities with Other Systems

The ability of bookkeeping software to integrate seamlessly with other operational systems is essential for efficiency. Many modern solutions offer built-in integrations with bank accounts, credit cards, payroll software, customer relationship management (CRM) platforms, e-commerce tools, and inventory management systems. Such integrations reduce the need for manual data entry, minimize the likelihood of errors, and enable real-time financial tracking. For businesses that rely heavily on multiple tools, it is crucial to choose bookkeeping software that supports smooth data exchange across platforms to streamline processes and enhance productivity.

Robust Reporting and Financial Statement Generation

Effective bookkeeping software must offer advanced reporting capabilities that align with standard accounting practices and business-specific needs. The software should provide customizable reports that allow businesses to track critical metrics, such as cash flow, profit margins, and accounts receivable. Reporting flexibility ensures that stakeholders—whether internal or external—receive clear and actionable financial insights. Additionally, the ability to generate compliant financial statements, such as income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, is essential for meeting regulatory requirements and supporting strategic decision-making.

Mobile Access and Cloud Technology

As remote work becomes increasingly common, cloud-based bookkeeping software solutions have grown in importance. Cloud platforms allow users to access financial data securely from any location, using mobile devices or web browsers. This flexibility ensures that accounting teams and business leaders can monitor and manage financial information on the go, facilitating faster decision-making. When selecting bookkeeping software, businesses should assess their mobile access needs and choose platforms that offer reliable mobile apps or responsive interfaces that enhance accessibility and collaboration.

Industry-Specific Features

Certain industries—such as construction, nonprofits, retail, and professional services—have unique accounting requirements. For example, construction companies may need to track project-based expenses, while nonprofits must adhere to specific reporting standards. Selecting bookkeeping software with industry-specific features can help businesses reduce the need for manual adjustments and ensure that the system aligns with operational workflows. These tailored functionalities can improve accuracy and efficiency, making it easier to meet both day-to-day and long-term accounting objectives.

Implementation, Training, and Customer Support

Even the most feature-rich bookkeeping software will fail to deliver value without proper implementation and team adoption. Vendors that offer comprehensive implementation support and seamless integration services can make the transition to new software smoother. Additionally, access to training resources—such as webinars, tutorials, and customer support—ensures that employees can quickly become proficient in using the software. Businesses should evaluate the quality of vendor support, including availability of live assistance and responsiveness to inquiries, to ensure ongoing success.

Cost vs. Value: A Balanced Approach

While pricing is an important consideration, businesses should not select bookkeeping software based solely on cost. The goal is to find a solution that delivers the best value by meeting both current and future accounting needs efficiently. In some cases, higher-priced software may offer features or integrations that significantly reduce manual work and increase accuracy, providing a strong return on investment over time. Companies should carefully weigh the total cost of ownership, including subscription fees, implementation expenses, and potential upgrades, against the benefits the software provides.

Scalability and Future Needs

Businesses evolve over time, and their accounting requirements grow more complex. It is crucial to choose bookkeeping software that can scale with the business, accommodating future needs without requiring frequent platform changes. Features such as multi-currency support, automated invoicing, and advanced analytics may become essential as the organization expands. Opting for scalable software ensures that the system remains a valuable tool even as the business grows.

Selecting the optimal bookkeeping software is a strategic decision that requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors. From user access and integration capabilities to mobile access and industry-specific features, businesses must align software functionality with their operational needs. Proper implementation, along with reliable vendor support and training resources, ensures smooth adoption and long-term success. While pricing is an important factor, the focus should be on finding a solution that provides the most value by streamlining accounting processes and preparing the organization for future growth. By taking a balanced approach to these considerations, businesses can select the best bookkeeping software to enhance financial management and drive success in a competitive marketplace.

Norene

Continue Reading

Accounting

GASB issues guidance on capital asset disclosures

Published

on

The Governmental Accounting Standards Board issued guidance today that will require separate disclosures for certain types of capital assets for the purposes of note disclosures.

GASB Statement No. 104, Disclosure of Certain Capital Assets, also establishes requirements and additional disclosures for capital assets held for sale. 

The statement requires certain types of assets to be disclosed separately in the note disclosures about capital assets. The intent is to allow users to make better informed decisions and to evaluate accountability. The requirements are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025, and all reporting periods thereafter, though earlier application is encouraged.

The guidance requires separate disclosures for four types of capital assets:

  1. Lease assets reported under Statement 87, by major class of underlying asset;
  2. Intangible right-to-use assets recognized by an operator under Statement 94, by major class of underlying asset;
  3. Subscription assets reported under Statement 96; and,
  4. Intangible assets other than those listed in items 1-3, by major class of asset.

Under the guidance, a capital asset is a capital asset held for sale if the government has decided to pursue the sale of the asset, and it is probable the sale will be finalized within a year of the financial statement date. A government should disclose the historical cost and accumulated depreciation of capital assets held for sale, by major class of asset.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: RRBB hires tax partner

Published

on

Uddin-Suha-RRBB.jpg
Suha Uddin

BRIAN BOUMAN MEMORY CREATIO

Suha Uddin was hired as a tax partner at RRBB Advisors, Somerset. 

Sax, Paterson, announced that its annual run/walk event SAX 4 Miler, supporting the Child Life Department at St. Joseph’s Children’s Hospital in Paterson, has achieved $1 million in total funds raised since its inception in 2012.    

Withum, Princeton, rolled out a new outsourcing service offering as part of its sustainability and ESG practice designed to help companies comply with the European Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the mandate requires reporting of detailed sustainability performance as it pertains to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards , effective January 2023.

Continue Reading

Trending