Connect with us

Accounting

Are remote partners the future for accounting firms?

Published

on

The remote partner represents a small but growing part of the professional landscape, their rise a reflection of the major changes that accounting firms were forced to make during the lockdowns. But while they’re a distinct minority today, the increasing sophistication of collaboration solutions — combined with the still-unresolved challenges with the talent pipeline — indicates their numbers are likely to rise. 

Jennifer Wilson, co-founder of Convergence Coaching, a remote work-focused leadership and management coaching and consulting firm, estimates that remote partners make up about 5% of firm leaders nationwide; adding in those who were already partners and then went remote, her estimate grows to about 10 to 15%. But she predicted this proportion will likely grow over time as more firms realize they’re no longer as bound to geography. 

“It’s just going to become more common because firms are getting smarter about hiring based on talent, not geography,” she said. “They’re looking for a certain skill set, a certain cultural fit, a certain leadership set of attributes and they shouldn’t care that it’s local or not. It’s more important that the fit is right than the geography. There is now enough support for cross-geography work and collaborations these days. The technology works. It’s proven. We’ll see more.” 

(See our feature story on the rise of the remote partner here.)

Randy Johnston, executive vice president of accounting-centered IT consulting firm K2 Enterprises, estimated that remote partners make up about 5% of the total population of accounting firm leaders, and the number will rise. 

“I think we’ll see a lot more,” he said. “It’ll be a long time, the culture has to shift a lot … and won’t shift fast enough for the percentage of change very quickly, but if we had this conversation 20 years from now, I don’t think it would be much of a conversation because you wouldn’t worry about it so much, it would just be kind of natural, so I expect it to well exceed 50%.” 

The idea of a partner who spends most of their time out of the office, or works with clients remotely from the office, has been already normalized over the years, especially at large firms. While there may have been a time when a partner saw everyone in person at their headquarters, even the most dedicated office dweller today does at least some of their work online. 

“We used to say any multi-office firm has already been working remotely,” said Wilson. “It’s not that far a leap for them to make the jump.” 

Another factor is the strong demand for high-quality talent, combined with the diminishing number of accounting professionals. Douglas Slaybaugh, a CPA career coach, noted this issue is exacerbated by the retirement of older experienced accountants with no one to replace them. While pipeline strain is felt mostly in the staff, manager and senior levels, it’s a problem increasingly being felt at the partner level as well. 

“Boomers are leaving and there’s not as many coming up the ranks,” said Slaybaugh. “Partners will start to feel a crunch in the ranks, losing some of their most experienced professionals.” 

Remote Partner flying

But while necessity does play a large role in the rise of remote partners, it’s not the only factor. Remote partners can serve as a key player in not just a firm’s recruitment strategy, but its growth strategy as well.

“They can expand into other niches more readily,” said Slaybaugh. “They tend to have more geographic coverage because, if you think of the traditional model, you’re a firm, you’re in one location, you’ve got maybe another office, you’re very hyper-local or regional. You start adding remote partners, suddenly you can work all over.”

This is especially advantageous for smaller firms hiring from metro areas with bigger firms. Johnston said that, many times, such remote partners bring with them new processes that the small firm may not have known about, so they can serve to upgrade their workflow. 

“Remote workers tend to bring the process from their predecessor firm with them, and they become the process if there is no process at the firm,” he added. “You go into a small firm, discover they have no processes, adopt the ones you’re familiar with and that becomes how they do things. Small firms can become sophisticated since they inherited a larger firm’s processes.” 

Wilson noted that even if small firms don’t have as many resources, they can offer a lot to these remote partners in terms of lifestyle. A firm in Lincoln, Nebraska can tell job candidates they don’t need to do an expensive daily commute to the office. “You can go visit clients, but for the most part you don’t need to come into the office every day, and that will save you time and money,” said Wilson. “Now Lincoln will need to pay New York pricing for that talent, and that could be a barrier, but oftentimes it is not.”  

Wilson added, though, that the flow goes both ways. Just as there is much a small firm can offer a remote partner who lives in a big city, a large big-city firm has a lot to offer for someone who lives outside the metro area too. That’s especially true for an accountant who is “stuck in a one-horse town where everyone is super-traditional, no one is evolving their firms, technology is not being utilized, and policies are really traditional,” said Wilson.

“You work in this tiny town in Oklahoma and your firm’s options are not great, but you’ll be living there because maybe your family is there so you’re not moving,” she added. “Well, guess what? You could work for a great progressive firm because we don’t care where you live, and you can have this fantastic career working for a firm you love and respect in a bigger city right from your small town. So we see both and they’re both effective.”

Johnston cited changing business models as another reason we’re seeing more remote workers. Many professionals who worked remotely during lockdown found it suited them and did not want to return to the office. This led to a lot of them leaving their more traditional firms (sometimes after being acquired) and founding their own firm, using a remote model. 

“Most say, look, we worked remotely during the pandemic,” said Johnston. “I want to start a firm with a remote work style. Then, just as the old saying goes, ‘birds of a feather flock together,’ so they start finding other people like that.”

Firms don’t necessarily have to be new to make this shift, though. Atlanta-based Aprio, a Top 50 firm, was founded in the 1950s but chose to lean heavily into remote work during the lockdowns, according to Larry Sheftel, Aprio’s chief human resources officer. 

“Aprio created a remote work model at the onset of the pandemic, and we continue to evolve our approach,” he said. “We currently look for talent located near one of our physical locations or located in an area where we will soon establish an office. If we are seeking a unique, specific skill set we may hire a partner who is fully remote.” 

Other firms, like Top 50 firm Schellman, have always been like this. While technically headquartered in Florida, CEO Avani Desai said the firm has always conceived of itself as a remote-first company. All of its partners are remote partners. “We believe talent has no bounds,” she said. 

“We wanted to tap into top-tier talent from coast to coast,” Desai added. “It was a strategic move to get the best and brightest to work here, to thrive, and it worked.”

See our entire series on the “Rise of the remote partner” here.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending