Connect with us

Accounting

Are remote partners the future for accounting firms?

Published

on

The remote partner represents a small but growing part of the professional landscape, their rise a reflection of the major changes that accounting firms were forced to make during the lockdowns. But while they’re a distinct minority today, the increasing sophistication of collaboration solutions — combined with the still-unresolved challenges with the talent pipeline — indicates their numbers are likely to rise. 

Jennifer Wilson, co-founder of Convergence Coaching, a remote work-focused leadership and management coaching and consulting firm, estimates that remote partners make up about 5% of firm leaders nationwide; adding in those who were already partners and then went remote, her estimate grows to about 10 to 15%. But she predicted this proportion will likely grow over time as more firms realize they’re no longer as bound to geography. 

“It’s just going to become more common because firms are getting smarter about hiring based on talent, not geography,” she said. “They’re looking for a certain skill set, a certain cultural fit, a certain leadership set of attributes and they shouldn’t care that it’s local or not. It’s more important that the fit is right than the geography. There is now enough support for cross-geography work and collaborations these days. The technology works. It’s proven. We’ll see more.” 

(See our feature story on the rise of the remote partner here.)

Randy Johnston, executive vice president of accounting-centered IT consulting firm K2 Enterprises, estimated that remote partners make up about 5% of the total population of accounting firm leaders, and the number will rise. 

“I think we’ll see a lot more,” he said. “It’ll be a long time, the culture has to shift a lot … and won’t shift fast enough for the percentage of change very quickly, but if we had this conversation 20 years from now, I don’t think it would be much of a conversation because you wouldn’t worry about it so much, it would just be kind of natural, so I expect it to well exceed 50%.” 

The idea of a partner who spends most of their time out of the office, or works with clients remotely from the office, has been already normalized over the years, especially at large firms. While there may have been a time when a partner saw everyone in person at their headquarters, even the most dedicated office dweller today does at least some of their work online. 

“We used to say any multi-office firm has already been working remotely,” said Wilson. “It’s not that far a leap for them to make the jump.” 

Another factor is the strong demand for high-quality talent, combined with the diminishing number of accounting professionals. Douglas Slaybaugh, a CPA career coach, noted this issue is exacerbated by the retirement of older experienced accountants with no one to replace them. While pipeline strain is felt mostly in the staff, manager and senior levels, it’s a problem increasingly being felt at the partner level as well. 

“Boomers are leaving and there’s not as many coming up the ranks,” said Slaybaugh. “Partners will start to feel a crunch in the ranks, losing some of their most experienced professionals.” 

Remote Partner flying

But while necessity does play a large role in the rise of remote partners, it’s not the only factor. Remote partners can serve as a key player in not just a firm’s recruitment strategy, but its growth strategy as well.

“They can expand into other niches more readily,” said Slaybaugh. “They tend to have more geographic coverage because, if you think of the traditional model, you’re a firm, you’re in one location, you’ve got maybe another office, you’re very hyper-local or regional. You start adding remote partners, suddenly you can work all over.”

This is especially advantageous for smaller firms hiring from metro areas with bigger firms. Johnston said that, many times, such remote partners bring with them new processes that the small firm may not have known about, so they can serve to upgrade their workflow. 

“Remote workers tend to bring the process from their predecessor firm with them, and they become the process if there is no process at the firm,” he added. “You go into a small firm, discover they have no processes, adopt the ones you’re familiar with and that becomes how they do things. Small firms can become sophisticated since they inherited a larger firm’s processes.” 

Wilson noted that even if small firms don’t have as many resources, they can offer a lot to these remote partners in terms of lifestyle. A firm in Lincoln, Nebraska can tell job candidates they don’t need to do an expensive daily commute to the office. “You can go visit clients, but for the most part you don’t need to come into the office every day, and that will save you time and money,” said Wilson. “Now Lincoln will need to pay New York pricing for that talent, and that could be a barrier, but oftentimes it is not.”  

Wilson added, though, that the flow goes both ways. Just as there is much a small firm can offer a remote partner who lives in a big city, a large big-city firm has a lot to offer for someone who lives outside the metro area too. That’s especially true for an accountant who is “stuck in a one-horse town where everyone is super-traditional, no one is evolving their firms, technology is not being utilized, and policies are really traditional,” said Wilson.

“You work in this tiny town in Oklahoma and your firm’s options are not great, but you’ll be living there because maybe your family is there so you’re not moving,” she added. “Well, guess what? You could work for a great progressive firm because we don’t care where you live, and you can have this fantastic career working for a firm you love and respect in a bigger city right from your small town. So we see both and they’re both effective.”

Johnston cited changing business models as another reason we’re seeing more remote workers. Many professionals who worked remotely during lockdown found it suited them and did not want to return to the office. This led to a lot of them leaving their more traditional firms (sometimes after being acquired) and founding their own firm, using a remote model. 

“Most say, look, we worked remotely during the pandemic,” said Johnston. “I want to start a firm with a remote work style. Then, just as the old saying goes, ‘birds of a feather flock together,’ so they start finding other people like that.”

Firms don’t necessarily have to be new to make this shift, though. Atlanta-based Aprio, a Top 50 firm, was founded in the 1950s but chose to lean heavily into remote work during the lockdowns, according to Larry Sheftel, Aprio’s chief human resources officer. 

“Aprio created a remote work model at the onset of the pandemic, and we continue to evolve our approach,” he said. “We currently look for talent located near one of our physical locations or located in an area where we will soon establish an office. If we are seeking a unique, specific skill set we may hire a partner who is fully remote.” 

Other firms, like Top 50 firm Schellman, have always been like this. While technically headquartered in Florida, CEO Avani Desai said the firm has always conceived of itself as a remote-first company. All of its partners are remote partners. “We believe talent has no bounds,” she said. 

“We wanted to tap into top-tier talent from coast to coast,” Desai added. “It was a strategic move to get the best and brightest to work here, to thrive, and it worked.”

See our entire series on the “Rise of the remote partner” here.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Crooks R Us

Published

on

The shadow knows; body of evidence; make a Note of it; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Newark, New Jersey: Thomas Nicholas Salzano, a.k.a. Nicholas Salzano, of Secaucus, New Jersey, the shadow CEO of National Realty Investment Advisors, has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for orchestrating a $658 million Ponzi scheme and conspiring to evade millions in taxes.

Salzano previously pleaded guilty to securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the U.S., admitting that he made numerous misrepresentations to investors while he secretly ran National Realty. From February 2018 through January 2022, Salzano and others defrauded investors and potential investors of NRIA Partners Portfolio Fund I, a real estate fund operated by National Realty, of $650 million.

Salzano and his conspirators executed their scheme through an aggressive multiyear, nationwide marketing campaign that involved thousands of emails to investors, advertisements, and meetings and presentations to investors. Salzano led and directed the marketing campaign that was intended to mislead investors into believing that NRIA generated significant profits. It in fact generated little to no profits and operated as a Ponzi scheme.

Salzano stole millions of dollars of investor money to support his lavish lifestyle, including expensive dinners, extravagant birthday parties, and payments to family and associates who did not work at NRIA. He also orchestrated a separate, related conspiracy to avoid paying taxes on his stolen funds.

He was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and agreed to a forfeiture money judgment of $8.52 million, full restitution of $507.4 million to the victims of his offenses and $6.46 million to the IRS.

Marina del Rey, California: Tax preparer Lidiya Gessese has been sentenced to 41 months in prison for preparing and filing false returns for her clients and for not reporting her income.

Gessese owned and operated Tax We R/Tax R Us and Insurance Services from 2013 through 2019 and charged clients $300 to $800. Gessese would then prepare returns that included claims to deductions and credits she knew her clients were not entitled to, including falsely claiming dependents, earned income credits, the American Opportunity Credit, Child Tax Credits, business deductions, education expenses or unreimbursed employee business expenses. The illegitimate claims led to some $1,135,554.64 issued by the IRS for 2010 through 2018.

She failed to report, or underreported, her own income for 2010 through 2018, some of which included improperly diverted funds from clients’ inflated or fraudulent refunds, causing a tax loss of $488,276.

Gessese, who pleaded guilty in April, was also ordered to pay $1,096,034.01 to the IRS and $53,526.95 to her other victims.

Fullerton, California: In Chun Jung of Anaheim, California, owner of an auto repair business, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns for 2015 to 2022, underreporting his income by at least $1,184,914.

He owned and operated JY JBMT INC., d.b.a. JY Auto Body, which was registered as a subchapter S corp. Jung was the 100% shareholder.

Jung accepted check payments from customers that he and his co-schemers then cashed at multiple area check cashing services; the cashed checks totaled some $1,157,462. Jung withheld the business receipts and income from his tax preparer and omitted them on his returns.

He will pay $300,145 in taxes due to the IRS and faces a $250,000 penalty and up to three years in prison. Sentencing is Jan. 31.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Tucson, Arizona: Tax preparer Nour Abubakr Nour, 34, has been sentenced to 30 months in prison.

Nour, who pleaded guilty a year ago, operated the tax prep business Skyman Tax and for tax years 2016 through 2018 prepared and filed at least 27 false individual federal income tax returns for clients.

These returns included falsely claimed business income that inflated refunds so that he could pay himself large prep fees. Nour’s clients had no knowledge that he was filing false tax returns under their names.

Nour was also ordered to pay $150,154 in restitution to the United States for the false tax refunds.

Farmington, Connecticut: Tax preparer Mark Legowski, 60, has been sentenced to eight months in prison, to be followed by a year of supervised release, for filing false returns.

From January 2015 through December 2017, Legowski was a self-employed accountant and tax preparer doing business as Legowski & Co. Inc. He prepared income tax returns for some 400 to 500 individual clients and some 50 to 60 businesses.

To reduce his personal income tax liability for 2015 through 2017, Legowski underreported his practice’s gross receipts by excluding some client payment checks. He then filed false personal income tax returns that failed to report more than $1.4 million in business income, which resulted in a loss to the IRS of $499,289.

Legowski, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, has paid the IRS that amount in back taxes but must still pay penalties and interest. He has also been ordered to pay a $10,000 fine.

Wheeling, West Virginia: Dr. Nitesh Ratnakar, 48, has been convicted of failing to pay nearly $2.5 million in payroll taxes.

Ratnakar, who was found guilty of 41 counts of tax fraud, owned and operated a gastroenterology practice and a medical equipment manufacturer in Elkins, West Virginia. He withheld payroll taxes from employees’ paychecks and failed to make $2,419,560 in required payments to the IRS. Ratnakar also filed false tax returns in 2020, 2021 and 2022.

He faces up to five years in prison for each of the first 38 tax fraud counts and up to three years for the remaining counts.

Orlando, Florida: Two men have been sentenced for their involvement in the “Note Program,” a tax fraud.

Jasen Harvey, of Tampa, Florida, was sentenced to four years in prison and Christopher Johnson, of Orlando, was sentenced to 37 months for conspiring to defraud the U.S.

From 2015 to 2018, they promoted a scheme in which Harvey and others prepared returns for clients that claimed that large, nonexistent income tax withholdings had been paid to the IRS and sought large refunds based on those purported withholdings. The conspirators charged fees and required the clients to pay a share of the fraudulently obtained refunds to them.

Overall, the defendants claimed more than $3 million in fraudulent refunds on clients’ returns, of which the IRS paid about $1.5 million.

Both were also ordered to serve three years of supervised release. Johnson was also ordered to pay $864,117.42 in restitution to the United States; Harvey was ordered to pay $785,858.42 in restitution. Co-defendant Arthur Grimes will be sentenced on Jan. 13.

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida: Tax preparer Jean Volvick Moise, 39, has been sentenced to three years in prison for filing false income tax returns.

Moise prepared false returns for clients to inflate refunds. He prepared returns which included, among other things, false dependents, false 1099 withholdings, false educational credits and false Schedule C expenses, often for businesses which did not exist. Moise’s fee was larger than the typical one charged by a tax preparer.

Moise filed hundreds of false returns that caused the IRS to issue more than $574,000 in fraudulent refunds.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting in 2025: The year ahead in numbers

Published

on

With 2025 almost upon us, it’s worth thinking about what the new year will bring, and what accounting firms expect their next 12 months to look like.

With that in mind, Accounting Today conducted its annual Year Ahead survey in the late fall to find out firms’ expectations for 2025, including their growth expectations, their hiring plans, their growth expectations, how they think tax season will play out and much more. The overall theme: Thing are going well, but there are elements of friction holding them back, particularly when it comes to moving to more of a focus on advisory services.

You can see the full report here; a selection of key data points are presented below.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: Withum marks over a decade of Withum Week of Caring

Published

on


Citrin Cooperman appoints CIO; PKF O’Connor Davies opens new Fort Lauderdale office; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Trending