Accounting
Barry Melancon: The most important man in accounting
Published
1 month agoon
The most important man in accounting originally intended to be a lawyer.
When Barry Melancon — who is retiring at the end of this year after three decades of leading the accounting profession as president and CEO of the American Institute of CPAs — started college at Nicholls State University in Louisiana in 1975, accounting wasn’t even on his radar.
“If you went back to my high school yearbook, I believe it would tell you that I wanted to be a lawyer,” he recalled, and when he started in his first semester, he was majoring in pre-law.
Coming from what he describes as “a very modest family” — his father had been pulled out of school in sixth grade to cut sugarcane by hand on the family farm — he explained that, “There wasn’t a frame of reference for me, really, about the CPA profession.”
That changed in his second semester, though, because he realized that he wanted to know more about business, and he chose accounting as a concentration largely because it offered the most comprehensive introduction to business: “If I majored in accounting, I would take all the other disciplines, because it was required — I would take management and marketing and economics and finance and, of course, accounting. And it just felt like if I wanted to know business — still probably within the back of my mind being a lawyer — that was going to give me the broadest base of knowledge.”
Then, in an epiphany experienced by countless CPAs before and since, he took the entry-level accounting course and was hooked.
“I liked it — I don’t think it’s the right course and we’re talking about changing it today, and I never thought it was the right course then,” he said. “It was way too mechanical to teach accounting. But I grasped the notion of what accountants really were doing, and so I changed my major into accounting after that first year.”
(See our 2024 list of the
Having made the choice, he charged ahead at full speed, finishing his undergraduate accounting degree in 3 ½ years, quickly landing a job at a small local firm, Bergeron & Co., and making partner there by the unprecedented age of 25. Not long after that he became the head of the Society of Louisiana CPAs, and seven years later he was named the youngest-ever head of the AICPA at 37. (He was actually hired when he was 36, but they delayed his start date until after his birthday so it would look better in the press release.)
By the time he arrived at the institute, Melancon had long since fully committed himself to accounting — and he had strong ideas about where he wanted to take the profession, and that would mean major changes at its main membership organization.
“Professional bodies in any profession usually have a DNA about saying why a profession couldn’t or shouldn’t do things,” he explained. “And I think what we created and what I had a passion about was to be an organization that led a profession, that worked with the profession to actually give permission to be much broader than what it was, to see those opportunities and what was in the best interest of the profession and the public interest — not to be an organization that tried to figure out why you might want to be really careful, or to say you shouldn’t do these types of things.”
While it’s far from the only thing Melancon has accomplished during his long tenure, shifting the AICPA from being an inhibitor to an enabler — and driving the profession as a whole to be more open to new opportunities and approaches and risks — may well be how he’s had the most influence.
“We need to have a mindset of the things we can do, rather than the reasons why we can’t,” he said, “and I think the profession embodies that today.”
Getting it in writing
To understand how Melancon rose to the level where he was able to wield that kind of influence, it helps to know that he had it written on his list of goals from the get-go.
Early in his career at Bergeron, Melancon started keeping a written list (he still keeps it, only now it’s on his phone), because a partner at the firm suggested it.
“One time this partner and I were going to a client, and the partner was building a new house and we passed in front of his house and he said, ‘You see, even before my house is being built, we have a pool in it. I had a written goal.’ This is what he said: ‘I had a written goal to have a pool, and now I’m able to achieve that.’ And he basically impressed upon me — I might have been 21 at that point — how important written goals were.”
And high on the list Melancon started keeping was a goal that sounds an awful lot like a job description for the head of the AICPA: “Literally I had a written goal to fly around, get off a plane and give speeches,” he said with a laugh. “I mean, it wasn’t worded exactly like that.”
Also on the list was making partner by 25 — an objective he almost didn’t fulfill, because a client offered him a job at a substantially higher salary than he was making at his firm.
“I was at Bergeron & Co. about nine months, and I was making $15,000 a year, and I had a client offer me a job at $25,000,” he recalled. “And when you’re making $15,000, $25,000 is a big increase, right?”
Feeling tempted, he told the partners of the firm about the offer — and even today, 40 years later, he makes a point of telling firm leaders about their response: “What they did is they said, ‘Let’s go to lunch.’ We had a 2 ½-hour lunch and basically they painted a picture for me of what being a partner was going to be like in the firm — basically what they made — and they painted the picture so well and it was one of my goals, that it caused me to say, ‘I am not doing this.’ I’m not leaving because I will always regret not experiencing that outcome.”
Not every goal on the list gets fulfilled, though; for instance, he originally had a goal to retire at 55: “But when I got later in my career, I said that’s a really dumb goal.”
The people around you
Of course, merely willing a thing (even in writing) isn’t always enough to make it come true. It also takes hard work and determination, which Melancon has always been willing to put in — and it certainly helped that leaders all around him recognized his talent early.
“The people around you in your life really determine who you are, and it’s important to understand that,” he said.
The day he passed the CPA exam, for instance, a partner at Bergeron & Co. congratulated him by taking his own name off an LSCPA committee, and having them put Melancon on it.
“So literally I was on a society or a professional committee the first day I was a CPA in my career,” he said, and he only got more involved, chairing committees and putting his minor in government from Nicholls to good use on advocacy work in the state.
(See who the most influential people in the profession
He was so active, in fact, that when the then-CEO of the society moved to the top spot at the Texas state society, both he and the CPA who succeeded him as head of the LSCPA offered Melancon the No. 2 spot at their respective organizations. Having just made partner at Bergeron, he turned them both down — but three years later when the Louisiana position opened up again and the then-chair made it clear that the job was his for the taking, he said yes.
“Really, what my wife and I talked about was that, in reality, we can go do this, and what’s the worst case? If I don’t like it, I can go back into public practice,” he said. “Those doors aren’t going to be closed to me.”
He couldn’t know that he wouldn’t return to public practice, and that his seven years at the Louisiana society would lead to him being so active with the AICPA that he would be considered a potential candidate to succeed then-president and CEO Phil Chenok in the mid-1990s.
But when the call came from search firm Korn Ferry, Melancon initially turned them down, too. “I told them no,” he recalled. “I said, ‘I’m probably too young for the institute to hire me and I don’t think that’s going to happen, and so I don’t think I’m going to put my name in.’ And about a month later, they called me back and they said, ‘Look, people want you to put your name in, and if you put your name in, I can guarantee you that you will be one of nine that gets interviewed.’ So, at that point, it’s sort of hard to say no to that.”
It wasn’t just the accountants recommending him to Korn Ferry who envisioned Melancon at the head of the institute. Much earlier, one of the leaders of the LSCPA saw it too. One component of his compensation involved deferred comp that would be forfeited if he left before serving for 10 years; at the time the position at the AICPA came open, Melancon had served seven years, but “unbeknownst to me, one of the society leaders had written into my contract a provision that said — and I didn’t ask for this — you forfeit unless you leave to be CEO of the AICPA. And that was written when I was 30.”
“It’s people around you who see things in you, at least in my case, that have been unbelievable in life,” he said. “For someone to see that in you, to me, is about what people around you make of you and what people around you contribute to you. When someone that was around me saw that — what an incredible compliment and support mechanism that was — it is amazing. I’ve had a lot of luck.”
Promising change
Melancon put his name in the ring, but still didn’t think he had a chance, even though he flew to California to meet the recruiter from Korn Ferry.
“We were supposed to have a one-hour dinner in the San Francisco airport,” he recalled. “And essentially I started that dinner off with, ‘Look, I didn’t go to a name-brand university. I’m 36 years old. I never worked in a big firm. I’m not from the Northeast. You and I both know that the institute is not going to hire me in this job. So, let me tell you what I think ought to happen.'”
The one-hour dinner ended four hours later, after Melancon had outlined all the changes he thought should be made at the institute. “And when I ultimately got into the role,” he said, “I did a lot of the stuff that we talked about.”
Despite — or perhaps because of — his candor with Korn Ferry, Melancon got the job, and felt empowered to implement the changes he had suggested. “I went in with the notion that people put me here and I was going to change the place,” he said. “And in the first 90 days I did a massive reorganization, including many people being asked to leave the institute.”
He cut headcount at the AICPA from 863 to below 600 (a level it maintained for 20 years, until it merged with the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants in 2016). He also began to build up the institute’s advocacy muscles, speed up its processes, promote high-potential talent (including current CEO of public accounting Sue Coffey), and to change what the institute meant to firms — particularly those below the Big Four, who had not been as engaged with the AICPA before.
“I knew the profession was changing and I knew that the institute could not be what a lot of people would have said that it was then — an ivory tower institute — and I also knew that we had to be more entrepreneurial and that the profession had to be more entrepreneurial and that’s what drove me, and we did it,” he said.
From there to the future
A wholesale reorganization of the leading organization in the profession would be accomplishment enough for many, but for Melancon, it served to give him a strong platform from which to lead accounting into the future.
The three decades of his tenure have been among the most tumultuous, unpredictable and full of change in accounting’s history, and Melancon has taken the lead in navigating the profession through two recessions, the collapse of Arthur Andersen and the Enron crisis, the creation of major new regulatory regimes in the form of Sarbanes-Oxley and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the rise of the internet and the cloud, a global pandemic, and most recently, the birth of artificial intelligence, through all of which he has charted a proactive course forward, rather than merely reacting.
All that time, Melancon and the institute were pursuing their own agenda — computerizing the CPA exam and taking it international, launching
CPA.com as its technology arm, exploring and proselytizing new services, launching initiatives to boost audit quality, working to promote diversity, aggressively pursuing solutions to the current pipeline program, and, perhaps most ambitiously, merging with CIMA to create an international powerhouse.
With so much to do, it’s easy to see why Melancon has stayed in his role longer than any other leader in AICPA history. “I went in at first with a five-year commitment, so you don’t really know how that is going to play out,” he said. “But I had a passion for the profession and I always have had confidence in myself, so I did not go in to the institute with the notion that this was going to be a short-term process.”
Even with his time at the institute almost up, Melancon is still looking forward, seeing the future course of the profession in his mind, spying out both challenges and opportunities.
He highlights artificial intelligence as a transformational technology that will, like the rise of the internet three decades ago, have repercussions for both society at large and the accounting profession.
“I am not one who’s going to say that with AI, the role of the human is going to be fine, or that it’s always going to be there. I don’t believe that at all,” he said. “I believe that just like a lot of other technologies change jobs, change the quantity of jobs in certain areas, change the expectations of what people do in jobs, it’s going to have an impact; it’s going to change how we define work in society not in the next two years but in the next decade.”
AI’s impact on the profession is going to be tied into an ongoing evolution in the structure of firms and how accountants progress in their careers. “The fundamental change for the profession is that we have been a profession that takes entry-level people … we take in entry-level people and we put them in an environment to progress upward to the middle of the organization,” he explained. “And it takes a while, and the key component of that is a broader set of competencies than just accounting and a broad notion of what you can call business acumen. And when you get to the middle part of an organization, whether it’s a finance function or a firm, your value-add to a client or to your employer is really about those broader skills and your business acumen.”
“Organizations like the AICPA and firms and professional accountancy bodies around the world need to think about how we take an entry-level accountant where technology is going to do the bulk of that entry-level accounting work and how we move them up quickly and get them those broader skills quicker so that they’re value-add players,” he explained. “It is an immense challenge, but we’re going to have to figure it out. And if we figure it out, then starting from human capital, our services are going to change.”
Those challenges will be for the next generation of leaders of the profession to deal with, but Melancon does have some advice for the accountants of the future — and it is, naturally, about taking a broader view of what they, and the profession, can do.
“If we go into every morning and we think, ‘We know accounting,’ we’re not going to have the same future as if we think, ‘We know business information,'” he said. “We really need to take our skills and our competencies and apply it to the broader footprint of business and do it right and effectively, with ethics. And if we do that, we’re going to have a lot of new and different opportunities, and the next generation of our profession is going to be even more successful than the current generation of our profession.”
Much of Melancon’s career can be summed up by a relentless drive to move accounting forward, to improve every aspect of it — but as he looks back, it’s not the impact he has had on the profession that is foremost in his mind, but rather the impact that the people in the profession had on him.
“I would thank the people that I have interacted with, the people in our profession, for how much I’ve learned from so many different people,” he said. “I find it really hard to believe someone can have a career that gets exposed to anything like what I’ve been exposed to, because CPAs and the profession are fantastic, and the people who interact with you and the questions they ask and the contributions they make are just tremendous. … And that knowledge makes one’s life — in my case, my life — so incredibly enjoyable and fulfilled that I’m very appreciative of the profession.”
You may like
Accounting
Inventory Management For Financial Accuracy and Operational Success
Published
1 day agoon
January 11, 2025In the dynamic world of business operations, precise inventory management is more than a routine task—it is a critical factor in achieving financial accuracy and operational efficiency. Beyond simple stock tracking, accurate inventory recording plays a vital role in financial reporting, resource planning, and strategic decision-making. This article explores the essential practices for maintaining accurate inventory records and their profound impact on business performance.
At the heart of effective inventory management is the implementation of a real-time tracking system. By leveraging technologies such as barcode scanners, RFID tags, and IoT sensors, businesses can maintain a perpetual inventory system that updates stock levels instantly. This ensures accuracy, reduces the risk of stockouts or overstocking, and enables better forecasting and planning.
A standardized process for receiving, storing, and dispatching inventory is equally important. Documenting each step—from goods received to final distribution—establishes a clear audit trail, reduces errors, and minimizes the potential for discrepancies. Properly labeled and organized inventory not only saves time but also supports efficient workflows across departments.
Regular physical counts are essential for verifying recorded inventory against actual stock. Whether conducted through periodic cycle counts or comprehensive annual inventories, these audits help identify issues such as shrinkage, theft, or obsolescence. Combining physical counts with real-time systems ensures alignment and strengthens the accuracy of inventory records.
The use of inventory management software has transformed the way businesses maintain inventory data. Advanced systems automate data entry, provide centralized visibility across multiple warehouses or locations, and generate actionable analytics. Features like demand forecasting, low-stock alerts, and real-time reporting empower businesses to make informed decisions and optimize inventory levels.
Accurate inventory valuation is another cornerstone of sound inventory management. Businesses typically choose from methods such as First-In, First-Out (FIFO), Last-In, First-Out (LIFO), or the weighted average cost method. Selecting and consistently applying the appropriate method is essential for financial accuracy, tax compliance, and reflecting inventory flow in financial statements.
Inventory management also has direct implications for financial reporting, tax preparation, and securing business financing. Reliable inventory records instill confidence in stakeholders, demonstrate operational efficiency, and support compliance with accounting standards and regulatory requirements. Additionally, precise data allows businesses to assess their inventory turnover ratio—a key metric for evaluating operational performance and profitability.
In conclusion, accurate inventory recording is a strategic imperative for businesses aiming to enhance financial precision and operational excellence. By adopting advanced technologies, implementing standardized processes, and conducting regular audits, companies can ensure their inventory records remain accurate and reliable. For business leaders and finance professionals, effective inventory management is not just about compliance—it is a powerful tool for driving profitability, improving resource allocation, and maintaining a competitive edge in the market.
Mastering inventory management creates a foundation for long-term success, allowing businesses to operate efficiently, make better decisions, and deliver consistent value to stakeholders.
Accounting
New IRS regs put some partnership transactions under spotlight
Published
1 day agoon
January 10, 2025Final regulations now identify certain partnership related-party “basis shifting” transactions as “transactions of interest” subject to the rules for reportable transactions.
The final regs apply to related partners and partnerships that participated in the identified transactions through distributions of partnership property or the transfer of an interest in the partnership by a related partner to a related transferee. Affected taxpayers and their material advisors are subject to the disclosure requirements for reportable transactions.
During the proposal process, the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service received comments that the
- Increased dollar threshold for basis increase in a TOI. The threshold amount for a basis increase in a TOI has been increased from $5 million to $25 million for tax years before 2025 and $10 million for tax years after.
- Limited retroactive reporting for open tax years. Reporting has been limited for open tax years to those that fall within a six-year lookback window. The six-year lookback is the 72-month period before the first month of a taxpayer’s most recent tax year that began before the publication of the final regulations (
slated for Jan. 14 in the Federal Register). Also, the threshold amount for a basis increase in a TOI during the six-year lookback is $25 million. - Additional time for reporting. Taxpayers have an additional 90 days from the final regulation’s publication to file disclosure statements for TOIs in open tax years for which a return has already been filed and that fall within the six-year lookback. Material advisors have an additional 90 days to file their disclosure statements for tax statements made before the final regulations.
- Publicly traded partnerships. Because PTPs are typically owned by a large number of unrelated owners, the final regulations exclude many owners of PTPs from the disclosure rules.
The identified transactions generally result from either a tax-free distribution of partnership property to a partner that is related to one or more partners of the partnership, or the tax-free transfer of a partnership interest by a related partner to a related transferee.
The tax-free distribution or transfer generates an increase to the basis of the distributed property or partnership property of $10 million or more ($25 million or more in the case of a TOI undertaken in a tax year before 2025) under the rules of IRC Sections 732(b) or (d), 734(b) or 743(b), but for which no corresponding tax is paid.
The basis increase to the distributed or partnership property allows the related parties to decrease taxable income through increased cost recovery allowances or decrease taxable gain (or increase taxable loss) on the disposition of the property.
Accounting
Treasury, IRS propose rules on commercial clean vehicles, issue guidance on clean fuels
Published
1 day agoon
January 10, 2025The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service proposed new rules for the tax credit for qualified commercial clean vehicles, along with guidance on claiming tax credits for clean fuel under the Inflation Reduction Act.
The
The credit is the lesser amount of either 30% of the vehicle’s basis (15% for plug-in hybrid EVs) or the vehicle’s incremental cost in excess of a vehicle comparable in size or use powered solely by gasoline or diesel. A credit up to $7,500 can be claimed for a single qualified commercial clean vehicle for cars and light-duty trucks (with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of less than 14,000 pounds), or otherwise $40,000 for vehicles like electric buses and semi-trucks (with a GVWR equal to or greater than 14,000 pounds).
“The release of Treasury’s proposed rules for the commercial clean vehicle credit marks an important step forward in the Biden-Harris Administration’s work to lower transportation costs and strengthen U.S. energy security,” said U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo in a statement Friday. “Today’s guidance will provide the clarity and certainty needed to grow investment in clean vehicle manufacturing.”
The NPRM issued today proposes rules to implement the 45W credit, including proposing various pathways for taxpayers to determine the incremental cost of a qualifying commercial clean vehicle for purposes of calculating the amount of 45W credit. For example, the NPRM proposes that taxpayers can continue to use the incremental cost safe harbors such as those set out in Notice 2023-9 and Notice 2024-5, may rely on a manufacturer’s written cost determination to determine the incremental cost of a qualifying commercial clean vehicle, or may calculate the incremental cost of a qualifying clean vehicle versus an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle based on the differing costs of the vehicle powertrains.
The NPRM also proposes rules regarding the types of vehicles that qualify for the credit and aligns certain definitional concepts with those applicable to the 30D and 25E credits. In addition, the NPRM proposes that vehicles are only eligible if they are used 100% for trade or business, excepting de minimis personal use, and that the 45W credit is disallowed for qualified commercial clean vehicles that were previously allowed a clean vehicle credit under 30D or 45W.
The notice asks for comments over the next 60 days on the proposed regulations such as issues related to off-road mobile machinery, including approaches that might be adopted in applying the definition of mobile machinery to off-road vehicles and whether to create a product identification number system for such machinery in order to comply with statutory requirements. A public hearing is scheduled for April 28, 2025.
Clean Fuels Production Credit
The Treasury the IRS also released guidance Friday on the Clean Fuels Production Credit under Section 45Z of the Tax Code.
Section 45Z provides a tax credit for the production of transportation fuels with lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions below certain levels. The credit is in effect in 2025 and is for sustainable aviation fuel and non-SAF transportation fuels.
The guidance includes both a
“This guidance will help put America on the cutting-edge of future innovation in aviation and renewable fuel while also lowering transportation costs for consumers,” said Adeyemo in a statement. “Decarbonizing transportation and lowering costs is a win-win for America.”
Section 45Z provides a per-gallon (or gallon-equivalent) tax credit for producers of clean transportation fuels based on the carbon intensity of production. It consolidates and replaces pre-Inflation Reduction Act credits for biodiesel, renewable diesel, and alternative fuels, and an IRA credit for sustainable aviation fuel. Like several other IRA credits, Section 45Z requires the Treasury to establish rules for measuring carbon intensity of production, based on the Clean Air Act’s definition of “lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions.”
The guidance offers more clarity on various issues, including which entities and fuels are eligible for the credit, and how taxpayers determine lifecycle emissions. Specifically, the guidance outlines the Treasury and the IRS’s intent to define key concepts and provide certain rules in a future rulemaking, including clarifying who is eligible for a credit.
The Treasury and the IRS intend to provide that the producer of the eligible clean fuel is eligible to claim the 45Z credit. In keeping with the statute, compressors and blenders of fuel would not be eligible.
Under Section 45Z, a fuel must be “suitable for use” as a transportation fuel. The Treasury and the IRS intend to propose that 45Z-creditable transportation fuel must itself (or when blended into a fuel mixture) have either practical or commercial fitness for use as a fuel in a highway vehicle or aircraft. The guidance clarifies that marine fuels that are otherwise suitable for use in highway vehicles or aircraft, such as marine diesel and methanol, are also 45Z eligible.
Specifically, this would mean that neat SAF that is blended into a fuel mixture that has practical or commercial fitness for use as a fuel would be creditable. Additionally, natural gas alternatives such as renewable natural gas would be suitable for use if produced in a manner such that if it were further compressed it could be used as a transportation fuel.
Today’s guidance publishes the annual emissions rate table that directs taxpayers to the appropriate methodologies for calculating carbon intensities for types and categories of 45Z-eligible fuels.
The table directs taxpayers to use the 45ZCF-GREET model to determine the emissions rate of non-SAF transportation fuel, and either the 45ZCF-GREET model or methodologies from the International Civil Aviation Organization (“CORSIA Default” or “CORSIA Actual”) for SAF.
Taxpayers can use the Provisional Emissions Rate process to obtain an emissions rate for fuel pathway and feedstock combinations not specified in the emissions rate table when guidance is published for the PER process. Guidance for the PER process is expected at a later date.
Outlining climate smart agriculture practices
The guidance released Friday states that the Treasury intends to propose rules for incorporating the emissions benefits from climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices for cultivating domestic corn, soybeans, and sorghum as feedstocks for SAF and non-SAF transportation fuels. These options would be available to taxpayers after Treasury and the IRS propose regulations for the section 45Z credit, including rules for CSA, and the 45ZCF-GREET model is updated to enable calculation of the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions rates for CSA crops, taking into account one or more CSA practices.
CSA practices have multiple benefits, including lower overall GHG emissions associated with biofuels production and increased adoption of farming practices that are associated with other environmental benefits, such as improved water quality and soil health. Agencies across the Federal government have taken important steps to advance the adoption of CSA. In April, Treasury established a first-of-its-kind pilot program to encourage CSA practices within guidance on the section 40B SAF tax credit. Treasury has received and continues to consider substantial feedback from stakeholders on that pilot program. The U.S. Department of Agriculture invested more than $3 billion in 135 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities projects. Combined with the historic investment of $19.5 billion in CSA from the Inflation Reduction Act, the department is estimated to support CSA implementation on over 225 million acres in the next 5 years as well as measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification to better understand the climate impacts of these practices.
In addition, in June, the U.S. Department of Agriculture published a Request for Information requesting public input on procedures for reporting and verification of CSA practices and measurement of related emissions benefits, and received substantial input from a wide array of stakeholders. The USDA is currently developing voluntary technical guidelines for CSA reporting and verification. The Treasury and the IRS expect to consider those guidelines in proposing rules recognizing the benefits of CSA for purposes of the Section 45Z credit.
Innovations in Green Computing and Energy Efficient Devices
The Role of Technology in Combating Climate Change
How to Feature your business success on this page
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
Trending
-
Personal Finance1 week ago
How to rebalance your portfolio after lofty stock returns in 2024
-
Economics1 week ago
Jimmy Carter reshaped his home town
-
Accounting1 week ago
Depreciation of Assets and Key Strategies for Accurate Valuation
-
Finance1 week ago
Ken Griffin’s flagship hedge fund at Citadel climbs 15.1% in 2024
-
Economics1 week ago
Russ Vought: Donald Trump’s holy warrior
-
Economics1 week ago
Overall, American states are becoming more democratic
-
Finance1 week ago
Stocks making the biggest moves midday: TSLA, U, CEG
-
Accounting1 week ago
Yeo & Yeo buys Amy Cell Talent, expands HR advisory services