Connect with us

Personal Finance

Bill would cap credit card interest rates at 10%. What it means for you

Published

on

Freshsplash | E+ | Getty Images

Despite the Federal Reserve‘s recent cuts, credit card interest rates have been hovering near record highs. A new bipartisan bill would cap them at a dramatically lower figure, but experts say it may not be a win for consumers.

Senators Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced a bill this week that would cap credit card interest rates at a 10% annual percentage rate (APR) for five years. It’s an idea President Donald Trump floated at campaign rally in New York in September

“Capping credit card interest rates at 10%, just like President Trump campaigned on, is a simple way to provide meaningful relief to working people,” Hawley said in a statement

More from Your Money:

Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

The average APR on credit cards for January 2025 was 24.26%, according to LendingTree.

Almost half of credit card holders carry debt from month to month, according to a recent survey by Bankrate. In 2022, credit card companies charged consumers more than $105 billion in interest and more than $25 billion in fees, according to a 2023 study by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 

“We cannot continue to allow big banks to make huge profits ripping off the American people. This legislation will provide working families struggling to pay their bills with desperately needed financial relief,” Sanders said in a statement.

Limiting credit card interest rates is not a new idea

This isn’t the first time these senators have proposed the idea of a rate cap. In 2023, Hawley proposed an 18% rate cap, while Sanders proposed a 15% rate cap in 2019. Neither had adequate support to advance the proposals.  

Around three-quarters, or 77%, of Americans surveyed said they support a cap on the interest rates financial institutions can charge on a credit card, according to a recent survey by LendingTree. But that support is down from 80% in 2022, and 84% in 2019. 

The legislation has a long way to go before it could become law, and experts say its fate may depend in part on what happens with inflation, and whether Trump continues to support the measure. 

“If pricing stays stable, I think it’s going to be much tougher to advance this kind of legislation,” said Jaret Seiberg, a policy analyst for TD Cowen.

Fees, rate structure may still make credit expensive

While a 10% rate cap may sound appealing, experts say the intricacies of how it is structured are important, with consideration for periodic interest rates, fees and the repayment structure.

“You could have zero interest and still have an incredibly expensive product,” said Chi Chi Wu, a senior attorney at the National Consumer Law Center.

The proposal also seems at odds with the Trump administration’s interest in eliminating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, she said.

“If policy makers want to show that they actually care about protecting consumers’ wallets and keeping them from being abused by high-cost credit, they would make sure we have a strong Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,” Wu said.

Rate caps could limit access to credit

The banking industry opposes the idea of a rate cap. Seven financial groups representing banks and credit unions of all sizes have joined forces to oppose the measure. They say it will limit consumers’ access to credit and push them into higher-priced, less-regulated products like payday loans, which can have an average APR of 400%

“There’s no evidence that APR caps make consumers better off or save them money,” said Lindsey Johnson, president and CEO of the Consumer Bankers Association. 

There are already a few federal caps on interest rates. In 2006, Congress passed the Military Lending Act, which put a 36% interest cap on revolving loans for active duty service members and their families.

Federal credit unions are typically restricted to a 15% APR maximum, but the rate can be increased to protect the safety and soundness of the credit union. The maximum is currently 18% through March 10, 2026.

Banks blame high credit card rates on regulation that's unlikely to arrive

Bankers say a rate cap inhibits lenders and reduces access to credit for higher-risk consumers. 

“Providing an all-in APR is a flawed tool for measuring the true cost of the loan, because to maintain the safety and soundness of the lender and ensure that credit availability is offered to a broad range of consumers, banks have to price their loan products commensurate with a risk for each borrower,” Johnson said. 

New bill may not apply to existing debt

For consumers who are already carrying debt, this proposal may not be the lifeline it appears. 

“If you already have a lot of debt, this legislation probably doesn’t help you,” said Seiberg.

That’s because the interest rate cap wouldn’t be applied retroactively, he said: “It’s likely to only be on new purchases.” 

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Trump’s IRS Commissioner pick Billy Long grilled by Senate Democrats

Published

on

UNITED STATES – MARCH 31: Rep. Billy Long, R-Mo., is seen during the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology hearing titled Connecting America: Oversight of the FCC, in Rayburn Building on Thursday, March 31, 2022.

Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

Senate lawmakers pressed President Donald Trump‘s pick for IRS Commissioner, former Missouri Congressman Billy Long, about his opinions on presidential power over the agency, use of taxpayer data and his ties to dubious tax credits.

Long, who worked as an auctioneer before serving six terms in the House of Representatives, answered Senate Finance Committee queries during a confirmation hearing Tuesday.

One of the key themes from Democrats was Trump’s power over the agency, and Long told the committee, “the IRS will not, should not be politicized on my watch.”

More from Personal Finance:
What Moody’s downgrade of U.S. credit rating means for your money
Long-term care costs can be a ‘huge problem,’ experts say. Here’s why
How student loan borrowers can avoid default as Trump ramps up collection efforts

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who provided her questions to Long in advance, asked whether Trump could legally end Harvard University’s tax-exempt status. If permitted, the move could have broad implications for the President’s power over the agency, she argued.

However, Long didn’t answer the question directly.

“I don’t intend to let anybody direct me to start [an] audit for political reasons,” he said.

Ties to dubious tax credits

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., scrutinized Long’s online promotion of the pandemic-era employee retention tax credit worth thousands per eligible employee. The tax break sparked a cottage industry of scrupulous companies pushing the tax break to small businesses that didn’t qualify.

“I didn’t say everyone qualifies,” Long said. “I said virtually everyone qualifies.”

Senators also asked about Long’s referral income from companies pushing so-called “tribal tax credits,” which the IRS has told Democratic lawmakers don’t exist.

“I did not have any perception whatsoever that these did not exist,” Long told the committee.

Senate Democrats also raised questions about donations people connected to those credits made to Long’s dormant Senate campaign, after Trump announced his nomination to head the IRS.

Direct File ‘one of the hottest topics’

While Senate Democrats grilled Long on his record, Republicans focused on questions about taxpayer service. Several Republican lawmakers voiced support for Long, including the committee chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho. 

If confirmed by the Senate, Long could mean a shift for the agency, which previously embarked on a multibillion-dollar revamp, including upgrades to customer service, technology and a free filing program, known as Direct File.

When asked about the future of Direct File, Long said he planned to promptly examine the program, describing it as “one of the hottest topics at the IRS.”

‘An unconventional pick’

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Student loan borrowers struggle to get into income-driven repayment plan

Published

on

franckreporter | Getty Images

Nearly 2 million federal student loan borrowers who’ve requested to be in an affordable repayment plan are stuck in a backlog of applications, waiting to be approved or denied, according to new data recently shared by the U.S. Department of Education.

The Education Department disclosed the information in a May 15 court filing in response to a legal challenge lodged by the American Federation of Teachers. The teachers’ union sued the Trump administration in March for shutting down access to income-driven repayment plan applications on the Education Department’s website.

IDR plans cap borrowers’ monthly bills at a share of their discretionary income with the aim of making their payments manageable.

More from Personal Finance:
House Republican bill calls for bigger child tax credit
Student loan borrowers in default may see 15% of Social Security benefit garnished
How college savers can manage 529 plans in a turbulent market

In late March, the Trump administration made the online applications available again, and said that it pulled the forms because it needed to make sure all repayment plans complied with a court order that blocked the Biden administration’s new IDR plan, known as SAVE, or the Saving on a Valuable Education plan.

Trump officials argued that the ruling had broader implications for other IDR plans, and it ended up removing the loan forgiveness component under some of the options.

The backlog complicates things for borrowers as the Trump administration restarts collection activity. The Education Department estimates that nearly 10 million people could be in default on their student loans within months.

Without access to an affordable repayment plan, student loan borrowers can be suspended on their timeline to loan forgiveness and at risk of falling behind and facing collection activity.

‘The opposite of government efficiency’

In the May court document, the Education Department disclosed that more than 1.98 million IDR applications remained pending as of the end of April. Only roughly 79,000 requests had been approved or denied during that month.

Consumer advocates slammed the findings.

“This filing confirms what borrowers have known for months: Their applications for loan relief have effectively been going into a void,” said Winston Berkman-Breen, legal director at the Student Borrower Protection Center.

The Center said that if the Education Department continued to move at its current rate, it would take more than two years to process the existing applications.

AFT President Randi Weingarten called the backlog “outrageous and unacceptable.”

“This is the opposite of government efficiency,” Weingarten said. “Millions of borrowers are being denied their legal right to an affordable repayment option.”

What’s behind the backlog

A spokesperson for the Education Dept. blamed the backlog on the Biden administration, saying that it “failed to process income-driven repayment applications for borrowers, artificially masking rising delinquency and default rates and promising illegal student loan forgiveness to win points with voters.”

“The Trump Administration is actively working with federal student loan servicers and hopes to clear the Biden backlog over the next few months,” they said.

The Biden administration put the student loan borrowers who’d enrolled in its new IDR plan, SAVE, into an interest-free forbearance while the GOP-led legal challenges to the program unfolded. Many of the currently pending IDR requests are likely from borrowers who are trying to leave that blocked plan to get into an available one.

Sarah Sattlemeyer, a project director at New America and senior advisor under the Biden administration, said that the current backlog began last year “and has existed across both the Biden and Trump administrations” as a result of the legal battle over the SAVE plan.

“It is a demonstration of how complicated the loan system is, how much uncertainty there has been over the last few years and what is at stake,” Sattlemeyer said. “There also isn’t clarity around how some applications in the backlog should or will be handled, such as those where a borrower chose an option that no longer exists on the application.”

Student loan default collection restarting

In recent months, the Trump administration has terminated around half of the Education Department’s staff, including many of the people who helped assist borrowers.

That is also likely one reason why so many of the applications haven’t been processed, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

“Perhaps the reduction in staff is affecting their ability to process the forms,” Kantrowitz said.

Continue Reading

Personal Finance

Student loan delinquencies risk ‘spillovers’ to other debts, NY Fed

Published

on

Student loan default collection restarting

The Trump administration’s resumption of collection efforts on defaulted federal student loans has far-reaching consequences for delinquent borrowers.

For starters, borrowers who are in default may have wages, tax returns and Social Security payments garnished.

But involuntary collections could also have a “spillover effect,” which puts consumers at risk of falling behind on other debt repayments, according to a recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,

As collection activity restarts, disposable income falls

‘It’s just money that can’t go to other financial things’

Until earlier this month, the Department of Education had not collected on defaulted student loans since March 2020. After the Covid pandemic-era pause on federal student loan payments expired in September 2023, the Biden administration offered borrowers another year in which they would be shielded from the impacts of missed payments. That on-ramp officially ended on Sept. 30, 2024, and the Education Department restarted collection efforts on defaulted student loans on May 5.

Whether borrowers face garnishment, or opt to resume payments to get current on their loan, that’s likely to have a significant impact on their wallet.

“It’s just money that can’t go to other financial things,” said Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree. 

After the five-year pause ended and collections are resumed, the delinquency rate for student loan balances spiked, the New York Fed found. Nearly 8% of total student debt was reported as 90 days past due in the first quarter of 2025, compared to less than 1% in the previous quarter.

Currently, around 42 million Americans hold federal student loans and roughly 5.3 million borrowers are in default, according to the Education Department. Another 4 million borrowers are in “late-stage delinquency,” or over 90 days past due on payments.

Among borrowers who are now required to make payments — not including those who are in deferment or forbearance or are currently enrolled in school — nearly one in four student loan borrowers are behind in their payments, the New York Fed found.  

As borrowers transition out of forbearance and into repayment, those borrowers may also face challenges making payments, according to a separate research note by Bank of America. “This transition will likely drive delinquencies and defaults on student loans higher and could have further knock-on effects for consumer finance companies,” Bank of America analyst Mihir Bhatia wrote to clients on May 15.

In a blog post, the New York Fed researchers noted that “it is unclear whether these penalties will spill over into payment difficulties in other credit products, but we will continue to monitor this space in the coming months.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Continue Reading

Trending