Connect with us

Accounting

Boomer’s Blueprint: Transactional + transformational growth

Published

on

The business environment is changing rapidly, and CPA firm leaders and their clients face the twin challenges of managing current operations while positioning themselves for future growth. We can achieve this balance by understanding and leveraging transactional and transformational growth.

As technology disruptions — particularly artificial intelligence — reshape markets, it’s impossible to overstate the importance of mastering these two types of growth.

This article takes a closer look at the significance of transactional and transformational growth, and how they impact cash flow, future investments, and the technological landscape.

In my opinion, too many mergers and acquisitions are focused on transactional rather than transformational growth. Focus on the top 20% of your firm’s client’s requirements to prioritize your growth strategies. Too often, firms focus on the bottom 80% rather than the top 20% of their clients. Focusing on the top 20% gives you a competitive advantage and allows you to continuously improve your service line offerings. This will increase the value and profitability of your firm in the long term.

Transactional versus transformational growth

“Transactional growth” refers to the incremental improvements and efficiencies gained through optimizing current processes and operations. This type of growth is essential for maintaining cash flow, ensuring profitability and achieving short-term goals. Examples include refining billing and collection practices, enhancing client service delivery and implementing cost-saving measures.

On the other hand, “transformational growth” involves radical changes that fundamentally alter how a business operates. It encompasses strategic initiatives aimed at long-term success, such as adopting new service lines and business models, entering new markets or leveraging disruptive technologies like AI. Transformational growth requires significant investment and a visionary mindset, but can yield substantial returns.

Both types of growth are essential, and balancing transactional and transformational growth is crucial. Here’s why:

1. Cash flow management

  • Transactional growth. By focusing on optimizing current operations, firms can ensure steady cash flow. This includes efficient billing and collections, reducing overhead costs, and improving the client experience. These efforts contribute to a healthy bottom line, providing financial stability for day-to-day operations.
  • Transformational growth. While it may strain short-term cash flow, investing in transformational initiatives can lead to significant long-term financial gains. These investments often involve upfront costs but position the firm for future growth and increased profitability.

2. Investment in the future

  • Transactional growth. This provides the necessary resources to fund transformational initiatives. The efficiencies gained through transactional improvements free up capital to reinvest into transformative projects.
  • Transformational growth. This ensures that the firm remains competitive in an evolving market. By embracing new technologies and innovative business models, firms can attract new clients, enter new markets and stay ahead of industry trends.

3. Technology disruption and changing markets

  • Transactional growth. This helps firms adapt to technological changes by improving existing processes. For example, adopting new workflow software can streamline operations and improve service delivery. AI-powered tools for routine tasks like scheduling, data entry, reconciliations and basic tax return preparation improve efficiency and free up talent for higher-value activities.
  • Transformational growth. This allows firms to leverage disruptive technologies like AI to fundamentally change their business models and develop compelling new service lines. AI can automate routine tasks, provide deep insights through data analysis and enhance decision-making capabilities, positioning firms for long-term success.

The Transformation Triangle

To effectively navigate both transactional and transformational growth, CPA firm leaders must focus on three critical areas: leadership, project management and process management — collectively known as “The Transformation Triangle.”

1. Leadership. Leadership is the cornerstone of both transactional and transformational growth. Effective leaders inspire their teams, drive strategic vision and create a culture of continuous improvement. They understand the importance of balancing short-term operational efficiencies with long-term strategic investments.

  • Vision and strategy. Leaders must articulate a clear vision that balances transactional improvements with transformational goals. They should align this vision with the firm’s overall strategy and communicate it effectively to all stakeholders.
  • Change management. Transformational growth often involves significant change, which can be challenging. Leaders must be adept at managing change, addressing resistance and fostering a culture that embraces innovation.

2. Project management. Project management is critical for executing both transactional and transformational initiatives. Effective project management ensures that initiatives are completed on time, within budget and to the desired quality standards. Project management differs from process management in that each project has an end date.

  • Planning and execution. Detailed planning and execution are critical for transactional projects. This includes setting clear objectives, allocating resources and monitoring progress. You may need a more flexible approach for transformational projects, as these initiatives often involve uncertainty and require adaptability.
  • Risk management. Both types of growth involve risks. Transactional projects may face risks related to process disruptions, while transformational projects may encounter strategic risks. Effective project management includes identifying, assessing and mitigating these risks.

3. Process management. Process management focuses on optimizing and innovating business processes. Continuous improvement is the primary goal. It is a journey, not an event, and it involves analyzing, improving and redesigning processes to achieve both transactional efficiencies and transformational breakthroughs.

  • Process optimization. Process optimization involves identifying inefficiencies and implementing improvements for transactional growth. This can include automating routine tasks, streamlining workflows and eliminating bottlenecks.
  • Process innovation. For transformational growth, process innovation involves rethinking how work is done. This can include adopting new technologies, redefining roles and responsibilities and exploring new business models.

Plan of action

To harness the power of both transactional and transformational growth, CPA firms and their clients can take the following practical steps:

1. Conduct a growth assessment. Evaluate current operations to identify areas for transactional improvements and potential opportunities for transformational growth. This assessment should include reviewing financial performance, market trends and technological advancements.
2. Develop a balanced growth strategy. Create a growth strategy that balances transactional and transformational initiatives. This strategy should align with the firm’s overall vision and include clear objectives, timelines and resource allocation.
3. Invest in leadership development. Develop leadership capabilities within the firm. This includes training leaders in change management, strategic thinking and innovation. Effective leadership is critical for driving both types of growth.
4. Implement robust project management practices. Adopt project management best practices to ensure the successful execution of growth initiatives. This includes defining project objectives, setting realistic timelines and managing risks.
5. Embrace technology. Leverage technology to drive both transactional and transformational growth. This includes adopting new tools and software to improve efficiency and exploring emerging technologies like AI to transform business models. Consider an innovation budget of 2-3% in addition to your transactional technology budget of 6-7% of revenue.
6. Foster a culture of continuous improvement. Create a culture that values continuous improvement and innovation. Encourage employees to identify opportunities for transactional improvements and support them in exploring transformational ideas.

Balancing transactional and transformational growth is essential for CPA firms and their clients to thrive in a rapidly changing business environment. Firms can achieve sustained success by focusing on cash flow management, investing in the future and embracing technology disruption.

Transformational growth, while riskier, can help your firm stay ahead of the curve, especially in the face of AI and other disruptive technologies. The Transformation Triangle — leadership, project management and process management — provides a framework for navigating these growth paths effectively. By developing a balanced growth strategy and fostering a culture of continuous improvement, CPA firms and their clients can survive and thrive in the face of technological disruption and changing markets.

Think, plan, grow!

Continue Reading

Accounting

FASB releases 2025 GAAP taxonomies

Published

on

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has posted the 2025 GAAP Financial Reporting Taxonomy (GRT), the 2025 SEC Reporting Taxonomy (SRT), and the 2025 GAAP Employee Benefit Plan Taxonomy (EBPT). 

The FASB also announced earlier this month the availability of the 2025 DQC Rules Taxonomy (DQCRT) and 2025 GAAP Meta Model Relationships Taxonomy (MMT), which together with the GRT, SRT and the EBPT are collectively referred to as the “FASB Taxonomies.”

The 2025 GRT provides updates for accounting standards, including disaggregation of income statement expenses, profits interest and similar awards, and induced conversions of convertible debt instruments, and other recommended improvements. 

The 2025 EBPT includes updates from the 2024 EBPT for elements specifically created for SEC Release Nos. 33–11070; 34–95025 which includes requirements for XBRL tagging of annual reports for employee stock purchase, savings and similar plans filing SEC Form 11-K.

The 2025 SRT offers improvements for elements whose underlying recognition and measurement are not specified by GAAP but are commonly used by GAAP filers and for SEC schedules related to supplemental information provided by insurance underwriters.

The DQCRT is structured from the typical design of XBRL taxonomies because it is narrowly focused on conveying the XBRL US Data Quality Committee’s validation rules, predominantly for regulator use. It isn’t intended to be used in SEC filers’ extension taxonomies. The DQCRT contains a subset of the DQC rules. The FASB Taxonomy staff evaluates the validation rules for inclusion in the DQCRT that have been available for use for more than a year, with consideration for how the DQC addressed any feedback received on a validation rule.

The 2025 MMT includes relationships focusing on accounting model information, which are viewed as helpful information for constituents. The objectives of the relationships in the MMT are to help preparers identify the proper elements for tagging their filings, assist data users in the consumption of data with additional relationship information, and assist in writing business rules that leverage the extra relationship information to help with the proper element selection and identification.

The 2025 GRT, 2025 SRT and 2025 EBPT are expected to be accepted as final by the SEC in early 2025. The FASB Taxonomies are available on the FASB Taxonomies Page and through these links:

Continue Reading

Accounting

Appeals court reinstates injunction on CTA beneficial ownership information reporting

Published

on

A federal appeals court has reversed itself, reinstating an injunction on beneficial ownership information reporting by businesses only days after lifting it.

On Monday, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted a stay of a preliminary injunction by a federal district court in Texas that had temporarily paused a requirement for filing BOI reports with FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act of 2019 in the case of Texas Top Cop Shop Inc. v. Garland. The plaintiffs petitioned the full appeals court for an en banc rehearing to consider additional issues in the case. They argued that the panel’s decision conflicted with a 2012 Supreme Court decision in the case of National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius, ignored potential violations of the First and Fourth Amendments, and improperly discounted serious harms that the plaintiffs and the public would suffer. They also argued that the decision to reinstate the Jan. 1 reporting deadline, which was only a few days away, disregarded the interests of millions of entities subject to the CTA. The law aims to deter criminals from using shell companies for illicit purposes such as money laundering and terrorism financing.

The appeals court issued an order Thursday reinstating the injunction, and noted the original order had expedited the appeal to the next available oral argument panel, which has yet to be scheduled. 

“The merits panel now has the appeal, which remains expedited, and a briefing schedule will issue forthwith,” said the court. “However, in order to preserve the constitutional status quo while the merits panel considers the parties’ weighty substantive arguments, that part of the motions-panel order granting the Government’s motion to stay the district court’s preliminary injunction enjoining enforcement of the CTA and the Reporting Rule is VACATED.”

Earlier this week, after the appeals court panel initially lifted the injunction, the Treasury Department announced an extension of time for businesses to file to meet the beneficial ownership information reporting deadline. Reporting companies that were created or registered prior to Jan. 1, 2024, were given until Jan. 13, 2025, to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, as opposed to the Jan. 1, 2025, deadline. The American Institute of CPAs and state CPA societies have been asking FinCEN to delay the BOI reporting requirements. Now the full appeals court appears to have delayed the reporting requirement indefinitely.

Continue Reading

Accounting

5 accounting firm M&A predictions for 2025

Published

on

I recently analyzed 132 deals across 212 accounting firms for 2024. The 2025 predictions I’m about to share are not investment advice, so please take it with a grain of salt and use your own judgement.

With that said, let’s dive in: In 2024, private equity money flooded the accounting M&A market. Top players scooped up niche firms left and right. The $2.3 billion CBIZ-Mar­cum megamerger (finalized in November) wasn’t alone—private equity is now center stage.

It’s causing excitement and apprehension in the small-to-midmarket space (some partners are raging at outside capital).

Check out the recent wave:

• Dean Dorton’s Florida pick-up of Shilts CPA on Dec. 5 and LBMC’s Memphis move to add Frazee Ivy Davis show targeted expansion.

• Citrin Cooperman’s spree (Clearview on Nov. 14, Signature Analytics on Nov. 13) shows relentless reach.

PKF O’Connor Davies’ capital injection (on Nov. 18) sets a new mid-market financing bar.

Not just big names—smaller firms too:

BerryDunn + Burzenski & Co. (Dec. 1), expanding in Connecticut;

LGA + McGaunn & Schwadron (Dec. 4), deepening veterinary/dental niches; and,

KNAV Advisory’s minority investment (Nov. 18), fueling global presence.

To put it in perspective:

Mid-market and regional firms are grabbing specialty shops—cannabis (BeachFleischman and Indiva Advisors on Nov. 4), valuation (KSM and ValueKnowledge on Nov. 12), and human capital (EY and Jubilant on Nov. 11). PE-backed platforms are stacking bolt-on deals, building full-service powerhouses.

Five p𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱

• Hyper-specialization reigns: Firms will zero in on ultra-niche areas (think AI-driven forensic accounting), leaving generalists scrambling.

• Open architecture models rise: CPA firms will partner with RIAs, ERP consultants and even legal advisors to become one-stop advisory powerhouses.

• Cross-border micro-mergers: Expect global mini-deals, just like KNAV merging in HLG Netherlands (Nov. 8), as firms chase unique talent and clients worldwide.

• Tech-centric valuations: Proprietary data analytics or AI stacks will influence deal pricing more than any traditional book of business metrics.

• PE-backed succession solutions: Outside capital will transform partner retirements from liabilities into strategic exit or growth opportunities.

For some, these moves will open the door to scale, differentiate and become indispensable. For others, it’s a stark warning: adapt or risk irrelevance.

Continue Reading

Trending