Connect with us

Accounting

Cloud computing tax threatens Chicago’s Silicon Valley ambitions

Published

on

Chicago’s bid to become the Silicon Valley of the Midwest has registered some major wins in recent years: Google bought a huge downtown building, PsiQuantum Corp. announced a $1 billion investment in the city, and local startups raised a record $19 billion in 2022.

Now a move to increase an unusual tax on cloud computing risks adding to a broader technology industry downturn to derail progress in the third-largest U.S. city.

Faced with a nearly $1 billion deficit for next year, Mayor Brandon Johnson has proposed an additional $128 million in revenue by increasing the levy, first implemented in 2016. The plan, expected to be voted on by the City Council’s finance committee on Tuesday, is spurring criticism from business leaders already fighting the progressive politician over everything from crime to the future of the city’s schools.

“This isn’t good,” said Chris Deutsch, founder of Chicago-based Lofty Ventures, which invests in startups. “They’re just going to keep ratcheting up these taxes and it’s going to really hurt business and the entire tech community here. Maybe not immediately but over time, this is a terrible trend and will absolutely hurt us.”

Johnson, a former union organizer who surprised pundits when he beat incumbent Lori Lightfoot, had already alienated many of the city’s economic leaders by proposing a series of taxes on the rich. All at a time when the Chicago area is contending with the loss of firms including Citadel, Boeing Co., Caterpillar Inc. and the local offices of Tyson Foods Inc.

The mayor’s plan to raise taxes on sales of million-dollar homes failed in a referendum and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker said he would block Johnson’s ambitions to establish a financial transaction tax. Raising the levy on cloud computing could be a solution after City Council members rebuked Johnson’s plan for a $300 million property tax increase in a historic 50-0 vote.

“That one is the least egregious of a lot of things that are out there,” said Alderman Brian Hopkins, who said Johnson is getting closer to securing the votes he needs to pass the budget before the Dec. 31 deadline. 

A spokesperson for the city’s finance and budget departments said the tax is based on usage, minimizing the impact on small businesses. For example, a small business using the starter suite of Salesforce Inc. for one user would see the levy increase by just 50 cents a month, according to a statement to Bloomberg.

“This approach balances the need for additional revenue with the city’s commitment to supporting economic growth and remaining an attractive environment for businesses of all sizes,” the spokesperson said.

Competitive disadvantage

Chicago is one of few cities in the country that taxes cloud computing and software — others include Denver and Washington, D.C. The tax, known as the Personal Property Lease Transaction, would be increased to 11% from the current rate of 9%.

Lucy Dadayan, a principal research associate at the Urban Institute warned that the levy may have “unintended consequences” by putting Chicago at a a competitive disadvantage.

“I don’t know the details of how this will come out, but the concern would be that you’re just driving people away from doing business in Chicago,” said Keith Todd, chief executive officer of Trading Technologies, a Chicago-based platform that offers clients access to derivatives trading. “All it will mean is that consumers will be disadvantaged.” 

Chicago’s tech community experienced a surge in growth after the pandemic, when work-from-home became the norm, allowing people to move to places with a lower cost of living like Chicago. Startups in the city raised $19.2 billion in 2022, an increase of 85% from a year earlier. Funds became much more scarce last year due to high interest rates and a broader downturn that saw tech companies lay off workers across the country.

The city also gained a boost when Alphabet Inc.’s Google announced in 2022 that it was buying the James R. Thompson Center, an underused government-owned building that occupies a full city block downtown. A year earlier, the company made a $1 billion equity investment in Chicago-based CME Group Inc. to accelerate the U.S.’s largest derivatives exchange’s move to the cloud.

In July, PsiQuantum said it would invest more than $1 billion to become the anchor tenant at a new quantum and microelectronics park planned by Pritzker in the South Side of Chicago.

The Illinois governor, who founded tech startup incubator 1871, has been key in trying to turn the state into a hub for new technologies from quantum to electric vehicles and data centers. His sister Penny Pritzker, former Secretary of Commerce, has also given the city a boost with her nonprofit P33, which aims to turn Chicago into a center of innovation by 2033.

Chicago startups

Cloud computing is essential to many up-and-coming tech companies, which often use the cloud as their main form of software distribution, according to Betsy Ziegler, CEO of 1871.  

“I’m less worried about Google and Amazon Web Services, I’m way more worried about the growth company that is trying to scale that has very constrained funds,” she said. “Does this create a constraint that reduces Chicago’s competitive environment to attract those companies to build here?” 

While Chicago’s tech community has grown, the city only ranked 23 among top markets, according to an analysis by commercial real estate firm CBRE which used metrics including talent concentration, labor costs and attractiveness to companies. The city has also lost 9.5% of its tech workforce between 2018 and 2023, with the most of the decline taking place last year.

Cloud computing is now almost as commonplace as email in most workplaces, becoming an attractive source of revenue for governments. When Chicago started taxing the service in 2016, the rate was just 5.25%. Lightfoot boosted it to 9% during the pandemic. If Johnson’s proposal goes ahead, the 11% rate will bring a total of $818 million in revenue for the city, said Budget Director Annette Guzman. 

The tax isn’t just a challenge for tech firms. About 5,000 companies are registered for the Personal Property Lease Transaction Tax, according to data from the city. These include CME, Citadel, Salesforce, Kraft Heinz Food Company, as well sports teams such the Cubs, the Blackhawks and the White Sox. 

“We are strongly opposed,” said Jack Lavin, chief executive officer for the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce. “This goes to the heart of what we are trying to do, which is to grow the economy.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Inventory Management For Financial Accuracy and Operational Success

Published

on

Inventory Management

In the dynamic world of business operations, precise inventory management is more than a routine task—it is a critical factor in achieving financial accuracy and operational efficiency. Beyond simple stock tracking, accurate inventory recording plays a vital role in financial reporting, resource planning, and strategic decision-making. This article explores the essential practices for maintaining accurate inventory records and their profound impact on business performance.

At the heart of effective inventory management is the implementation of a real-time tracking system. By leveraging technologies such as barcode scanners, RFID tags, and IoT sensors, businesses can maintain a perpetual inventory system that updates stock levels instantly. This ensures accuracy, reduces the risk of stockouts or overstocking, and enables better forecasting and planning.

A standardized process for receiving, storing, and dispatching inventory is equally important. Documenting each step—from goods received to final distribution—establishes a clear audit trail, reduces errors, and minimizes the potential for discrepancies. Properly labeled and organized inventory not only saves time but also supports efficient workflows across departments.

Regular physical counts are essential for verifying recorded inventory against actual stock. Whether conducted through periodic cycle counts or comprehensive annual inventories, these audits help identify issues such as shrinkage, theft, or obsolescence. Combining physical counts with real-time systems ensures alignment and strengthens the accuracy of inventory records.

The use of inventory management software has transformed the way businesses maintain inventory data. Advanced systems automate data entry, provide centralized visibility across multiple warehouses or locations, and generate actionable analytics. Features like demand forecasting, low-stock alerts, and real-time reporting empower businesses to make informed decisions and optimize inventory levels.

Accurate inventory valuation is another cornerstone of sound inventory management. Businesses typically choose from methods such as First-In, First-Out (FIFO), Last-In, First-Out (LIFO), or the weighted average cost method. Selecting and consistently applying the appropriate method is essential for financial accuracy, tax compliance, and reflecting inventory flow in financial statements.

Inventory management also has direct implications for financial reporting, tax preparation, and securing business financing. Reliable inventory records instill confidence in stakeholders, demonstrate operational efficiency, and support compliance with accounting standards and regulatory requirements. Additionally, precise data allows businesses to assess their inventory turnover ratio—a key metric for evaluating operational performance and profitability.

In conclusion, accurate inventory recording is a strategic imperative for businesses aiming to enhance financial precision and operational excellence. By adopting advanced technologies, implementing standardized processes, and conducting regular audits, companies can ensure their inventory records remain accurate and reliable. For business leaders and finance professionals, effective inventory management is not just about compliance—it is a powerful tool for driving profitability, improving resource allocation, and maintaining a competitive edge in the market.

Mastering inventory management creates a foundation for long-term success, allowing businesses to operate efficiently, make better decisions, and deliver consistent value to stakeholders.

Continue Reading

Accounting

New IRS regs put some partnership transactions under spotlight

Published

on

Final regulations now identify certain partnership related-party “basis shifting” transactions as “transactions of interest” subject to the rules for reportable transactions.

The final regs apply to related partners and partnerships that participated in the identified transactions through distributions of partnership property or the transfer of an interest in the partnership by a related partner to a related transferee. Affected taxpayers and their material advisors are subject to the disclosure requirements for reportable transactions. 

During the proposal process, the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service received comments that the final regulations should avoid unnecessary burdens for small, family-run businesses, limit retroactive reporting, provide more time for reporting and differentiate publicly traded partnerships, among other suggested changes now reflected in the regs.

  • Increased dollar threshold for basis increase in a TOI. The threshold amount for a basis increase in a TOI has been increased from $5 million to $25 million for tax years before 2025 and $10 million for tax years after. 
  • Limited retroactive reporting for open tax years. Reporting has been limited for open tax years to those that fall within a six-year lookback window. The six-year lookback is the 72-month period before the first month of a taxpayer’s most recent tax year that began before the publication of the final regulations (slated for Jan. 14 in the Federal Register). Also, the threshold amount for a basis increase in a TOI during the six-year lookback is $25 million. 
  • Additional time for reporting. Taxpayers have an additional 90 days from the final regulation’s publication to file disclosure statements for TOIs in open tax years for which a return has already been filed and that fall within the six-year lookback. Material advisors have an additional 90 days to file their disclosure statements for tax statements made before the final regulations. 
  • Publicly traded partnerships. Because PTPs are typically owned by a large number of unrelated owners, the final regulations exclude many owners of PTPs from the disclosure rules. 

The identified transactions generally result from either a tax-free distribution of partnership property to a partner that is related to one or more partners of the partnership, or the tax-free transfer of a partnership interest by a related partner to a related transferee.

IRS headquarters

Bloomberg via Getty Images

The tax-free distribution or transfer generates an increase to the basis of the distributed property or partnership property of $10 million or more ($25 million or more in the case of a TOI undertaken in a tax year before 2025) under the rules of IRC Sections 732(b) or (d), 734(b) or 743(b), but for which no corresponding tax is paid. 

The basis increase to the distributed or partnership property allows the related parties to decrease taxable income through increased cost recovery allowances or decrease taxable gain (or increase taxable loss) on the disposition of the property.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Treasury, IRS propose rules on commercial clean vehicles, issue guidance on clean fuels

Published

on

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service proposed new rules for the tax credit for qualified commercial clean vehicles, along with guidance on claiming tax credits for clean fuel under the Inflation Reduction Act.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the credit for qualified commercial clean vehicles (under Section 45W of the Tax Code) says the credit can be claimed by purchasing and placing in service qualified commercial clean vehicles, including certain battery electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid EVs, fuel cell electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid fuel cell electric vehicles.  

The credit is the lesser amount of either 30% of the vehicle’s basis (15% for plug-in hybrid EVs) or the vehicle’s incremental cost in excess of a vehicle comparable in size or use powered solely by gasoline or diesel. A credit up to $7,500 can be claimed for a single qualified commercial clean vehicle for cars and light-duty trucks (with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of less than 14,000 pounds), or otherwise $40,000 for vehicles like electric buses and semi-trucks (with a GVWR equal to or greater than 14,000 pounds).

“The release of Treasury’s proposed rules for the commercial clean vehicle credit marks an important step forward in the Biden-Harris Administration’s work to lower transportation costs and strengthen U.S. energy security,” said U.S. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo in a statement Friday. “Today’s guidance will provide the clarity and certainty needed to grow investment in clean vehicle manufacturing.”

The NPRM issued today proposes rules to implement the 45W credit, including proposing various pathways for taxpayers to determine the incremental cost of a qualifying commercial clean vehicle for purposes of calculating the amount of 45W credit. For example, the NPRM proposes that taxpayers can continue to use the incremental cost safe harbors such as those set out in Notice 2023-9 and Notice 2024-5, may rely on a manufacturer’s written cost determination to determine the incremental cost of a qualifying commercial clean vehicle, or may calculate the incremental cost of a qualifying clean vehicle versus an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle based on the differing costs of the vehicle powertrains.

The NPRM also proposes rules regarding the types of vehicles that qualify for the credit and aligns certain definitional concepts with those applicable to the 30D and 25E credits. In addition, the NPRM proposes that vehicles are only eligible if they are used 100% for trade or business, excepting de minimis personal use, and that the 45W credit is disallowed for qualified commercial clean vehicles that were previously allowed a clean vehicle credit under 30D or 45W. 

The notice asks for comments over the next 60 days on the proposed regulations such as issues related to off-road mobile machinery, including approaches that might be adopted in applying the definition of mobile machinery to off-road vehicles and whether to create a product identification number system for such machinery in order to comply with statutory requirements. A public hearing is scheduled for April 28, 2025.

Clean Fuels Production Credit

The Treasury the IRS also released guidance Friday on the Clean Fuels Production Credit under Section 45Z of the Tax Code.

Section 45Z provides a tax credit for the production of transportation fuels with lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions below certain levels. The credit is in effect in 2025 and is for sustainable aviation fuel and non-SAF transportation fuels.

The guidance includes both a notice of intent to propose regulations on the Section 45Z credit and a notice providing the annual emissions rate table for Section 45Z, which refers taxpayers to the appropriate methodologies for determining the lifecycle GHG emissions of their fuel. In conjunction with the guidance released Friday, the Department of Energy plans to release the 45ZCF-GREET model for use in determining emissions rates for 45Z in the coming days.

“This guidance will help put America on the cutting-edge of future innovation in aviation and renewable fuel while also lowering transportation costs for consumers,” said Adeyemo in a statement. “Decarbonizing transportation and lowering costs is a win-win for America.”

Section 45Z provides a per-gallon (or gallon-equivalent) tax credit for producers of clean transportation fuels based on the carbon intensity of production. It consolidates and replaces pre-Inflation Reduction Act credits for biodiesel, renewable diesel, and alternative fuels, and an IRA credit for sustainable aviation fuel. Like several other IRA credits, Section 45Z requires the Treasury to establish rules for measuring carbon intensity of production, based on the Clean Air Act’s definition of “lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions.”

The guidance offers more clarity on various issues, including which entities and fuels are eligible for the credit, and how taxpayers determine lifecycle emissions. Specifically, the guidance outlines the Treasury and the IRS’s intent to define key concepts and provide certain rules in a future rulemaking, including clarifying who is eligible for a credit.

The Treasury and the IRS intend to provide that the producer of the eligible clean fuel is eligible to claim the 45Z credit. In keeping with the statute, compressors and blenders of fuel would not be eligible.

Under Section 45Z, a fuel must be “suitable for use” as a transportation fuel. The Treasury and the IRS intend to propose that 45Z-creditable transportation fuel must itself (or when blended into a fuel mixture) have either practical or commercial fitness for use as a fuel in a highway vehicle or aircraft. The guidance clarifies that marine fuels that are otherwise suitable for use in highway vehicles or aircraft, such as marine diesel and methanol, are also 45Z eligible.

Specifically, this would mean that neat SAF that is blended into a fuel mixture that has practical or commercial fitness for use as a fuel would be creditable. Additionally, natural gas alternatives such as renewable natural gas would be suitable for use if produced in a manner such that if it were further compressed it could be used as a transportation fuel.

Today’s guidance publishes the annual emissions rate table that directs taxpayers to the appropriate methodologies for calculating carbon intensities for types and categories of 45Z-eligible fuels.

The table directs taxpayers to use the 45ZCF-GREET model to determine the emissions rate of non-SAF transportation fuel, and either the 45ZCF-GREET model or methodologies from the International Civil Aviation Organization (“CORSIA Default” or “CORSIA Actual”) for SAF.

Taxpayers can use the Provisional Emissions Rate process to obtain an emissions rate for fuel pathway and feedstock combinations not specified in the emissions rate table when guidance is published for the PER process. Guidance for the PER process is expected at a later date.

Outlining climate smart agriculture practices

The guidance released Friday states that the Treasury intends to propose rules for incorporating the emissions benefits from climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices for cultivating domestic corn, soybeans, and sorghum as feedstocks for SAF and non-SAF transportation fuels. These options would be available to taxpayers after Treasury and the IRS propose regulations for the section 45Z credit, including rules for CSA, and the 45ZCF-GREET model is updated to enable calculation of the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions rates for CSA crops, taking into account one or more CSA practices.    

CSA practices have multiple benefits, including lower overall GHG emissions associated with biofuels production and increased adoption of farming practices that are associated with other environmental benefits, such as improved water quality and soil health. Agencies across the Federal government have taken important steps to advance the adoption of CSA. In April, Treasury established a first-of-its-kind pilot program to encourage CSA practices within guidance on the section 40B SAF tax credit. Treasury has received and continues to consider substantial feedback from stakeholders on that pilot program. The U.S. Department of Agriculture invested more than $3 billion in 135 Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities projects. Combined with the historic investment of $19.5 billion in CSA from the Inflation Reduction Act, the department is estimated to support CSA implementation on over 225 million acres in the next 5 years as well as measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification to better understand the climate impacts of these practices.

In addition, in June, the U.S. Department of Agriculture published a Request for Information requesting public input on procedures for reporting and verification of CSA practices and measurement of related emissions benefits, and received substantial input from a wide array of stakeholders. The USDA is currently developing voluntary technical guidelines for CSA reporting and verification. The Treasury and the IRS expect to consider those guidelines in proposing rules recognizing the benefits of CSA for purposes of the Section 45Z credit.

Continue Reading

Trending