Connect with us

Accounting

Deloitte audits nature-related risks on Earth Day

Published

on

Deloitte auditors have been turning their attention to climate risks affecting clients who need to deal with a growing array of regulations and laws around the world as the pace of climate change accelerates.

With Monday, April 22, marking the 54th anniversary of Earth Day, the accounting profession is playing a greater role in sustainability reporting and assurance for many organizations that are trying to comply with the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the International Sustainability Standards Board’s S1 and S2 standards for sustainability and climate-related disclosures, and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s recently issued rule on climate-related disclosures, which is current on hold due to lawsuits.

Big Four firms like Deloitte have been doing more work in the sustainability space to help clients account for their impact on nature in response to these types of requirements, as well as demand from investors and the public. “The world is evolving to account for nature, and that means there’s different guidance and frameworks looking into value in nature, and who better to do this than accountants?” said Stephanie Cardenas, an audit and assurance senior manager at Deloitte. “It has to do with how accountants have evolved in the profession.”

galapagos.jpg

Her own career has progressed from working in the Galapagos Islands studying the impact of tourism on the global ecosystem to a career at Deloitte, while working in between with different environmental groups.

“I’m a Deloitte ‘boomerang’ which means I was once at Deloitte Ecuador, and then I moved to New York, and then went back to Deloitte,” she explained. “How everything started was I saw what tourism was doing to the natural environment during my days in the hospitality industry and then I wanted to become part of the solution. I worked with some companies in the Galapagos Islands on tourism and focused with different NGOs — local and also from the U.S. — around what can be done within the Galapagos Islands on different projects.”

She worked on conservation projects to preserve the endemic species of trees in the Galapagos and the larger ecosystem. Then she studied for a master’s degree in sustainability to focus her career on this area. She has worked with the Galapagos Conservancy as well as the World Wildlife Fund Ecuador. And now that she’s at Deloitte, she’s working with her fellow auditors at CPAs.

“Here at Deloitte, I think there’s that magic sauce,” she said. “I work with CPAs and people that have done audit and assurance for a longer period of time. My background is much more technical. Pairing those two really helps our clients in this space meet those regulatory requirements with the process, controls and assurance in mind.”

She sees more of a demand for sustainability reporting and assurance from clients to comply with the various rules. frameworks and standards. In addition to the EU and SEC rules and the ISSB standards, the Global Reporting Initiative has developed sustainability and biodiversity standards and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures offers a set of disclosure recommendations and guidance.

“I have been working on the voluntary side and helping clients work on the more regulatory lens,” said Cardenas. “I did a secondment thanks to Deloitte on TNFD, the Taskforce for Nature-related Financial Disclosures. That was a fantastic experience seeing groups come together and really think through with that science lens what’s practical to really look into nature-related risks.”

The TNFD has been partnering with the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group and the ISSB, she noted. The EU has promulgated not only the CSRD but also the Regulation on Deforestation Free Products, which deals with seven categories of forest risk commodities: timber, cattle, soy, palm oil, cocoa, coffee and rubber. Under the EU Deforestation Regulation, those types of products will no longer be sold in the EU if they come from areas affected by deforestation or forest degradation practices.

“If you’re importing or exporting from the EU, and this is part of your materials you used in your products, you will have to look into a due diligence process, ensuring that these products are not coming from deforested land,” said Cardenas.

In the U.S., such guidelines are still mostly voluntary, but as states like California promulgate their own climate-related disclosures, U.S. companies may be forced to abide by such rules as well. 

“I think it’s very important for companies to think about this,” said Cardenas. “You can see specifically there’s an evolution of the market, and that’s what we’re seeing with our clients as well. Probably everything started on that voluntary lens, then going more into a must have and it’s mandatory. All the supply chain disruptions are forcing companies to rethink in the short term and the long term about where those materials are coming from. Are they coming from clear cutting? Is it deforested land? Is it land degradation? How are you impacting IPLC, a term for Indigenous People in Local Communities? Thinking of this as more of a systems problem, that’s where we help our clients put the pieces together and not see nature and climate as separate, but bringing it together as one topic. To be strategic about it, you need to approach it with that lens.”

Auditors will also need to be sure that companies are properly reporting the impacts on the climate, vetting the claims, in some cases by visiting these places to see whether they’re really fulfilling what they say they’re doing, although in the Galapagos and other remote areas, they may need to rely on technology such as satellite imaging.

“Nature tech is one of the highest-rising areas in this space,” said Cardenas. “There’s still a lot of development that needs to happen. But there are various technologies where you could actually measure the state of nature: how an ecosystem is performing, many tools that are out there, including geospatial technology that we use at Deloitte for clients to measure the state of nature. And pairing this with the regulatory requirements, specifically for EUDR [EU Deforestation Regulation] where the regulation does require you to go look at the flood level, like where has this commodity been produced?”

The satellite imagery can help produce different data sets for land and water-related risks. “Nature risk is very localized, but then this enters that supply chain lens,” said Cardenas. “If any deforestation is happening in a country like Brazil or Indonesia, and these products enter the different markets, that’s how it all goes back to companies that work with these products or raw materials.” 

Despite the backlash against ESG in some parts of the U.S., other parts of the world like the EU are requiring companies to do more to mitigate their environmental impact.

“Because of the regulatory requirements from CSRD, we have seen an uptick in the market,” said Cardenas. 

Even in the U.S., she has seen more demand for reporting and assurance services on nature-related risks.

“Nature specifically is a topic that is more tangible,” said Cardenas. “You know that there’s no water because you can see it. You can feel it. You don’t know if there’s more emissions or not if you just go outside. You know if it’s raining or if it’s not raining, if it’s sunny, if it’s too hot. With emissions, it’s a little bit less tangible. We can measure them. We can know their impact. That’s also why I think there’s that acceptance toward what does nature mean, especially to our business? Many examples are happening right now. The price of cacao is being raised in the market because of a huge drought in Africa, and also rain. It’s like all the other markets. That nature-related risk is impacting supply chains directly.”

For accountants who want to enter the field, particularly young people who are concerned about climate change, she has some advice.

“First of all, identify what your transferable skills are,” said Cardenas. “How can you use what you’ve learned to apply it to something else? There are frameworks like natural capital accounting. It is something that accountants would be doing, but now with that nature lens. It might not be only accountants. I’m dreaming of an accountant wanting to become an ecologist or biologist and pairing both things. Keep up with the market knowledge. Read a lot to stay informed. Be open to a fast-paced changing environment that’s full of opportunities. And really think through how you get better data. This is one of the key things that accountants are really good at is getting that data. The data processes, controls and completeness of that data will help you make the right decisions. It goes back to the impact that you could have with those magic skills.”

The urgency of the need for nature accounting can’t be dismissed due to the quickening pace of climate change. “They know climate change is happening,” said Cardenas. “They know biodiversity loss is happening. But all this is happening not in the timeframe that was supposed to happen, but faster, at unprecedented rates. I think that urgency is a good motivation for all of us to think about nature, what we have and really shift those mindsets and relate that business to nature to make sure that we have thriving economies, societies and businesses.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending