Connect with us

Accounting

Deloitte audits nature-related risks on Earth Day

Published

on

Deloitte auditors have been turning their attention to climate risks affecting clients who need to deal with a growing array of regulations and laws around the world as the pace of climate change accelerates.

With Monday, April 22, marking the 54th anniversary of Earth Day, the accounting profession is playing a greater role in sustainability reporting and assurance for many organizations that are trying to comply with the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, the International Sustainability Standards Board’s S1 and S2 standards for sustainability and climate-related disclosures, and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s recently issued rule on climate-related disclosures, which is current on hold due to lawsuits.

Big Four firms like Deloitte have been doing more work in the sustainability space to help clients account for their impact on nature in response to these types of requirements, as well as demand from investors and the public. “The world is evolving to account for nature, and that means there’s different guidance and frameworks looking into value in nature, and who better to do this than accountants?” said Stephanie Cardenas, an audit and assurance senior manager at Deloitte. “It has to do with how accountants have evolved in the profession.”

galapagos.jpg

Her own career has progressed from working in the Galapagos Islands studying the impact of tourism on the global ecosystem to a career at Deloitte, while working in between with different environmental groups.

“I’m a Deloitte ‘boomerang’ which means I was once at Deloitte Ecuador, and then I moved to New York, and then went back to Deloitte,” she explained. “How everything started was I saw what tourism was doing to the natural environment during my days in the hospitality industry and then I wanted to become part of the solution. I worked with some companies in the Galapagos Islands on tourism and focused with different NGOs — local and also from the U.S. — around what can be done within the Galapagos Islands on different projects.”

She worked on conservation projects to preserve the endemic species of trees in the Galapagos and the larger ecosystem. Then she studied for a master’s degree in sustainability to focus her career on this area. She has worked with the Galapagos Conservancy as well as the World Wildlife Fund Ecuador. And now that she’s at Deloitte, she’s working with her fellow auditors at CPAs.

“Here at Deloitte, I think there’s that magic sauce,” she said. “I work with CPAs and people that have done audit and assurance for a longer period of time. My background is much more technical. Pairing those two really helps our clients in this space meet those regulatory requirements with the process, controls and assurance in mind.”

She sees more of a demand for sustainability reporting and assurance from clients to comply with the various rules. frameworks and standards. In addition to the EU and SEC rules and the ISSB standards, the Global Reporting Initiative has developed sustainability and biodiversity standards and the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures offers a set of disclosure recommendations and guidance.

“I have been working on the voluntary side and helping clients work on the more regulatory lens,” said Cardenas. “I did a secondment thanks to Deloitte on TNFD, the Taskforce for Nature-related Financial Disclosures. That was a fantastic experience seeing groups come together and really think through with that science lens what’s practical to really look into nature-related risks.”

The TNFD has been partnering with the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group and the ISSB, she noted. The EU has promulgated not only the CSRD but also the Regulation on Deforestation Free Products, which deals with seven categories of forest risk commodities: timber, cattle, soy, palm oil, cocoa, coffee and rubber. Under the EU Deforestation Regulation, those types of products will no longer be sold in the EU if they come from areas affected by deforestation or forest degradation practices.

“If you’re importing or exporting from the EU, and this is part of your materials you used in your products, you will have to look into a due diligence process, ensuring that these products are not coming from deforested land,” said Cardenas.

In the U.S., such guidelines are still mostly voluntary, but as states like California promulgate their own climate-related disclosures, U.S. companies may be forced to abide by such rules as well. 

“I think it’s very important for companies to think about this,” said Cardenas. “You can see specifically there’s an evolution of the market, and that’s what we’re seeing with our clients as well. Probably everything started on that voluntary lens, then going more into a must have and it’s mandatory. All the supply chain disruptions are forcing companies to rethink in the short term and the long term about where those materials are coming from. Are they coming from clear cutting? Is it deforested land? Is it land degradation? How are you impacting IPLC, a term for Indigenous People in Local Communities? Thinking of this as more of a systems problem, that’s where we help our clients put the pieces together and not see nature and climate as separate, but bringing it together as one topic. To be strategic about it, you need to approach it with that lens.”

Auditors will also need to be sure that companies are properly reporting the impacts on the climate, vetting the claims, in some cases by visiting these places to see whether they’re really fulfilling what they say they’re doing, although in the Galapagos and other remote areas, they may need to rely on technology such as satellite imaging.

“Nature tech is one of the highest-rising areas in this space,” said Cardenas. “There’s still a lot of development that needs to happen. But there are various technologies where you could actually measure the state of nature: how an ecosystem is performing, many tools that are out there, including geospatial technology that we use at Deloitte for clients to measure the state of nature. And pairing this with the regulatory requirements, specifically for EUDR [EU Deforestation Regulation] where the regulation does require you to go look at the flood level, like where has this commodity been produced?”

The satellite imagery can help produce different data sets for land and water-related risks. “Nature risk is very localized, but then this enters that supply chain lens,” said Cardenas. “If any deforestation is happening in a country like Brazil or Indonesia, and these products enter the different markets, that’s how it all goes back to companies that work with these products or raw materials.” 

Despite the backlash against ESG in some parts of the U.S., other parts of the world like the EU are requiring companies to do more to mitigate their environmental impact.

“Because of the regulatory requirements from CSRD, we have seen an uptick in the market,” said Cardenas. 

Even in the U.S., she has seen more demand for reporting and assurance services on nature-related risks.

“Nature specifically is a topic that is more tangible,” said Cardenas. “You know that there’s no water because you can see it. You can feel it. You don’t know if there’s more emissions or not if you just go outside. You know if it’s raining or if it’s not raining, if it’s sunny, if it’s too hot. With emissions, it’s a little bit less tangible. We can measure them. We can know their impact. That’s also why I think there’s that acceptance toward what does nature mean, especially to our business? Many examples are happening right now. The price of cacao is being raised in the market because of a huge drought in Africa, and also rain. It’s like all the other markets. That nature-related risk is impacting supply chains directly.”

For accountants who want to enter the field, particularly young people who are concerned about climate change, she has some advice.

“First of all, identify what your transferable skills are,” said Cardenas. “How can you use what you’ve learned to apply it to something else? There are frameworks like natural capital accounting. It is something that accountants would be doing, but now with that nature lens. It might not be only accountants. I’m dreaming of an accountant wanting to become an ecologist or biologist and pairing both things. Keep up with the market knowledge. Read a lot to stay informed. Be open to a fast-paced changing environment that’s full of opportunities. And really think through how you get better data. This is one of the key things that accountants are really good at is getting that data. The data processes, controls and completeness of that data will help you make the right decisions. It goes back to the impact that you could have with those magic skills.”

The urgency of the need for nature accounting can’t be dismissed due to the quickening pace of climate change. “They know climate change is happening,” said Cardenas. “They know biodiversity loss is happening. But all this is happening not in the timeframe that was supposed to happen, but faster, at unprecedented rates. I think that urgency is a good motivation for all of us to think about nature, what we have and really shift those mindsets and relate that business to nature to make sure that we have thriving economies, societies and businesses.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Crooks R Us

Published

on

The shadow knows; body of evidence; make a Note of it; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Newark, New Jersey: Thomas Nicholas Salzano, a.k.a. Nicholas Salzano, of Secaucus, New Jersey, the shadow CEO of National Realty Investment Advisors, has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for orchestrating a $658 million Ponzi scheme and conspiring to evade millions in taxes.

Salzano previously pleaded guilty to securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the U.S., admitting that he made numerous misrepresentations to investors while he secretly ran National Realty. From February 2018 through January 2022, Salzano and others defrauded investors and potential investors of NRIA Partners Portfolio Fund I, a real estate fund operated by National Realty, of $650 million.

Salzano and his conspirators executed their scheme through an aggressive multiyear, nationwide marketing campaign that involved thousands of emails to investors, advertisements, and meetings and presentations to investors. Salzano led and directed the marketing campaign that was intended to mislead investors into believing that NRIA generated significant profits. It in fact generated little to no profits and operated as a Ponzi scheme.

Salzano stole millions of dollars of investor money to support his lavish lifestyle, including expensive dinners, extravagant birthday parties, and payments to family and associates who did not work at NRIA. He also orchestrated a separate, related conspiracy to avoid paying taxes on his stolen funds.

He was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and agreed to a forfeiture money judgment of $8.52 million, full restitution of $507.4 million to the victims of his offenses and $6.46 million to the IRS.

Marina del Rey, California: Tax preparer Lidiya Gessese has been sentenced to 41 months in prison for preparing and filing false returns for her clients and for not reporting her income.

Gessese owned and operated Tax We R/Tax R Us and Insurance Services from 2013 through 2019 and charged clients $300 to $800. Gessese would then prepare returns that included claims to deductions and credits she knew her clients were not entitled to, including falsely claiming dependents, earned income credits, the American Opportunity Credit, Child Tax Credits, business deductions, education expenses or unreimbursed employee business expenses. The illegitimate claims led to some $1,135,554.64 issued by the IRS for 2010 through 2018.

She failed to report, or underreported, her own income for 2010 through 2018, some of which included improperly diverted funds from clients’ inflated or fraudulent refunds, causing a tax loss of $488,276.

Gessese, who pleaded guilty in April, was also ordered to pay $1,096,034.01 to the IRS and $53,526.95 to her other victims.

Fullerton, California: In Chun Jung of Anaheim, California, owner of an auto repair business, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns for 2015 to 2022, underreporting his income by at least $1,184,914.

He owned and operated JY JBMT INC., d.b.a. JY Auto Body, which was registered as a subchapter S corp. Jung was the 100% shareholder.

Jung accepted check payments from customers that he and his co-schemers then cashed at multiple area check cashing services; the cashed checks totaled some $1,157,462. Jung withheld the business receipts and income from his tax preparer and omitted them on his returns.

He will pay $300,145 in taxes due to the IRS and faces a $250,000 penalty and up to three years in prison. Sentencing is Jan. 31.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Tucson, Arizona: Tax preparer Nour Abubakr Nour, 34, has been sentenced to 30 months in prison.

Nour, who pleaded guilty a year ago, operated the tax prep business Skyman Tax and for tax years 2016 through 2018 prepared and filed at least 27 false individual federal income tax returns for clients.

These returns included falsely claimed business income that inflated refunds so that he could pay himself large prep fees. Nour’s clients had no knowledge that he was filing false tax returns under their names.

Nour was also ordered to pay $150,154 in restitution to the United States for the false tax refunds.

Farmington, Connecticut: Tax preparer Mark Legowski, 60, has been sentenced to eight months in prison, to be followed by a year of supervised release, for filing false returns.

From January 2015 through December 2017, Legowski was a self-employed accountant and tax preparer doing business as Legowski & Co. Inc. He prepared income tax returns for some 400 to 500 individual clients and some 50 to 60 businesses.

To reduce his personal income tax liability for 2015 through 2017, Legowski underreported his practice’s gross receipts by excluding some client payment checks. He then filed false personal income tax returns that failed to report more than $1.4 million in business income, which resulted in a loss to the IRS of $499,289.

Legowski, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, has paid the IRS that amount in back taxes but must still pay penalties and interest. He has also been ordered to pay a $10,000 fine.

Wheeling, West Virginia: Dr. Nitesh Ratnakar, 48, has been convicted of failing to pay nearly $2.5 million in payroll taxes.

Ratnakar, who was found guilty of 41 counts of tax fraud, owned and operated a gastroenterology practice and a medical equipment manufacturer in Elkins, West Virginia. He withheld payroll taxes from employees’ paychecks and failed to make $2,419,560 in required payments to the IRS. Ratnakar also filed false tax returns in 2020, 2021 and 2022.

He faces up to five years in prison for each of the first 38 tax fraud counts and up to three years for the remaining counts.

Orlando, Florida: Two men have been sentenced for their involvement in the “Note Program,” a tax fraud.

Jasen Harvey, of Tampa, Florida, was sentenced to four years in prison and Christopher Johnson, of Orlando, was sentenced to 37 months for conspiring to defraud the U.S.

From 2015 to 2018, they promoted a scheme in which Harvey and others prepared returns for clients that claimed that large, nonexistent income tax withholdings had been paid to the IRS and sought large refunds based on those purported withholdings. The conspirators charged fees and required the clients to pay a share of the fraudulently obtained refunds to them.

Overall, the defendants claimed more than $3 million in fraudulent refunds on clients’ returns, of which the IRS paid about $1.5 million.

Both were also ordered to serve three years of supervised release. Johnson was also ordered to pay $864,117.42 in restitution to the United States; Harvey was ordered to pay $785,858.42 in restitution. Co-defendant Arthur Grimes will be sentenced on Jan. 13.

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida: Tax preparer Jean Volvick Moise, 39, has been sentenced to three years in prison for filing false income tax returns.

Moise prepared false returns for clients to inflate refunds. He prepared returns which included, among other things, false dependents, false 1099 withholdings, false educational credits and false Schedule C expenses, often for businesses which did not exist. Moise’s fee was larger than the typical one charged by a tax preparer.

Moise filed hundreds of false returns that caused the IRS to issue more than $574,000 in fraudulent refunds.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting in 2025: The year ahead in numbers

Published

on

With 2025 almost upon us, it’s worth thinking about what the new year will bring, and what accounting firms expect their next 12 months to look like.

With that in mind, Accounting Today conducted its annual Year Ahead survey in the late fall to find out firms’ expectations for 2025, including their growth expectations, their hiring plans, their growth expectations, how they think tax season will play out and much more. The overall theme: Thing are going well, but there are elements of friction holding them back, particularly when it comes to moving to more of a focus on advisory services.

You can see the full report here; a selection of key data points are presented below.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: Withum marks over a decade of Withum Week of Caring

Published

on


Citrin Cooperman appoints CIO; PKF O’Connor Davies opens new Fort Lauderdale office; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Trending