Connect with us

Economics

Elon Musk will check with Trump on idea for tax refunds from DOGE savings

Published

on

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks next to Elon Musk and X Æ A-12, Musk’s son, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 11, 2025. 

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Elon Musk on Tuesday said he’s going to touch base with President Donald Trump on a proposal to send Americans tax refund checks from money saved by the Department of Government Efficiency advisory group he heads.

In a post on X, the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive said he “Will check with the President.” The remark came in response to a separate post from James Fishback, CEO of the Azoria investment firm, suggesting that Trump has the opportunity to issue a so-called “DOGE Dividend” in the form of a tax refund check sent to U.S. households funded by savings created by DOGE’s cost-cutting campaign.

Musk has said that his goal is to cut federal spending by $2 trillion, out of a $6.75 trillion annual budget in the latest fiscal year ended last Sept. 30. If that were met, Fishback suggests taking 20% of that, or $400 billion, and distributing it to taxpayers. That would amount to approximately $5,000 per household, he said.

“When a breach of this magnitude happens in the private sector, the counterparty, at minimum, refunds the customer since they failed to deliver what was promised,” Fishback wrote in his proposal. “It’s high time for the federal government to do the same, and refund money back to taxpayers given what DOGE has uncovered.”

Government stimulus checks mailed to millions of taxpayers in 2020 during the Covid pandemic bore Trump’s signature, the first time a president’s name appeared on any IRS payments, the Associated Press reported at the time.

According to DOGE, it has saved an estimated $55 billion through its efforts. However, recent reports suggest that the actual figure is likely far below that.

On Wednesday, Bloomberg reported that the DOGE website only accounts for $16.6 billion of the $55 billion it claims to have saved. On Tuesday, the New York Times said DOGE mistakenly cited an $8 billion saving on a federal contract that was actually for $8 million instead.

Meanwhile, many of DOGE’s efforts have been met with court challenges. But a federal judge on Tuesday denied a request to stop DOGE from accessing federal agencies’ computer systems or directing government worker firings while litigation is ongoing.

Economics

Trump tariffs are making rate path ‘more complicated’

Published

on

ECB's Pierre Wunsch: Trump's tariffs will impact interest rates in Europe

U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff policies are making the path ahead for European Central Bank interest rates “more complicated,” according to Pierre Wunsch, member of the ECB’s Governing Council.

“We were going in the right direction. And I was actually quite relaxed,” he told CNBC’s Karen Tso on Thursday on the sidelines of the IIF Europe Summit in Brussels.

“If we forget tariffs …. we were going in the right direction. Then the question was more a question of fine tuning of the pace of cuts and where we land,” Wunsch said. “I was like, you know, inflation might be the boring part of [20]25, and [20]25 is not a boring year. But if you add tariffs to the equation, it’s becoming more complicated,” he said.

Wunsch, who is also the Governor of the National Bank of Belgium, said tariffs would be “bad for growth” and “probably” inflationary, but noted that the exact impact remains uncertain and will depend any potential retaliation and on how exchange rates react to duties.

His comments come a day after Trump announced 25% tariffs on all cars “not made in the United States,” effective as of April 2. In a post on Truth Social, Trump on Thursday also threatened to place “far larger” tariffs on the European Union and Canada if they were to work together to resist duties from the U.S.

These are just the latest developments in Trump’s trade policy turmoil, which has seen a slew of tariffs announced — and at times postponed, amended or abolished, as negotiations and counter measures have also come into play.

April 2 is set to be a key date for a wide range of duties to come into effect, although recent comments from Trump and his administration have signaled that adjustments could be made and the duties could be more lenient than originally indicated.

Interest rate decisions ahead

The ECB will make its next interest rate decision on April 17 soon after the tariffs are scheduled to come into effect. Markets were last pricing in a roughly 79% chance of a 25-basis-point interest rate cut from the ECB next month, according to LSEG data.

By then, Wunsch said the central bank could have a rough idea of the impact of tariffs, which could influence the ECB’s decision making. However, he said he “wouldn’t put too much focus on April,” as trade policy would have a medium-term impact.

The central banker on Thursday left the door open for all possible actions from the ECB regarding interest rates — further cuts, a hike, or a pause.

“I think the likelihood is still limited that we would have to hike, but there might be a case for a pause,” he said.

“If tariffs have an inflationary impact and a negative impact on growth, it’s going to be a difficult equation, and we might have to consider a pause. I’m not pleading for one, but I think it should be part of the discussion,” he said.

Continue Reading

Economics

The cover-up is worse than the group chat

Published

on

A wiser president would admit a lapse and be grateful for the chance to prevent a more devastating blunder

Continue Reading

Economics

White House denials over the Signal snafu ring hollow

Published

on

THE ROW over Mike Waltz’s security slip-up rages on. On March 11th America’s national security adviser accidentally added Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic, a magazine, to a group chat on Signal, an encrypted messaging app. Days later Mr Waltz and a succession of American officials including J.D. Vance, the vice-president, Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defence, Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, and John Ratcliffe, the director of the CIA, used the group to discuss air strikes on Yemen. How serious a breach was this?

Continue Reading

Trending