Connect with us

Economics

German inflation, January 2025

Published

on

Customers waiting at the checkout in a supermarket.

Markus Scholz | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

German inflation was unchanged year-on-year at 2.8% in January, preliminary data from the country’s statistics office Destatis showed Friday in the last reading before Germans head to the polls next month.

The reading was also in line with a forecast from economists polled by Reuters. The print is harmonized across the euro area for comparability. 

On a monthly basis, the harmonized consumer price index fell by 0.2%

Germany’s inflation rate has now stayed above the European Central Bank’s 2% target for the fourth month in a row, after falling below that threshold in September last year.

This roughly mirrors the development of re-accelerating inflation in the wider euro area. The European Central Bank on Thursday said that disinflation in the bloc “is well on track” and has broadly developed in line with staff projections.

Euro area inflation came in at 2.4% in December. The January figures are slated for release next week.

The January inflation print is among the final key economic data released before Germany’s election on Feb. 23, which is taking place earlier than originally scheduled after the collapse of the ruling coalition in November 2024.

Germany’s economy has been one of big topics during campaigning next to immigration, as the country has been grappling with lackluster economic growth and the renewed rise of inflation.

The government earlier this week slashed gross domestic product expectations to 0.3% for full-year 2025, after annual GDP contracted in the last two years. Quarterly growth has also been sluggish, even as the economy has so far avoided a technical recession characterized by two consecutive quarter of contraction.

Non-harmonized inflation is expected to average 2.2% this year, the government added in its annual economic report.

This is a breaking news story. Please check back for updates.

Economics

What happens if the Inflation Reduction Act goes away?

Published

on

“IT’LL BE somewhere between a scalpel and a sledgehammer,” was how Mike Johnson, speaker of the House, described the emerging Republican approach to the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), Joe Biden’s signature climate law. Pressure from companies and congressmen with clean-energy projects benefiting from its subsidies in their districts (most are found in Republican counties) suggested surgical precision would prevail. But relentless pressure to abolish the IRA from the president, who is a fan of drilling, baby, drilling and denounced the law as the “Green New Scam,” pointed instead to brute force. The president reinforced this by dropping in on a private party caucus on May 20th to strong-arm waverers and threaten dissenters with a MAGA primary challenge. “They won’t be Republicans much longer…they’d be knocked out so fast,” he declared.

Continue Reading

Economics

Joe Biden did not decline alone

Published

on

Accept, for a moment, Joe Biden’s contention that he is as mentally as sharp as ever. Then try to explain some revelations of the books beginning to appear about his presidency: that he never held a formal meeting to discuss whether to run for a second term; that he never heard directly from his own pollsters about his dismal public standing, or anything else; that by 2024 most of his own cabinet secretaries had no contact with him; that, when he was in Washington, he would often eat dinner at 4.30pm and vanish into his private quarters by 5.15; that when he travelled, he often skipped briefings while keeping a morning appointment with a makeup artist to cover his wrinkles and liver spots. You might think that Mr Biden—that anyone—would welcome as a rationale that he had lost a step or two. It is a kinder explanation than the alternatives: vanity, hubris, incompetence.

Continue Reading

Economics

Three paths the Supreme Court could take on birthright citizenship 

Published

on

AMERICA’S SUPREME COURT appears unusually uncertain about how to resolve Trump v CASA—a case that could redefine who qualifies as an American citizen and reshape the limits of judicial power. At issue is the 14th Amendment’s promise of citizenship for “all persons born or naturalised” in America. For more than 125 years this has been understood to grant automatic citizenship to almost everyone born on American soil (the children of diplomats and soldiers of invading armies are exceptions). Donald Trump has issued an executive order that claims the clause was never intended to apply to children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visa-holders.

Continue Reading

Trending