Connect with us

Accounting

GOP faces headwinds on push for second big tax and spending bill

Published

on

House Republican leaders face powerful headwinds as they return to Washington to push for a second major tax and spending bill this year designed to meet fiscal conservatives’ demands for deeper federal budget cuts.

The new GOP legislative drive, still in the early stages, lacks the urgency that the year-end expiration of 2017 tax cuts provided to speed President Donald Trump’s signature tax and spending law, and party leaders already stretched the limit of available sweeteners in that struggle to win over wavering swing-district lawmakers. 

“A big part of how they ultimately got to yes on the first bill was the sense that they had built something that was too big to fail,” said Molly Reynolds, interim vice president of government studies at the Brookings Institution.

House Speaker Mike Johnson pledged to lead an effort to pass a follow-up tax and spending bill by late fall, which could revive provisions left out of the $3.4 trillion package Trump signed in July. 

That bill is likely fiscal conservatives’ last, best hope before next year’s midterm congressional elections to cut federal benefit programs such as Medicaid and food stamps even deeper than the first bill did.

But it’s unclear what could induce moderates from competitive districts to support more cuts to safety-net programs. And Republicans so far lack a unified vision for the package.

Johnson’s counterparts in the Senate also haven’t been enthusiastic. Senate Republican leader John Thune told Bloomberg Government in July that the effort would be “a big undertaking.”

Still, House Republicans are determined to push forward. The Republican Study Committee, the biggest GOP House caucus, held several staff-level meetings in August to brainstorm provisions to include.

Among the ideas on the table are cutting federal Medicaid funding to the 40 states that expanded eligibility under the Obama administration’s health-care overhaul law, ending student-loan forgiveness for public-sector workers, extending a one-year moratorium on Planned Parenthood funding, further limiting eligibility for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as food stamps, and banning Medicaid funding for gender-affirming care, a person familiar with discussions said.

House Republican leaders don’t plan to turn to the package until October, after Congress resolves how to keep the federal government open beyond the Sept. 30 expiration of current funding, said a person familiar with their thinking. But behind-the-scenes preparations are already underway, the person said.

No ‘forcing mechanism’

In some ways, Republican leaders are a victim of their own legislative success. The first tax bill incorporated breaks with broad appeal that the president campaigned on such as exempting tips and overtime pay from income taxes.

Even so, GOP lawmakers from competitive districts are struggling against national polling data showing the overall law is unpopular.

“There was the forcing mechanism of expiring tax cuts and President Trump’s campaign promises,” said Adam Michel, director of tax policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. “There’s less of an imperative here.”

The first package had hard deadlines baked into it, including an increase in the federal borrowing limit essential to averting an impending U.S. debt default. Without action before Dec. 31, Americans also would have faced a tax increase as the 2017 tax cuts expired. 

Republican leaders also dipped into a grab bag of inducements to hold together the party’s disparate factions. Steep cuts to Medicaid and other social safety net programs convinced conservative deficit hawks to back the package. While the promise of tax relief, particularly a higher cap for state and local tax deductions, kept on board the moderates who were leery of social safety net cuts.

It’s unclear what incentive swing-district Republicans have to back additional safety net cuts without SALT relief or something similar.

“You don’t have the same cudgel to go to them and say to them, you’ve got to eat some spending cuts here because we’re gonna do something for you on SALT,” Brookings’ Reynolds said.

Second try

Jonathan Burks, chief of staff to then-House Speaker Paul Ryan, is among the skeptics. Party leaders’ cupboard of incentives is nearly bare, he said.

“If it were popular spending cuts or popular tax increases it would’ve been included” in the Trump tax bill, said Burks, now executive vice president of economic and health policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

But Brittany Madni, executive vice president of the Economic Policy Innovation Center, a conservative think tank, said concerted efforts could sway swing-district Republicans to come around to policy ideas they previously wouldn’t accept.

“Some of the policies didn’t have broad support just because they didn’t have enough time to be socialized,” Madni said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending