Connect with us

Accounting

House committee advances IRS tax legislation

Published

on

The House Ways and Means Committee passed a set of bipartisan bills aimed at improving tax filing and administration at the Internal Revenue Service.

Two of the bills, which were backed by the American Institute of CPAs, would treat electronic tax filing and payments the same as paper equivalents, and require the IRS to explain to taxpayers any reassessment due to alleged math errors. 

The Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act would apply the “mailbox rule” to electronically submitted tax returns and payments. Currently, documents and payments properly addressed and sent through the U.S. mail by the due date are considered to be timely, even if they’re received later, which is known as the “mailbox rule.” The legislation would expand that rule to include electronically submitted documents and payments that are submitted by the due date, even if the IRS processes them at a later date.

The Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act would enable payments electronically submitted to the IRS to be treated the same as those sent through the mail. In fiscal year 2023, over 213 million—79% of all filings— returns and other forms were filed electronically. The bill would enable electronic payments and documents that are submitted by midnight on the due date to be considered timely. The bill passed the committee by a unanimous vote of 41-0.

The IRS Math and Taxpayer Help Act aims to improve the transparency of the IRS in addressing and rectifying simple accounting mistakes on taxpayers’ returns. The Internal Revenue Code allows the IRS to make “math error” corrections, which are expedited adjustments to tax returns containing simple math or clerical errors. The bill would require the IRS to notify taxpayers of the specific reasoning for math errors and provide 60 days to challenge the IRS’s assessment of the alleged error. 

Each year, the IRS sends millions of “math error” notices to taxpayers that propose to adjust their tax liabilities. But the notices often don’t explain the reasons for the adjustments, and some are never received by the taxpayer due to lost mail. The IRS is not currently required to inform taxpayers that they must dispute the adjustments within 60 days if they disagree or generally forfeit their right to do so. As a result, many taxpayers fail to dispute the IRS assessment. The bill would require the IRS to ensure all math error notices provide a clear explanation of the alleged error including showing the mathematical change and informing taxpayers they have 60 days to challenge the alleged math error. The bill passed the committee by a unanimous vote of 43-0.

“The AICPA is pleased that these bills have been included in the markup and is encouraged by the momentum generated by these provisions moving forward in a bipartisan way,” said Melanie Lauridsen, vice president of tax policy and advocacy for the AICPA, in a statement Wednesday. “These policies are common-sense reforms that will significantly help taxpayers, tax practitioners and tax administration, and we assert our strong support for these bills. We look forward to continuing our work with the committee to advance comprehensive proposals to achieve these goals.”

The bills were also part of a set of IRS administrative proposals that were included late last month in a bipartisan discussion draft by leaders of the Senate Finance Committee, chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and ranking member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon. 

The House Ways and Means Committee also advanced several other bills in the package. One would help protect the independence of the National Taxpayer Advocate at the IRS.

The National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025 would prevent IRS interference with National Taxpayer Advocate personnel by granting the NTA responsibility for its employees. In advocating for taxpayer rights, the National Taxpayer Advocate often requires independent legal advice, its proponents noted. Currently, staff hired by the National Taxpayer Advocate is accountable to internal IRS counsel, not the Taxpayer Advocate, creating a potential conflict of interest to the detriment of the taxpayer. The bill authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to hire attorneys who report directly to her, helping establish independence from the IRS. The bill passed the committee by a unanimous vote of 43-0.

The Recovery of Stolen Checks Act would require the IRS to create a process for taxpayers to request a replacement via direct deposit for a stolen paper check. If a check is determined to be stolen or lost, and not cashed, a taxpayer will receive a replacement check once the original check is cancelled, however many taxpayers are having their replacement checks stolen as well. Taxpayers who have a check stolen are then unable to request that the replacement check be sent via direct deposit. The bill would require the Treasury Secretary to establish processes and procedures under which taxpayers, who are otherwise eligible to receive an amount by paper check in replacement of a lost or stolen paper check, may elect to receive such amount by direct deposit. The bill passed the committee by a unanimous vote of 41-0.

The Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Enforcement Act would extend the statute of limitations for CARES Act-related unemployment insurance fraud from five to 10 years. The statute of limitations for prosecuting fraud in COVID-era pandemic unemployment insurance programs expires on March 27, 2025. After this date, Congress cannot retroactively change the statute of limitations on criminal prosecutions. The bill would extend the statute of limitations for criminal prosecution and civil enforcement actions in pandemic unemployment programs from five to 10 years. The bill passed the committee by a more divided vote of 24 to 18.

“The statute of limitations for these investigations runs out in 43 days on March 27,” said House Ways and Means Committee chairman Jason Smith, R-Missouri. “If we don’t extend the statute of limitations, those that perpetrated the greatest theft of taxpayer dollars in American history will not be brought to justice.”

Taxes on seniors

Separately, Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-New York, a member of the House Ways and Means Committee, introduced two pieces of legislation Monday to reduce the tax burden on seniors.

The Bonus Tax Relief for America’s Seniors Act, would amend the Tax Code to increase the additional bonus deduction for seniors age 65 and over from $1,950 to $5,000 for single filers, and from $3,100 to $10,000 for married couples. On average, this bipartisan legislation would reduce federal taxes by $2,100 for married couples filing jointly earning $85,000 per year.

The Tax Relief Unleashed for Seniors by Trump (TRUST) Act, would increase the amount of income that is tax exempt and index the threshold to inflation, allowing seniors to keep more of their benefits. The legislation would double current exempt income from $25,000 to $50,000 for single filers and from $32,000 to $64,000 for married couples age 65 and older.

“Our seniors have worked hard and paid taxes their whole lives and they should be able to keep more of their Social Security and retirement income without Uncle Sam trying to reach into their pockets again,” Malliotakis said in a statement. “Many of our seniors have been crushed by inflation, and are being forced to stretch their retirement savings further than ever before. The bills I’m introducing today would reduce the tax burden on our seniors, keep more money in their pockets and allow them to retire with greater financial security.”

Estate tax

Over in the Senate, a group of 46 Senate Republicans reintroduced legislation the Death Tax Repeal Act on Thursday to eliminate the estate tax. Senate Republicans had attempted to repeal the estate tax when Congress considered the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017. The final version of the TCJA did not fully repeal the death tax, but it effectively doubled the individual estate and gift tax exclusion to $10 million (approximately $13.9 million in 2025 dollars) through 2025, which prevents more families and generationally owned businesses from being affected by this tax. The increased exclusion expires at the end of 2025. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting firms seeing increased profits

Published

on

Accounting firms are reporting bigger profits and more clients, according to a new report.

The report, released Monday by Xero, found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of firms reported increased profits over the past year and 56% added new clients thanks to operational efficiency and expanded service offerings.

Some 85% of firms now offer client advisory services, a big spike from 41% in 2023, indicating a strategic shift toward delivering forward-looking financial guidance that clients increasingly expect.

AI adoption is also reshaping the profession, with 80% of firms confident it will positively affect their practice. Currently, the most common use cases for AI include: delivering faster and more responsive client services (33%), enhancing accuracy by reducing bookkeeping and accounting errors (33%), and streamlining workflows through the automation of routine tasks (32%).

“The widespread adoption of AI has been a turning point for the accounting profession, giving accountants an opportunity to scale their impact and take on a more strategic advisory role,” said Ben Richmond, managing director, North America, at Xero, in a statement. “The real value lies not just in working more efficiently, but working smarter, freeing up time to elevate the human element of the profession and in turn, strengthen client relationships.”

Some of the main challenges faced by firms include economic uncertainty (38%), mastering AI (36%) and rising client expectations for strategic advice (35%). 

While 85% of firms have embraced cloud platforms, a sizable number still lag behind, missing out on benefits such as easier data access from anywhere (40%) and enhanced security (36%).

Continue Reading

Accounting

Private equity is investing in accounting: What does that mean for the future of the business?

Published

on

Private equity firms have bought five of the top 26 accounting firms in the past three years as they mount a concerted strategy to reshape the industry. 

The trend should not come as a surprise. It’s one we’ve seen play out in several industries from health care to insurance, where a combination of low-risk, recurring revenue, scalability and an aging population of owners create a target-rich environment. For small to midsized accounting firms, the trend is exacerbated by a technological revolution that’s truly transforming the way accounting work is done, and a growing talent crisis that is threatening tried-and-true business models.

How will this type of consolidation affect the accounting business, and what do firms and their clients need to be on the lookout for as the marketplace evolves?

Assessing the opportunity… and the risk

First and foremost, accounting firm owners need to be aware of just how desirable they are right now. While there has been some buzz in the industry about the growing presence of private equity firms, most of the activity to date has focused on larger, privately held firms. In fact, when we recently asked tax professionals about their exposure to private equity funding in our 2025 State of Tax Professionals Report, we found that just 5% of firms have actually inked a deal and only 11% said they are planning to look, or are currently looking, for a deal with a private equity firm. Another 8% said they are open to discussion. On the one hand, that’s almost a quarter of firms feeling open to private equity investments in some way. But the lion’s share of respondents —  87% — said they were not interested.

Recent private equity deal volume suggests that the holdouts might change their minds when they have a real offer on the table. According to S&P Global, private equity and venture capital-backed deal value in the accounting, auditing and taxation services sector reached more than $6.3 billion in 2024, the highest level since 2015, and the trend shows no signs of slowing. Firm owners would be wise to start watching this trend to see how it might affect their businesses — whether they are interested in selling or not.

Focus on tech and efficiencies of scale

The reason this trend is so important to everyone in the industry right now is that the private equity firms entering this space are not trying to become accountants. They are looking for profitable exits. And they will do that by seizing on a critical inflection point in the industry that’s making it possible to scale accounting firms more rapidly than ever before by leveraging technology to deliver a much wider range of services at a much lower cost. So, whether your firm is interested in partnering with private equity or dead set on going it alone, the hyperscaling that’s happening throughout the industry will affect you one way or another.

Private equity thrives in fragmented businesses where the ability to roll up companies with complementary skill sets and specialized services creates an outsized growth opportunity. Andrew Dodson, managing partner at Parthenon Capital, recently commented after his firm took a stake in the tax and advisory firm Cherry Bekaert, “We think that for firms to thrive, they need to make investments in people and technology, and, obviously, regulatory adherence, to really differentiate themselves in the market. And that’s going to require scale and capital to do it. That’s what gets us excited.”

Over time, this could reshape the industry’s market dynamics by creating the accounting firm equivalent of the Traveling Wilburys — supergroups capable of delivering a wide range of specialized services that smaller, more narrowly focused firms could never previously deliver. It could also put downward pressure on pricing as these larger, platform-style firms start finding economies of scale to deliver services more cost-effectively.

The technology factor

The great equalizer in all of this is technology. Consistently, when I speak to tax professionals actively working in the market today, their top priorities are increased efficiency, growth and talent. Firms recognize they need to streamline workflows and processes through more effective use of technology, and they are investing heavily in AI, automation and data analytics capabilities to do that. Private equity firms, of course, are also investing in tech as they assemble their tax and accounting dream teams, in many cases raising the bar for the industry.

The question is: Can independent firms leverage technology fast enough to keep up with their deep-pocketed competition?

Many firms believe they can, with some even going so far as to publicly declare their independence.  Regardless of the path small to midsized firms take to get there, technology-enabled growth is going to play a key role in the future of the industry. Market dynamics that have been unfolding for the last decade have been accelerated with the introduction of serious investors, and everyone in the industry — large and small — is going to need to up their games to stay competitive.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Trump tax bill would help the richest, hurt the poorest, CBO says

Published

on

The House-passed version of President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill would deliver a financial blow to the poorest Americans but be a boon for higher-income households, according to a new analysis from the Congressional Budget Office.

The bottom 10% of households would lose an average of about $1,600 in resources per year, amounting to a 3.9% cut in their income, according to the analysis released Thursday. Those decreases are largely attributable to cuts in the Medicaid health insurance program and food aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Households in the highest 10% of incomes would see an average $12,000 boost in resources, amounting to a 2.3% increase in their incomes. Those increases are mainly attributable to reductions in taxes owed, according to the report from the nonpartisan CBO.

Households in the middle of the income distribution would see an increase in resources of $500 to $1,000, or between 0.5% and 0.8% of their income. 

The projections are based on the version of the tax legislation that House Republicans passed last month, which includes much of Trump’s economic agenda. The bill would extend tax cuts passed under Trump in 2017 otherwise due to expire at the end of the year and create several new tax breaks. It also imposes new changes to the Medicaid and SNAP programs in an effort to cut spending.

Overall, the legislation would add $2.4 trillion to US deficits over the next 10 years, not accounting for dynamic effects, the CBO previously forecast.

The Senate is considering changes to the legislation including efforts by some Republican senators to scale back cuts to Medicaid.

The projected loss of safety-net resources for low-income families come against the backdrop of higher tariffs, which economists have warned would also disproportionately impact lower-income families. While recent inflation data has shown limited impact from the import duties so far, low-income families tend to spend a larger portion of their income on necessities, such as food, so price increases hit them harder.

The House-passed bill requires that able-bodied individuals without dependents document at least 80 hours of “community engagement” a month, including working a job or participating in an educational program to qualify for Medicaid. It also includes increased costs for health care for enrollees, among other provisions.

More older adults also would have to prove they are working to continue to receive SNAP benefits, also known as food stamps. The legislation helps pay for tax cuts by raising the age for which able bodied adults must work to receive benefits to 64, up from 54. Under the current law, some parents with dependent children under age 18 are exempt from work requirements, but the bill lowers the age for the exemption for dependent children to 7 years old. 

The legislation also shifts a portion of the cost for federal food aid onto state governments.

CBO previously estimated that the expanded work requirements on SNAP would reduce participation in the program by roughly 3.2 million people, and more could lose or face a reduction in benefits due to other changes to the program. A separate analysis from the organization found that 7.8 million people would lose health insurance because of the changes to Medicaid.

Continue Reading

Trending