Connect with us

Accounting

How a once-hot accounting fintech’s bet on AI led to bankruptcy

Published

on

Bench Accounting, like many fintech startups, had ambitions to shake up a boring but important corner of finance — in this case, bookkeeping for small businesses. 

It racked up more than 10,000 clients in a little over a decade and seemed well on its way. Yet that wasn’t fast enough to make it the hot fintech it aspired to be when it raised over $100 million in venture financing. In a final push to improve its business, Bench turned to tech’s favorite new go-to: AI. It laid off staff and introduced new automation programs, including a bot named BenchGPT. 

It all culminated in nothing short of a disaster, punctuated by a troubled 2023 tax season when the company needed to request extensions for many of its clients, according to former employees. The next year was no better. As 2024 ended, Bench told clients it couldn’t handle their books. This January, the company filed for bankruptcy, hammering investors including Contour Venture Partners, Bain Capital Ventures and Inovia Capital. Its customers were temporarily left in limbo until an acquirer agreed to buy its assets and revive the business. 

“It’s literally days before year-end and I don’t know what my books look like,” former Bench client Sam Plester, chief executive officer and founder of Mission Brands Consulting in Madison, Wisconsin, said during an interview in December, adding that he had to pay a different firm to redo his books. 

Bench’s downfall is a cautionary tale for companies in a hurry to use AI to transform their business. The episode capped a year of ugly headlines for once-promising fintechs that were VC standouts — and are now learning that there’s virtually no margin for error when dealing with financial services. As the bankruptcy works its way through a Vancouver court, KSV Restructuring Inc., the trustee retained to oversee the proceedings, expects almost all investors to be wiped out. Bench’s most senior creditor, National Bank of Canada, is expected to get only a fraction of what it lent back, according to court filings. 

One serial acquirer saw Bench’s closure as an opportunity. Jesse Tinsley, co-founder and CEO of Employer.com, reached out to the Bench team on the day of the closure announcement to place his bid for the company’s assets. He won the deal and promised to honor all customer contracts by rehiring bookkeepers and taking a back-to-basics approach. “If you just look at the simple nuts and bolts of it, you can run this business well, especially if you don’t have the financial pressure of VC or private equity funding,” said Gary Levin, co-founder and chief strategy officer of Employer.com. The deal, terms of which weren’t disclosed, is expected to close this quarter pending court approval. 

This account of Bench’s challenges is based on interviews with more than a dozen current and former executives, employees and investors in the company who asked not to be named discussing its internal affairs, as well as documents provided by them.

Internal challenges

By late 2021, former Bench executives say the company was garnering $35 million in revenue and growing 40% annually. Yet, it still wasn’t profitable; its automation efforts required investment, and the small business segment is marked by notoriously high turnover rates, meaning it lost clients from closures. Bench wasn’t demonstrating the traits of a venture success story. It wasn’t a hypergrowth, high-margin software business, the type of metrics that hold the potential for a public stock listing.

Despite this, Ian Crosby, co-founder and former CEO of Bench, was in talks that year to receive an acquisition offer valued between $200 million and $300 million from business banking startup Brex, technology publication Newcomer reported. He used the offer as an opportunity to pitch his board on a new path forward: He would conduct another fundraise and use the money to take a bigger bet — an expansion into banking services. The board agreed and in June 2021 Bench announced it had raised $60 million of blended equity and debt financing in a round led by Contour Venture Partners with participation from Altos Ventures, Inovia Capital, Shopify and Bank of Montreal. 

With fresh cash in the bank, Bench tripled the size of its engineering, product and design team to build the next iteration of the business. It began burning through that cash — spending about $1.5 million per month at its peak, according to a former executive. A few months after the 2021 funding round closed, board members approached Crosby with concerns, according to people familiar with the discussions. Instead of straying too far from the core bookkeeping business by expanding into banking services, board members thought Bench should use the new funding to focus on achieving profitability. The board insisted the goal should be slashing one of the company’s biggest expenses: bookkeepers, the same people said. 

In the months following the June funding round, Crosby and board members clashed over whether to continue gradually automating processes, bet big on automation or move ahead with the expansion into banking services, according to former executives. On Dec. 1, 2021, Crosby was removed as the company’s CEO, according to people close to the discussions. He declined offers to stay on the board or take a different executive position and exited the company, they said. 

In August 2022, Bench Chief Financial Officer Jean-Philippe Durrios was promoted to CEO. By this point, a significant portion of the $30 million in series C equity funding had been spent, according to people familiar with the company’s operations. Durrios did not respond to requests for comment. 

AI rollout

Durrios’ tenure was defined by an intense focus on profitability, according to former executives. In the first two years under his leadership, Bench’s 613-person staff underwent multiple rounds of layoffs. By the time it filed for bankruptcy, Bench had 413 employees.  

In mid-2023, Durrios implemented a strategy designed to increase the efficiency of the bookkeepers by splitting them into specialized teams and arming them with AI tools. Under the new model, associates took over client communications despite no longer performing the bulk of the bookkeeping services themselves. The number of clients they were responsible for swelled from the 70 or so they handled completely, to roughly 200 for which they only fielded questions, according to former employees. Shortly after the reorganization, about 40 bookkeepers were laid off, a former executive said, adding strain to the implementation. 

Bench hired outsourcing firm HJS Accountants and promised that upcoming AI product launches would make everything run smoothly. One of these new programs was called BenchGPT, an internal tool for employees to ask questions about client needs. The tool proved to be unreliable, according to a former employee. Bench launched a similar chatbot tool for clients designed to help with expense categorization, but it was often inaccurate and its entries needed to be manually fixed, two employees said. HJS Accountants did not respond to a request for comment. 

As with most AI product launches, the tools gradually improved, but weren’t live in time to support the pared-down bookkeeping team for the 2023 tax season, according to former employees. For that year, Bench was unable to meet filing deadlines and requested extensions for a significant portion of its clients, the same people said. The company needed to rehire bookkeepers, adding additional financial pressure. 

Meanwhile, people familiar with the company’s operations say Bench was frequently facing cash shortages and leaned on bridge rounds of venture funding and debt to continue operating. During Durrios’ tenure, Bench paid off its debt from Bank of Montreal and obtained an increased credit line from National Bank of Canada, the same people said. 

Last fall, Durrios told the board that the business needed money again. They responded with additional funding and sent Adam Schlesinger from Inovia Capital to evaluate the state of the business. In October, Schlesinger was appointed to replace Durrios as CEO while the board searched for a buyer for Bench. However, Bench had breached terms attached to its line of credit, according to people who were present and asked not to be named discussing confidential information. 

On Dec. 27, Bench posted to its website that it was closed for business and recommended clients turn to a competitor, Kick. In January, Bench Accounting Inc. and 10Sheet Services Inc., which operated as a consolidated business, filed for bankruptcy with an accumulated deficit of $135 million, according to a report by the trustee, KSV. National Bank of Canada did not respond to requests for comment. Bank of Montreal declined to comment. 

Continue Reading

Accounting

IAASB tweaks standards on working with outside experts

Published

on

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board is proposing to tailor some of its standards to align with recent additions to the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants’ International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants when it comes to using the work of an external expert.

The proposed narrow-scope amendments involve minor changes to several IAASB standards:

  • ISA 620, Using the Work of an Auditor’s Expert;
  • ISRE 2400 (Revised), Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements;
  • ISAE 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information;
  • ISRS 4400 (Revised), Agreed-upon Procedures Engagements.

The IAASB is asking for comments via a digital response template that can be found on the IAASB website by July 24, 2025.

In December 2023, the IESBA approved an exposure draft for proposed revisions to the IESBA’s Code of Ethics related to using the work of an external expert. The proposals included three new sections to the Code of Ethics, including provisions for professional accountants in public practice; professional accountants in business and sustainability assurance practitioners. The IESBA approved the provisions on using the work of an external expert at its December 2024 meeting, establishing an ethical framework to guide accountants and sustainability assurance practitioners in evaluating whether an external expert has the necessary competence, capabilities and objectivity to use their work, as well as provisions on applying the Ethics Code’s conceptual framework when using the work of an outside expert.  

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tariffs will hit low-income Americans harder than richest, report says

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s tariffs would effectively cause a tax increase for low-income families that is more than three times higher than what wealthier Americans would pay, according to an analysis from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

The report from the progressive think tank outlined the outcomes for Americans of all backgrounds if the tariffs currently in effect remain in place next year. Those making $28,600 or less would have to spend 6.2% more of their income due to higher prices, while the richest Americans with income of at least $914,900 are expected to spend 1.7% more. Middle-income families making between $55,100 and $94,100 would pay 5% more of their earnings. 

Trump has imposed the steepest U.S. duties in more than a century, including a 145% tariff on many products from China, a 25% rate on most imports from Canada and Mexico, duties on some sectors such as steel and aluminum and a baseline 10% tariff on the rest of the country’s trading partners. He suspended higher, customized tariffs on most countries for 90 days.

Economists have warned that costs from tariff increases would ultimately be passed on to U.S. consumers. And while prices will rise for everyone, lower-income families are expected to lose a larger portion of their budgets because they tend to spend more of their earnings on goods, including food and other necessities, compared to wealthier individuals.

Food prices could rise by 2.6% in the short run due to tariffs, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab. Among all goods impacted, consumers are expected to face the steepest price hikes for clothing at 64%, the report showed. 

The Yale Budget Lab projected that the tariffs would result in a loss of $4,700 a year on average for American households.

Continue Reading

Accounting

At Schellman, AI reshapes a firm’s staffing needs

Published

on

Artificial intelligence is just getting started in the accounting world, but it is already helping firms like technology specialist Schellman do more things with fewer people, allowing the firm to scale back hiring and reduce headcount in certain areas through natural attrition. 

Schellman CEO Avani Desai said there have definitely been some shifts in headcount at the Top 100 Firm, though she stressed it was nothing dramatic, as it mostly reflects natural attrition combined with being more selective with hiring. She said the firm has already made an internal decision to not reduce headcount in force, as that just indicates they didn’t hire properly the first time. 

“It hasn’t been about reducing roles but evolving how we do work, so there wasn’t one specific date where we ‘started’ the reduction. It’s been more case by case. We’ve held back on refilling certain roles when we saw opportunities to streamline, especially with the use of new technologies like AI,” she said. 

One area where the firm has found such opportunities has been in the testing of certain cybersecurity controls, particularly within the SOC framework. The firm examined all the controls it tests on the service side and asked which ones require human judgment or deep expertise. The answer was a lot of them. But for the ones that don’t, AI algorithms have been able to significantly lighten the load. 

“[If] we don’t refill a role, it’s because the need actually has changed, or the process has improved so significantly [that] the workload is lighter or shared across the smarter system. So that’s what’s happening,” said Desai. 

Outside of client services like SOC control testing and reporting, the firm has found efficiencies in administrative functions as well as certain internal operational processes. On the latter point, Desai noted that Schellman’s engineers, including the chief information officer, have been using AI to help develop code, which means they’re not relying as much on outside expertise on the internal service delivery side of things. There are still people in the development process, but their roles are changing: They’re writing less code, and doing more reviewing of code before it gets pushed into production, saving time and creating efficiencies. 

“The best way for me to say this is, to us, this has been intentional. We paused hiring in a few areas where we saw overlaps, where technology was really working,” said Desai.

However, even in an age awash with AI, Schellman acknowledges there are certain jobs that need a human, at least for now. For example, the firm does assessments for the FedRAMP program, which is needed for cloud service providers to contract with certain government agencies. These assessments, even in the most stable of times, can be long and complex engagements, to say nothing of the less predictable nature of the current government. As such, it does not make as much sense to reduce human staff in this area. 

“The way it is right now for us to do FedRAMP engagements, it’s a very manual process. There’s a lot of back and forth between us and a third party, the government, and we don’t see a lot of overall application or technology help… We’re in the federal space and you can imagine, [with] what’s going on right now, there’s a big changing market condition for clients and their pricing pressure,” said Desai. 

As Schellman reduces staff levels in some places, it is increasing them in others. Desai said the firm is actively hiring in certain areas. In particular, it’s adding staff in technical cybersecurity (e.g., penetration testers), the aforementioned FedRAMP engagements, AI assessment (in line with recently becoming an ISO 42001 certification body) and in some client-facing roles like marketing and sales. 

“So, to me, this isn’t about doing more with less … It’s about doing more of the right things with the right people,” said Desai. 

While these moves have resulted in savings, she said that was never really the point, so whatever the firm has saved from staffing efficiencies it has reinvested in its tech stack to build its service line further. When asked for an example, she said the firm would like to focus more on penetration testing by building a SaaS tool for it. While Schellman has a proof of concept developed, she noted it would take a lot of money and time to deploy a full solution — both of which the firm now has more of because of its efficiency moves. 

“What is the ‘why’ behind these decisions? The ‘why’ for us isn’t what I think you traditionally see, which is ‘We need to get profitability high. We need to have less people do more things.’ That’s not what it is like,” said Desai. “I want to be able to focus on quality. And the only way I think I can focus on quality is if my people are not focusing on things that don’t matter … I feel like I’m in a much better place because the smart people that I’ve hired are working on the riskiest and most complicated things.”

Continue Reading

Trending