Accounting
How American tax breaks brought a Chinese solar energy giant to Ohio
Published
4 months agoon
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7e85/c7e85c2eecce9eae113612a8e44ff9a2d45269cd" alt=""
Nestled among the corn fields of Pataskala, Ohio, Illuminate USA’s sprawling new solar factory is buzzing. Hundreds of freshly hired local employees are hoisting pallets, soldering equipment and inspecting their work as sheets of glass are transformed into state-of-the-art photovoltaic panels. They’re collecting hourly wages that start at double the state minimum. The factory has also delivered contracts to area electricians and suppliers.
From the outside, these are the hallmarks of the 21st century clean energy manufacturing boom promised by the Biden administration, the result of sweeping incentives designed to restore national prowess in a market dominated by China.
In reality, what looks like a domestic triumph is also a win for America’s primary industrial and geopolitical rival. Invenergy, America’s biggest private renewable power developer, owns 51% of the plant. Longi Green Energy Technology Co., the Chinese solar giant, owns the other 49%, and it’s Longi’s panel-making expertise, technology and supply chain that are churning out tariff-free equipment for the U.S. market.
Inside the plant, signs in both English and Mandarin admonish workers to clean up trash. Machine displays also toggle between the two languages. More than 100 Chinese nationals are on site working alongside more than 1,000 American colleagues, and bridging the language barrier requires lots of hand gestures and smartphone-enabled translation. Illuminate says much of this is temporary, and most of the Chinese workers will leave once the Americans are up to speed.
But long after they return home, Longi will continue to profit. The joint venture benefits from millions in economic development incentives and federal tax credits for domestic clean energy manufacturing. For its part, Longi avoids anti-China tariffs and deepens its foothold in one of the
Companies based in or linked to China are replicating the strategy across the U.S. They are building or planning to build at least a dozen plants with 30 gigawatts of module-making capacity, according to a Bloomberg review of public statements, filings and other documentation. All told, the facilities would be able to supply roughly three-quarters of today’s U.S. panel needs. (BloombergNEF projects U.S. domestic demand for solar panels will be 45.5 gigawatts in 2024 and 50.4 gigawatts in 2025.)
American manufacturers are crying foul, saying these factories undermine their quest to build a domestic solar supply chain. Although other countries have taken advantage of the IRA’s subsidies, political objections have focused on Chinese investment. Bipartisan momentum is building in Congress to block China-backed firms from claiming tax credits for manufacturing anything central to the energy transition — a category that extends beyond solar panels to electric vehicles and batteries.
In Ohio, retired middle-school science teacher Eileen DeRolf has become an outspoken critic of Illuminate and the policies that brought it to Pataskala. She points to a 15-year tax abatement from the city and $4 million in incentives from a state economic development agency, to say nothing of the $350 million in potential annual tax subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act.
“To me, this is betraying America, to allow an uneven playing field,” DeRolf said. “I happen to not particularly want our geopolitical No. 1 enemy to benefit off our economic system.”
Illuminate and its American and Chinese parent companies see it differently. They point to an influx of well-paying jobs and to a resurrection of manufacturing in a fast-growing sector of the economy.
“We’re a majority-owned American company,” said John Duer, Illuminate’s chief legal officer. “We have a minority partner based in China. We’re not a Chinese company trying to do business in the U.S.”
Executives at Invenergy and Longi had been talking about collaborating for years, but it took the Inflation Reduction Act — the 2022 law meant to jumpstart U.S. clean energy manufacturing — to spur them to action. Less than seven months after President Joe Biden signed the IRA, they
In addition to the tax credits Illuminate can claim for its U.S.-made panels, its parent companies reap significant benefits from the tie-up. Invenergy is the factory’s first and biggest customer, earning additional credits for using domestically produced components in its solar arrays. And Longi, like other Chinese panel-makers, brings advantages gained through decades of experience and generous support from Beijing.
In addition, the industry has been dogged by allegations that some suppliers
What no one disputes is that today Chinese companies dominate the market for solar panels and all of their component parts.
For environmental advocates, China’s cheap panels have been a boon, driving a more than 50-fold increase in emissions-free solar power generation globally since 2010. But to American rivals, something more nefarious was at work. They argued Chinese solar companies were selling their products below cost to unfairly corner the market, and trade authorities agreed, kicking off a cycle of tariffs meant to level the playing field.
Today, steep U.S. tariffs have effectively killed domestic demand for made-in-China solar panels. Companies, including Longi, first responded by shifting operations to other Asian nations, spurring another round of trade probes and enforcement. By producing panels in Ohio, Longi steps out of this game of
(The estimate is based on the average price in September for panels exported to the U.S. ($0.25 per watt), Longi’s share of Illuminate’s planned annual production capacity (5GW) and a potential combined antidumping and countervailing duty rate for Malaysian modules exported to the U.S. of 25%. Note: Any final
Combined with the incentives from the IRA, Longi and other panel-makers can “make huge profits,” said Yana Hryshko, chief solar analyst at consulting group Wood Mackenzie. After surviving two decades of industry turbulence, these “are not stupid companies,” she said. “They will not make a move without being confident.”
On a June Friday morning, job-seekers started to gather at the Perry County, Ohio, career center well before Illuminate’s recruitment event was scheduled to begin. Many of the plant’s workers come from outside Pataskala, including areas hit hard by the collapse of coal mining.
A job at the plant would mean a longer commute for Tricia Tilley, a 47-year-old janitor and church secretary. It would also nearly double her income and provide health insurance for her and her teenage son.
As for the company’s ties to China? “I know they’re from another country, but they’re here trying to put money into our country,” she said. “As long as it’s a good job and they’re paying everybody — keeping on the up-and-up — I don’t see any problem with it. Follow the rules like everybody else, we’re cool.”
Right now, Illuminate depends on the expertise of Chinese workers who’ve spent years handling specialized module-making machinery and brittle crystalline silicon cells. For many, it’s their first time outside of China, drawn by higher salaries and a sense of adventure.
“We’re here just to teach the American workers,” said Li, a production line technician who asked to be identified by her family name because she wasn’t authorized to speak to reporters. “When they can start a production line by themselves, there’ll be no need for us to be here anymore.”
Li’s days begin with a video chat around 5 a.m., a chance to talk with her children in China before a company shuttle takes her from suburban Columbus to the factory. Many of the Chinese workers at Illuminate work 12-hour shifts, six days a week, logging 60% more hours every month than the plant’s typical American employees.
Longi’s expats went through language training, though most rely on translators to communicate with their trainees. They also got a crash course in American culture, with advice to avoid commenting on race, skin color or body type. Li said her American colleagues have been kind.
“I hadn’t been out of China before. Now I get to come out and take a look,” she said. Li pegged her timeline at “two or three years. After that I’ll go back. Then I can say I’m a person who has been to the United States!”
Illuminate is leaning into its heartland identity. Its website touts its role “investing in Ohio” and “onshoring America’s supply chains.” It’s partnering with local high schools for a robotics challenge and also has sponsored the
DeRolf and other local skeptics deride these efforts as a charm offensive, albeit an effective one. It’s made it “ever so much more difficult to get this town and the people to pay attention to what we’ve got in that building,” DeRolf said.
Like DeRolf, activists in Mesquite, Texas, are taking aim at a $270 million plant that began producing panels late last year. Some 1,400 Texans now work at the factory owned by Canadian Solar Inc. — and while the company’s corporate headquarters are in Ontario, most of its directors and much of its manufacturing reside in China.
Foreign direct investment has always been critical to countries trying to build domestic industry. In the late 1990s, China, for its part, welcomed Western automakers, providing access to its growing market while learning from their decades of experience.
“Most of the companies that are building solar panels right now that have the know-how or skills are Chinese,” said Ilaria Mazzocco, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. They also have well-established supply chains outside the U.S. At Illuminate, for example, panels are made with photovoltaic cells and glass from Malaysia and aluminum frames from Vietnam.
Many key materials aren’t yet produced domestically, and Illuminate says it’s actively working to expand its U.S. supply base.
The promise of the Inflation Reduction Act was that “you’re restoring the American industrial base,” said Nathan Picarsic, the founder of consulting group Horizon Advisory, which has investigated Chinese supply chain dominance and the use of forced labor. But as more Chinese-backed solar companies operate on U.S. soil, it betrays “the story that we’re telling ourselves about the manufacturing renaissance.”
The clash reverberates beyond solar to the fast-growing field of electric vehicles and battery manufacturing, also subsidized by the Inflation Reduction Act. In rural northwest Michigan, the town government is opposing an electric vehicle battery factory planned by a subsidiary of China’s
In Virginia, Governor Glenn Youngkin discouraged Ford Motor Co.’s interest in building an electric vehicle battery plant with China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. in the state, calling it a “
Licensing is one way the U.S. can tap Chinese manufacturing expertise and technical know-how while retaining more control over operations, said Mazzocco. Regardless, the issue is a flashpoint for politicians — and is fueling bipartisan efforts in Congress to bar companies with ties to China and other so-called “foreign entities of concern” from claiming the IRA’s manufacturing tax incentives. (It’s also a way lawmakers could try to offset spending in the next budget fight.) The Treasury Department could also move unilaterally to impose restrictions on what projects qualify for the credit.
Cory Ford, a school bus mechanic in the Pataskala area, doesn’t share his community’s embrace of the Illuminate plant. He doesn’t want U.S. taxpayer dollars to benefit Chinese industry; he’s also concerned that the firms could leave as quickly as they arrived. After all, Chinese companies have become expert at rapidly relocating in response to unfavorable tariffs or taxation.
“We’ve given so much in subsidies and government funding,” he said. “When that runs dry, how quickly is that building going to empty out?” And, he asks, what happens to the local American workers left behind?
Illuminate isn’t going anywhere, Duer said, even if Washington puts the manufacturing subsidies outside of reach: “We would adjust. Nothing is fatal. Nothing can’t be overcome. The fact of the matter is, we’re here to stay.”
You may like
Accounting
DOJ, SEC investigating $32M CrowdStrike deal with Carahsoft
Published
50 minutes agoon
February 21, 2025data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01183/01183e6fdee2dc8fc7905c549fe0e7d2bf7cca12" alt=""
U.S. prosecutors and regulators are investigating a $32 million deal between CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. and a technology distributor to provide cybersecurity tools to the Internal Revenue Service, according to two people familiar with the matter and a document seen by Bloomberg News.
Investigators for the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission have been interviewing people and collecting records related to the deal, according to the document and people. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the matter.
Carahsoft Technology Corp. paid CrowdStrike for the deal that the cybersecurity firm closed on the last day of a fiscal quarter in 2023, but the IRS never purchased the products, Bloomberg first reported in October. The transaction under investigation was big enough that it could have made the difference between CrowdStrike beating or missing Wall Street projections for the period, although the Austin, Texas-based company has declined to detail how it accounted for the deal. The day after CrowdStrike reported results for the record quarter, its shares rose 10%.
The parallel probes, which haven’t been previously reported, also represent additional scrutiny of Carahsoft, a dominant reseller of technology to the U.S. government. The FBI
CrowdStrike spokesperson Brian Merrill said in an email, “we stand by the accounting of the transaction.” A lawyer for Carahsoft, Samarth Barot, declined to comment.
A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, Nicholas Biase, declined to comment. An SEC spokesperson, Cory Jarvis, said the agency doesn’t comment on “the existence or nonexistence of a possible investigation.”
As early as last fall, SEC and DOJ investigators were questioning former CrowdStrike employees involved in the deal, as well as IRS staff, and they’ve continued to pursue interviews in recent weeks, according to the people and documents. They’ve also collected records related to the deal, including written communications from employees of the IRS, CrowdStrike and Carahsoft.
The investigators asked witnesses detailed questions about the interactions between CrowdStrike sales staff and IRS officials in the lead-up to the deal’s closure, one of the people said. They’ve inquired repeatedly whether the agency purchased the CrowdStrike software and were told no, the person said.
IRS officials did not respond to calls and emails seeking comment.
Prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York are among those working on the investigation, according to the person.
The deal under scrutiny is complex and some specifics of it remain unclear. Documents from Carahsoft and CrowdStrike show that it was for identity threat protection software to be used by the IRS. The agency, however, never bought it.
CrowdStrike closed the deal on the last day of its third fiscal quarter in 2023. In a subsequent earnings call, Chief Executive Officer George Kurtz highlighted it by saying, “identity threat protection wins in the quarter included an eight-figure total deal value win in the federal government.”
Carahsoft has been making on-time payments to CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity firm told Bloomberg last fall. Both companies explained then that they had a “non-cancellable order” between them, but declined to say why they struck the deal without a purchase in place from the IRS, or what became of the millions of dollars worth of software subscriptions that were at stake.
In an earnings report in November 2024, CrowdStrike excluded roughly $26 million
CrowdStrike representatives have declined to elaborate or say whether the comments were related to the deal involving the IRS and Carahsoft.
At the time of the deal, some CrowdStrike staff raised internal concerns that the company was “pre-booking” the transaction, which they viewed as incomplete because it was unclear whether the IRS would ever make the large purchase, Bloomberg previously reported. U.S. regulators have in some cases sued and fined companies over alleged pre-booking, also known as channel stuffing, claiming they misled investors by improperly recognizing revenue to inflate their financial figures.
A CrowdStrike spokesperson previously said it was “demonstrably false” that there was any pre-booking and that the deal was reviewed and “given a clean bill of health.”
U.S. investigators have already spent years examining Carahsoft, a leading player among resellers and distributors that help technology companies navigate the complexities of selling to government agencies. In September, agents from the FBI and the U.S. Department of Defense searched the company’s Reston, Virginia, headquarters.
A Carahsoft spokesperson said at the time that it was cooperating with the FBI probe, which involved “an investigation into a company with which Carahsoft has done business in the past.” The Justice Department is also conducting a separate civil investigation of Carahsoft and SAP SE for potential price fixing on government contracts, as
There’s no known link between CrowdStrike and the civil investigation nor the search of Carahsoft’s office. A representative of the cybersecurity company previously said it’s not connected to either.
Federal investigations, especially of complex cases, often run for years and many end without any formal accusations of wrongdoing.
Adam Pritchard, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School and former SEC lawyer, said that regardless of what investigators find, the probes will cost CrowdStrike and Carahsoft in legal fees and managers’ time, and draw scrutiny from their boards of directors. He said investigators will likely be interested in whether the companies had any “additional understandings” about the deal beyond their contract and, if so, whether they were disclosed to auditors.
“If I were investigating, I would want to know if there were implicit understandings that if the deal didn’t go through with the IRS that they could work out the money over the course of their ongoing relationship,” said Pritchard.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be4b/1be4bfd6903ead952894c6623b9de7c36b72eced" alt=""
Thousands of IRS employees around the country reported to work Thursday prepared for an email announcement that they were being placed on leave.
For many, the email never arrived. Not because they weren’t being terminated — they were — but because of a technical glitch that prevented officials from notifying them via email, according to an agency employee and messages reviewed by Bloomberg News.
The agency has resorted to paper: “All terminated employees, whether they received the email or not, will be receiving a paper copy of the letter via UPS overnight tracked mail,” an internal message said, referring to United Parcel Service Inc.
The IRS didn’t respond to a request for comment. The agency is planning to terminate about 6,700 probationary workers, a category that includes new hires as well as people recently promoted or reassigned, as billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency project enacts sweeping job cuts across the federal workforce.
Replacing email termination with overnight letter delivery added a potentially ironic wrinkle to the IRS job cuts: additional costs. Full details weren’t available Friday, but overnight letter delivery from UPS can cost more than $30 between adjacent areas, according to published rate schedules.
Spread across the roughly 6,700 employees scheduled to be terminated this week, the inability to deliver the bad news electronically could mean more than $200,000 in postage.
Cutting thousands of federal workers all at once has proved harder than anticipated for DOGE and the Trump administration. Last week, officials at the Small Business Administration sent termination notices to probationary staff,
The Department of Energy laid off nuclear bomb specialists,
There was no indication the IRS was having second thoughts about the cuts, only having trouble with last-minute paperwork.
A copy of the IRS termination notice reviewed by Bloomberg said the agency was abiding by an executive order to “terminate probationary employees who were not deemed as critical to filing season.”
“We don’t have many details that we are permitted to share, but this is all tied to compliance with the executive order,” the message said.
Accounting
Trump eyes tariffs to counter digital taxes despised by big tech
Published
2 hours agoon
February 21, 2025data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5ba6/a5ba68a097c4391637ec34430ca7d9a57416825c" alt=""
President Donald Trump is expected to sign a memorandum Friday that opens the door to levies in response to digital services taxes some countries impose on U.S. tech giants, people familiar with the plans said, the latest step to expand a tariff war aimed at addressing imbalances in global trade.
The memo, which the people familiar discussed on condition of anonymity before it is made public, focuses broadly on digital trade issues. Friday’s action directs the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to develop remedies for the taxes that foreign governments impose on U.S. tech companies such as Alphabet Inc. and Meta Platforms Inc., the people said.
The memo is not expected to implement tariffs immediately and it does not set a timeline for when such duties might take effect, according to the people familiar.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The move addresses an issue that has long been a concern for Trump — dating back to his first stint in the White House. In 2019, the USTR initiated separate probes into the tax systems for France, Italy, Spain, India and other countries, with the U.S. concluding at the time that the taxes were discriminatory and disproportionately hurt American firms.
Some nations have since withdrawn their digital services tax plans and instead joined a global negotiation for a minimum tax on tech companies — but those talks have stalled repeatedly.
According to the Computer and Communications Industry Association, approximately
Trump’s action comes ahead of a visit from French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country has a digital tax that hits major U.S. tech multinationals, and whose finance minister said earlier this month they intended to keep in place.
France was one of the first countries to implement a digital services tax. The two sides negotiated a truce, under which France would have withdrawn the tax after global rules on taxing digital multinationals came into effect. Those negotiations, however, never concluded.
U.S. retaliation over digital taxes threatens to roil already tense relations with France and other European countries already at odds with Washington over Trump’s push to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Trump and his allies have railed against what he sees as unfair practices from Europe over trade, taxation and efforts to counter mis- or dis-information on social media that he says target U.S. tech companies. More broadly, Trump’s plans highlight how in his second term he has sought to employ tariffs to reshape global trade ties and force companies to move production to the U.S.
The president has already imposed a blanket 10% tax on imports from China, ordered — and then paused — 25% tariffs on goods from Canada and Mexico, unveiled plans for a 25% levy on U.S. imports of steel and aluminum and directed his administration to propose a round of reciprocal tariffs for each trading partner. He’s also said tariffs on automobiles, semiconductors and drug imports are forthcoming.
Trump’s second term has seen Silicon Valley executives seek to woo the new president, with the prominent CEOs of some of the country’s largest tech companies visiting him at his Mar-a-Lago estate during the transition and attending his inauguration last month. Trump has vowed to target policies abroad he says harm those giants but many of his moves, such as fresh tariffs, threaten to squeeze tech companies that rely on global supply chains.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bd0e/3bd0e1289af4dae69b85f1947f19b6c66b581809" alt=""
DOJ, SEC investigating $32M CrowdStrike deal with Carahsoft
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd623/bd623f606eeee5c980cc1901014fd3dcf2e3b4a6" alt=""
IRS plans to cut thousands of workers by mail
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/524bf/524bfc8acca307ec8804d41554ac3703d46582aa" alt=""
Trump eyes tariffs to counter digital taxes despised by big tech
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7025d/7025d35208384663d9ab291a8b4e55e52dda5ddf" alt=""
New 2023 K-1 instructions stir the CAMT pot for partnerships and corporations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4e62/d4e628112690ee21ab1191c89a42864ae69e7265" alt="Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation"
The Essential Practice of Bank and Credit Card Statement Reconciliation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74611/7461111e9a348ce14927f9127c832e7253e79fab" alt=""
Are American progressives making themselves sad?
Trending
-
Economics1 week ago
Donald Trump wants states and cities to do as they are told
-
Economics1 week ago
Defense stocks drop after Trump says Pentagon spending could be halved
-
Economics1 week ago
Cut debt or face economic heart attack
-
Technology6 days ago
Reddit CEO Steve Huffman Unveils Monetization Strategy for 2025
-
Economics1 week ago
PPI January 2025:
-
Leaders6 days ago
Adebayo Ogunlesi – From Nigerian Roots to Global Financial Leadership
-
Economics1 week ago
Mexico, Canada tariffs could add $6,000 to the cost of a car, by one estimate
-
Blog Post6 days ago
Power of Ratio Analysis in Business Performance Assessment