Connect with us

Accounting

How to choose the right technology for your accounting firm

Published

on

Your LinkedIn is inundated with posts about an endless sea of fintech companies who recently got their “Series Whatever” funding.

They’re coming for the old legacy companies who haven’t figured out how to roll AI into their archaic platform that everyone still uses since changing feels like it would be a major headache.

They’re also coming for their competitors who don’t have the talent that they have or features that they’re thinking about which will make your life, as the customer, so much easier and more efficient.

They’re all “transformational” and going to totally change the way you think about your job, make you “ready for the future” and prepare you to take on “tomorrow’s challenges”.

Yes, these are all sarcastically in “air quotes” because they’re the same marketing buzzwords we’ve seen on every piece of advertising material from nearly all these tech companies.

It’s also the reason why they all continue to struggle to actually get adoption of their new technology, even with deep pockets from VCs and PE firms, and even with some of the smartest and most talented teams on the planet, they treat marketing like a playbook that can just be copied and pasted company to company, industry to industry.

People say accountants just repeat the same things over and over again, but at this point, I’m pretty sure most marketing executives SALY more than we do! But I digress…

All of this leads to us being overwhelmed by the number of options that exist to choose between.

We know things are changing. We know the role of accountants will be different. We know our skill sets and technologies need to evolve. What we don’t know is what basket we should put our eggs in, and we don’t really have the time or flexibility in our profession that many other professions do of “failing” — because failing has serious implications.

In entrepreneurship, you’re encouraged to fail fast, learn and try again. The worst case is you learned a lesson and are out some time and money.

In accounting, if you followed this logic, you’d have taxes not being properly filed, compliance being not adequately submitted, and financials not being timely issued. Forget about just the individual legal worst cases; there could be rippling mass economic effects.

And that’s why we are so hesitant to adopt new technologies, no matter how many SOC compliance certifications or media publications the company has! The reason we don’t choose options quickly in the accounting profession is because of the risk that comes with uncertainty. It’s also the reason many of us stay in public accounting longer than we desire — the path to success is straightforward, predictable and nearly guaranteed.

What we are left with is being paralyzed by infinite directions to go in, and no clearcut solution.

If there’s someone who understands paralysis from analysis, it’s me.

It’s sort of par for the course when you’re a jack of all trades, master of none. Good at everything, the best at nothing. It leaves an endless list of options on the table.

So what should you do, as an accounting professional, aware that you need to make a choice, yet being unsure of which choice is right?

Reflection

It starts with looking inward and recognizing where you and your company are currently. You can’t be afraid of asking tough questions about what the trajectory of your role, department and company will be.

  • Are you a small business with lots of flexibility or are you an enterprise with rigid protocols that are tough to get around?
  • Will you be looking at global expansion in the upcoming years?
  • Are you settled into your role looking to get through until retirement, or are you envisioning the future of the company under your management?
  • Is the company leadership excited by the idea of downsizing headcount while expanding operations?
  • Are the regulatory requirements that you’ll be facing going to be different based on where you’re heading?

All of these answers can help you anticipate what your needs will be, which will help you filter out products that don’t meet those needs.

The needs of corporate controllers, fractional CFOs, bookkeepers, tax practitioners, firm owners and start-up team builders are all vastly different — yet most marketing material identifies “accountant” somewhere in your title and throws everything they have at you, regardless of applicability.

The goal is understanding what is most important to you.

Research

Now that you know yourself, what is important to your team and company, and what you want that will make you more successful (however that looks in your eyes), you need to be proactive.

If you wait for the inbound calls, they’ll go exactly as you expect.

Some young salesperson — likely one who never made it as deep into your career path as you — giving you a pitch on how you could do your job better. Oh, the irony.

This is of no disrespect to salespeople — they hustle in a relentlessly difficult field — but selling something highly technical to deeply technical professionals cannot and should not be as easy as convincing someone to buy something they don’t need. Unlike the selling rule of thumb, which is “people buy off of emotions,” in accounting, there are not emotional buyers — it’s logic-based decision making.

There is plenty you can learn from the fintech company website, from talking to a salesperson, and booking a demo. They know their product and they know the benefits it has. But as the good professional skeptics we are, we also know that anybody doing outbound sales at a company is going to have a natural bias — that’s why the best salespeople don’t try to oversell.

So that’s why research becomes important (and why I always advise companies to simply make information available, rather than to shove it into prospective customers’ faces).

  • Does the technology need to have certain compliance requirements?
  • How long have they existed and is there a major risk of the startup running out of capital and is no longer able to support the product?
  • How easily can it be implemented, and can it be done at the same time that you’re using your current system?
  • What are the credentials of the people actually building the product and company, and can they be trusted?

Since you’ve reflected, you know what you’re looking for. You know the questions to ask. You know what the needs of your job, team and company are, and you’ll be able to enter conversations from a point of leverage.

Flip the narrative so you have the power. You’re not getting sold to — you’re looking for something to buy. 

Treat the comparison analysis like an audit. Don’t just consider the benefits listed on the packaging, but understand the short-term and long-term implications of every scenario.

Peer community feedback

We care a lot about what other people think. Not just about how we are perceived, but about how they perceive other things.

Generally speaking, an estimated 93% of buyers consider reviews when making purchases.

When someone leaves a product review, they really have nothing to gain from it, other than informing the rest of the world about their opinion (people love sharing opinions). So you’re likely to get more authentic, honest feedback.

Similarly, our personal and professional networks are powerful tools, and they offer us the best form of marketing that exists: peer-to-peer word of mouth. 

Think about it — you need the siding on your house done. You can just look online or wait for an ad to appear about a local shop … or you can ask your colleagues who they’ve used and how satisfied they were. It’s the same with fintechs. Having reflected, you also know what specific inquiries to make about their experience.

There are enough comparable business operations out there that you can easily find and connect with someone at that organization who is actively using the product(s) you’re evaluating. You can bond over shared struggles and discuss the things that are important to each of you for your job functions.

This is the main selling point of conferences by the way — meeting with other professionals in similar jobs as yours, and getting direct, trusted, authentic and genuine opinions from open, honest and transparent discussions. It’s not the person onstage who you blindly follow (although the information is great); it’s the conversations you have afterward that move the needle in your decision-making process.

I encourage everyone to maintain a strong community in their job realm or areas of interest because this is the best and most useful way to understand what making a fintech choice will look like for you. Again, and I can’t stress this enough, being able to pinpoint your questions based on your reflective exercise maximizes the clarity you’ll have on if a solution is right for you.

The right technology choice is built on trusting it has done and will continue to do what you need it to first and foremost.

The takeaway

Ignore all of the noise that your social media is flooded with, and evaluate the technology based on functionality and durability.

Nobody would ever argue that saving time and money by implementing a new piece of technology, objectively, is not worth whatever the investment cost is. 

What is mission critical in accounting functions, however, is that the technology will do what it says it will do. Period.

So don’t get bogged down by pricing or sales negotiations. Eliminate all of the distractions and focus your attention on identifying the solution you can first and foremost trust. The rest will make itself clear.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending