Connect with us

Economics

How to win Nevada

Published

on

THE END of America’s election season always coincides with Halloween. That can make for some deeply weird campaigning. Democrats in Las Vegas, Nevada, staged a “Project 2025 haunted house” by decorating their offices with skeletons, tombstones—and a video of January 6th 2021. A huge, fuzzy stuffed spider hangs in a web in one corner. “Look what a mess Trump has made”, a poster in front of it reads, “in his web of LIES!” A cardboard cutout of Kamala Harris (wearing a cape) stands watch over the coffee bar, where exhausted campaign staffers nurse their 6pm brews.

With just six electoral votes, Nevada is the least populous of the seven swing states. It has been the friendliest terrain for Democrats in recent elections. Every other swing state went for Donald Trump in 2016, but the last Republican presidential candidate to win in Nevada was George Bush in 2004. Yet the margin of victory for Democrats is always narrow. Joe Biden won the Silver State by just over two percentage points in 2020. As of November 2nd, The Economist’s presidential-forecast model suggests that Nevada is a toss-up. Democrats are losing ground nationally with Latino and working-class voters, who make up significant parts of Nevada’s electorate. But the party’s ground game in Nevada is strong, thanks in large part to the endurance of the political machine built by the late Harry Reid, a former majority leader in the Senate. Can Democrats eke out another win?

Because Nevada’s population is small and centralised, its political geography is easy to understand. There are three regions, electorally speaking, that matter in Nevada: Clark County, Washoe County and the rural parts of the state. Nearly three-quarters of Nevada’s 2.4m registered voters live in Clark County, which includes Las Vegas. These voters lean Democratic. Rural counties—with about 12% of voters—are heavily Republican. And Washoe County, which includes Reno, is swingy. Slightly more Republicans than Democrats live there, but the area has tended to back Democratic presidential candidates and senators in recent years.

In past elections Democrats have been able to run up the vote enough in Las Vegas and its suburbs to offset the Republican Party’s advantage in rural areas. But according to early-voting numbers, that large lead in Clark County has yet to materialise. In fact, Republican early turnout has surged. “Usually it’s been the Democrats who have [early voting] all to their own, and then the Republicans have had to try to play catch-up on election day,” says David Damore, a political-science professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. “Now it’s a little bit reversed.”

Democrats are trying to stay zen. Campaign operatives suggest that mailed ballots, rather than in-person early voting, take longer to arrive and be processed. Their big lead in Clark County is coming, they argue, and the ground game doesn’t need tweaking. Not everyone is so diplomatic. “The Republicans are kicking our ass at the early voting,” exclaimed Dina Titus, a Democratic congresswoman, at a rally for Ms Harris in North Las Vegas on Halloween night. “We cannot let that happen.”

Three questions haunt the early-voting figures, and will determine whether Ms Harris or Mr Trump can claim victory in Nevada this year. The first is whether non-partisans will break for Democrats or Republicans. In 2020 the state began to automatically register Nevadans to vote when they apply for a driver’s licence. This swelled the voter rolls with non-partisans, the default choice. Unaffiliated voters jumped from a quarter of Nevada’s registered voters in 2020 to a third in 2024, and could swing the election for either candidate. Shelby Wiltz, who runs the co-ordinated campaign for Nevada Democrats, insists that the state party’s network and the Harris campaign were built to reach these voters, which skew younger than members of both major parties.

The second question is whether many Republicans will defect. In recent weeks Ms Harris’s campaign has been courting conservatives who cannot bring themselves to vote for Mr Trump. Vanessa Herbin, a 65-year-old Las Vegas resident, had never been to a political rally before arriving at Ms Harris’s gathering on Thursday evening. Supporters swayed to Maná, a Mexican rock band, and shivered in the cool desert night. Mrs Herbin has long voted for Democrats, but says her husband is a registered Republican who is also supporting the vice-president. That’s not the kind of thing that shows up in early-voting data.

Finally, it is unclear whether the Republicans voting early are new and low-propensity voters, who usually sit out elections but were inspired to go to the polls. Or if, at Mr Trump’s urging, Republicans are just voting early instead of on election day. Democrats have taken to calling this the “cannibalisation” of election-day votes. If the former is true, Ms Harris is in deep trouble and Jacky Rosen, a Democratic senator running for re-election, may have a closer race on her hands than polls suggest. If the latter proves to be correct, then the race will still be tight but Ms Harris could be saved by those slow postal votes in Clark County after all. Halloween may be over, but Nevadans are still in for a scare.

Economics

Protests against a regal presidency have been notably peaceful

Published

on

There is no need to send in the troops

Continue Reading

Economics

Gavin Newsom is ready for his close-up

Published

on

NORMALLY, GAVIN NEWSOM is loose. The Democratic governor of California talks with a staccato cadence, often flitting from one incomplete thought to the next. When he talks to journalists or asks a guest on his podcast a meandering question, he tends to use a lot of meaningless filler words: “in the context of” is a frequent Newsomism. But on June 10th he was clear and direct. “This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation,” he said during a televised address after President Donald Trump deployed nearly 5,000 troops to Los Angeles to quell protests over immigration raids. “We do not want our streets militarised by our own armed forces. Not in LA. Not in California. Not anywhere.”

Continue Reading

Economics

Consumer sentiment reading rebounds to much higher level than expected as people get over tariff shock

Published

on

A woman shops at a supermarket on April 30, 2025 in Arlington, Virginia.

Sha Hanting | China News Service | Getty Images

Consumers in the early part of June took a considerably less pessimistic about the economy and potential surges in inflation as progress appeared possible in the global trade war, according to a University of Michigan survey Friday.

The university’s closely watched Surveys of Consumers showed across-the-board rebounds from previously dour readings, while respondents also sharply cut back their outlook for near-term inflation.

For the headline index of consumer sentiment, the gauge was at 60.5, well ahead of the Dow Jones estimate for 54 and a 15.9% increase from a month ago. The current conditions index jumped 8.1%, while the future expectations measure soared 21.9%.

The moves coincided with a softening in the heated rhetoric that has surrounded President Donald Trump’s tariffs. After releasing his April 2 “liberation day” announcement, Trump has eased off the threats and instituted a 90-day negotiation period that appears to be showing progress, particularly with top trade rival China.

“Consumers appear to have settled somewhat from the shock of the extremely high tariffs announced in April and the policy volatility seen in the weeks that followed,” survey director Joanne Hsu said in a statement. “However, consumers still perceive wide-ranging downside risks to the economy.”

To be sure, all of the sentiment indexes were still considerably below their year-ago readings as consumers worry about what impact the tariffs will have on prices, along with a host of other geopolitical concerns.

On inflation, the one-year outlook tumbled from levels not seen since 1981.

The one-year estimate slid to 5.1%, a 1.5 percentage point drop, while the five-year view edged lower to 4.1%, a 0.1 percentage point decrease.

“Consumers’ fears about the potential impact of tariffs on future inflation have softened somewhat in June,” Hsu said. “Still, inflation expectations remain above readings seen throughout the second half of 2024, reflecting widespread beliefs that trade policy may still contribute to an increase in inflation in the year ahead.”

The Michigan survey, which will be updated at the end of the month, had been an outlier on inflation fears, with other sentiment and market indicators showing the outlook was fairly contained despite the tariff tensions. Earlier this week, the Federal Reserve of New York reported that the one-year view had fallen to 3.2% in May, a 0.4 percentage point drop from the prior month.

At the same time, the Bureau of Labor Statistics this week reported that both producer and consumer prices increase just 0.1% on a monthly basis, pointing toward little upward pressure from the duties. Economists still largely expect the tariffs to show impact in the coming months.

The soft inflation numbers have led Trump and other White House officials to demand the Fed start lowering interest rates again. The central bank is slated to meet next week, with market expectations strongly pointing to no cuts until September.

Continue Reading

Trending