Connect with us

Accounting

I’m a CPA and my client claimed a questionable Employee Retention Credit. Now what?

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service announced in March that its compliance efforts related to the Employee Retention Credit had exceeded $1 billion, with the agency specifying that “more than 12,000 entities filed over 22,000 claims that were improper and resulted in $572 million in assessments.”

According to the IRS, which as of the end of February 2024 had initiated more than 386 criminal cases in the ERC space, enforcement efforts will only continue to expand. IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel has also made it clear that the IRS is taking erroneous ERC claims seriously, recently commenting that the agency remains “concerned about widespread abuse involving these claims that have harmed small businesses.”

In the face of these eye-popping statistics, and the IRS adding ERC fraud to its “Dirty Dozen” list of abusive tax schemes, the question for accountants across the U.S. becomes: “What is my responsibility if my client presents me with a questionable ERC claim?” More importantly, accountants need to ask themselves what personal risks they take on if they push through an ERC calculation they suspect could be inaccurate.

The IRS Office of Professional Responsibility released guidance on March 7 regarding how tax professionals can ensure they are meeting their Circular 230 professional responsibilities when dealing with a potentially erroneous claim from a third party.

Citing Section 10.22(a) of Circular 230, the IRS OPR stated that if “the practitioner cannot reasonably conclude … that the client is or was eligible to claim the ERC then the practitioner should not prepare an original or amended return that claims or perpetuates a potentially improper credit.”

The IRS OPR went on to state that, as a best practice, tax practitioners should consider advising their clients of the option to file an amended return, as well as penalties for noncompliance.

In short, Section 10.22(a) cited in the guidance binds accountants to diligence as to the accuracy of the claim and requires a reasonable inquiry to confirm the client’s ERC eligibility, as well as further inquiry into the credit calculation if it appears to be incorrect, incomplete, or inconsistent.

IRS OPR Director Sharyn Fisk has been on record cautioning that the agency is more frequently auditing taxpayers who claim credits that they are not entitled to and that the IRS “can’t ignore information that’s inconsistent, incomplete or incorrect.”

Fisk has gone on to say that accountants aren’t exercising due diligence if they fail to ask the question of a client or a third party who calculated an ERC, while noting that documentation is critical for tax practitioners to protect themselves. 

The American Institute of CPAs has also issued warnings to accountants reviewing ERC calculations from third-party providers. The AICPA stated in Risk Alert 2.1.23 that if a “client’s ERC claim is later denied, the client may allege the CPA, through its preparation of the tax return reflecting the ERC claimed, tacitly agreed with it, thus negating all prior written warnings provided to the client.”

The AICPA added that, if asked by a client to prepare a return using information from a third party, including ERC calculations, accountants “should first obtain a signed engagement letter defining which federal and state tax returns require preparation or amendment and then evaluate the information in accordance with professional standards.”

In terms of factors to consider when an accountant is vetting an ERC calculation, the IRS has provided a list of “red flags” for taxpayers and tax practitioners to look out for, which include a third party being able to determine ERC eligibility “within minutes” and large upfront fees to claim the credit. 

In short, accountants who are seeing a noticeable lack of documentation to support a credit, or excessively high ERC calculation based on what they know of their client, should take steps to validate the figure, including consulting with those firms that specialized in tax credits prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, before moving forward.

Return preparers who fail to take note of these red flags and either proceed with ERC calculations they know aren’t reasonable, or fail to amend an existing claim, might face consequences themselves, including possible disciplinary proceedings from IRS OPR for those who have ignored Circular 230, as well as possible preparer penalties under Section 6694 or 6701 of the Internal Revenue Code.

As stated, the IRS’s ERC enforcement campaign is far from over. And although the agency’s Voluntary Disclosure Program for ERC ended on March 22, there are still some options available. Tax practitioners should inform their client of the option to withdraw a questionable ERC if monies have not yet been received.

American CPAs cannot, and should not, accept ERC calculations they feel lack a reasonable basis. As a result, it is incumbent upon accountants faced with questionable ERC figures to ask the right questions and consult established tax consulting firms in order to validate the ERC figure at issue.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Tax Fraud Blotter: Crooks R Us

Published

on

The shadow knows; body of evidence; make a Note of it; and other highlights of recent tax cases.

Newark, New Jersey: Thomas Nicholas Salzano, a.k.a. Nicholas Salzano, of Secaucus, New Jersey, the shadow CEO of National Realty Investment Advisors, has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for orchestrating a $658 million Ponzi scheme and conspiring to evade millions in taxes.

Salzano previously pleaded guilty to securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud the U.S., admitting that he made numerous misrepresentations to investors while he secretly ran National Realty. From February 2018 through January 2022, Salzano and others defrauded investors and potential investors of NRIA Partners Portfolio Fund I, a real estate fund operated by National Realty, of $650 million.

Salzano and his conspirators executed their scheme through an aggressive multiyear, nationwide marketing campaign that involved thousands of emails to investors, advertisements, and meetings and presentations to investors. Salzano led and directed the marketing campaign that was intended to mislead investors into believing that NRIA generated significant profits. It in fact generated little to no profits and operated as a Ponzi scheme.

Salzano stole millions of dollars of investor money to support his lavish lifestyle, including expensive dinners, extravagant birthday parties, and payments to family and associates who did not work at NRIA. He also orchestrated a separate, related conspiracy to avoid paying taxes on his stolen funds.

He was also sentenced to three years of supervised release and agreed to a forfeiture money judgment of $8.52 million, full restitution of $507.4 million to the victims of his offenses and $6.46 million to the IRS.

Marina del Rey, California: Tax preparer Lidiya Gessese has been sentenced to 41 months in prison for preparing and filing false returns for her clients and for not reporting her income.

Gessese owned and operated Tax We R/Tax R Us and Insurance Services from 2013 through 2019 and charged clients $300 to $800. Gessese would then prepare returns that included claims to deductions and credits she knew her clients were not entitled to, including falsely claiming dependents, earned income credits, the American Opportunity Credit, Child Tax Credits, business deductions, education expenses or unreimbursed employee business expenses. The illegitimate claims led to some $1,135,554.64 issued by the IRS for 2010 through 2018.

She failed to report, or underreported, her own income for 2010 through 2018, some of which included improperly diverted funds from clients’ inflated or fraudulent refunds, causing a tax loss of $488,276.

Gessese, who pleaded guilty in April, was also ordered to pay $1,096,034.01 to the IRS and $53,526.95 to her other victims.

Fullerton, California: In Chun Jung of Anaheim, California, owner of an auto repair business, has pleaded guilty to filing false returns for 2015 to 2022, underreporting his income by at least $1,184,914.

He owned and operated JY JBMT INC., d.b.a. JY Auto Body, which was registered as a subchapter S corp. Jung was the 100% shareholder.

Jung accepted check payments from customers that he and his co-schemers then cashed at multiple area check cashing services; the cashed checks totaled some $1,157,462. Jung withheld the business receipts and income from his tax preparer and omitted them on his returns.

He will pay $300,145 in taxes due to the IRS and faces a $250,000 penalty and up to three years in prison. Sentencing is Jan. 31.

jail2-fotolia.jpg

Tucson, Arizona: Tax preparer Nour Abubakr Nour, 34, has been sentenced to 30 months in prison.

Nour, who pleaded guilty a year ago, operated the tax prep business Skyman Tax and for tax years 2016 through 2018 prepared and filed at least 27 false individual federal income tax returns for clients.

These returns included falsely claimed business income that inflated refunds so that he could pay himself large prep fees. Nour’s clients had no knowledge that he was filing false tax returns under their names.

Nour was also ordered to pay $150,154 in restitution to the United States for the false tax refunds.

Farmington, Connecticut: Tax preparer Mark Legowski, 60, has been sentenced to eight months in prison, to be followed by a year of supervised release, for filing false returns.

From January 2015 through December 2017, Legowski was a self-employed accountant and tax preparer doing business as Legowski & Co. Inc. He prepared income tax returns for some 400 to 500 individual clients and some 50 to 60 businesses.

To reduce his personal income tax liability for 2015 through 2017, Legowski underreported his practice’s gross receipts by excluding some client payment checks. He then filed false personal income tax returns that failed to report more than $1.4 million in business income, which resulted in a loss to the IRS of $499,289.

Legowski, who pleaded guilty earlier this year, has paid the IRS that amount in back taxes but must still pay penalties and interest. He has also been ordered to pay a $10,000 fine.

Wheeling, West Virginia: Dr. Nitesh Ratnakar, 48, has been convicted of failing to pay nearly $2.5 million in payroll taxes.

Ratnakar, who was found guilty of 41 counts of tax fraud, owned and operated a gastroenterology practice and a medical equipment manufacturer in Elkins, West Virginia. He withheld payroll taxes from employees’ paychecks and failed to make $2,419,560 in required payments to the IRS. Ratnakar also filed false tax returns in 2020, 2021 and 2022.

He faces up to five years in prison for each of the first 38 tax fraud counts and up to three years for the remaining counts.

Orlando, Florida: Two men have been sentenced for their involvement in the “Note Program,” a tax fraud.

Jasen Harvey, of Tampa, Florida, was sentenced to four years in prison and Christopher Johnson, of Orlando, was sentenced to 37 months for conspiring to defraud the U.S.

From 2015 to 2018, they promoted a scheme in which Harvey and others prepared returns for clients that claimed that large, nonexistent income tax withholdings had been paid to the IRS and sought large refunds based on those purported withholdings. The conspirators charged fees and required the clients to pay a share of the fraudulently obtained refunds to them.

Overall, the defendants claimed more than $3 million in fraudulent refunds on clients’ returns, of which the IRS paid about $1.5 million.

Both were also ordered to serve three years of supervised release. Johnson was also ordered to pay $864,117.42 in restitution to the United States; Harvey was ordered to pay $785,858.42 in restitution. Co-defendant Arthur Grimes will be sentenced on Jan. 13.

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida: Tax preparer Jean Volvick Moise, 39, has been sentenced to three years in prison for filing false income tax returns.

Moise prepared false returns for clients to inflate refunds. He prepared returns which included, among other things, false dependents, false 1099 withholdings, false educational credits and false Schedule C expenses, often for businesses which did not exist. Moise’s fee was larger than the typical one charged by a tax preparer.

Moise filed hundreds of false returns that caused the IRS to issue more than $574,000 in fraudulent refunds.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Accounting in 2025: The year ahead in numbers

Published

on

With 2025 almost upon us, it’s worth thinking about what the new year will bring, and what accounting firms expect their next 12 months to look like.

With that in mind, Accounting Today conducted its annual Year Ahead survey in the late fall to find out firms’ expectations for 2025, including their growth expectations, their hiring plans, their growth expectations, how they think tax season will play out and much more. The overall theme: Thing are going well, but there are elements of friction holding them back, particularly when it comes to moving to more of a focus on advisory services.

You can see the full report here; a selection of key data points are presented below.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: Withum marks over a decade of Withum Week of Caring

Published

on


Citrin Cooperman appoints CIO; PKF O’Connor Davies opens new Fort Lauderdale office; and more news from across the profession.

Continue Reading

Trending