Connect with us

Accounting

IRS adds AGI import to Direct File

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has added a new feature to the Direct File free tax filing program that will import a taxpayer’s adjusted gross income from the previous year, according to the Treasury Department as a new government report finds the program could cost the IRS considerably more than the estimated $64 million to $249 million per year to maintain.

The IRS has been pilot testing the Direct File program in 12 states this tax season after launching it last month and has been seeing steadily increasing use, even though the pilot program is currently limited to certain types of income such as W-2 wages, Social Security and unemployment compensation and only supports the standard deduction. However, it promises to rival commercial tax software if more features get added to increase its usage, such as the ability to directly import prior tax return information, as in the newly added feature.

“An important update has been made to IRS Direct File to better serve taxpayers and minimize user error,” said a Treasury official in an email Tuesday. “When taxpayers finish their returns and it’s time to file, they must enter last year’s AGI or temporary PIN as the final step before submitting. With online filing options taxpayers have previously used, this information is imported from past years. An upgrade made today to Direct File will pull last year’s AGI from the information the IRS already has about you to minimize taxpayer error. In the opening weeks of Direct File being widely available, this was the most common mistake taxpayers would make because the information was not readily available to them because Direct File is a new tool. This upgrade is an example of how Direct File is being updated with taxpayers at the forefront.”

The Treasury said taxpayers are only able to access information from their own IRS account, which is protected via National Institute of Standards and Technology-compliant identity verification, and they cannot retrieve information for anyone else.

“Direct File was built with and for taxpayers and has been continuously improved based on their feedback and experience,” said Bridget Roberts, Direct File lead at the IRS, in a statement Tuesday. “This important update will allow Direct File users to take advantage of information the IRS already has to simplify the filing process even further.”

Separately on Tuesday, the Government Accountability Office released a report on the Direct File program that found more actions are needed during the pilot program to improve information on its costs and benefits. The IRS estimated that Direct File could cost between $64 million and $249 million annually, depending on assumptions such as the number of taxpayers served. The IRS estimated that participating taxpayers may save $21 million in tax preparation costs, according to the GAO report, but the IRS’s cost estimates did not include startup costs, such as the technology required for a new system. The GAO recommended, among other things, that the IRS estimate the full costs of developing and operating a Direct File system.

The program is largely funded by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which allocated $80 billion over 10 years to the IRS to improve taxpayer service, technology and enforcement, although Congress later rescinded about $20 billion of that amount as part of a deal to avert a default on the debt limit. The Inflation Reduction Act appropriated funds for the IRS to study the cost of developing and running a free Direct File tax return system and included a provision for the GAO to oversee the distribution and use of such funds. 

A group of tax software companies have banded together to oppose expansion of the Direct File program and issued a statement in response to the GAO report.

“The report released today by GAO confirms the IRS Direct File program is an unnecessary and expensive solution in search of a problem,” said David Ransom, counsel for the American Coalition for Taxpayer Rights. “As the report demonstrates, the agency’s cost estimates — already in the hundreds of millions — failed to include startup costs, including the technology needed to launch the tool. As the tax filing season nears its end, we’re seeing just how little the appetite is for government-completed tax returns. Roughly 50,000 of the 19 million eligible Americans — far less than one percent — have used Direct File. In contrast, the tax industry provided nearly 30 million free returns last year. The millions of dollars spent on Direct File would be better directed towards improving IRS customer service and promoting Free File, a long-standing public-private partnership that provides free returns to low-income Americans.”  

direct-file-pilot.png

The IRS reported to Congress in May 2023 that it estimated the annual costs of a Direct File tax system could range from $64 million to $249 million depending on the number of taxpayers served and the complexity of tax situations supported, the GAO noted. The IRS also described the assumptions it used to estimate those costs. It assumed the Direct File system would start with a limited tax scope, as it did this tax season. The IRS also included elements of a sensitivity analysis to examine how its changes in assumptions could affect cost estimates. The IRS described how those costs were expected to change depending on the number of taxpayers served and the complexity of tax situations supported.

However, the report noted that the IRS’s cost estimates did not address other recommended best practices, such as ensuring all costs were included and documented. The GAO and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration found the IRS had no documentation to support the underlying data, analysis or assumptions used for its Direct File cost estimates. IRS officials told the GAO that the cost estimates didn’t include startup costs, such as technology for a new system, which could be substantial. 

On the positive side, the report acknowledged that the Direct File pilot provides opportunities for the IRS to estimate potential benefits for taxpayers and improve tax administration. The IRS estimates the Direct File pilot for this tax season will save taxpayers around $21 million in compliance costs. The IRS also sees other potential benefits of Direct File, such as making it easier for eligible taxpayers to claim credits and deductions, reducing the volume of paper returns, and reducing errors. However, the IRS evaluation documents did not consistently identify relevant metrics for measuring these potential benefits.

IRS officials told the GAO in February that its senior leadership has not decided on the future of the pilot beyond the 2024 tax filing season. IRS officials reported that the time required to continue Direct File would depend on several factors, such as the size of the team working on the program. They noted that hiring new employees to replace outgoing employees is a lengthy process, so IRS officials will only have a short amount of time to analyze the cost and benefit information before making decisions about the pilot for the 2025 tax filing season.

“Direct File is a completely new service offered by the IRS and, in terms of technology and customer support, is not something the IRS or other federal agencies have offered before,” wrote IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel in response to the GAO report. “Unlike other government technology projects like student loan relief, passport applications and the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), Direct File is not the only option for taxpayers but is one of many options available for taxpayers to fulfill their tax filing obligations.”

The IRS is keeping track of several customer service costs and metrics during the pilot phase, including live chat assistance, wait time, average handle time, and shifting demand throughout the day and the filing season as a whole. It’s also looking at technology costs, as well as the costs of integrating state tax returns and of supporting additional tax situations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Global ESG Reporting Standards and Double Materiality Compliance

Published

on

Corporate accounting departments face expanding reporting expectations as international sustainability disclosure standards achieve regulatory enforcement across major global jurisdictions. Chief Accounting Officers (CAOs) and corporate controllers are establishing rigorous internal accounting controls to treat Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics with the same data precision, auditability, and governance as traditional financial statements.

Regulatory Harmonization Under Global Sustainability Frameworks
The implementation of standardized sustainability reporting frameworks—notably rules established by international sustainability accounting boards—has created unified expectations for public and large private enterprises. Corporations must report standardized metrics covering greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3), energy utilization, workforce demographics, and supply chain governance.

In Europe and other participating international jurisdictions, double materiality principles are mandatory. Under double materiality, organizations must report both how external sustainability risks impact corporate financial performance, and how internal corporate operations affect surrounding environmental and social structures.

Integrating Sustainability Metrics into Core ERP Systems
To provide auditable non-financial data, enterprise organizations are integrating specialized carbon accounting and ESG management platforms directly into core ERP systems. Automated data collectors capture energy utility invoices, logistics fuel consumption metrics, and vendor compliance records in real time.

Establishing automated, traceable data pipelines ensures that non-financial reporting is supported by clear audit trails. This structured approach allows external financial auditors to provide reasonable assurance on sustainability disclosures during annual corporate reporting cycles.

Financial Impacts and Capital Market Disclosure
Accurate ESG reporting directly influences corporate cost of capital and institutional credit ratings. Commercial lenders and institutional asset managers systematically incorporate sustainability metrics into risk pricing models. Companies that demonstrate transparent, verifiable progress in operational energy efficiency and climate risk mitigation benefit from expanded access to green bond markets and lower debt pricing.

Action Steps for Accounting Leadership
1. Implement Double Materiality Frameworks: Conduct comprehensive assessments to identify material financial and operational sustainability metrics.
2. Build Auditable Non-Financial Data Pipelines: Automate ESG data collection within core accounting software to ensure data integrity.
3. Align Sustainability with Annual Financial Filings: Prepare non-financial disclosures concurrently with financial statements to satisfy regulatory audit expectations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Modernizing Internal Controls: Machine Learning and Continuous Monitoring in Auditing

Published

on

Internal audit departments and corporate risk managers are modernizing internal control frameworks by shifting from periodic sampling techniques to continuous monitoring and machine learning analytics. As operational data volumes increase across enterprise organizations, automated control testing ensures financial integrity, prevents corporate fraud, and streamlines annual audit engagements.

The Limitation of Periodic Audit Sampling
Historically, internal and external auditors evaluated internal controls by reviewing random samples of financial transactions—often analyzing less than five percent of total ledger entries. In complex enterprise environments, periodic sampling methods carry inherent risks of overlooking localized financial misstatements, unauthorized disbursements, or operational control breakdowns.

In 2026, progressive internal audit functions are utilizing automated continuous monitoring platforms that evaluate one hundred percent of financial transactions in real time. Continuous control auditing systems continuously monitor general ledger entries, procurement approvals, and expense reimbursements across all operating subsidiaries.

AI-Powered Fraud Detection and Anomaly Identification
Machine learning models trained on historical corporate financial data excel at identifying subtle transactional anomalies that indicate potential fraud or operational error. Automated systems instantly flag duplicate invoice payments, unapproved vendor creation, unusual journal entry timing, and unauthorized override of authority thresholds.

When an anomaly is detected, the automated auditing platform generates an instant risk alert, allowing internal audit teams to investigate root causes immediately. Early detection prevents minor operational errors from escalating into material weaknesses in financial reporting.

Streamlining External Audit Preparation
Continuous internal control monitoring delivers significant benefits during annual external financial audits. External audit firms can review continuous audit logs and automated control testing documentation, reducing the time required for manual field testing.

This integrated approach lowers overall audit compliance fees, reduces administrative burdens on corporate accounting staff, and provides senior management and audit committees with real-time visibility into the organization’s overall risk profile.

Core Implementation Guidelines
1. Transition to 100% Data Testing: Replace legacy sampling methods with automated continuous audit monitoring systems.
2. Deploy Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Implement machine learning models to identify unauthorized transactions and operational control overrides.
3. Align Internal and External Audit Workflows: Coordinate continuous control testing protocols with external auditors to optimize annual compliance cycles.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Tax Compliance and Global Regulatory Harmonization in 2026

Published

on

Corporate tax accounting departments are navigating an era of unprecedented regulatory complexity as global tax harmonization frameworks take full effect alongside real-time digital tax reporting mandates. Tax directors and accounting teams are adopting cloud-based tax compliance automation tools to manage multi-jurisdictional tax liabilities and satisfy stringent reporting rules across international jurisdictions.

Implementation of Global Minimum Tax Provisions
The implementation of international tax reform agreements—notably the Pillar Two global minimum tax framework—has reshaped multinational corporate tax planning. Multinational enterprises with consolidated revenues exceeding established thresholds must ensure an effective tax rate of at least 15% across every jurisdiction in which they operate.

Accounting teams are implementing specialized tax calculation modules integrated directly into enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms. These automated tools calculate effective tax rates per country, identify top-up tax liabilities, and generate standardized compliance documentation required by national tax authorities.

Real-Time Digital Invoicing and E-Reporting Mandates
Tax authorities across Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific have enacted mandatory electronic invoicing (e-invoicing) and continuous transaction controls (CTC). Under these systems, corporate transaction data must be submitted electronically to government portals in real time at the point of sale or invoice issuance.

This shift toward continuous digital tax reporting eliminates traditional annual tax audits in favor of ongoing automated compliance monitoring. Accounting departments are upgrading invoicing software to ensure seamless XML data formatting, digital signature authentication, and real-time validation against tax authority databases.

Automation and Data Analytics in Corporate Tax Strategy
To keep pace with dynamic tax legislation, tax departments are transitioning from reactive compliance teams to proactive strategic advisors. Machine learning algorithms analyze corporate transactional data to identify tax credits, research and development (R&D) incentives, and cross-border transfer pricing adjustments.

By automating routine tax return filings and calculations, corporate tax directors can focus on long-term capital structuring, evaluating the tax implications of corporate mergers, and optimizing international supply chain networks.

Strategic Priorities for Tax Executives
1. ERP System Upgrades: Ensure enterprise software is capable of generating real-time, granular tax data required for global minimum tax compliance.
2. E-Invoicing Integration: Implement scalable e-invoicing platforms to satisfy regional continuous transaction control regulations.
3. Strategic Tax Analytics: Utilize predictive tax modeling tools to evaluate structural changes in corporate operations and cross-border trade.

Continue Reading

Trending