Connect with us

Accounting

IRS adds AGI import to Direct File

Published

on

The Internal Revenue Service has added a new feature to the Direct File free tax filing program that will import a taxpayer’s adjusted gross income from the previous year, according to the Treasury Department as a new government report finds the program could cost the IRS considerably more than the estimated $64 million to $249 million per year to maintain.

The IRS has been pilot testing the Direct File program in 12 states this tax season after launching it last month and has been seeing steadily increasing use, even though the pilot program is currently limited to certain types of income such as W-2 wages, Social Security and unemployment compensation and only supports the standard deduction. However, it promises to rival commercial tax software if more features get added to increase its usage, such as the ability to directly import prior tax return information, as in the newly added feature.

“An important update has been made to IRS Direct File to better serve taxpayers and minimize user error,” said a Treasury official in an email Tuesday. “When taxpayers finish their returns and it’s time to file, they must enter last year’s AGI or temporary PIN as the final step before submitting. With online filing options taxpayers have previously used, this information is imported from past years. An upgrade made today to Direct File will pull last year’s AGI from the information the IRS already has about you to minimize taxpayer error. In the opening weeks of Direct File being widely available, this was the most common mistake taxpayers would make because the information was not readily available to them because Direct File is a new tool. This upgrade is an example of how Direct File is being updated with taxpayers at the forefront.”

The Treasury said taxpayers are only able to access information from their own IRS account, which is protected via National Institute of Standards and Technology-compliant identity verification, and they cannot retrieve information for anyone else.

“Direct File was built with and for taxpayers and has been continuously improved based on their feedback and experience,” said Bridget Roberts, Direct File lead at the IRS, in a statement Tuesday. “This important update will allow Direct File users to take advantage of information the IRS already has to simplify the filing process even further.”

Separately on Tuesday, the Government Accountability Office released a report on the Direct File program that found more actions are needed during the pilot program to improve information on its costs and benefits. The IRS estimated that Direct File could cost between $64 million and $249 million annually, depending on assumptions such as the number of taxpayers served. The IRS estimated that participating taxpayers may save $21 million in tax preparation costs, according to the GAO report, but the IRS’s cost estimates did not include startup costs, such as the technology required for a new system. The GAO recommended, among other things, that the IRS estimate the full costs of developing and operating a Direct File system.

The program is largely funded by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which allocated $80 billion over 10 years to the IRS to improve taxpayer service, technology and enforcement, although Congress later rescinded about $20 billion of that amount as part of a deal to avert a default on the debt limit. The Inflation Reduction Act appropriated funds for the IRS to study the cost of developing and running a free Direct File tax return system and included a provision for the GAO to oversee the distribution and use of such funds. 

A group of tax software companies have banded together to oppose expansion of the Direct File program and issued a statement in response to the GAO report.

“The report released today by GAO confirms the IRS Direct File program is an unnecessary and expensive solution in search of a problem,” said David Ransom, counsel for the American Coalition for Taxpayer Rights. “As the report demonstrates, the agency’s cost estimates — already in the hundreds of millions — failed to include startup costs, including the technology needed to launch the tool. As the tax filing season nears its end, we’re seeing just how little the appetite is for government-completed tax returns. Roughly 50,000 of the 19 million eligible Americans — far less than one percent — have used Direct File. In contrast, the tax industry provided nearly 30 million free returns last year. The millions of dollars spent on Direct File would be better directed towards improving IRS customer service and promoting Free File, a long-standing public-private partnership that provides free returns to low-income Americans.”  

direct-file-pilot.png

The IRS reported to Congress in May 2023 that it estimated the annual costs of a Direct File tax system could range from $64 million to $249 million depending on the number of taxpayers served and the complexity of tax situations supported, the GAO noted. The IRS also described the assumptions it used to estimate those costs. It assumed the Direct File system would start with a limited tax scope, as it did this tax season. The IRS also included elements of a sensitivity analysis to examine how its changes in assumptions could affect cost estimates. The IRS described how those costs were expected to change depending on the number of taxpayers served and the complexity of tax situations supported.

However, the report noted that the IRS’s cost estimates did not address other recommended best practices, such as ensuring all costs were included and documented. The GAO and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration found the IRS had no documentation to support the underlying data, analysis or assumptions used for its Direct File cost estimates. IRS officials told the GAO that the cost estimates didn’t include startup costs, such as technology for a new system, which could be substantial. 

On the positive side, the report acknowledged that the Direct File pilot provides opportunities for the IRS to estimate potential benefits for taxpayers and improve tax administration. The IRS estimates the Direct File pilot for this tax season will save taxpayers around $21 million in compliance costs. The IRS also sees other potential benefits of Direct File, such as making it easier for eligible taxpayers to claim credits and deductions, reducing the volume of paper returns, and reducing errors. However, the IRS evaluation documents did not consistently identify relevant metrics for measuring these potential benefits.

IRS officials told the GAO in February that its senior leadership has not decided on the future of the pilot beyond the 2024 tax filing season. IRS officials reported that the time required to continue Direct File would depend on several factors, such as the size of the team working on the program. They noted that hiring new employees to replace outgoing employees is a lengthy process, so IRS officials will only have a short amount of time to analyze the cost and benefit information before making decisions about the pilot for the 2025 tax filing season.

“Direct File is a completely new service offered by the IRS and, in terms of technology and customer support, is not something the IRS or other federal agencies have offered before,” wrote IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel in response to the GAO report. “Unlike other government technology projects like student loan relief, passport applications and the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), Direct File is not the only option for taxpayers but is one of many options available for taxpayers to fulfill their tax filing obligations.”

The IRS is keeping track of several customer service costs and metrics during the pilot phase, including live chat assistance, wait time, average handle time, and shifting demand throughout the day and the filing season as a whole. It’s also looking at technology costs, as well as the costs of integrating state tax returns and of supporting additional tax situations.

Continue Reading

Accounting

EV makers win 2-year extension to qualify for tax credits

Published

on

The Biden administration gave carmakers a partial reprieve in finalizing electric-vehicle tax credit rules intended to loosen China’s grip on battery materials crucial to the car industry’s future.

Starting in 2025, plug-in cars containing critical minerals from businesses controlled by U.S. geopolitical foes, including China, will be ineligible for up to $7,500 tax credits, the Treasury Department said Friday. Automakers will get an extra two years, however, to shore up sourcing of graphite and other materials considered difficult to trace to their origin.

The rules put finishing touches on President Joe Biden’s push to develop an alternative to China’s preeminent EV and battery supply chains. The administration is imposing stringent sourcing requirements for raw materials and components in order for electric cars to qualify for the tax credits that are a powerful draw for consumers otherwise put off by still-high prices.

“These actions provide a strong signal to automakers that we want to see EVs built here in America with components and critical minerals sourced from the U.S. and our allies and partners,” White House Climate adviser John Podesta said.

The two-year exemption speaks to the challenges automakers have had reducing their reliance on Chinese suppliers of materials such as graphite. The mineral used in battery anodes emerged as a geopolitical flashpoint last year when Beijing placed restrictions on exports, sparking fears of global shortages.

The Biden administration’s rules don’t allow tax breaks for vehicles with batteries containing critical minerals from foreign entities of concern, a term referring to businesses controlled by US geopolitical foes such as China, North Korea, Russia and Iran. Those requirements take effect in 2025, as proposed.

But Biden has given auto and battery manufacturers some flexibility on this front, too. In December, the administration decided to allow materials from foreign subsidiaries of privately owned Chinese companies in non-FEOC countries — such as Australia or Indonesia — to count toward tax credit eligibility. This drew criticism from Western miners and policymakers who want Biden to more aggressively cut China out of the supply chain.

Automakers will now have until 2027 to curb the use of certain difficult-to-trace materials from FEOCs, provided that they submit plans to comply after the two-year transition and it’s approved by the government, the Treasury Department said.

“FEOC exemptions for any battery materials should be temporary,” said Abigail Hunter, the executive director of the Center for Critical Minerals Strategy at SAFE, a Washington think tank. “We need a clear exit strategy, lest we continue our dependencies on adversaries and further undermine the competitiveness of U.S. and allied critical minerals projects.”

The rules release concludes two years of work on requirements that already have reduced the number of EVs eligible for tax credits. About 20 models qualify today, compared to as many as 70 previously. Treasury Department officials said Friday they expect the number of qualifying vehicles to continue to fluctuate as companies adjust their supply chains.

Automakers including Tesla Inc., General Motors Co. and Toyota Motor Corp. have lobbied for additional flexibility to meet requirements. A lobby group representing automakers based outside the US praised the additional two years provided for the difficult-to-trace materials.

“It will take time for the global production and sourcing of graphite and other critical minerals needed to produce EVs to match the strict standards required by automakers,” Autos Drive America President Jennifer Safavian said in a statement.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Oregon senator Ron Wyden demands refunds for TurboTax customers over glitch

Published

on

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, demanded in a letter that Intuit give a refund to Oregonians who, due to a software glitch in the company’s TurboTax tax prep software, were steered toward taking the standard deduction when they would have paid less tax if they’d itemized. The senator said the company had known of this glitch in early April, but didn’t acknowledge it until shortly before the filing deadline.

The glitch, according to the Oregonian, affected about 12,000 people, some of whom reported having to pay hundreds more in tax dollars than they needed to. They were generally using the desktop version of the software, versus the online version.

“Fixing this error will require identifying all affected Oregonians, notifying them, and ensuring they can be made whole,” said the senator. “In part because of TurboTax’s various guarantees and market share, Oregonians who overpaid due to TurboTax’s error likely assumed the software opted them into claiming state standard deduction to minimize their taxes. That assumption was wrong. And because the vast majority of taxpayers understandably dread filing season and avoid thinking about taxes after it ends, many of those affected will not learn on their own that they overpaid. Intuit must act to inform them and help them get the full tax refunds they are entitled to receive.”

The TurboTax logo on a laptop computer in an arranged photograph in Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, U.S., on Friday Sept. 3, 2021. Photographer: Tiffany Hagler-Geard/Bloomberg

Tiffany Hagler-Geard/Bloomberg

An Intuit spokesperson said the company is currently working to resolve the issue, referencing their tax return lifetime guarantee.

“As part of our tax return lifetime guarantee, we are committed to the accuracy of TurboTax tax filers’ tax returns to ensure they receive the maximum refund possible. We are quickly working to resolve an issue impacting a small number of customers and actively engaging with those filers impacted to ensure their returns are correct and that they receive the maximum refund they are owed,” said the spokesperson.

The senator has also asked Intuit for an explanation of how this glitch happened in the first place, as well as an approximate timeline for the steps it took once it became aware of it. He has also asked for a count of precisely how many people were affected, as well as Intuit’s plans for both addressing this problem and what the company will do to prevent it in the future.

Continue Reading

Accounting

On the move: RSM names a client experience leader

Published

on

RSM US named its first enterprise client experience leader; the Financial Accounting Foundation is looking for nominees for its Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council; RKL named a new office managing partner; REDW appointed three new vice presidents; and other firm and personnel news from across the accounting profession.

Continue Reading

Trending