Connect with us

Accounting

Pay transparency leads to more engaged accounting employees

Published

on

The taboo around discussing and comparing accounting salaries is slowly fading. New salary transparency legislation is being passed in states like New York and California. Thousands of accountants are using salary comparison websites to view and share salary data openly. Having more transparency around pay is a boon to employees and job seekers alike. But can pay transparency also benefit employers? The answer is a resounding yes.

When a firm is following a data-driven approach to compensation — for instance, by comparing its salaries to industry benchmarks for each position — it can help set reasonable compensation expectations for employees. For example, some of my previous employers committed to benchmarking our compensation to the 75th percentile, communicated it to employees, and showed the calculations they used to arrive at their conclusion. From that point forward, anyone who was unhappy about their compensation could no longer claim they were “underpaid.” Instead, they had to approach their pay argument from a more quantitative perspective. 

To justify being paid beyond the 75th percentile, a team member would have to show why their contributions to the business were well beyond the 75th percentile — and how their efforts were reflected in the company’s performance. In this scenario, it’s important for the 75th percentile to be based on data relevant to the employee. For example, according to our firm’s data, a tax manager at the 75th percentile across the U.S. in 2024 has a base salary of approximately $150,000. But in the case of an employee working in-office in New York City, that same 75th percentile would be a $183,000 base salary to account for a higher cost of living.

Any increase in salary beyond the benchmark would need to be accompanied by a commensurate increase in company performance beyond that benchmark. As a result, the firm becomes more results driven and employees become better aligned with the company’s goals. 

Improving engagement through psychological security

Being transparent when setting compensation is a great way to align employee incentives with company performance. Further, it provides a great amount of psychological safety. There aren’t many professionals who are more numbers-driven than we accountants. It’s natural to wonder if you are optimizing your earnings by staying at your current firm or jumping ship. I’ll get to that in a minute. Just know that thinking about your comp takes up a lot more mental energy than you might think. Replaying your last compensation discussion over and over in your head can be stressful and counterproductive. It’s easy to spend an inordinate amount of time thinking about your next steps for getting a promotion or perusing through open jobs online to see if your current compensation is at the “market” rate.

You can put your mind at ease when you are confident that your firm is taking care of you and is making its best efforts to ensure your compensation is in line with market rates. When the psychological burden of pay equality is lifted, you can focus better and do your best work. That’s great for you and great for the firm.

Avoiding inequities and the dreaded loyalty tax

When employers don’t take a data-driven approach to compensation discussions, however, pay inequity continues in two important ways:

1. Employers end up being reactive rather than proactive. If an employee comes forward with a competing offer, they try to match it; if someone negotiates harder, they capitulate. And they end up with a number of employees with the same job titles providing similar value, with comparable experience, but who are paid vastly differently. And these pay disparities inevitably come to light, which reduces the team’s morale, productivity and loyalty to the firm. They may also find themselves guilty of perpetuating a gender pay gap or succumbing to unconscious biases.

2. Employers inadvertently create a “loyalty tax.” They are flexible on salaries to attract talent to the firm but are not offering the same salary bands to internally promoted employees. So, they end up creating a vicious cycle in which employees feel they must change jobs every few years in order to be paid competitively. That’s a drain on all parties involved as the firm loses institutional knowledge and must bear the costs of constantly recruiting, hiring and training new talent. Meanwhile employees feel they must leave a firm — no matter how happy they are there —- if they want to be compensated competitively. This can be avoided when firms are transparent about their compensation policies and adhere to them. 

So, where’s the line?

If you’re an employer, I’m not proposing you leave a spreadsheet in the company breakroom containing everyone’s salary information. Some companies opt for a radical level of transparency, but that’s not necessary to reap the benefits I’ve discussed above. Just having a system you stand by can change compensation discussions from emotional to objective. This makes everyone more productive on your team and reduces hard feelings.

One way to do this is to share the way you benchmark salaries openly, and at what percentile you are looking to peg salaries. Even if you aren’t meeting an aggressive benchmark like the 75th or 90th percentile, you can communicate clearly to employees that the firm is choosing a given benchmark because it makes up the salary gap by offering a generous vacation policy, reduced workload or maybe reduced summer hours.

As my mom always told me growing up, honesty is the best policy.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Accounting

Misunderstandings keep families from claiming tax credits

Published

on

Lack of awareness, fear of mistakes and penalties, and the cost of filing are preventing many families from claiming millions of dollars in tax credits, according to a new study.

The report, released Tuesday by the New Practice Lab at New America, surveyed over 5,000 respondents to learn why so many households fail to claim the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax breaks that could help them.

Awareness gaps were a big barrier. Among households earning under $10,000 annually, 36% were unaware of any tax credits, more than double the rate among households earning over $150,000 (17%).

Misunderstanding their eligibility also kept many taxpayers from filing their annual returns. One-third of lower-income households earning under $26,000 who hadn’t filed taxes in the past three years said they didn’t file because they believed their income was too low. But within this group, 20% had earned income and 37% had children — factors that probably would have made them eligible for claiming the tax credits if they had filed.

Fear of making a mistake and being penalized for it was the most common barrier to filing a return, particularly among lower-income households. This fear had major consequences, as 61% of respondents who felt this way hadn’t filed tax returns in the past three years, and even when they did file, they were more likely to miss out on tax credits.

Filing a tax return can be expensive for families, forcing them to forgo other expenses in order to file. Even though 36% of survey respondents cited cost as a barrier, most had used professional tax help at some point due to concerns around navigating the process alone.

Accessing the right documents poses a challenge for taxpayers.Half of the survey respondents said they had trouble gathering the documents they needed to file their taxes, and 80% of those who faced documentation issues struggled with more than one type of document.

Most low-income households are already connected with other types of government support services, but tax credits feel like a separate disconnected area. The survey found 84% of households who had not filed taxes at all or irregularly in the past three years had participated in at least one other public support service during that same time period. 

“Accessing tax credits is often overwhelming and costly, creating unnecessary barriers for the families who need this support the most,” said Devyani Singh, lead author of the report, in a statement. “Tax credits can be a critical lifeline for families that are struggling financially, and it’s up to state Departments of Revenue to look at the process as a delivery issue. There’s no one-size-fits-all solution to increasing tax credit uptake; improving access requires a multipronged strategy combining personalized outreach, streamlined systems, and policies that meet families where they are.”

The report pointed out that such  factors are important for government agencies to consider, especially as the White House and some lawmakers in Congress express interest in increasing the amount families can get from the Child Tax Credit. However, the proposed shuttering of free tax-filing programs like Direct File, which New America was involved in studying, will make it harder for families to access these benefits. The tax reconciliation bill would also restrict access to claiming the Child Tax Credit to families with Social Security numbers as a way to deter immigrants from accessing such benefits.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Senate panel grills IRS commissioner nominee Billy Long

Published

on

The Senate Finance Committee questioned Billy Young, President Trump’s nominee for Internal Revenue Service commissioner, about his plans for the beleaguered agency and promotion of dubious “tribal tax credits” and Employee Retention Tax Credits during a long-awaited confirmation hearing Tuesday after a series of acting commissioners temporarily held the role.

Trump announced in December he planned to name Long, a former Republican congressman from Missouri, as the next IRS commissioner, even though then-commissioner Danny Werfel’s term wasn’t scheduled to end until November 2027. Since then, the role has been filled by four acting commissioners who have faced pressures to accept drastic staff cuts at the agency and share taxpayer data with immigration authorities.

Long insisted during the confirmation hearing that he would defend the integrity of the IRS and maintain an open door policy, emulating the example of former commissioner Charles Rossotti, who served from 1997 to 2002.

“If confirmed, I will implement a comprehensive plan aimed at enhancing the IRS, but also one that develops a new culture at the agency,” he said in his opening statement. “I am eager to implement the necessary changes to maximize our effectiveness, while also remaining transparent with both Congress and taxpayers. It is important to also recognize the dedicated professionals currently at the IRS whose hard work too often goes unnoticed. It is my pledge that we will invest in retaining skilled members of the team. This does not mean a bloated agency, but an efficient one where employees have the tools they need to succeed.”

Committee chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, expects to see changes at the agency. “Congressman Long is very clear that he will make himself available to all IRS employees, no matter their seniority,” Crapo said in his opening statement. “Moreover, he wants to implement a top-down culture change at the agency. This sea change will benefit American taxpayers, who too often view the IRS as foe, rather than friend. Congressman Long knows, from years of experience in the House, that to be a successful Commissioner, he must be a valuable partner in Congress’ efforts to ensure that new tax legislation is implemented and administered as Congress intends it to be.  I am also confident that he will be fully transparent and responsive to Congress and the American people.”

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, the top Democrat on the committee, questioned Long about his promotion of “tribal tax credits” and the fraud-plagued ERTC. “Most of Congressman Long’s experience with tax issues came after he left Congress, when he dove headlong into the tax scam industry,” he said in his opening statement. “Cashing in on the credibility of his election certificates, he raked in referral fees steering clients to firms that sold faked tax shelters and pushing small businesses to unknowingly commit tax fraud.”

Wyden asked Long about the $65,000 he earned from referring friends to tax promoters who claimed they had acquired income tax credits issued to a Native American tribe and then sold the tax credits to investors. “There’s a problem. The IRS said in March that the credits do not exist. They’re fake. They are a scam. Now you’re asking to be put in charge of the IRS, and the IRS confirms that these aren’t real. Tell the committee, do you believe these so-called tribal tax credits actually exist?”

Long insisted his only involvement with the credit was to connect interested friends and offer to put them on a Zoom call with someone, but he was not on the Zoom calls himself. Wyden pressed him on whether the tax credits actually exist.

“I think the jury’s still out on that,” Long admitted. “I know since 2022 they’ve been accepting them, so now they claim that they’re not. I think that all this is going to play out, and I want to have it investigated, just as you do. I know you’re very interested in this subject. I am too.”

Wyden also asked about $165,000 in campaign donations that went to Long’s unsuccessful 2022 Senate campaign after Trump named him as the next IRS commissioner. Long insisted he had followed guidelines from the Federal Election Commission. “You know as well as I do, anytime you’re dealing with the FEC, you have to follow FEC guidelines, and that’s exactly what I did all the way,” he said.

Wyden then asked him about his work with promoters of the Employee Retention Tax Credit. “You stated on a YouTube video that everybody qualifies for the Employee Retention Tax Credit, and you urge listeners to ignore CPAs that said they didn’t qualify. Do you really think everybody qualifies?”

“If you listen to that video, I hate to correct you, but I didn’t say everyone qualifies,” Long responded. “I said virtually everyone qualifies, meaning most people.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, and other Democrats also questioned Long about whether he would follow Trump’s orders to audit certain taxpayers or remove the tax-exempt status of organizations, even if it violated the law. Long insisted he would follow the law but declined to explicitly say whether he would defy an order from Trump.

“I don’t intend to let anybody direct me to start an audit for political reasons,” he said.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Minnesota approves CPA licensure changes bill

Published

on

Minnesota approved a bill on Monday night to create additional pathways to CPA licensure, and it awaits the signature of Gov. Tim Walz.

As part of an omnibus bill, Senate File 3045, it creates two new pathways to CPA licensure: a bachelor’s degree plus two years of experience, or a master’s degree plus one year of experience. The new pathways will be effective Jan. 1, 2026. 

The bill sunsets the current 150-hour credit rule after June 30, 2030, and establishes automatic mobility and practice privileges one day following the bill’s ratification. All candidates must still pass all parts of the CPA exam.

minnesota-capitol.jpg
Minnesota State Capitol building in St. Paul

Jill Clardy/stock.adobe.com

“It’s a step forward in the right direction,” said Geno Fragnito, government relations director at the Minnesota Society of CPAs. “It allows some flexibility to hopefully bring in people who are on the fence about whether they could afford the extra year of education and whether the accounting profession fit into their long-term goals because of that.”

Generally, the governor has 14 days to act on the presented bill. Otherwise, without any action, the bill becomes law. Minnesota is one of more than a dozen states that have already passed changes to licensure requirements in an ongoing effort to address the profession’s talent shortage.

(Read more: “New ways to CPA”)

Minnesota was the first state to propose licensing changes in December 2022. 

“Initial strong opposition eventually turned into support as more professionals, state societies, universities, government entities and businesses rallied behind broadening pathways to CPA licensure with the first state, Ohio, passing its law in January,” said an MNCPA blog post.

“There were a lot of people — chairs ahead of me and other people on the board and at the Minnesota society — that have done a ton of work on this and really deserve a lot of credit for all of the conversations they had and the testifying they did,” said MNCPA chair Eric O’Link. “We’re very appreciative of our legislative sponsors and everybody who helped make it a reality.”

Continue Reading

Trending