Connect with us

Accounting

Pros and cons of Trump’s Big Beautiful tax bill

Published

on

trump-signing-one-big-beautiful-bill.jpg
President Donald Trump displays the signed One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg

Although negotiations were widely predicted to last well into July, the One Big Beautiful Bill, H.R. 1, made it to President Trump’s desk in time for his signature on July 4. And depending on your view of it as a giveaway to billionaires or a much-needed tax cut for the middle class, it has something for everyone to consider. 

“It’s encouraging that both the House and Senate are committed to expanding bonus depreciation and R&E expensing available to businesses,” said Eversheds Sutherland attorney Ellen McElroy just prior to House passage of the final bill. “The permanency that would be granted under the Senate’s bill is a welcome improvement to the initial House bill, as it provides greater stability and certainty for companies that will allow them to plan not only for the short-term, but also for long-term future investment.”

“The new law provides incentive for domestic investment  by businesses, particularly in light of the compounded benefit of immediate expensing for qualified property coupled with the reversion to EBITDA for determining the business interest limitation under Section 163(j),” McElroy observed. 

The provisions taken together could allow for a 10% increase in the benefit that would be available under Section 168(k) alone, she explained: “In other words, for companies that take advantage of bonus depreciation, every $10 of investment in qualified property during a given tax year could allow for an extra dollar of business interest expense to be recovered that year. We expect this will be particularly beneficial to businesses in highly leveraged industries.” 

The new election to immediately expense qualified production property is a great idea that has received a great deal of attention from companies, according to McElroy. However, “it’s disappointing that the bill’s text does not make the scope and applicability of the election more clear. As drafted, many questions remain. For example, what constitutes an integral part of a production activity? When does construction ‘begin?’ What is the difference between manufacturing and production? Additional regulatory guidance will be required to answer these questions and more in order for companies to determine whether construction projects are eligible for accelerated recovery under the election. The  provision grants a very limited timeframe during which companies must begin and complete construction of major projects requiring significant investment, and administrative guidance typically takes years to draft and be released. Consequently, we question whether this provision will be effective at incentivizing investment in new domestic production facilities when companies will not have certainty from the outset that their projects will qualify for the benefit.”

“The new law has both temporary changes and permanent changes,” said Miklos Ringbauer, founder of Miklos CPA in Southern California. “For example, the SALT allowance has been capped at $40,000 for 2025. It’s a temporary increase, and will continue to increase every year until 2029. At that point it will drop back to $10,000.”

Most of the higher tax brackets went down a little bit, Ringbauer said: “The $750,000 principal mortgage limitation became permanent. So if you purchase a house with a greater than $750,000 mortgage, the extra interest is not deductible, versus precious years when you could deduct the interest on a loan of up to $1 million.” 

Since home prices continue to rise, buyers will need to come up with a larger down payment to stay within the deductible interest limitation.

The increase in the standard deduction will simplify filing for preparers and taxpayers alike, according to Ringbauer. “In many cases taxpayers are unaware of all the documents they need in order to file,” he added. “This is true especially when it comes to itemized deductions. Having less people that need to itemize will  simplify the process considerably.”

The House bill that was sent to the Senate was not as good as the “improved” bill sent back from the Senate, according to Travis Riley, a partner at Top 10 Firm Baker Tilly, especially when it comes to immediate expensing of domestic research costs. “The House bill was only for a five-year period, so the fact that the Senate came back with a permanent bill is awesome,” he said. “One negative is the fact that you have to continue to amortize over 15 years for foreign owners, but for everyone else it’s a big deal. We can now go back to the old provisions, especially for small businesses with under $31 million in revenue, and amend for 2022, 2023 and 2024. All businesses that do research are happy — we’ve been waiting for this for years.”

Continue Reading

Accounting

Continuous Auditing Transforms Corporate ERPs

Published

on

continuous auditing transforms corporate erps

As corporate accounting departments cross the threshold into late July 2026, the adoption of continuous, automated auditing systems has reached a definitive turning point. Driven by advances in artificial intelligence and deep integration with modern Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) platforms, leading finance organizations are moving away from traditional, periodic post-hoc audits in favor of real-time, 100% transactional verification. This technological transition is redefining internal control environments, reducing compliance costs, and eliminating the structural delays inherent in legacy quarterly closing processes.

Unlike traditional auditing frameworks that rely on statistical sampling—a process that inevitably leaves operational blind spots—continuous auditing software monitors operational data feeds continuously. Every purchase order, electronic invoice, payroll disbursement, and cross-border wire transfer is automatically cross-referenced against established corporate governance parameters, regulatory tax schedules, and anti-fraud algorithms in real time. Anomalies or unauthorized ledger entries are flagged instantly, allowing internal audit teams to investigate and remediate compliance gaps immediately rather than months after the close of a financial period.

The implications for executive financial management are far-reaching. By embedding continuous verification directly into daily transaction workflows, chief financial officers gain uninterrupted visibility into the organization’s true financial standing. Real-time balance sheet auditing eliminates the severe operational bottlenecks associated with month-end and quarter-end financial reconciliations, freeing accounting professionals to focus on strategic financial modeling, tax planning, and capital allocation rather than manual data entry and spreadsheet consolidation.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting leadership to invest heavily in data governance and technical upskilling. Internal audit teams must evolve from manual ledger reviewers into system architects capable of auditing complex algorithms and validating automated data pipelines. Accounting firms and corporate controllers that master continuous auditing will establish a resilient compliance framework capable of meeting stringent international regulatory standards with total transparency.

Continue Reading

Accounting

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

Published

on

U.S. Imposes New 50% Tariffs on Canadian Imports Under Rare Legal Provision

WASHINGTON — In a major escalation of cross-border trade friction, U.S. President Donald Trump has signed executive orders imposing new 50% tariffs on a wide selection of Canadian exports, citing discriminatory practices by Ottawa targeting American auto, dairy, and beverage industries.

The new duties, announced Monday, will take effect in 30 days. They target a broad spectrum of consumer and industrial goods—ranging from wine, liquor, and milk products to commercial cement, furniture, clothing, and hockey equipment.

Untested Legal Mechanism

To enact the sweeping measures, the administration invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930—a rarely used legal provision allowing the executive branch to levy additional tariffs of up to 50% on foreign nations deemed to discriminate against U.S. commerce.

White House officials noted that Section 338 addresses trade discrimination rather than national security or economic emergencies. The move comes months after prior global emergency tariffs faced legal challenges in domestic courts, signaling Washington’s pivot toward alternate statutory authorities to maintain import duties.

Senior administration officials briefed reporters that the measure directly responds to Canadian provincial bans on U.S. alcohol, restrictions on American vehicle exports, and import quota disparities affecting U.S. dairy and cheese producers relative to third-party trading partners.

“While the administration continues to secure reciprocal trade agreements globally, Canada retaliated against efforts to protect domestic industry,” U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer stated.

USMCA Impact and Carve-Outs

Significantly, the newly ordered 50% duties will apply to designated items even if they otherwise comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

However, the administration confirmed key targeted exemptions:

  • Energy products (including oil and natural gas)
  • Potash and critical minerals
  • Fish and seafood
  • Goods already governed by sector-specific duties (such as existing steel and aluminum tariffs)

Administration representatives emphasized that the tariffs do not stem from recent disputes concerning drifting Canadian wildfire smoke, noting that policy options regarding environmental spillover remain under separate review.

Canadian Response and Market Reaction

Following the White House announcement, the Canadian dollar experienced a sharp decline against the U.S. dollar, falling approximately 0.4% during evening trading.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement emphasizing that Canada’s earlier counter-duties had merely matched previous U.S. trade actions. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the U.S. to the mutual benefit of our citizens,” Carney stated, pointing to detailed proposals Ottawa submitted to modernize the USMCA framework.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford took a firmer stance, urging a “dollar-for-dollar” reciprocal response if the measures go into effect on August 19.

With a 30-day implementation window before the duties officially lock in, industry associations and trade groups on both sides of the border are calling for urgent bilateral negotiations to avert further supply chain disruption across North America.

Continue Reading

Accounting

Automated Continuous Auditing: Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

Published

on

Transforming Compliance and Real-Time Financial Oversight

The traditional accounting paradigm—defined by periodic monthly closures and post-hoc annual audits—is rapidly giving way to continuous, automated financial oversight. As of July 2026, forward-thinking accounting practices and multinational corporate finance departments are leveraging continuous auditing systems powered by advanced machine learning models. These systems monitor operational transactions in real time, shifting audit methodologies from sample-based post-analysis to absolute, 100% transaction-level verification.

The operational advantages of continuous auditing are transformative. Standard auditing procedures historically relied on statistical sampling, which, despite rigorous methodology, inherently left gaps where anomalies or fraudulent transactions could go undetected for months. Modern continuous auditing platforms integrate directly with enterprise resource planning (ERP) databases, instantly cross-referencing purchase orders, invoices, bank feeds, and tax records. Any deviation from established control parameters or unusual transaction behavior triggers immediate flags for internal audit teams, dramatically reducing detection lag from quarters to seconds.

Beyond fraud prevention, continuous auditing fundamentally alters internal reporting and decision-making. Executive leadership no longer has to wait weeks after the close of a quarter to evaluate precise financial standing; real-time verified ledger data provides an uninterrupted view of operating margins, tax liabilities, and cash flow dynamics. This real-time visibility enables corporate controllers to adjust capital allocation strategies dynamically, mitigating liquidity constraints and capitalizing on emerging commercial opportunities far more efficiently than competitors bound to legacy reporting cycles.

However, implementing continuous auditing requires accounting professionals to acquire new analytical capabilities. The role of the auditor is evolving from manual data reconciliation toward system validation, algorithmic model governance, and strategic risk interpretation. Accounting firms and corporate finance departments must invest in continuous technical education, ensuring that audit staff possess the data engineering skills necessary to design, maintain, and evaluate complex automated compliance systems.

Continue Reading

Trending